START A PETITION37,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
Group Discussions
| track thread
« Back to topics
5 years ago

The four American deaths in Benghazi are a direct result of decisions and actions by President Obama that undermine the national-security interests of the United States. Those deaths may well be only a foretaste of the catastrophe awaiting the United States if Barack Hussein Obama remains in office four more years.

As we all know, Obama may be removed by a vote of the people Nov. 6. But if not, if the lapdog media succeed in hiding his malfeasance and incompetence well enough for Obama to win a narrow victory at the polls, then Congress may summon the courage to exercise its constitutional duty to impeach and remove him.

Obama’s foreign-policy disasters have not been a major focus of the presidential race, and that is unfortunate. The grave national-security issues raised in the Benghazi fiasco cannot be easily or intelligently addressed in a 30-second television spot, but they are nonetheless critical to our future safety and well-being. Obama’s pro-Islamist policies are more than mere blips on the political radar screen.

In the view of many, Obama had earned impeachment even before the Benghazi tragedy of Sept. 11. His open abuse of power in making recess appointments when the Senate was not in recess, his open defiance of Congress in his administrative amnesty for 2 million illegal aliens, his misuse of “executive privilege” in withholding documents pertaining to the illegal Fast and Furious gunwalking scandal – those actions alone qualify as impeachable offenses under the Constitution.

However, if treason is added to the mix, Congress will find it hard to shirk its duty to impeach him. The many people who think those other offenses do not rise to the constitutional standard of “highcrimes and misdemeanors” will not be so charitable with regard to the crime of treason.

But when does a foreign policy “blunder” cross the line into treason? Well, maybe when it is not a blunder at all but the entirely predictable consequence of a deliberate policy that invites attack on our embassies and indeed our homeland.

Concerned about the impact of illegal aliens on the United States? Don’t miss Tom Tancredo’s book, “In Mortal Danger: The Battle for America’s Border and Security” – now just $7.95!

The word treason means a betraying, treachery, or breach of allegiance. Article III of the U.S. Constitution defines treason against the United States to consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid or comfort. If radical Islam is a self-declared enemy of the United States, as can be easily demonstrated, Obama has certainly given them aid and comfort: Most Americans will think that welcoming the Muslim Brotherhood into the White House and appointing Muslim Brotherhood members to important posts does in fact constitute “aid and comfort.”

If the Muslim Brotherhood is not an avowed enemy of the United States, what else should we call an organization that openly and officially calls for the replacement of the U.S. Constitution by Shariah law? Apparently, an Islamist armed to the teeth must carry an al-Qaida membership card to qualify for Obama’s distrust.

Here is the brute fact of the matter. The attack on the United States consulate in Benghazi was a terrorist act. Obama’s foreign policies and decisions not only left the consulate vulnerable to attack but in fact invited the attack – and then he blamed an unknown American film for the attack and turned a blind eye on the al-Qaida allied terrorists who were responsible.

Despite the establishment media’s best efforts to protect Obama from any fallout from the Benghazi deaths, we now know that Obama and his team lied about those events.

Obama lied when he said the attack on the consulate was a spontaneous act in response to an obscure film no one in Libya had yet seen. He knew differently. He lied when he said the Libyan embassy staff had not requested additional security for its Benghazi consulate. He lied in the weeks leading up to the Benghazi attack when he said al-Qaida had been “knocked back on its heels” and is no longer a threat to the United States.

5 years ago

Obama’s lies about the Benghazi attack and the four American deaths are lies told to cover up not State Department “incompetence” but the predictable consequences of policies of denial, neglect and stupidity toward our nation’s enemy, radical Islam.

But here is the most damning aspect Obama’s behavior. Obama is unwilling even today to name the enemy that has declared war on the United States and to deal forthrightly with that imminent threat. Our pro-Islamist president will not name Islamism, the Muslim Brotherhood and the government of Iran as enemies of the United States even though they have declared war on us and are engaged in numerous plots to bring death and destruction to the American homeland.

Why are we so reluctant to call this by its right name – treason?

The failure in Benghazi was more than a State Department failure to provide needed security for the embassy personnel in our Libyan outpost. That failure is bad enough, but it is only part of a larger betrayal. Additional security was denied to Benghazi consulate because doing so would have been an admission that eastern Libya was under the effective control of armed militias allied with al-Qaida. Making that admission would have undermined one of the pillars of Obama’s re-election.

