my care2
make a difference

community & fun

groups

get together & make a difference

 
 
Practice December 17, 2004 10:46 PM

I just wrote this for school. Please comment! Many like the idea of loyalty to humankind but complain that it seems “thin” or abstract. I have, over the years, evolved some practices that help support the growth of a cosmopolitan identity. (None of them have anything to do with travel, although that can be a good thing.) My list is not exhaustive; you will have different ideas. Most importantly, don’t do any of the things listed out of a sense of duty. Do them as a way of affirming yourself as a human being first and foremost. Seeing the Earth from space can be extremely powerful. If you don’t have an extra $10 million lying around, just find copies of The Home Planet by Kevin Kelley and Pale Blue Dot (the fully illustrated version) by Carl Sagan. Flip through them. Read the quotes. Read chapters 1 through 5 of Pale Blue Dot. Spend some time gazing at the photographs and paintings. Read chapter 1 again. Photocopy your favorite picture and put it on your wall or find a poster. You can also rent some videos. Powers of Ten is excellent for acquiring a sense of perspective. I’ve seen the IMAX film Space Station 3D at least three times; watch it and related movies. For more perspective and to build a larger story of yourself in the world, study the history of the Earth and Universe. There are many excellent books out there; Shadows of Forgotten Ancestors by Carl Sagan and Ann Druyan is one of my favorites. Put a geologic time scale poster on your wall. Learn about how carbon, nitrogen and other elements cycle through the biosphere and think about it when you eat, drink or even take a deep breath. Great books have been written about people’s attempts to overcome or deal with prejudice. Isaac Asimov’s Pebble in the Sky falls in the former category; Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird (which I read nine times while in high school) falls in the latter. Try mentally saying “human being beyond category” when you see somebody who makes you uncomfortable. Read science fiction. Find music that supports you; many people love “Imagine”. Meet people who are where you want to be or are trying to get there. Talk. Plan a ritual. And find practical things to do. As environmentalist Ed Abbey put it, “Sentiment without action is the ruin of the soul”.  [ send green star]
 
anonymous  December 22, 2004 11:38 AM

You can try too hard at these things. "Itinerary" is a word I kind of dread and it entered my mind whilst I was reading the above. It seemed far too prescriptive. You can devise and propose all the methods in the world for giving someone a more cosmopolitan perspective but it doesn't mean it will sink in, these things take time. Just as some people over do the holiday itinerary, seeing everything but appreciating nothing. I think it's important to find your own steps in appreciating a world perspective. It's more likely to come from unforced social interaction with people from other countries. I know people with five languages, an in depth knowledge of history from across the globe and yet still they have a narrow, nationally focused view of the world. Teaching can only take you so far at some point you got to start feeling it and make it part of your psyche. (To be fair, you did say: "don't do any of the things listed out of a sense of duty" but I'm not one to mince my words. For me having an international perspective is not a matter of choice it's who I am. It isn't about traveling but is most likely to result from living in more than one country at a formative age or having parents from different parts of the world. Once the international perspective is a part of you, you could, theoretically, never travel again and yet be international in a way someone who takes two exotic holidays a year might never understand. I grew up in Southern Spain and went to an international school. I had friends from all over the world and to be honest it was always the English that had moved out later that I found hardest to get on with. They expected you as someone from England to fit their mould. With my Swedish, Danish, Romanian, Syrian, Iranian friends I could make it up as I went along. I could "hybridise" my humour, mix things up more and basically be appreciated as myself rather than continually referenced back to the national model. I love humour but humour solely from one location can quickly seem cliched and hackneyed to me. Growing up as I did was such a blessing from the view point of evaluating everything. I live in England now but the downside to being an internationalist is I don't belong anywhere, I'm completely rootless. I often feel most at home with other rootless people. I wouldn't swap my perspective for anything though. I have met a few special people who have an international perspective who've never traveled. They have usually been mentally adventurous people that love new ideas who don't need the security of the familiar. (It helps of course if they live in a cosmopolitan city). They are great people and I'm glad to have some of them as friends. Also they have the added plus of having roots somewhere at the same time. Understanding the vagaries and subtleties of your immediate environment is not to be taken lightly. Sensitivity to your own cultural nuances can be a springboard to appreciating others across the world.  [report anonymous abuse]  [ accepted]
 
