my care2
make a difference

community & fun

groups

get together & make a difference

 
 
anonymous Essays about evolution by Dale H July 23, 2007 1:03 PM

EVOLUTION 101

Evolution is the scientific theory that is intended to explain the diversity of life on Earth. The most basic definition of it is "cumulative change through time". In biology, it says that populations of organisms are subject to change as a result of environmental factors acting on them and causing them to adapt to specific environmental changes.

There are several mechanisms of evolution, but the most common and powerful one is natural selection.    This mechanism is based on several facts and one conclusion based on those facts:

  1. All organisms overproduce, making more offspring than are necessary to replace themselves.
  2. Populations of organisms tend to remain stable in most environments.
  3. There will be variation in the traits and forms of specific organisms in a population.
  4. Those variations in organisms that are better suited to a specific environment will most likely help their possessors survive and reproduce themselves.
  5. Over time, as environments change, the populations of organisms will change along with them.

Now, there should be nothing controversial about such things, since they are based on perfectly straightfoward observations about organisms that can occur today. But because the implications of evolution strike so deeply at how humans view themselves, some people, using their religious beliefs as the excuse, have argued that evolution is somehow evil or destructive.

Also, because evolutionary theories have been applied so extensively to past events, some people have claimed that evolution is somehow not scientific. But that is ludicrious. ALL scientific theories are based on  clearly defined physical or chemical laws and ALL of them must have application to past events or they are useless, because time itself is a never ending stream of present events going into the past. The only way evolution could not be scientific is if it was not consistent with the scientific laws already established via the scientific method. And there is no evidence that evolution violates any scientific law, despite claims to the contrary by certain anti-evolutionists, who themselves ignore the contraints of the scientific method in reaching their own conclusions about the world they live in.

Mutations are the primary source of variations that appear in populations of organisms, and they are result of random changes in the sequences of genes. Genes are made of DNA, a molecule made of thousands or even millions of repeating units. Chemical or physical reactions may shift or remove one or more of those units, causing the DNA sequence to code for a different trait in an organism than it otherwise would. Because mutations are random in nature, their results are far more likely to weaken the resulting organism, called a mutant, that is born with the new trait. Then the organism will die later as a result of competition with others, or at least it will fail to reproduce itself, and the mutation will disappear along with its possessor when it dies. But occasionally a mutation will occur that actually gives a organism an advantage of some kind over others, and then it will survive, reproduce itself, and its decendants will inherit the beneficial trait. Eventually, nearly all the members of the population will have that trait, and the species itself will have changed. Either that, or the population itself will split in two, with one group having the new trait and the other not having it, and the two groups will begin to live apart, thus establishing a new species.

In addition to environmental factors, another way of changing the population of organisms is via sexual selection. In this, the members of one sex in a population will express a preference for certain traits in members of the opposite sex, resulting in that trait becoming common in the population even though it does not actually contribute at all to the individual organism's survival. The only thing that matters is that the organism reproduce itself, and so a male bird may evolve things like long tail feathers (which may make it more vulnerable to predators) to prove to females of the same species that it is strong enough to provide good genes to the female's offspring. A deer may grow long antlers for the same reason, though the antlers may also provide both an ability to fight with other males for the females' favor, as well as a defense against predators.

 [report anonymous abuse]
 
anonymous More advanced lessons July 23, 2007 1:06 PM

What evolution is not

Sex and evolution

Fish evolution and diversity

Horse evolution

What makes evolution scientific

Vertebrate Flight

Vertebrate Hearts

Mass Extinctions

The Scientific Method

Intelligent Design as an Unscientific Concept

The "Mermaid baby" and adaptive mutations

Two Critical Points that SUPPORT Creationism

Why School Boards May Do Stupid Things

Schools of Thought in Creationism

Evolution in other fields.

Of Pandas, People, and Punishment

The eyes of vertebrates

Alfred Russel Wallace, the “second witness” to...

Blog: Dale Husband’s hypothesis of bird evolution.

Henry M. Morris dies, February 25, 2006

Chance, Probability, and a Deck of Cards

Lamarck: Darwin’s failed predecessor

Blog: Ann Coulter is a CREATIONIST!!!

Reviewing Richard Dawkins’ “The Ancestor’s Tale”

The possible role of nondisjunction in evolution.

The humble chicken, an excellent proof of...

The difference between a clade and a grade.

Was our Solar System Intelligently Designed?

Blog: The Cladistic Method of Taxonomy

Amphibians as a Support for Evolution

Overproduction and Mutation

Evolution does not run backwards

Runaway Evolution

Evolution of the Sun

 [report anonymous abuse]
 
anonymous  July 23, 2007 1:07 PM

Blog: Evolution of Galaxies

Venting about the fish guy.

Dog evolution and diversity

Hox genes and the Cambrian Explosion

The irony of the Irreducible Complexity Argument

The abiogenesis question

 [report anonymous abuse]
 
anonymous  August 09, 2007 5:04 AM

Evolution of the vertebrate skull

Blog: Dogmatic "deniers"

How Continental Drift Affects Evolution

Evolution of languages

Venting about the fish guy II

Dale Husband’s Evolution Experiment

 [report anonymous abuse]
 
anonymous  August 21, 2007 5:43 PM

To respond to any of my essays, the best place to go is here:

http://www.care2.com/c2c/groups/disc.html?gpp=2192&pst=784871

 [report anonymous abuse]
 
anonymous  October 16, 2007 11:51 AM

Why science education must be naturalistic

Thomas Huxley, the St. Paul of evolution

 [report anonymous abuse]
 
anonymous  January 27, 2008 12:41 PM

Protostomes vs. Deuterostomes

Why the term "species" should be abolished.

 [report anonymous abuse]
 
anonymous  March 13, 2008 4:54 PM

The ribosome connection

A critical test of common descent (evolution)

 [report anonymous abuse]
 
anonymous  July 31, 2008 11:38 PM

Science, natural history, and evolution  [report anonymous abuse]
 
 October 23, 2008 12:00 AM

Dale Husband's Second Evolution Experiment

Why do miscarriages happen so often?

 [ send green star]
 
 January 15, 2009 10:57 PM

Evolution in Everquest  [ send green star]
 
 September 13, 2009 9:11 PM

The bottleneck effect and the Genesis creation myth

 [ send green star]
 
  New Topic              Back To Topics Read Code of Conduct

 

This group:
Evolution Education
251 Members

View All Topics
New Topic

Track Topic
Mail Preferences


Copyright © 2009 Care2.com, inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved