Excellent Shane, I have another thread aboutthis with evidence also, this one has even more...
Yeah, the real clinchers for me were the Dad who laughed, then got "into character" for the press, followed by his posting memorials about his daughter days before the event, and the photo of the family, "victim" included, hanging with Obama. Sloppy. Very sloppy.
The Doctor was completely useless. Obviously didn't read his script enough.
But the worst part is, most of the places I've posted this, all I've been met with is people lashing out, calling it despicable that anyone would pretend this didn't happen, blah, blah, blah....and yet, not a one of them can say they were there, that they knew any of the families personally, nothing so far.
It's sad how up in arms people get, when they're just keeping up appearances, not willing to stick their necks out, not willing to give curiosity a chance.
I found it relieving, actually. Nobody shot? No one killed? All children likely alive and well? GREAT!!!!! Why anyone would rather wallow in sorrow over something that evidence is pointing to as a probable hoax is beyond me.
People cling to these illusions like flotsam in a hurricane sea. Normalcy bias, all the way.
yES, IN ONE OF THE VIDEOS i POSTED IN THE OTHER THREAD ABOUT THIS, CLEARLY EXPOSES THAT MAN AS AN ACTOR, FIRST HE WAS LAUGHING AND THEN HE GOT HIMSELF IN CHARACTER, SO OBVIOUS...SUCH A SCAM, IT IS SO OBVIOUS THIS WAS ALL ORCHESTRATED AS A PREAMBLE TO GUN CONTROL. AND OF COURSE, THEY WILL ALWAYS BE VICTIMS, THEY DO NOT CARE, DON'T THEY KILLED CHILDREN WEEKLY IN AFGHANISTAN AND EVERYDAY IN THIS COUNTRY WITH ABORTION...
Man, I'm getting FFFFFLLLLLLLLLAAAAAAACCCCCKKKKKKKKK for this one in other groups!
Some people are fairly objective, but a lot of people are lashing out without even considering the possibility. So frustrating. I'm done debating with them all. SOme claim they know people in the town, and such, and maybe there were actual casualties, after all. I hope not, but apparently there were. This does not mean that whoever was responsible wasn't put there on purpose in some way. This is all far too convenient. ANd yes, this video exposes a lot, in my opinion. That was some of the most pitiful acting I've seen. And I do like me some b-movies.
This post was modified from its original form on 16 Jan, 15:59
Amen and amen Rhonda, please e-mail me...
I wouldn't pretend to know what exactly happened at Sandy Hook, because I've invested all my energy since then learning about guns and gun politics, not "what happened." I do think that mass crime scenes with hundreds of people in the area have a lot to sort through, and one shouldn't jump to conclusions. People have some pretty good reasons to be running through the woods if they hear shooting. Wouldn't you want to get the hell away from whatever is going on? I haven't looked at the forensic evidence. I don't even know what forensic evidence is available to the public at this point.
The video does one thing truly obnoxious at one point, which caused me to turn it off. It lectures a man about how he's supposed to grieve. Don't ever do that to someone. Some people laugh, some people cry, some people fall silent, some people do all of the above at different times. If someone had the nerve to come up to my grieving family member and start lecturing them about how they're supposed to grieve, I'd give them about 1.5 seconds to back off. And if they pushed, frankly I'd deck 'em, and take my chances with the assault charge in front of a jury.
A month after 9/11 I was in an airport, headed for a cheap trip to Vegas because so many people were afraid to fly. I had heightened awareness of everyone's mood and disposition. I found myself profiling a man with a turban. Then I saw the Congressional style USA pin on his lapel, and I was ashamed that I had been thinking that way. Still I kept my eyes open for anything unusual. The most unusual guy I saw was a white man with a funny briefcase, not typical of the kinds of luggage people bring in airports. I sorta profiled him... by talking to him about "stuff." Guess why he looked odd? Because he had just come from a funeral, his brother's if I remember correctly. So I thought to myself, "Way to go dipshit" and stopped playing these games of second guessing people.
Actually I might not deck 'em. It's hard to know what I'd actually do in such circumstances. I've certainly had plenty of people "in my face" before where I did nothing but stand my ground and talk calmly, but I didn't have a family member to protect either. I know for fact I'd get physically between them, direct the family member to leave, and tell the asshole in no uncertain terms that he's not following. Maybe I would physically obstruct him. Maybe my verbal threat alone would be enough and the situation would end. If I were the kind of person to carry pepper spray, maybe I'd pepper spray 'em. Who knows. But I know I would not allow someone to continue torturing my grieving family member about "how they're supposed to grieve."
Why do people presume they can sit in their armchairs across the internet and just poke holes in everything? Where are the standards of evidence?
Well said Brandon. True critical thinking. Not jumping on the Conspriacy theory bandwagon.
"Like the family wouldn't print an obit. in the local paper??? "
BTW, Cam Vallee's family didn't. You have to payf ro those obits.
And here is Emilie Parker's obituary.
thanks Nancy for posting it...
Obama Signs 23 Gun Control Executive Orders
And Increases Funding To Psychotropic Drug Industry
Nancy of course the govt. would print an obit if it was a false flag. They sure failed on so many other levels though it's amazing to me more people are not questioning it.
It just doesn't pass the smell test."
Yes, and the families of 20 kids who now have no identity went along with it. Emilie Parker will never be Emilie Parker again. And all the funeral homes went along with it including one in Utah.
And yes, people are asking all kinds of questions. They are just reaching different conclusions.
This post was modified from its original form on 17 Jan, 8:40
YOu aren't wrong. What I said is that we reach different conclusions.
And BTW, I have found an obituary for every single Newtown victim that I havce checked. Haven't checked them all.
"So what are you asserting Nancy? That Emilie's dad is just crazy and inappropriate and that the picture of Emilie with Obama was photo shopped? I guess it's possible but hardly likely."
I have seen several threads totally debunking the idea that it was Emilie in the photo. Go do your research and find out about that.
Why would twenty families pretend their child is dead and have funerals and obituaries? Thnik about that. The identity previously known as Emilie Parker is now dead. Does she have a different name now? Is she with a different family> Why would a 6 yr old go along with this? Please explain.
It's possible that the shooting was real, but the Parker family was inserted into the mix as the unofficial "spokesmen" for the gov'ts push for gun control. When they interview real people on the news, they usually sound about as sharp as a bowling ball, let's face it.
So, the Parker family does their piece to put over the emotional toll of the event, horrifying America, priming us for acceptance of the stripping down of yet another cornerstone of what's left of the constitution and what makes America, America.