When the attack was under way, military assistance that was only two hours away was denied. Today’s revelation by the CIA that it sent a four-person support team from the capital, Tripoli, does not answer the question of why military backup was denied and who denied it. Sending additional CIA support to the post was admirable but was too little and too late. Why was military support at AFRICOM – less than two hours distant – denied when it was available and ready to deploy? Did Secretary of Defense Panetta consult Obama in making that decision?

The many unanswered questions about Benghazi are unanswered for only one reason: Truthful answers would embarrass Obama and jeopardize his re-election. This is election fraud conducted not from Chicago but straight from the West Wing of the White House.

Thanks to a compliant media, the American people will not have those answers in time to make an informed choice on Tuesday. It will fall to the people’s representatives in Congress to find those answers. And when the full truth is known, Congress must consider removing Barack Obama for giving aid and comfort to America’s enemies – and that is treason against the United States.


5 years ago

Video: Malkin: Impeach Obama For Benghazi ‘Jihadi-Coddling’

Nov 10, 2012 01:10 pm

Michelle Malkin sounds off on Obama’s disgraceful conduct on Sean Hannity’s Fox News show. Related posts: Michelle Malkin Exposes Obama’s Real War On Women Michelle Malkin helps Sean Hannity fact-check the recent debate.… Continue… Homeland Security Turned Into Frat House Sean Hannity and Michelle Malkin discuss the case of a…

Read More and Comment: Video: Malkin: Impeach Obama For Benghazi ‘Jihadi-Coddling’

5 years ago

This might happen Carol. Then you will have Joker Joe and Cry Baby Boehner at the helm.

5 years ago

Come to think of it some Americans do not know whether to laugh or cry right now so this might be rather appropriate!

5 years ago

Either way,we'er up a creek without a paddle.

5 years ago

I don't know about that Cam...Biden was in there with them too along with Hillary and whoever else was in that room watching those murders!! They are all guilty and if Obama would be ousted for treason then for sure I would think the rest of them would get their just due least I would HOPE so!!

5 years ago

People who have followed, and still voted for Obama, know all of the above in the article. Deny is what is to be expected,  as always, not because they are ignorant to the facts, but because they stand by even murder if done for this occupier in our WH.  On the lives of those who were murdered for this occupier and his ilk, I stand by their honor, and not ever will I show respect for those who stood by this treason by their vote for the occupier. 

5 years ago

So if we got rid of Obama and Biden that would mean Boehner would be POTUS right?

5 years ago

Well, if the bummer got it for treason, Biden might not be so hard to handle.

5 years ago

If we got impeached Obama, Biden would become president.  Biden would then appoint a new VP, who would take over if Biden were impeached!  Then we would have a socialist or communist as potus that no one ever voted for. 


If Obama and Biden could be impeached at the same time, then Boehner would become potus and would appoint his VP.

5 years ago

Doesn't it mean that if Obama is impeached Biden becomes pres and Boehner the VP? Can't remember but seeings as most of us don't know whether to laugh or cry don't you think that Joker Joe and cry baby Bohenor would be perfect????

5 years ago

What a nightmare of a thought....but then biteme biden is considering running in 2016....are there really enough fools out there that would vote for him.....the man is a nutcase.....he probably wouldn't even know what Country he was president of if elected.....he never seemed to know what state or city he was campaigning in.

Boehner....omg.....I don't think there is enough kleenex available if he was appointed prez.....and I don't mean for him!!!!!!

I really am thinking obama's win just might have been a good thing....only because it's going to show how inept he really is and how he will fail our country worse....and that's how he will be couldn't happen to a better guy!!!!  I think by the end of his term.....the lapdog media will turn into doberman pinchers and they will bash him like they did to President Bush.....that to me would be a win!!!!!!!   Did you hear the rumor that if obama hadn't won, they were thinking of giving moochelle her own talk show on tv?  OMG!!!

5 years ago

Maui... Laughed all the way through your reply!!! God help us! Obama is evil so if he goes that would be fine with me Biden is just an idiot and I think could be handled unlike Obama the narcissist!!! Something has to happen though!! Maybe they could all just got to prison and hand it over to Mitt!!

5 years ago

On second thought.............if Obama won by fraud which we all know he did..that would mean the Democrats actuially didn't win and Mitt Romney DID!!

5 years ago

I say throw the bums out and put Romney in,but that's wishful thinking.

5 years ago

ObamabuttbiterBiden is thinking of running in 2016?  Oh pleeease. And the fools who don't know where they are now would be lost enough to vote for him. 

Recount, recount!

This thread is archived. To reply to it you must re-activate it.

New to Care2? Start Here.