START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
Group Discussions
Obama's "forged" birth certificate
3 years ago

A recent ballot challenge hearing in New Jersey exposes a desperate strategy by Obama to distance himself from his forged certificate and induce the contrived value of his transient political popularity as the only “legitimate qualification” needed to hold the office of the presidency.

By Dan Crosby of THE DAILY PEN
Editor: Penbrook Johannson

Thursday, April 12, 2012

NEW YORK, NY – After a Maricopa County law enforcement agency conducted a six-month forensic examination which determined that the image of Obama’s alleged 1961 Certificate of Live Birth posted to a government website in April, 2011 is a digital fabrication and that it did not originate from a genuine paper document, arguments from an Obama eligibility lawyer during a recent New Jersey ballot challenge hearing reveals the image was not only a fabrication, but that it was likely part of a contrived plot by counterfeiters to endow Obama with mere political support while simultaneously making the image intentionally appear absurd and, therefore, invalid as evidence toward proving Obama’s ineligibility in a court of law.

Taking an audacious and shocking angle against the constitutional eligibility mandate, Obama’s lawyer, Alexandra Hill, admitted that the image of Obama’s birth certificate was a forgery and made the absurd claim that, therefore, it cannot be used as evidence to confirm his lack of natural born citizenship status. Therefore, she argued, it is “irrelevant to his placement on the ballot”.

Hill went on to contort reasoning by implying that Obama needs only invoke his political popularity, not legal qualifications, in order to be a candidate.

At the hearing, attorney for the plaintiffs, Mario Apuzzo, correctly argued that Obama, under the Constitution, has to be a “natural born Citizen” and that he has not met his burden of showing that he is eligible to be on the New Jersey primary ballot by showing that he is indeed a “natural born Citizen.” He argued that Obama has shown no authenticate evidence to the New Jersey Secretary of State demonstrating who he is and that he was born in the United States. Apuzzo also argued that as a matter of law, Obama is not a “natural born Citizen” because he was born to a father who was not a U.S. citizen.

As Obama’s legal argument becomes more contorted, he is being forced to avoid an ever shrinking legal space, and an increasing weight, of his failure to meet constitutional eligibility requirements. 

Hill, of Genova, Burn & Giantomasi Attorneys in Newark, made a desperate motion to dismiss the ballot objection arguing that Obama’s lack of natural-born citizenship status was not relevant to being placed on the New Jersey presidential ballot because no law exists in New Jersey which says that a candidate’s appearance on the ballot must be supported by evidence of natural born citizenship status. Only the U.S. constitution restricts eligibility to hold the office of president to natural born citizens.

 

more here:  http://www.teapartytribune.com/2012/04/13/obama-lawyer-admits-forgery-but-disregards-image-as-indication-of-obamas-ineligibility-damage-control/

3 years ago

I saw that and just wondered, If Anrnold Schwarzeneggar wanted to become President, could he just say that he really isn't German, it was just a guize so that he could get into the movies as a foreign actor and make better money.

Then he could go down to Mexico, and for just a couple of hundred bucks, he could get a California birth certificate from a hospital that no longer exists, (or never did) and then he could run for office because it doesn't make any difference anymore as to what the U S Constitution says, and who cares anyway???

I know I'm being sarcastic - but it just seems that the who HOUSE FULL OF POLITICIANS is CONDONING CRIMINAL ACTIVITY and TYRANNY without giving anything a second thought as to the consequences.

WHAT TO DO??????????????????

Jim

3 years ago

So now it is admitted that it is not legitimate but that means because it is admitted it can't be used against him but do they forget that means he still has not submitted a valid birth certificate so we are at square one that says, without proof, he cannot appear on the ballot or run for president.  Hmmm, nice try but this does not cut the mustard.

This thread is archived. To reply to it you must re-activate it.