 December 27, 2004 11:20 PM

Hey, Wow, great response. I understand your concern but am simply trying to respond to some comments I hear fairly often about the abstractness or dryness of cosmopolitanism. It doesn't seem dry to me at all! You'd like reading "Nine Paths to Global Citizenship" by Doug McGill at http://www.worldbeyondborders.org/ninepaths.htm. I guess the stuff I wrote is a tenth path, one closely tied to seeing or imagining the Earth from above. I'm an immigrant (from Ukraine, then part of the Soviet Union) and spent 3 weeks in Austria and 3 months in Italy with my family when I was 6. This definitely influenced my views, but I think the collapse of the Soviet Union was more important. The land was still there, the people were still there, but the country was, all of a sudden, gone. If that doesn't teach you the difference between collective imagination and reality, nothing will. Learning that difference, important as it is, is different from coming to relate to humanity as a whole. It's hard to trace how that happened, but almost all the things I recommended to others happened to me, usually without any intent on my part to develop the identity that I did. Hope that makes sense.  [ send green star]
 
anonymous  December 29, 2004 5:27 AM

Not totally but it sounds brilliant Your origins are interesting and I liked your observation about the collapse of the Soviet Union. The bit that confuses me is "almost all the things I recommended to others happened to me". Are you referring to the influence of positive thought on our destiny here?  [report anonymous abuse]  [ accepted]
 
 December 29, 2004 11:42 AM

No, I was referring to the original post in this thread.  [ send green star]
 
 January 15, 2005 12:01 PM

I think you both have some great insights and ideas.

Like you, Jane, I love to read. Many do not. I know doctors who never read for pleasure.

I read those books. As a kid Pebble in the Sky influence me as I enjoyed the story.

The deep understanding came in my work as a critical care nurse caring for people and their families during times of crisis. The feelings between parent and child are at once complex and universal.

(By parent include adoptive parents both formal and not)

Music is a wonderful pleasure. I was once with a very stoic man until a song came on the radio. He sang along (in Hindi). Then told us through tears of his mother playing that song when he was little. By sharing that he helped us know and like him. He recently said, "I used to dislike Americans. But I like you ladies. (Those of us who work with him)

Empathetic eye contact or the touch of a hand transends language and culture.

Helping and accepting help can begin a friendship across so called cultural divisions.

Just a few thoughts. I've rarely been out of the US. Your perspectives are enlightening.

Honza - I wonder why you gained a more human rather than nationalise way of thinking than the other English students at your school.

 [ send green star]  [ accepted]
 
anonymous  January 15, 2005 2:34 PM

Welcome Kathy. To answer your question, it was because I had barely lived in Britain and had grown up in Southern Spain when tourism was still not overbearing. The English who came over in their teens had their satellite TV, their ex-pat communities and their British discotheques so they could in effect continue living in England with a better climate. Depressing really since the weather was the lesser bonus of living out there in my opinion. The Scandinavians and the Dutch in contrast were great assimilators and blended well with the Spanish community. I could probably also say that I'm a bit of a loner and not inclined to follow any tribal line but that would distract from the fact that Marbella circa 1986 had a great multicultural mix at my International College. Unfortunately all the students I was friendly with moved on to other countries, sometimes returning home and by the beginning of the 90's there were a lot of new to the coast English students who were still mentally living back in Britain and brought their parochial attitudes with them. I have been back to the college in the last two years and I can see evidence of shifting patterns. Sometimes a more cosmopolitan intake will lead to another great period like 1986 to 89. From what I saw the Naughties look like another golden period at my old college, so I'm not just chasing nostalgia.  [report anonymous abuse]  [ accepted]
 
  New Topic              Back To Topics Read Code of Conduct

 

This group:
Beyond Borders Circle
79 Members

View All Topics
New Topic

Track Topic
Mail Preferences


Copyright © 2009 Care2.com, inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved