START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
Group Discussions
label:  
  new ideas
| track thread
« Back to topics
the unify theory of physics
4 years ago
| new ideas

well Albert Einstein wrote the theory of relativity and spend the rest of his life trying to find the answer to theory at work for all the universe for the smallest atom to the largest spiral galaxy.

Well I start my own journey to finding the unify theory for physics. But Albert Einstein start at the level of string theory. I start at the level of a high school science student.

Welcome to the beginnings of my unify theory for physics



This post was modified from its original form on 05 Aug, 1:05
theory on electro magnetism and gravity fields at the atomic level
4 years ago

theory on electro magnetism and gravity fields at the atomic level
I think that every atom from hydrogen up has it's own electro magnetic field equaled in strength to the number of protons and electrons. So the electro magnetic field increases in strength. As the size of the atom increases through the periodical table and expanses through each size of molecule. And expanses with the grouping of molecules at the planetary level and the level of stars.
I think there is a mathematical equation at the hydrogen atom level that predicates the electro magnetic field strength based on atomic weight. or total molecular weight for a planet or star
I also think that the electro magnetic field creates the gravitational field as a sub force. By the passage of the electro magnetic field through matter. I think that the gravitational field lines run at a 90 degree angle inwards towards the electro magnetic field lines. The tighter the packing of the electro magnetic fields the high the strength of the gravitational field.
I think that the electro magnetic field strength increases a an exponential rate. In line with the increase of molecular weight of any give object. And therefore the exponential increase in gravitational field of any give object
So under this theory there should be an mathematical equation at the atomic level to predicate. The field strength of magnetism and gravity.
Current research on the magnetic fields and gravitational fields. For the sun. the earth and the moon. When looked as ratios of field strength over molecular weight. Suggest this is true.
Rules for electro magnetic and gravitational field lines rule one) for electro magnetic field lines- no electro magnetic field can have an ending in dead space. All electro magnetic field lines must form perfect circles or perfect ellipses. This is true for all levels, from atomic, to molecules. to planets, to solar systems. to clusters of solar system in a galaxy. To the entire universe.
rule two) for gravitational fields a) at the atmosphere level for atoms, molecules planets and stars. the first ring of gravitational field- is a bi-directional force. with a gravitational field both towards and away from the centre line of any collective mass of matter. b) at the orbiting level, for the orbits of electrons, moons and planets and solar systems(within a known galaxy). gravity is a four way force, with the original bi-direction force of towards and away form the nucleus(at the atom level. then the cluster of molecules, then the size of planets, then the size of suns and the focus point of a galaxy. Third and fourth forces of gravity, of an orbiting body is the up and down forces of gravity. That are produce by the largest rings of the electro magnetic field lines. That incircle the entire orbiting belt(the final electro magnetic field of the solar system is the asteroid belt). There is an asteroid belt for all levels of matter from the smallest at the atom level through to largest at the spiral galaxy level
So under the above rules for any size of matter. Two bodies would attract each

next page in above story
4 years ago

other until the asteroid belts joined. But further attraction beyond the asteroid belts would create at repelling gravitational field because at the asteroid belt(the final ring of electro magnetic field lines). Their are three separate gravitational field zones. The first is the gravitational from space towards the electro magnetic field line( this is the force of attraction all sized matter bodies). The second gravitational field is contained within the electro magnetic field line. And this is a neutral gravity zone. The third gravitational field, is from the centre of the nucleus(atom, molecule, planet or star) in to the electro magnetic field line. This is the force of repelling. So these three gravitational force. Allow an atom to attract other atoms to the point of joining their asteroid belts. Which maintain a neutral distance with the neutral gravitational zones creating a bond of stabilisation. If two atoms tried to close the gap past the neutral asteroid belt. Then both atoms must fight against the repelling gravitational forces of the each atoms asteroid belt
The strength of the gravitational field is relative to the electro magnetic fields density. For example the electro magnetic field travelling through the earth has a high density. When compare to the density of the electro magnetic field that surrounds the earth. So the gravitational field towards the centre of the earth is greater. Than the gravitational field that surrounds the earth. The electro magnetic field lines that surround the earth. Each has it's own gravitational field pulling away from the earth, towards the centre of each electro magnetic field line. But the density of the electro magnetic that travel through space(around the earth). Is lower than the density of the electro magnetic fields that travel through the earth. So the sum of the total gravitational field on earth is towards the earth's surface.
I think the second weaker gravitational field that pulls away from the earth.Towards the electro magnetic field lines that surround the earth. Is what keeps the atmosphere from collapsing to the earth's surface. Under the primary gravitational field, caused by the electro magnetic field lines travelling through the earth. Another key fact about the electro magnetic field lines that surround earth. Is that the electro magnetic field lines would line up at the every edge of the atmosphere. The gravitational field strength at the earth's crust is 9.8 metres per second squared. The gravitational field from the earth's crust to the edge of the atmosphere (or magnetic field line) is 9.6 metres per second squared . The gravitational cap of the atmosphere(which starts at the magnetic field line & travels into space) would have a gravitational field strength of 10.0 metres per second squared. This part of the theory is the same at atomic and molecular level. With atoms and molecules having an atmosphere(the orbits of electrons) with a gravitational cap. With this second weaker gravitational field, atoms and molecules have the ability to attract and repel(within a neutral orbit- neutral gravity).
Under this theory the sun and the solar system is the same as the atom level. With the sun and nucleus of an atom at the same level. The planets of the solar system are the same as the electrons of an atom. The gravitational cap of the atmosphere of the solar system is the asteroid belt(neutral gravitational field). With a secondary weaker gravitational field pulling on all planets towards the neutral gravitational zone of the asteroid belt. The asteroid belt is stabilised by two gravitational fields. one field pulling from the universe into the neutral gravitational field of the asteroid

next page in above story
4 years ago

belt. And a second gravitational field pulling from the sun towards the neutral gravitational field of the asteroid belt
But I do not have the mathematical ability to make this calculation. I think this is the
foundation of a unified theory for the laws of physics and the theory of relativity. So I'll leave the field of the mathematics for this theory open to all physicists. As long as I get credit for the theory and you can get credit for the maths. That way we both win a nobel prize in physics.
Within the mathematics there could be a figure for minimum molecular weight for a body(planet or sun). To produce the gravitational field to hold an atmosphere. For example venus, the earth and the sun all have atmospheres but the moon and mars do not have atmospheres. Both the moon and mars are small than the earth so have a lower total molecular weight. The odd one out is venus which is smaller than mars. But venus may achieve the same molecular weight as the earth. If venus was 99% uranium
This theory, if correct, wipes out the theory of the neutron star(black holes). Because neutrons have no electro magnetic field lines. Therefore no gravitational fields. So under the theory of electro magnetism and gravitational fields. It is impossible for at neutron star to exist. And if the neutron star does exist it would have zero gravity. To prove this part of the theory, researchers would need to be able to measure the electro magnetic field strength of normal water molecules and for the heavy water molecule. No change in the electro magnetic field strength between both measurements. Would indicate that a neutron has no electro magnetic field and therefore no gravitational field.
Under the current theory of magnetism. There to no part of the theory to explain how a particle in a particle accelerator. Is stabilise in the super magnetic fields of a particle accelerator. But the Theory of electro magnetic and gravitational fields, has the ability to explain how a particle in a particle accelerator is stabilise. Under this theory the electro magnetic field lines of a particle accelerator travel around the centre line of the particle accelerator. In an high density of less than 0.1 millimetres per width of the electro magnetic field line. So under this theory the gravitational field lines run at 90 degree angles to the electro magnetic field lines. With a gravitational pulling force towards the centre of the electro magnetic field lines. It is this gravitational field that forces the particle to stay within the centre of the electro magnetic field lines within a particle accelerator
The study of the forces of a particle accelerator should provide the figures of field strength at the hydrogen atom level for electro magnetic fields and gravitational fields. I think the key to discovering the figure of gravitational field strength at the hydrogen atom level. Is the study of centrifugal force or the constant acceleration of the circle particle accelerator. It should be easy to calculate the point when the centrifugal force equals the gravitational force on an electro magnetic field line. And overrides the gravitational field.
Further study in this field would include whether field lines move under the laws of physics. When a new force field crosses the original field line. AT this level of interaction the field lines may react like waves on a pond. Passing through each

next page in above story
4 years ago

other but creating interference or force acceleration patterns.
Under this theory the current research into building a nuclear fusion reactor is impossible. Because the current nuclear fusion reactor in france has a circumference of less than 20 metres. At this diameter the centrifugal force of the orbiting plasma cloud confined in a 0.1 millimetre magnetic field line. Would accelerate beyond the gravitational field strength and slam into the magnetic wall of the nuclear fusion reactor. The minimum diameter of a nuclear fusion reactor is 20 kilometres the same as the minimum diameter of a particle accelerator.
The limits of technology in the area of building a nuclear fusion reactor. I dare say these idiots in france have a hydrogen fuel line leading into the nuclear fusion reactor. While this hydrogen fuel line creates a magnetic bubble. There are magnetic bubbles on the sun. They are known as a magnetic or solar storms. So if the idiots in france ever achieve a fusion reaction. It will create an automatic magnetic or solar storm. With a jet of plasma straight down their hydrogen fuel line. Which will turn their hydrogen fuel line into an atomic fuse. With an atomic change reaction straight into their hydrogen store tank. With 100% atomic denotation. Which will dig a hole under their nuclear fusion reactor, to a depth of 500 metres with a ground zero of about 20 kilometres radius.
second limitation of fusion technology is the removal of helium from the plasma cloud. Without the removal of helium from their plasma cloud. The fusion reaction will terminate when the density of helium to hydrogen reaches about 50%. The only way to remove helium from the plasma cloud is with a complete shut down of the magnetic containment field.
Third limitation of fusion technology is containment of the light and heat waves from a fusion reaction. the sun melts even uranium at a distance of 1,000,000 kilometres from the sun. So the only way humans can contain a nuclear fusion reactor on the earth. Is to place it within a neutron star(black hole) but that is outdate technology and impossible
Under the new definitions of the laws of physics fusion reactor technology is impossible. And these facts under the new laws of physics will never change
i think that Newton's formula for the force of gravity at 9.8 metre per second squared incorrect. I think the force of gravity increases at an exponential rate until it equals the speed of light(in a vacuum of space). I think the formula for the force of gravity would look something like this
(9.8 times 1.0000005 (to the power of light seconds)) metres per second squared
I think that Albert's formula for the speed of light(in a vacuum of space) is incorrect. I think the speed of light is calculate by the same formula as the above gravity formula. As an opposite force to gravity with exponential growth per light second. With start of any calculation of the speed of light. Starting at the surface of the star. The formula is the opposite to the above gravitational force formula. Just that the speed of light has a higher starting force ratio. When compared to Newton's

next page in above story
4 years ago

gravitational force number of 9.8 metres per second squared. The acceleration force number must be higher than the acceleration force of gravity. So that light has the ability to escape the gravitational force of a star.
the formula would look something like this (13 times 1.0000005 (to the power of light seconds)) metres per second squared.
I think that Albert's calculation of the speed of light at the distance from the sun at about 120 light seconds is correct. But I don't think that the speed of light is constant. As Albert's work states. Under the work of Albert for calculating the speed of light. He works on theory that light has finite acceleration at the point of creation (millionth of a second) to achieve a constant speed of light. This is an impossible calculation under the laws of physics. I think that the speed of light over the length of the known universe(in 1,000th of light years) is finite. With constant acceleration in terms of light seconds with an infinite top speed(in a vacuum of space)
Basic facts to calculate the accelerating force of light. The force measurements of atomic denotations as a ratio of newtons metres over kilotons. the weight of a light/ photon, the weight of air. the facts for the calculation is that the force of an atomic denotation is constant. But the acceleration forces for the three types of waves from a atomic denotation are different based of molecular weight. the heaviest, matter waves or wind waves. second heaviest, sound waves. the lightest, light waves or photons
I think that there are two types of force formula's. That use the basic force formula, force = mass times acceleration. The first type of forces the force of creation, which has constant acceleration. Example- the force of light. The second type of force is the force of longevity, which has exponential growth of acceleration. Example- the force of gravity. Unlike the force of light, the force of gravity has the formula of force = mass times (acceleration times acceleration).
The differences between the force of light and the force of gravity. one) the force of light- has just one pushing force(at the point of creation). two) the force of gravity- has a constant pulling force(a new force calculation for every second)
the formula's
gravity force(in newton metres per second per second) = mass(in kilograms) times acceleration(in metres per second per second)
light force(in newton metres per second) = mass(in kilograms) times acceleration(in metres per second per second)
So under the current laws of physics there are two types of forces. And they are for a lack of better words. constant velocity force & exponential accelerating force
examples of constant velocity force the denotation of a riffle bullet, light, sound waves

next page in above story
4 years ago

the definition of a constant velocity force- is that it has only pushing force at the point of creation (which is measured in millionth's of a second)
Examples of exponential accelerating force the acceleration of a motor vehicle, the acceleration of gravity, the acceleration of magnetism the definition of exponential accelerating force- has a pulling force that builds every second. So unlike the constant velocity force that has only one force measurement. The exponential accelerating force, needs at new force calculation for every second
Another key step of the evolution of this theory. is to definite how magnetic storms are produced by the magnetic field. My current thinking is that a magnetic storms (solar winds on the sun or cyclones and tornado on earth). Is when a gravitational field line shorts circuits and becomes a electro magnetic field line(that runs parallel along a gravitational field) which produces the normal gravitational field of any electro magnetic field lines. this short circuit or arc of a electro magnetic field line would produce a gravitational field line parallel to the surface of the sun or earth. With the short circuit gravitational field it is gravity that force the matter to rotate in a predictable orbit. So it is gravity that starts the spinning motion of a cyclone or tornado. But I have no idea at this stage on how the this short circuit of the electro magnetic field is created under the new laws of physics
A key part to the short circuit of electro magnetic field theory. Would be an average temperature and average humidity density figures that would cause the atoms to vibrate and the calculations that show how this heat causes the electro magnetic field lines of water vapour molecules to align along the gravitational field lines
The strength of a tornado or cyclone could be predicted by the molecular weight to water vapour(humidity density) within the eye of the storm. The higher the molecular weight of the water vapour, the higher the rating for the storm category 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. with each upgrade of a storms category. the electro magnetic field at the centre of the storm increases in strength in equal steps(equaled to the increases in molecular weight). The storms end when the density of humidity falls below a level in percentage points. Which causes a collapse of the short circuit in the electro magnetic field lines
if the above short circuit theory of the electro magnetic field lines can be proven correct for tropical storms. Then this would lead into the doomsday theory of a partial flipping of the earth's magnetic field at a 90 degree flip. The doomsday theory starts with an asteroid impact in the oceans at the equator. That forms an atomic mushroom cloud of vaporises sea water. the size of the mushroom cloud would need a diameter of 1,000 km. This super mushroom cloud(the birth of a super cyclone) would cause a new electro magnetic field so large than it would cause the earth magnetic field at atomic level to flip 90 degrees. So creating a new south and north pole at the equator. The timeframe for this flip at the atomic level is no greater than five minutes after impact of the asteroid. Then this primary flip of the magnetic pole would cause at secondary magnetic field movement of 90 degrees in the opposite direction. As the magnetic field of the sun drag the entire new magnetic field of the earth back into alignment. This secondary flip would cause the

next page in above story
4 years ago

entire planet to rotate 90 degrees at an acceleration rate equaled to the acceleration of light.
So under this doomsday theory if you when't vaporised by the asteroid impact. Then you, along with every tree on the planet would be flatten with the entire rotation of the earth
under this theory the birth of the universe was a cloud of 100% hydrogen and the hydrogen atom is the building block of all elements.
under this theory the birth of the universe was a cloud of 100% hydrogen and the hydrogen atom is the building block of all elements. So what is the story of creation of the known universe from the birth of a 100% hydrogen cloud universe Will at the start the 100% hydrogen cloud would have form a very low density electro magnetic and gravitational field. That cover the entire known universe. This would have started the entire universe spinning. Then as the entire universe was spinning. Individual hydrogen atoms would have collide and joined creating the first two atom solar system. Over time the first two atom solar system would have collide and expansed. With each new hydrogen atom the collective electro magnetic and gravitational fields would natural grow. Until the birth weight(in molecular weight) of a new star was achieved. This new star as a 100% hydrogen cloud would have the required strength of electro magnetic and gravitational field at it surface. To create gravity induced startup nuclear fusion. Upon the startup of nuclear fusion the entire 100% hydrogen cloud would condense until atomic pressure wave theory to a 1% diameter of the startup 100% hydrogen cloud. After the birth of a new solar system. It has the electro magnetic and gravitational fields to maintain the solar system for ever. And will go through phases of sun birth and sun deaths in an almost never ending lifecycle. With the birth of the first sun there is no other elements in the solar system. With the lifecycle of the first sun all of the elements a create at random in the sun. For example the fusion of two hydrogen atoms creates helium and the fusion of eight hydrogen atoms creates oxygen and so no for all the elements. After the death of the first sun in a new solar system. That new solar system has all the element need to create the planets. The rebirth solar system from the death of the first star has the same electro magnetic and gravitational fields as with the birth of the first solar system. After the supernova of the first sun. The rebirthing solar system continues to rotate within the known universe collecting new hydrogen atoms by random collisions with stray hydrogen atoms. until it has collected enough hydrogen at the centre of the rebirthing solar system to achieve minimum molecular startup weight for the birth of a new sun
Under this theory the attraction of carbon steel to a magnet. Is not an attraction of magnetism but an attraction of gravity. This can be proven by a simple experiment of one piece of carbon steel plus two rectangle magnets with a north and south pole. Stage one place to pole of the north magnet to the carbon steel conclusion equals attraction. Stage two place the pole of the south magnet to the carbon steel conclusion equals attraction. stage three place the south pole on the north pole with the two magnets conclusion equals attraction. stage four place the north of one magnet against the north pole of the second magnet conclusion equal repulsion.
total conclusion if two north poles on two magnet equals repulsion. Why can't we

next page in above story
4 years ago

get a repulsion result in the test on carbon steel from either the north pole or the south pole. conclusion the force that attracts carbon steel to a magnet must be the force of gravity
there you go a simple high school experiment rewritten with the correct conclusion. Which provides 100% proof of my theory on electro magnetic and gravitational field lines. So have fun terminating all physics class in the world from high school through to post grad at uni level. So that you can completely rewrite and burn the entire physics field's current textbooks and all research papers. I think the first physics paper that you should burn. Is your paper on string theory. That is the funniest doco on the discovery channel I have ever see.
How long before I receive my Nobel Prizes for Physics and Computer Engineering
thank you for sharing my dream craig j clark CEO of Craig Clark Corporation craigclark.ceo@craigclarkfoundation.org http://www.craigclarkfoundation.org

Theory of reflected and absorbed light
4 years ago

Theory of reflected and absorbed light
No one can see the true color of an object. The human eye can only see the color of the reflected light.
For example
the green leaf on a tree. The leaf on a tree absorbs the red and blue spectrum of light and reflects the green spectrum of light.
So no-one on earth knows the true color of a leaf because the human eye can only see the color of the reflected light. Which for a leaf on a tree is green.
So theory that photosynthesis in a plant using the green spectrum of light. Is incorrect. As the green spectrum of light does not penetrate the surface of the leaf or plant .But is reflected at 100% to give the green leaf it's reflected green color.
So photosynthesis must use either the red or blue or infra-red or ultra-violet spectrums of light. To fuel photosynthesis.
the riddle of the century father- hi son son- hi dad why is the sky blue? father- well son the sky is blue because the sea is blue and the sea of the world reflect blue into the sky and turn it blue son- I see but why aren't the clouds blue too? father i don't understand son son- well father if the sky is blue because the oceans are blue. and the sky turns blue from the reflected light lightning up the sky from bottom up then the clouds are also light up with blue reflected light. So why aren't the clouds blue. or are you lairing about why is the sky blue.
thank you for sharing my dream craig j clark ceo of craig clark corporation 2/2 miller place pottsville beach nsw 2489 australia craigclark.ceo@craigclarkfoundation.org

Theory of the Internal Structure of the Sun
4 years ago

Theory of the Internal Structure of the Sun
Core knowledge for this theory the study of pressure waves from the videos of atomic tests
In an atomic test there are three main pressure waves created from the blast of an atomic weapons. Each pressure wave starts at ground zero and expanses in equal arcs of circumference. three main pressure waves are 1)light and heat 2) sound 3) matter wave or wind waves.
If the current knowledge of the sun is correct then on the surface of the sun. There are an finite number of atomic denotation per second. There three main pressure waves from the finite number of atomic denotations per second. Form the source of light and heat from the sun know as photons and sound plus matter waves known as the solar winds. That expanse from the surface of the sun in equal arcs of circumferences.
Now these three main types of pressure waves also form a focal point in the centre of the sun. The combine strength of an finite number of atomic denotations per second on the surface of the sun form. Form a pressure wave at the focal point of the centre of sun. At such a magnitude to cause the hydrogen in the sun to compress to a solid and an internal temperature of absolute zero kelvin degrees
So under the study of atomic pressure waves the centre of the sun would be a frozen solid ball hydrogen. With out the frozen ball of solid hydrogen at the centre of the sun. To stop the passage of an finite number of atomic denotation per second at the surface. The sun would simple rip it's self apart. As the pressure wave from one side of sun, blow out the opposite side of the sun.
The sun which is also the hottest place in the universe is also the coldest place in the universe. Under the study of atomic pressure wave theory
the red giant phase of the sun is when the solid frozen hydrogen core is so small that the atomic matter wave flows around it and out the opposite side of the sun. Causing the red giant to expansed
The supernova death of a star is when the matter wave pressure becomes less than the pressure of the compress solid frozen hydrogen core. The first stage of a supernova denotation the complete decompression of the frozen hydrogen core. Stage two of a supernova denotations the complete atomic denotation of all remaining hydrogen
another one second thought
thank you for sharing my dream Craig J Clark CEO of Craig Clark Corporation 2/2 Miller Place Pottsville Beach NSW 2489 Australia
craigclark.ceo@craigclarkfoundation.org

THEORY ON DENOTATIONS NEXT LEVEL OF UNIFY THEORY
4 years ago

THEORY ON DENOTATIONS NEXT LEVEL OF UNIFY THEORY
Types of denotations electricity lightning fire uranium denotation( stage one 100% fission, stage two 99.999% fusion) hydrogen denotation(stage one 100% fusion) radiation oxidation
byproducts of all denotations light photons heat
current theory on photons is that a photon is both a particle and a wave
My thoughts on the definition of a photon I think that a photon is a particle in space and the photon does not create a wave. But as the photon travels through matter- it creates a wave and this wave is the source of heat. example rock thrown into a pond. In this example the air equals space and the water in a pond equals the air of the atmosphere. Now when the rock travels through the air- the air does not create waves. like a photon traveling through space. But when the rock hits the water it creates waves. Now these waves are three dimensional. The same as the waves created by the photons hitting the pond of air that is the atmosphere
The theory of denotation under the unify laws of physics would divide into two category one) sub atomic- the joining of the cores of atoms two) atomic- the joining of atoms into molecules sub category for the joining of atoms into molecules level one share neutrons level two stealing neutrons level three stealing in entire hydrogen atoms
An example of level three of atomic denotations is all the radioactive metals. Are not elements but molecules of gold plus a known number of hydrogen atoms. This level of bonding is so tight that the entire hydrogen atom are contained with the asteroid belt of the gold atom. So they function more like an atom then an molecule. So chemistry has label the radioactive metals as atoms not molecules
thank you for sharing my dream Craig J Clark
CEO of Craig Clark Corporation craigclark.ceo@craigclarkfoundation.org http://www.craigclarkfoundation.org

Theory of light waves based on impact velocities of photon
4 years ago

Theory of light waves based on impact velocities of photon
different types of light waves radiation( highest level of impact velocity) infra red( next level of impact velocity) red (next level of impact velocity) yellow(next level of impact velocity) green( next level of impact velocity purple(next level of impact velocity) blue(next level of impact velocity) sound waves(lowest level of impact velocity) ultra violet(direct impact of the photon with the core of an atom)
the theory of light waves based on impact velocities.this is a theory has infinite levels of deceleration of a photon. With each level of deceleration is a new type of light wave. So the colours of a rainbow are created by infinite levels of photon impact based of previous numbers of impacts that over the density of matter creating the spectrum of light.
So each main level of colour has it's own maximum and minimum photon velocities THE BASIC MATHEMATICAL FORMULA FOR ALL THE OF WAVES
WAVE HEIGHT(FREQUENCY) = (MASS TIMES VELOCITY) divided by (FORCE OF THE GRAVITATIONAL FIELD= THE DEGREE OF DE-ACCELERATION
The story line for this equalisation for the impact of a photon. The speed of the photon this equal to the timeframe of interaction with a magnetic field. The electro magnetic field of an atom is warp by the gravitational fields attraction to the mass of the photon. The slow the velocity of the photon the greater the timeframe for the gravitational field to warp the electro magnetic therefore the increase in wave height( frequency) Because the electro magnetic field has been pull further out of alignment. So with each impact of a photon. the degree of de-acceleration of the next impact is slightly greater due to the greater timeframe within the the gravitational field of the next atom

theory on the interaction of magnetic and gravitational forces
4 years ago

theory on the interaction of magnetic and gravitational forces
this story line is based on theorised fact that gravitational fields attract and bend other gravitational fields
laws of electro magnetic and gravitational field will the gravitational fields are 100% spherical fields with infinite number of radii focus points along the electro magnetic field lines. Now the theorised facts that gravitational have the power of attraction over other gravitational fields. creates at story line of neighbouring gravitational bending all gravitational fields except the gravitational at 90 degree angle to the electro magnetic field lines.
Plus the increase density of gravitational fields contain within the electromagnetic field arc. Creates two focal points of concentration one) at the magnetic poles two) at the equator of an electro magnetic field line
experiment. to feel the forces of electro magnetic(repulsion). Plus the two different gravitational fields(in the repulsion magnetic field)
method. Slow move two permanent magnetics towards each other. first test. two north poles second test. two south poles third test. one north pole and one south pole
with the two north poles. you should be able to feel the force of attraction. until it is replace by the force of repulsion. if you use force too push the two north poles together. The two poles will sided side ways until the gravitational field of the electro magnetic field that is at 90 degrees to the magnetic field, captures and stabilises the two north poles in contact(or electro magnetic and gravitational fusion)
The eight sectors of gravitational fields aligning within the centre of an electro magnetic field line In this story line we will use the idea that one electro magnetic field line creates and entire circle around a body of matter. This is incorrect the electro magnetic field is a donut spherical shape. But for the story line on sectors of gravitational fields accelerated within an electro gravitational field
sector one 0 degrees to 45 degree sector two 360 degrees to 315 degrees sector three 135 degrees to 180 degrees sector four 225 degrees to 180 degrees sector five 45 degrees to 90 degrees sector six 135 degree to 90 degrees sector seven 225 degrees to 270 degrees sector eight 315 degrees to 270 degrees
sector one has a gravitational field accelerating from 45 degree towards 0 degrees (north pole)
Sector two has a gravitational field accelerating from 315 degree towards 360 degrees(north pole) sector three has a gravitational field accelerating from 135 degree towards 180 degrees(south pole) sector four has a gravitational field accelerating from 225 degree towards 180 degrees sector five has a gravitational field accelerating from 45 degree towards 90 degrees(equator) sector six has a gravitational field accelerating from 135 degree towards 90 degrees(equator) sector seven has a gravitational field accelerating from 225 degree to 270 degrees (equator) sector eight has a gravitational field accelerating from 315 degree to 270 degrees (equator)
So at the equator there are two sets of gravitational fields field one) high strength direction- towards the focal point of the equator field two) average strength direction- at a 90 degree angle towards the electro magnetic field line
so at the magnetic poles there are two sets of gravitational fields field one) high strength direction- towards the poles at a 90 degree angle to the surface of any give matter body field two) average strength direction- towards the centre of the electro magnetic filed lines and parallel to the surface of any matter body
thank you for sharing my dream Craig J Clark CEO of Craig Clark Corporation craigclark.ceo@craigclarkfoundation.org http://www.craigclarkfoundation.org

The Automatic Refuel System under the Unify Theory of Physics
4 years ago

The Automatic Refuel System under the Unify Theory of Physics
Under the unify theory of physics every star has it on gravitational field refuel system. Contain within all electro magnetic fields
When view the star as a compass with the north pole at 0 degrees and the south pole a 180 degrees and the equator at 90 and 270 degrees.
The refuel system for the north and south poles are within 315 degree and 45 degrees north and 135 degree and 225 degree south. Within these two refuel zones the gravitational field contain within all electro magnetic field is towards the north and south poles. So at the sun level all photons and hydrogen atoms that hit with in these two zones are pulled within the sun. Provide the protons and hydrogen atoms hit at the minimum capture velocity an angle of attack.
So under this automatic refuel system photons are no an almost endless journey of benign recycle from one sun to the next
Within the electro magnetic field lines are the gravitational field zones for the creation of matter bodies(molecules, asteroids, planets, moons, comets) the compass zones for this gravitational zone 45 degree to 135 degree and 225 degree to 315 degree with the equator at 90 degree and 270 degree.
This automatic refuel system works for all levels(atoms, molecules, asteroids, moons, planets, suns, solar systems, galaxies, spiral galaxies, and the entire universe)
This automatic refuel system is a major factor within the earth weather system. The earth weather(automatic refuel) system. Uses water vapour instead of photons and hydrogen atoms. So under the earth's weather(automatic refuel) system under the unify theory of physics. We have a case of a permanent microscopic snowfall at the poles. With microscopic snowfalls increasing and decreasing with the humidity levels at the poles
thank you for sharing my dream Craig J Clark CEO of Craig Clark Corporation craigclark.ceo@craigclarkfoundation.org
http://www.craigclarkfoundation.org

THEORY NOTES ON THE THIRD FORCE OF A UNIFY THEORY.
4 years ago

THEORY NOTES ON THE THIRD FORCE OF A UNIFY THEORY.
facts one) the theory of electro magnetic and gravitational field is correct for all levels of matter. But this theory fails to explain how the atoms join into molecules.
So there must be a third force at the atomic level to explain how atoms join into molecules
This third force is the starting point of the creation of the electro magnetic and gravitational field lines
this third force is the force of electricity, from the positive proton and the negative electron.
Under this theory there are two possible structures at the atomic level.
the structure of a proton and neutron core surround by orbiting electrons or the structure of a proton and electron core surround by orbiting neutrons.
the electricity force of an atom is a force of attraction and repulsion and can't be measure by a meter as the range of this force ends at the atoms asteroid belt.
Case study how do both types of atoms structure behave at the two bonding techniques of sharing electrons and stealing electrons
first case study the structure of a proton and neutron core surround by orbiting electrons
first of the two atoms are attracted by the force of gravity of each atoms asteroid belt. But how does each atom over come the gravitational force of repulsion of the asteroid belt to join and share or steal electrons. Problem with this structure the orbiting electrons create a secondary repulsion force from the interaction of the two orbiting electron. So under this structure the joining of atoms into molecules is impossible.
the structure of a proton and electron core surround by orbiting neutrons.
this structure of an atom is the better structure of the two types to provide the startup theory for the creation of the electro magnetic and gravitational field lines. The main structure of the nucleus is with the nucleus divided at the equator. Into at north hemisphere of protons and a south hemisphere of electrons. This north and south hemispheres of a nucleus of every atom is the foundation of atomic forces that create the electro magnetic field and gravitational fields for all atoms. Now the electro magnetic and gravitational fields have a growth potential that is exponential with the growth of molecular weight .
Now the electrical field with an atom is confined to within the magnetic and gravitational fields of the atoms asteroid belts. To provide this part of theory we would need to search current knowledge on whether a magnetic field or

next page in above story
4 years ago

gravitational field has the power to bend electricity or static electricity fields or arcs.
So now to the joining of two atoms and the sharing or stealing of neutrons at first the two atoms are attracted by the gravitational field of an atoms asteroid belts. then the two atoms reach a point of stabilisation within the rules of the gravitational field.
Now for the joining of two atoms the weaker electricity force of the atoms nucleus must over ride the repulsion force of the two asteroid belts.
Which allow the two atoms to move closer to each other with a share asteroid belt.
An with atom bonding based of sharing neutrons. Both of the atoms maintain individual outer circular orbits with both orbits joining and synchronising like the two circular orbits of an electric beater. With and elliptical shared asteroid belt around the entire molecule.
When two atoms from a bond where one atom steals an neutron. This a much tight bond the sharing an neutron. This involves the two atoms closing the distance so that there are two elliptical orbits around the molecule. One elliptical orbit for the stolen neutron and the outer elliptical orbit for the asteroid belt of the new molecule.
Current evidence that the second structure of the atom is correct. When viewing both structures in the context of a atomic denotation. Both fusion and fusion. First of all an atomic denotation is not at fire ball of combustion. The atomic denotation is a lightning and thunder storm. or a static electricity and or magnetic and or gravity force. The ground zero of an atomic denotation is a a ball of infinite lightning strikes within the blast radius. A lighting ball produces the light and sound. the fire created by the lightning strikes produces the flames and wind.
First structure of the structure of a proton and neutron core surround by orbiting electrons as a story line of atomic denotation at the fusion level of two hydrogen atoms. As the two atoms join the electrons pass each other with on static electricity. As the electrons move towards the core there is at low level static electricity arc between the electron and the proton core which fuse like the welding arc of a welding rod fuses to the steel if the rod and steel touch. So under this structure the atom structure after the fusion of two hydrogen atoms is one of a core of two protons and two electrons fused together. Like the positive welding rod and the negative steel, Fuses together when they touch.
The second structure, the structure of a proton and electron core surround by orbiting neutrons. In the story line of an atomic denotation. The fusion of two hydrogen atoms. The two hydrogen atoms are attracted to each other and achieve stabilisation within the asteroid belt of both atoms. As the fusion process starts with both atoms moving through the outer magnetic field this creates a electricity charge on both atoms simultaneously Creating an static electricity storm. That can create electrical arcs between the two fusing atoms but is a fusion atomic denotation. The number of hydrogen atoms that can fuse together. is almost unlimited for example radium can be create along with elements as heavy as uranium. So the atomic denotation of a hydrogen bomb is the instant fusing of trillions of hydrogen atoms. So the size of static electric storm is the ability of the atomic lightning arc to arc not

next page in above story
4 years ago

for just one hydrogen atom to next. But across the entire hydrogen fusing cloud and expansing into the non fusing atoms. Like the passage of normal lightning. The final stage of the fusion of two hydrogen atoms is the helium core of two protons and electrons with no orbiting neutrons.
I think that neutrons just dead protons or electrons and a free movers with in hyper- space. Until they collide with and atom. Then the neutron falls into alignment in one of the atoms orbits(which are equaled to the field of electro magnetic field lines). The large the atom, molecules, planet, sun, or solar system. The large the number of orbits(electro magnetic field lines) . So the conclusion is that science has the incorrect definition of the structure of an atom. And the correct structure of an atom is-
"the structure of a proton and electron core surround by orbiting neutrons"
So now we have the three basic forces of a unified theory. Now the entire field of physics must be redefined. The conclusions of every experiment in science must be rewritten and recalculated. For example. the next level of definitions electricity heat radiation light maybe sub category of the same definition
THANK YOU FOR SHARING MY DREAM CRAIG J CLARK CEO OF CRAIG CLARK CORPORATION craigclark.ceo@craigclarkfoundation.org http://www.craigclarkfoundation.org
Perhaps the scientific world will not accept my unify theory of the universe. Just because my unify theory is so radical. At it rebuilds the core foundations of all fields of science. Which sets off a chain reaction that requires the redefining of every term and definition, that extends in to the darks corners of science and knowledge. Every calculation in the fed of science is incorrect and every definition is incorrect.
HAVE SCIENTISTS GOT ANYTHING RIGHT?
THE NEW FOCUS OF UNIVERSITY EDUCATION IN THE 21TH CENTURY START-MATHEMATICS-PHYSICS-CHEMISTRY-EARTH SCIENCES-BIOLOGY- MEDICINE SO UNDER THE NEW UNIFY THEORY OF PHYSICS THERE IS JUST ONE UNI COURSE AND STUDENTS END THEIR EDUCATION WHEN THEIR HAVE THE LEVEL OF KNOWLEDGE REQUIRED MATHEMATICS 4 YEARS PHYSICS 4 YEARS CHEMISTRY 3 YEARS EARTH SCIENCES 2 YEARS BIOLOGY 2 YEARS
MEDICINE 4 YEARS
SO TO BECOME A DOCTOR FOR RESEARCH REQUIRES 19 YEARS OF UNI EDUCA TION

IMPORTANT NOTE ON THE UNIFY THEORY OF PHYSICS
4 years ago

IMPORTANT NOTE ON THE UNIFY THEORY OF PHYSICS
AT THIS STAGE MY UNIFY THEORY OF PHYSICS HAS ONLY ONE FLAW AND THAT IS THAT MY UNIFY THEORY IS SO STABLE. UNDER THE ELECTRO MAGNETIC AND GRAVITATIONAL FIELD LINES AND THE CORRECT STRUCTURE OF THE ATOM. IS THAT IT DOES NOT HAVE THE ABILITY TO CREATE A ROTATING ORBITS. SO THERE MUST BE A FOUR FORCE TO UNSTABLE THE ATOM AND THE ATOMIC LEVEL TO CAUSE THE MAGNETIC FIELD TO ROTATE IN PREDICTABLE WAY.
IDEAS I DON'T THINK THAT THE CORE OF THE ATOM IS ROTATING. WITH THE ELECTRO MAGNETIC FIELD ROTATING IN UNISON. AS THIS WOULD CREATE A CONSTANT ORBITING RATE FOR ALL ORBITS. THE FORCE THAT CAUSE THE ROTATION OF ORBITS MUST BE LINK TO THE FORCE OF GRAVITY. I CANNOT SEE A WEAKNESS IN THE GRAVITATIONAL FIELD THAT IS PREDICTABLE. THAT WOULD DICTATE DIRECTION AND SPEED OF AN ORBIT. BASED ON TOTAL MOLECULAR WIEGHT OF THE ATOM OR MOLECULE OR PLANET OR STAR OR SOLAR SYSTEM.
PERHAPS THE ORBITING PHOTONS AND NEUTRONS ARE THE KEY TO THE ORBITING SPEED AND DIRECTION. BUT WITH MY HIGH SCHOOL KNOWLEDGE I CAN GO NOT FURTHER
CURRENT KNOWLEDGE ABOUT THE ROTATION OF MAGNETIC FIELDS ON AND IN THE EARTH. STATE THAT THE MAGNETIC FIELD ROTATES BECAUSE THE MOLTEN CORE OF THE EARTH IS ROTATING. THIS IS IN CORRECT. THE CORE OF THE EARTH IS MOLTEN AND SUPER HEAT BECAUSE OF THE ROTATION OF DIFFERENT ORBITING ELECTRO MAGNETIC FIELD LINES. THERE MAY BE UP TO THREE ORBITING ELECTRO MAGNETIC FIELD LINES AT DIFFERENT ORBITING VELOCITIES. WHICH CAUSE THE GRAVITATIONAL FIELD TO ROTATE AND DRAG THE MOLTEN CORE AT DIFFERENT ORBITING VELOCITIES WHICH CREATES THE FRICTION BETWEEN DIFFERENT ORBITS.
BUT WHAT IS THE INTERACTION OF THE GRAVITATIONAL FIELDS BASED ON FIELD DENSITY. THAT CREATES THE WEAKNESS THAT PREDICTS THE STRENGTH OF ROTATIONS
I DON'T THINK THAT THE ROTATIONAL FORCE IS LINK TO A WEAKNESS IN
THE GRAVITATIONAL FIELD. BECAUSE THAT WOULD LEAD TO UNLIMITED ACCELERATION WITHIN THE ORBIT UNTIL THE ORBITING VELOCITY BECAME GREATER THAT THE CENTRIFUGAL FORCE AND THE PLANET OF A SOLAR SYSTEM WOULD BE ACCELERATED OUT OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM.
NO IT MUST BE A CONSTANT VELOCITY FORCE OF MOMENTUM NOT AN ACCELERATION of gravity.
I NEED HELP PLEASE SEND COPY OF THE CURRENT THEORY THAT DESCRIBES THE FORCE OF AN ORBITING PLANET WITHIN THE SOLAR SYSTEM PERHAPS THAT IS CORRECT

next page in above story
4 years ago

I NEED AT UNDERSTANDING OF THE FORCE OF MAGNETISM. I THINK AT THE ONE ATOM LEVEL THERE IS NO ROTATIONAL. BUT WITH MATTER AT THE TWO ATOM AND GREATER LEVEL WE GET ROTATION BECAUSE OF THE INTERACTION OF ELECTRO MAGNETIC FIELDS. AND THE INSTABILITY THAT COMES FROM THE TWO NORTH POLES COMING IN ALIGNMENT. AND THE TILTING OF THE MAGNETIC POLES
KNOWN FACTS THE TILT ANGLE OF EARTH IN A SUPERCONDUCTOR THE MAGNETIC POLES COME WITHIN 100% PARALLEL ALIGNMENT.
IS THE ANGLE OF TILT EQUAL AS A RATIO OF MOLECULAR OVER DISTANCE OF RADIUS OF ORBIT. FOR EXAMPLE AT THE SUN LEVEL. THE TILT ANGLE GREATER FOR MERCURY THAN THE TILT ANGLE OF PLUTO.
SO WHAT THE TILT ANGLE IS THE TERMS OF THE ELECTRO MAGNETIC AND GRAVITATIONAL FIELD LINE THEORY. I NEED TO BE ABLE TO WRITE THE STORY LINE FOR THE FORCES OF REPULSION THAT ALLOWS THE PREDICTION OF DIRECTION AND CONSTANT VELOCITY
UNDER MY STAR THEORY THAT THE CENTRE OF A SUN IS A FROZEN CORE OF HYDROGEN. THEN THIS WOULD EQUAL AT SUPER CONDUCTOR AND EQUAL ZERO ROTATION OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM SO THE CORE OF THE SUN'S MUST BE LIQUID HYDROGEN.
SO THE MAGNETIC FIELD DOES NOT ROTATE WITH NUCLEUS OF AN ATOM. BUT IT DOES ROTATE THE ENTIRE ATOM. THIS IS WHAT CREATES THE ROTATING ORBITS. THE GRAVITATIONAL FIELD ROTATES BECAUSE THE ELECTRO MAGNETIC FIELD IS ROTATING.
RULES OF THE ELECTRO MAGNETIC ORBITS 1) IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE GRAVITATIONAL FIELD OF ANY GIVE ELECTRO MAGNETIC FIELD TO CREATE ACCELERATION OF A MASS OF MATTER WITHIN THE ORBIT
2) A ELECTRO MAGNETIC ORBIT HAS THE ABILITY TO DECREASE VELOCITY OF A MASS OF MATTER. BELOW THE CAPTURE VELOCITY FOR THAT GIVE ORBIT.
SO UNDER THESE RULES THE ELECTRO MAGNETIC AND GRAVITATIONAL FIELD OF AN GIVE ORBIT HAS THE ABILITY TO TURN AND A MASS OF MATTER. BUT THAT MASS OF MATTER WILL LOSE VELOCITY IN THE TURN
THE THREE BASIC LAWS OF THE UNIFY THEORY OF PHYSICS. AT THE ONE ATOM LEVEL, THE LEVEL OF COMPLEXITY IS LOW. BUT AS THE MOLECULAR WIEGHT OF ANY BODY(CLUSTER OF ATOMS) GROWTHS IN MOLECULAR WIEGHT. THE COMPLEXITY OF THE UNIFY THEORY OF PHYSICS GROWS AT AN EXPONENTIAL RATE UNTIL IT REACHS AT LEVEL OF INFINITE COMPLEXITY AT THE LEVEL OF THE UNIVERSE

next page in above story
4 years ago

QUESTION- ARE PHOTONS NEGATIVE CHARGE OR POSITIVE CHARGE OR NEUTRAL CHARGE PARTICLES. IF PHOTONS ARE NEUTRAL CHARGE PARTICLES THEN. DUE THERE SIZE THERE WOULD BE AND INFINITE NUMBER OF PHOTONS IN THE ASTEROID BELT OF AN HYDROGEN ATOM AND A NEUTRON IS A CLUSTER OF PHOTONS. UNDER THE SAME ELECTRO MAGNETIC AND GRAVITATIONAL FIELD LAWS AS A PLANET THAT ORBITS THE SUN
THOUGHTS OF MATTER DENSITY LEVELS(STARTING AT THE HIGHEST DENSITY LEVEL DESCENDING TO THE LOWEST DENSITY LEVEL)
SUB ATOMIC (THE CORE OF AN ATOM) ATOMIC PLASMA CLOUD(FUSION) SUPER CONDUCTOR HEAVY METALS(RADIOACTIVE ELEMENTS) PURE METALS METAL MOLECULES(OXIDE METALS) HEAVY LIQUIDS(LARGE MOLECULES) LIGHT LIQUIDS(SMALL MOLECULES) STATIC ELECTRICITY AIR SPACE HEAVY DENSITY(HYDROGEN CLOUDS) SPACE LIGHT DENSITY(PHOTONS CLOUDS)
AT LEVELS OF MATTER ARE AFFECTED BY THE ELECTRO MAGNETIC AND GRAVITATIONAL FIELDS
UNDER THE UNIFY THEORY OF PHYSICS. THE IDEA OF A BLACK HOLE. IS THEORETICALLY ACHIEVABLE BUT THE BASIC LAWS OF GRAVITY ARE AGAINST IT. A BALCK HOLE IS AN ELEMENT THAT CONTAINS ONLY ONE ATOM. WITH THE ENTIRE MOLECULAR WIEGHT OF THE SUN CONTAINED WITHIN THE CORE OF ONE ATOM

next stage of research for the unify theory of physics
4 years ago

Will I've started work on the next stage of the unify theory of physics

By correcting the periodical table the first stage was to correct the atomic numbers next stage is to research each atom and divide them into two groups elementary atoms an elementary molecules.

for example the element of helium is not an atom but an elementary molecule of Hydrogen-2 (deuterium) plus one hydrogen atom

which burns with oxygen to form heavy water

The next stage after the review of the periodical table is to move no too matter bodies(planets, moons, suns, spiral galaxies). The complexity of the unify theory of physics grows with the increase of molecular weight of a matter body

Unify Theory
4 years ago

Sorry to interrupt but -

1. Einstein got it 'ever so slighly' wrong, and it bugged him, he knew there was just a tweek to be done, but what? - e=mc2 - come on, he was so close, but not perfect, are you so close? but so distracted?. The answer is right in front of you !! It is the Obvious !! Who was your Professor ? and at which University, or Post grad?

2. Why are you not on the Face of the Coll 'Eiger? yourself if you are so intimate with their safety issues? Switzerland is full of Pixies, messing with Pixie Dust !! They scoured the World for the contributers to work on this project, which, if it succeeds, will bring about an ever accellerating black hole that will be another Big Bang ? At least that is what many people fear, please would you explain why the magic 8 is not going to happen.

3. You have 'intimated' that you think 'genius' - Where were you tested for such a status, and at what level in the various aspects of the Testing,and where are you strenghts particularly, and how much of a disparagy is there between your strenghs and your 'weaknesses' ? Was it the Wechler Test ? what was THAT mark, the other test gives very high marks which is a bit confusing for the uninitiated !!.

hi victoria
4 years ago

I was born with a creative mind. I taught myself in the field of binary programming, It's is a field in the world of computers that has only one member and that is me.

As for university. I'm a student in the university of life

A normal university never interested me and I'm not welcome at university, I have an english mark of below 30%

Besides today's universities support copycats not genius. To get a university all you have to do is copy the work of genius with 95% accuracy. There is no part of a university that has a requirement to demonstrate critical thinking(the creation of new technology).

My first invention 32 bit digital color as a 16 years old. Cause a giant jump in technology and gave birth to the entire digital age both sound and images. University students each made small improvements in technology in an effort to use my technology. Which are 1% improvement steps

you can be a normal university student with the ability to create 1% improvement steps in technology

or

you can be a student in the university of life at the genius level and work towards giant leaps in technology

option two is the hardest way two make money

4 years ago

Hi - Just like to point out that Leaonardo Da Vinci never received any formal schooling.
This is because he was illegitimate ie a bastard - But what a genius of a bastard he proved to be.
Leonardo stated how glad and grateful he was not to have received any education because it meant he had to use his own thoughts and not parrot those of his so called elder and betters.

hi micheal
4 years ago

thank you for my new lesson on Leaonardo Da Vinci

I believe that everyone has a lesson to teach me

I have a world book dictionary from the late 70's

leonine= of a lion, like a loin

da= daughter day or days

vinic= of, obtained, or derived from wine or alcohol

so under the history of words

leo Da Vinci name translate into Leonine Da Vinic

I like the translated name better

And I like your lesson of originality by non-uni students thank you

Dark Matter
4 years ago

Hi No B
Yes - Thanks - I had never really considered the root meaning of Leonardo's name.
I have a friend whose Great Grandfather was a pioneer in the discovery of DNA - his name being William Astbury - his ideas were later refined by others. I think the best science is based on curiousity and asking the right questions. I know Willian Astbury would not like the way that DNA is now used to manipulate nature. He was fun loving and idealistic which is confirmed by his family. He mereley wanted to understand, building his own specialised microscopes to zoom into a world hidden from us and seeing a pattern that ran through all living things.
What I am trying to say is sometimes we just know things but proving them to others is the difficult bit. Some of what you say flys above my head - I am an artist poet and see from a different perspective but I think we are looking for the same things. I consider all creative thought to come from the same place so to speak - It is how we channel our creative thoughts that defines category such as Science Art etc - I am fascinated by the way the Universe works and Astronomy and so called SacredGoemetry influence my work. I believe indeed there are hidden dimensions which affect our reality - Prior to Hubble it is aid that our knowledge of the Universe was only 2per cent of what is known today and yet there is a massive per cent we still do not know - Dark Matter being one of the unanswered questions - I wondered what your thoughts on this are.
Warm Regards
Michael

hi Micheal
4 years ago

I did a google search on dark matter. And I think the simple answer to dark matter. Is that all dark matter are photons. Photons are invisible in space they create no light until they impact will matter. Example the light from a star is only create via the impact of photons with the night time atmosphere . The Hubble space telescope is within the upper level of the earth atmosphere. So the photons from other stars create light via the photon impact with the thin atmosphere and the glass lens. Under this theory of photons only creating light via the impact with matter. A photon impact with the human eye in outer space would created the light in the human eye

I think photons are neutral in charge and can be bend via gravitational fields. There is a simple experiment of bending a laser beam bending in an magnetic field. The experiment would need to be recreated.
stage 1) bend a laser beam in a north pole magnetic field
stage 2) bend a laser beam in a south pole magnetic field

predicted outcomes
if the laser beam bends towards a north pole magnetic and away form a south pole magnetic. Then photons are negative charge
if the laser beam bends away from a north pole magnetic and towards a south pole magnetic. then photons are positive charge
if the laser beam bends towards both north and south pole magnetic then the photon is neutral in charge and it is the force of gravity that is bending the laser beam

So in my unify theory of physics there are protons, electrons and photons(and an neutron is just a collection of photons)

4 years ago

I understand some of what you are saying. I know that "Einstiens Cross" theory was proved by Hubble when it produced images of one galaxy directly behind another which bent the light of the galaxy behind producing 4 seperate images around the cardinal points of the galaxy in front. The Galaxy in front was in the centre of the four other images. I was wondering if you had considered that your problem with a static model of your theory could be that there is another element so to speak. The element or force I am thinking of is the original source of energy which expanded into the Universe we know today and that original source is still at work. We see it in the way that some stars super nova and so produce more star birth just like how a seed say of an apple contains many seeds in that you plant an apple seed and from that one seed a tree full apples containing yet more seeds grows. In ancient times they saw what they referred to as the Primum Mobile or Prime Movement which initiated all things. This is considered to be the source that can manipulate energy itself. I refer to it this way - Power/Energy by itself is destructive unless tempered by what for a better word is Love or Higher Inteligence. I believe we are all part of this and our studies and contemplation bring us to a realisation that Whatever created the Universe was no accident and that this creator which we are all a small part of is Indeed a master Scientist and Artist etc.

hi michael
4 years ago

Yes there are many possibilities to creating a rotating model> but think the key is the interaction of the electro magnetic fields of different atoms.
I have my first patent 1)the unify theory of physics
the next patents are a
2) review and correction of the periodical table from chemistry
3) matter bodies(planets, suns, galaxy)
4) between electro magnetic field lines(case study the atmosphere)

the complexity level of patents 3) and 4) may be at a level that human-beings will never understand

I started work on correcting the periodical correcting the element. to start with all the atomic numbers are wrong. For example helium's atomic number should be 4 and I think helium is an elementary molecule of hydrogen deuterium bond to two hydrogen atoms.

In the current periodical table there are two two types of element pure atoms(elements created in the sun) and elementary molecules(molecules created on earth)

But to move further forward I need my own research lab. Which I have add to my business plan for the construction of my global headquarters in the hinterland of Byron Bay NSW Australia

I'm working my theory in a casual way but you really need to run experiments to provide the facts for the unify theory of physics.

So for this moment in time I must wait for the outcome of my child abuse case with the FBI .then I will have the money to move forward with the unify theory of physics

Albert's Mind of God equals your master scientist or artist or the religious gods or the entire universe could just be the fart of a god(pure hydrogen fart)

4 years ago

This is facinating,but way over my head.

hi Ancil
4 years ago

There is such thing as a dunce. Just teachers who are to stupid to explain the concept in terms that you understand. If a teacher can't speak you language. Then it is the teacher who should be wearing the dunce cap not yourself.

If find a concept that you don't understand please ask for a review

the secrets of gravitational rotation
4 years ago

At the moment I'm unable to define the laws of rotation for the unify theory of physics.

I see two possible paths to achieve a theory of rotation within the the unify theory of physics

Path one
the key to theory of rotation is contain within the interaction of atoms and molecules within a matter body(planet, sun, galaxy). This interaction cause the entire atom to rotate and therefore the entire electro magnetic field lines of a matter body rotate with the rotation of atoms within the matter body

path two (gravitational lift theory)
in this theory the electro magnetic fields created via a matter body do not rotate. But the interaction of the gravitational fields between a matter body contain within a electro magnetic(example the earth contain within the electro magnetic field of the sun= which equals the earth's orbit). Some how create gravitational lift(like the lift of a plane wing with the interaction with the atmosphere). This gravitational lift is a constant that is govern via the electro magnetic fields strength(density) and constant in direction via the magnetic hemisphere in which it's contain.

for example the gravitational lift within the northern hemisphere is in a anti clock wise direction and the gravitational lift in the southern hemisphere is in a clock wise direction. Which is a hard scientific fact under the study of rotational direction of tropical storms and the rotational direction of a water whirlpool(example the water whirlpool of water running down the kitchen sink)

Off the two above theories I think the second theory of gravitational lift is the path for defining the rotational theory for the unify theory of physics. But at the moment my mind is unable to penetrate the complexity of this part of the unify theory of physics. I have too wait for another one second thought to explain this part of the unify theory of physics

perhaps the correction of the periodical table for chemistry will proved the answers

4 years ago

All objects in the universe and our solar system move in space. The earth moves in two ways. It rotates like a top on its axis, an imaginary line through the north and south poles, and revolves in an orbit around the Sun. Centrifugal force results from the earth's rotation; without gravity, centrifugal force could cause objects to fly into space. Because the force of the earth's gravity is 289 times stronger than its centrifugal force, gravity prevents objects from leaving the surface. Centrifugal force causes the earth to bulge at the equator, making it slightly ovoid in shape.

The earth's counterclockwise rotation is in the opposite direction of the apparent movement of heavenly bodies. Thus, although the Sun and stars appear to move from east to west, the earth rotates from west to east.

The rotation of Earth can be proven in several ways.

One is the *Foucault experiment. This was first conducted in 1851, by the Frenchman Léon Foucault. He suspended a heavy iron ball from a 200 ft (61 m) wire, creating a pendulum, from the dome of the Pantheon in Paris. He put sand underneath the pendulum, and placed a pin on the bottom of the ball, so it would leave a mark on its swing from side to side. On each swing, over the course of 24 hours, the mark in the sand would move to the right. The direction in the path showed movement of the earth against the swing of the pendulum.



This post was modified from its original form on 22 Aug, 18:29
4 years ago

A more modern proof of the rotation is shown by the orbits of artificial satellites. A satellite is launched from the Kennedy Space Center at a 30 degree angle to an orbit 100 mi (161 km) above Earth. Its orbit stays at approximately the same plane in space. If Earth did not rotate, the satellite would pass over Cape Canaveral each time it completed an orbit, but it does not. As it completes the first orbit, it flies over Alabama and over Louisiana on the third. Each time the satellite passes over locations in the United States

, it is 1,000 mi (1,609 km) farther to the west. Tracking stations have made this observation with hundreds of satellites.

 

Another way of proving rotation is through the prevailing winds. In the northern hemisphere, they move in a counter clockwise direction, while in the southern hemisphere, they blow clockwise.

continued...>

4 years ago

The inner core of Earth rotates faster than the crust. Earth is made up of an inner core, an outer core, the mantle and the crust. The inner core, a solid mass of iron about 1,500 mi (2,400 km) in diameter, is suspended in the molten metal of the outer core, which is about 1,400 mi (2,240 km) thick. The mantle of the earth is a layer of mostly solid material about 1,700 mi (2,720 km) thick; the crust itself varies from 4 to 25 mi (6 to 40 km) thick. Although the inner core spins in the same direction as Earth's crust, the inner core rotates at a different speed. Scientists estimate that the inner core of Earth spins from one to three degrees a year faster than the crust of Earth. This means that while a point on the crust of Earth moves 360° in a year, a similar point on the inner core would move 361-363° in a year. Thus, over approximately 360 years, the inner core would make one complete rotation more than the crust of Earth.

Generally when we speak of Earth's rotation, we are talking about the rotation of Earth's surface. This rotation is used to define time. Since people began to measure time, it's been done by the movement of Sun and stars. One rotation of Earth makes up one 24 hour day. This is in contrast to the time of revolution around the Sun of 365 days, or one year. Because the earth's axis is not perpendicular to the equator, but leans at a 23.5° angle, the amount of daylight varies over the course of a year.

Over time the speed of Earth's rotation has slowed. Knowing how fast it spins, at any given time, is important to navigators and pilots in finding locations.


(not sure if the links will work)
Hi Kit
4 years ago

I'm not saying the matter bodies do not rotate. just that in my theory of the unify theory of physics. I have not achieve at theory within the gravitational field theory to explain how this rotation occurs. In the field of science there is no current theory to explain how the orbits of electro magnetic field happen. In the field of science, there is an observation that electro magnetic fields do rotate. I need within my theory to provide a theory of how these electro magnetic fields rotate

In the theory of relativity there is no laws to define the rotation of electro magnetic fields. In quantum mechanic there is no laws to define the rotation of electro magnetic fields

the secrets of gravitational rotation update
4 years ago

the secrets of gravitational rotation

At the moment I'm unable to define the laws of rotation for the unify theory of physics.

I see two possible paths to achieve a theory of rotation within the the unify theory of physics

Path one
the key to theory of rotation is contain within the interaction of atoms and molecules within a matter body(planet, sun, galaxy). This interaction cause the entire atom to rotate and therefore the entire electro magnetic field lines of a matter body rotate with the rotation of atoms within the matter body

path two (gravitational lift theory)
in this theory the electro magnetic fields created via a matter body do not rotate. But the interaction of the gravitational fields between a matter body contain within a electro magnetic(example the earth contain within the electro magnetic field of the sun= which equals the earth's orbit). Some how create gravitational lift(like the lift of a plane wing with the interaction with the atmosphere). This gravitational lift is a constant that is govern via the electro magnetic fields strength(density) and constant in direction via the magnetic hemisphere in which it's contain.

for example the gravitational lift within the northern hemisphere is in a anti clock wise direction and the gravitational lift in the southern hemisphere is in a clock wise direction. Which is a hard scientific fact under the study of rotational direction of tropical storms and the rotational direction of a water whirlpool(example the water whirlpool of water running down the kitchen sink)

Off the two above theories I think the second theory of gravitational lift is the path for defining the rotational theory for the unify theory of physics. But at the moment my mind is unable to penetrate the complexity of this part of the unify theory of physics. I have too wait for another one second thought to explain this part of the unify theory of physics

perhaps the correction of the periodical table for chemistry will proved the answers


gravitational lift formula for our solar system via the known planets

mercury
orbit = 7,341,321seconds
radius of orbit = 70,000,000,000 metres
circumference of orbit = 440,000,000,000 metres
gravitational lift velocity = 59,934 metres per second


venus
orbit = 19,414,080 seconds
radius of orbit = 108,000,000,000 metres
circumference of orbit =678,857,142,900 metres
gravitational field velocity = 34,967 metres per second

earth
orbit = 31,536,000 seconds
radius of orbit = 150,000,000,000 metres
circumference of orbit = 942,857,142,900 metres
gravitational lift velocity = 29,897 metres per second

mars
orbit = 59,356,800 seconds
radius of orbit = 230,000,000,000 metres
circumference of orbit = 1,445,714,286,000 metres
gravitational lift velocity = 24,356 metres per second

jupiter
orbit = 374,016,960 seconds
radius of orbit = 778,000,000,000 metres
circumference of orbit = 4,890,285,714,000 metres
gravitational lift velocity = 13,075 metres per second

saturn
orbit = 929,577,600 seconds
radius of orbit = 1,400,000,000,000 metres
circumference of orbit = 8,800,000,000,000 metres
gravitational lift velocity = 9,466 metres per second

uranus
orbit = 2,649,024,000 seconds
radius of orbit = 3,000,000,000,000 metres
circumference of orbit = 18,857,142,860,000 metres
gravitational lift velocity = 7,118 metres per second

neptune
orbit = 5,196,817,440 seconds
radius of orbit = 4,550,000,000,000,metres
circumference of orbit = 28,600,000,000,000 metres
gravitational lift velocity = 5,503 metres per second

the above mathematical formula's give a clear reading that gravitational lift is a ratio of electro magnetic field density which creates a ratio of gravitational field density which creates the ratio of gravitational lift velocity

hi kit
4 years ago

your have a degree in physics. this degree is build on the theory of relativity and the theory of quantum mechanics. But these theories like 90% of your knowledge in the field of physics is incorrect. The unify theory of physics is a completely virgin field. that rebuilds the foundations of science.

So for this theory you have rewrite and recalculate your entire knowledge based

over a thousand of physicist are trying to create a unify theory out of the two theories of relativity and quantum mechanics and it is impossible because both theories are incorrect as are the foundations of science that both of these theories are build on is incorrect.

Albert Einstein created his theory of relativity out of the current knowledge base that was the foundation of physics in his time. He forgot to correct the foundations of science and because of this incorrect foundation in science. All theories have a degree of inaccuracy because the foundations of all science is incorrect. The basic structure of an atom in the current knowledge base of science is incorrect

This is why building the unify theory of physics is so hard at the moment I'm breaking my head wide open on the complexity of this theory. which unlike the theory of relativity and quantum mechanics is almost infinite in complexity and human beings may never have the ability to fully understand or rewrite or calculate the unify theory of physics

The complexity is almost infinite

hi kit
4 years ago

your current understanding of the force of gravity incorrect

your current understanding on how the planets orbit the sun is incorrect

the correct theory for how the planets orbit the sun. Is that there is a clearly define electro magnetic field line for the orbit off every planet. This clearly define electro magnetic field line creates the gravitational fields of each planets orbits. It is the gravitational fields created by the electro magnetic field of the orbit. Is what holds the planet on to the orbit like a train on a railroad.

It is the interaction of the gravitational field of the electro magnetic field line(off the orbit) and the matter body(planet with a solar system, the solar system within the spiral galaxy) that creates the gravitational lift velocity. As move away from the centre of the electro magnetic field lines within any give matter body. The density of the electro magnetic field line decreases. therefore the density or strength of the gravitational field decreases. Which leads to a decrease in the gravitational lift velocity

it is the same for the earth. the electro magnetic field line for the core of the earth is highest, Next is the electro magnetic field line for the crust, Next is the electro magnetic field line for the edge of the atmosphere, Next is the electro magnetic field line for the orbit of the moon.

How the interaction of electro magnetic fields at the atomic level within a matter body(planet, moon, sun, spiral galaxy). Work to create these clearly define electro magnetic field lines(orbits). I'm unable to explain, again I'm defeated via the complexity of the interaction of so many atoms within all matter bodies

Newton's mistake
4 years ago

Newton's calculations for the force of gravity at 9.8 metres per second squared. May or may not be correct within the electro magnetic field/gravitational field. Which is centered within the earth's crust

The force of gravity must be recalculated with each electro magnetic field line. Which varieties with the density of each electro magnetic field line( as a ratio over distance from the center of creation= matter body)

Albert's mistake

Albert Einstein's mistake in the calculation of the speed of light. Albert's calculation for the speed of light fails to include the calculation of the photon passing different regions of acceleration and deceleration as it pass through different levels of density of electro magnetic field lines/gravitational field that are apart of the electro magnetic fields(orbits). Within the field of space.

mistake's created through a lack of complexity

Doubts about the force of gravity
4 years ago

the force of gravity may not be a force of acceleration as Newton has stated. Under the study of gravitational lift for the planets of our own solar system. Seams to suggest the gravity is a force of constant velocity. That increases and decreases with the density of the electro magnetic field.

If the force of gravity was an accelerating force. Then would stand to reason that the force of gravitational lift would also be an accelerating force. And the planets would be in a constant state of acceleration. Under Newton's paper on gravity

But this maybe an incorrect point of view. But a topic that warrants further reasoning.

BIG BANG
4 years ago

SOUND? Where did the sound go? ...

HINT - IS That what is missing from the theory ?

hi victoria
4 years ago

at the moment the missing piece is the theory of rotation or the theory of gravitational lift. I'm unable to wrap my mind around this part of the theory. It is clear from observations of the known universe that there must be a theory of rotation within the unify theory. The are a couple of different areas to the theory of rotation.

1) the rotation of orbits
2) the tilt and rotation of matter bodies(example the tilt of the earth and the rotation of the earth due to the interaction of the electro magnetic field of the sun and the electro magnetic field of earth and the electro magnetic field of the moon)

again the complexity of this theory maybe so great that we will never be able to wrap the collective mind of humanity around it. But I'm still searching

4 years ago

What happens with a tuning fork? The fork itself vibrates, the sound vibrates the ear drum. Ergo everything else in the room on some level is affected by the vibration.

Hi victoria
4 years ago

The sounds of vibration I think is the interaction of gravitational fields at the atomic level. The vibration of the electro magnetic/gravitational field is warp by the vibration of the electro magnetic/gravitational field of the neighboring atom. This warping of electro magnetic fields/gravitational fields also applies to light waves, radiation waves and matter waves(wind and water). The speed of vibration or gravitational warping is dedicate via the frequency of the wave.

Example the speed of sound and light only warps the electro magnetic/ gravitational field around the atom. But with the matter waves of water and wind the speed of the wave or gravitational warping. warps the entire atom

4 years ago

AND ? - For example, how does 'sound' produce energy, and how does 'light' produce energy,,,,,,,,,,What is the constant with those two?

hi victoria
4 years ago

well the theory of electricity. is a study of electro magnetic field warping. The electricity current warps of entire atoms so that the electro magnetic hemisphere rotate into alignment. the first atom rotates 90 degrees. this rotate warps the electro magnetic field of the next atoms causing it to rotate. The electrical resistance of a copper wire is the earth electro magnetic fields dragging the atoms of the copper wire back into alignment with the earth's electro magnetic field.

Under super conductor technology that I read about in the late 80's. which is an alloy that has zero electrical resistance when cooled to the temperature of liquid hydrogen. There best effort was the temperature of liquid oxygen that I currently have knowledge off. The alloy of the superconductor is this like to be drag up back into alignment by the earth's electro magnetic field.

So under this theory of electricity the electricity resistance of a copper wire would be lower on the moon than when compared to the electrical resistance on earth because the electro magnetic field on the moon has a lower density

In the science of solar panels where the impact of a photon the silicon of the solar panel cause the atoms to rotate and align their electro magnetic fields to create DC current

In AC current the atoms of the copper wire rotate with the changing polarity of the AC current. This rotation of atoms creates heat due to the fiction on neighboring atoms. So in theory there is a maximum frequency for AC current. Because above this maximum frequency the copper atoms can not rotate quick enough and therefore at the maximum frequency, the electrical resistance of a copper wire is measured at 100%

Sound energy could be explain via warping of entire atoms via the warping of the gravitational field at the atomic level. In theory sound vibration could have the ability to rotate entire atoms in a conductor thereby creating an electrical field

4 years ago

How does all this then relate to Gravity, and Energy and the Vortex of Black Holes?

hi victoria
4 years ago

to answer your question I would have to repost every post that I have already posted. the vortex of black holes is a theory that does not exists. Some theories in the field of science are based on correct observations but have the incorrect conclusion. other theories have no observations to support their individual theory and just pure bullshit backup via complexity mathematical formulas. The theory of black holes is a theory of 100% bullshit.

In the field of energy some the basic understanding individual types of energy are incorrect and the correct philosophy for each type of energy must be define. The basic calculation for each type of energy may or may not be correct

electricity under the unify theory of physics
4 years ago

electricity under the unify theory of physics

there are two types of electrical current

1) the electrical current within a conductor= electro magnetic field rotation the elements atoms for both DC & AC currents

2) electrical arcs the follow of photons e.g. lightning and the arc of an electric welder

update theories
1) the electrical current within a conductor= electro magnetic field rotation the elements atoms for both DC & AC currents

well the theory of electricity. is a study of electro magnetic field warping. The electricity current warps of entire atoms so that the electro magnetic hemisphere rotate into alignment. the first atom rotates 90 degrees. this rotate warps the electro magnetic field of the next atoms causing it to rotate. The electrical resistance of a copper wire is the earth electro magnetic fields dragging the atoms of the copper wire back into alignment with the earth's electro magnetic field.

Under super conductor technology that I read about in the late 80's. which is an alloy that has zero electrical resistance when cooled to the temperature of liquid hydrogen. There best effort was the temperature of liquid oxygen that I currently have knowledge off. The alloy of the superconductor is this like to be drag up back into alignment by the earth's electro magnetic field.

So under this theory of electricity the electricity resistance of a copper wire would be lower on the moon than when compared to the electrical resistance on earth because the electro magnetic field on the moon has a lower density

In the science of solar panels where the impact of a photon the silicon of the solar panel cause the atoms to rotate and align their electro magnetic fields to create DC current

In AC current the atoms of the copper wire rotate with the changing polarity of the AC current. This rotation of atoms creates heat due to the fiction on neighboring atoms. So in theory there is a maximum frequency for AC current. Because above this maximum frequency the copper atoms can not rotate quick enough and therefore at the maximum frequency, the electrical resistance of a copper wire is measured at 100%

Sound energy could be explain via warping of entire atoms via the warping of the gravitational field at the atomic level. In theory sound vibration could have the ability to rotate entire atoms in a conductor thereby creating an electrical field


2) electrical arcs the follow of photons e.g. lightning and the arc of an electric welder

Experiment that is needed for this theory to work

I think photons are neutral in charge and can be bend via gravitational fields. There is a simple experiment of bending a laser beam bending in an magnetic field. The experiment would need to be recreated.
stage 1) bend a laser beam in a north pole magnetic field
stage 2) bend a laser beam in a south pole magnetic field

predicted outcomes
if the laser beam bends towards a north pole magnetic and away form a south pole magnetic. Then photons are negative charge
if the laser beam bends away from a north pole magnetic and towards a south pole magnetic. then photons are positive charge
if the laser beam bends towards both north and south pole magnetic then the photon is neutral in charge and it is the force of gravity that is bending the laser beam

I think that photons are neutral in charge so it is force field of gravity that force the beam of photons to travel in an electric arc

under theory of lightning there is only one direction for the force of gravity to drag the lightning arc and that in the direction of the cloud towards the earth or from the direction of the cloud into outer space

Under theory of an electric welding arcs there are two force field of gravity drag the photons. One from the welding rod towards the metal subject and a second force field from the metal subject towards the welding rod. The photon density of an electric arc is about 50 to 100 times the density of photons within sunlight. It is the impact of photon with the metal subject that creates heat and melt the metal. It is the impact of photon with the welding rod the creates heat and melts the welding rod. It is the force of magnetism that confines the two melt metals of the subject and the welding rod. A major factor within the newly create weld that creates a weak point within the weld bead is the change in the electro magnetic alignment of atoms between the weld bead and the subject metal. The electro magnetic alignment of atoms within the metal subject is created via the forging process. The electro magnetic field alignment of the weld bead is in the direction at is parallel with the welding arc

Current definition of voltage

the SI unit of electromotive force, the difference of potential that would drive one ampere of current against one ohm resistance

Current definition of ampere

a unit of electric current equal to a flow of one coulomb per second. The SI base unit of electric, 1 ampere is precisely define as the constant current which, if maintained in two straight parallel conductors of infinite length , of negligible circular cross section and placed 1 meter apart in a vacuum, would produce between these conductors a force of 2 times 10 to the power of negative 7 newton per metre

correction of ampere
an ampere is the percentage of atoms with in a known conductor that rotate into alignment. thereby creating the electrical field. So there is a theory, the maximum ampere per conductor at 100% rotation of all atoms within a conductor

correction of ohm resistance
within a DC current
the ohm resistance within a conductor for a DC

next page in above story
4 years ago

correction of ohm resistance
within a DC current
the ohm resistance within a conductor for a DC current is the ability of the electro magnetic field on any give matter body dragging the DC current(atom rotation and alignment of electro magnetic fields) back into alignment with the greater electro magnetic field of any give matter body. Example ohm resistance on earth is greater than the ohm resistance on the moon

Within a AC current
the ohm resistance within a conductor for a AC current is the combination of the electro magnetic field of any give matter body dragging the AC current(atom rotation and alignment of electro magnetic fields)back into alignment plus the resistance create via fiction of rotating atoms through the change polarity of an frequency of a AC current. To the point where rotation resistance of the atoms within a conductor increase with the frequency of the AC current. to the theoretical maximum frequency for AC current. At the theoretical maximum frequency of an AC current. the atoms of the conductor can not rotate with the speed of change of polarity at the maximum AC frequency. And the theory maximum frequency of an AC in a conductor the Ohm resistance is at 100%

the three fundamental forces of the unify theory of physics
4 years ago

the three fundamental forces of the unify theory of physics are created at the atomic level

first we have the force of electricity created via the positive change proton and the negative change electron.

it is the interaction of the protons and electron fused within the core of every atom that creates the electro magnetic forces of north pole magnetism which equals the positive charge of electricity and the force of the south polar of magnetism which equals the negative charge of electricity

It is the electro magnetic field lines that create the force of gravity. the interaction to the gravitational fields and the different electro magnetic fields of the different hemisphere of magnetism within any give matter body(atom, molecule, planet, moon, sun, solar system, spiral galaxy). That defines the direction of rotation and the gravitational lift velocity of any matter body( photon, planet, moon, solar systems within a galaxy). that defines direction of rotation and orbiting duration

So the unify theory of physics is build the foundation of combining three fundamental force of electricity, electro magnetism and gravitational in the story of creation. Starting with the smallest hydrogen and expansing with increasing levels of complexity to the largest known universe

thoughts of the correct way to calculate the force gravity
4 years ago

thoughts of the correct way to calculate the force gravity

I think the key to calculating the force of gravity at any given point between electro magnetic field lines or within the electro magnetic fields. Is a dual calculation to the two types of gravitational fields create via the electro magnetic fields.

This calculation is made up of gravitational field of acceleration and the gravitational of deceleration which has the ability to achieve a balancing point that is equaled to the gravitational lift velocity

Example when calculating the gravitational force within a electro magnetic field line or orbit. The gravitational of the orbit calculation achieves a balance point that is equaled to the gravitational lift velocity of the orbit. The balancing point of this gravitational force calculation varieties in ratio inline with the field density of the elector magnetic field or orbits

This balancing point that equals the gravitational lift velocity. Would also be true within the gravitational force calculation for between electro magnetic field lines. Example the electro magnetic field line that is centered within the earth's crust and the electro magnetic field line that is placed at the edge of the earth's atmosphere. Under this calculation the balancing point of gravitational force calculation or gravitational lift velocity would change in a ratio over distance from the earth's surface(location within two electro magnetic lines).

As you move closer to the earth's surface the balancing point of the gravitational forces would %#&!*% towards a balancing point of a higher gravitational lift velocity.

Example the maximum velocity(gravitational lift velocity) at 3,000 metre above the earth's would equal something 100km per hour at 1,000 metres above the earth's surface it would reach at balancing point of say 150 km per hour

I don't think gravitational force calculation are based on the infinite acceleration theories of Newton at 9.8 metres per second per second. Is correct, the study of gravitational lift velocities of the known planets of our solar system list in an above post suggest that this new theory on calculating the force of gravity within any known point of the universe. Is the more correct model

but what are the numbers for different densities of different gravitational fields(Albert's new mind of God or for an atheist- just plain magic)

definition of fire under the unify theory of physics
4 years ago

definition of fire under the unify theory of physics

the definition of fire: is the infinite number of static electricity(lightning) strikes within the blast(combustion) area

the definition of static electricity(lightning): the strength of a lightning strike is govern via the photon density within the lightning strike plus the speed of photon velocity(which is highlight via color) white light equals the highest photon velocity, the next level of photon velocity is blue light, the lowest level of photon velocity is red or orange light. the flow of photon density and speed is government via the strength of the gravitational field of the magnetic poles of the reacting elements

density levels of fire from highest to lowest
1) atomic(fusion) in stars or atomic bombs
2) atmospheric lightning
3) welding electric arc and plasma cutting troches
4) laser cutting technology
5) fire blue flame
6) fire red or orange flame
7)combustion of oxygen with carbon to form CO2 within the animals body, resulting in body heat
8) combustion of CO2 with H20 within a plant to form oxygen and plant matter under photosynthesis
9) oxidation of metals or elements

correction of uranium & plutonium technology
4 years ago

correction of uranium & plutonium technology

the current conclusions for the research in uranium and plutonium atom splitting technology is incorrect. It is impossible to spilt an atom

The elementary definition of uranium and plutonium is incorrect

both uranium and plutonium are correctly classify as elementary molecules. There are two types of elements within the periodical table pure elements(which are created within stars) and elementary molecules(which are created on earth)

the correct elementary molecule for the uranium molecule is gold plus 42 hydrogen atoms

the correct elementary molecule for the plutonium is gold plus 48 hydrogen atoms

the elementary molecule is a type of atom bonding that is at tightest level. in an elementary molecule the hydrogen atoms are contain within the electro magnetic field lines(orbits) of the gold atom. So it reacts as an element and appears to be one atoms due to the tightness of the bonding between the gold atom and the hydrogen atoms

in a uranium and plutonium atomic bomb. The hydrogen atoms within the elementary molecules of uranium and plutonium are fused with the gold atom. Same as the fusion reaction on the sun. The enrichment of uranium to the levels of enrich uranium and to the level of plutonium. Is a process that forces Hydrogen atoms in the the electro magnetic fields(orbits) of the gold atom of uranium

The states of enrichment of uranium are define via the percentages of penetration or saturation as the uranium elementary molecule grows from
uranium = gold plus 42 hydrogen atoms
enrich uranium = gold plus 43 hydrogen atoms or
enrich uranium = gold plus 44 hydrogen atoms or
enrich uranium = gold plus 45 hydrogen atoms or
enrich uranium = gold plus 46 hydrogen atoms or
enrich uranium = gold plus 47 hydrogen atoms
plutonium = gold plus 48 hydrogen atoms

Uranium power technology is based on the fire created via two different types of uranium control rods. In this uranium power technology. the uranium power rods have the ability to create fire(infinite number of static electricity strikes within the blast area) within a matter body of heavy water.

The correct definition of atom splitting technology is atomic fusing technology

Atomic splitting technology is impossible as no force in the known universe in fine enough to cut the core of an atom(nucleus)