START A PETITION37,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
Group Discussions
Obama Threatens Fox News and Rush Limbaugh
5 years ago


In a sycophantic interview with 
The New Republic, conducted by former campaign staffer Chris Hughes and leftist writer Franklin Foer, President Obama suggested that he had all the answers to the pressing issues facing America and therefore no compromise was necessary with Republicans. He added that Republicans should compromise. And if those Republicans don’t compromise, Obama suggested that the fault would lie at the feet of Fox News and Rush Limbaugh – and that the calculus had to be changed to force Fox News and Limbaugh to stop holding Republicans accountable to conservatism.

Here’s Obama on how he’s going to fix the country:

The truth is that most of the big issues that are going to make a difference in the life of this country for the next thirty or forty years are complicated and require tough decisions, but are not rocket science. We know that to fix our economy, we've got to make sure: that we have the most competitive workforce in the world, that we have a better education system, that we are investing in research and development, that we've got world-class infrastructure, that we're reducing our health care costs, and that we're expanding our exports. On issues like immigration, we have a pretty good sense of what's broken in the system and how to fix it. On climate change, it's a daunting task. But we know what releases carbon into the atmosphere, and we have tools right now that would start scaling that back, although we'd still need some big technological breakthrough. So the question is not, Do we have policies that might work? It is, Can we mobilize the political will to act?

Despite the fact that Obama’s policies have been abysmal failures on virtually every front, the question for Obama is not what to do, but how to swindle the American people into doing it. And Obama said he would not be focusing on how to get things done in Washington, D.C.; instead, he’d be attempting to drum up public support on every issue. Obama then compared himself to Lincoln for such tactics:

I always read a lot of Lincoln, and I'm reminded of his adage that, with public opinion, there's nothing you can't accomplish; without it, you're not going to get very far. And spending a lot more time in terms of being in a conversation with the American people as opposed to just playing an insider game here in Washington is an example of the kinds of change in orientation that I think we've undergone, not just me personally, but the entire White House.

But what of his Republican opposition? That opposition, said Obama, has to be forced to embrace his positions:

And I think if you talk privately to Democrats and Republicans, particularly those who have been around for a while, they long for the days when they could socialize and introduce bipartisan legislation and feel productive. So I don't think the issue is whether or not there are people of goodwill in either party that want to get something done. I think what we really have to do is change some of the incentive structures so that people feel liberated to pursue some common ground. One of the biggest factors is going to be how the media shapes debates. If a Republican member of Congress is not punished on Fox News or by Rush Limbaugh for working with a Democrat on a bill of common interest, then you'll see more of them doing it.

How, exactly, will Obama achieve changing that incentive structure, exactly? Fox News and Rush Limbaugh are a free press. But according to Obama, that media must apparently be curbed. The media on the left, however, need not be curbed, because “more left-leaning media outlets recognize that compromise is not a dirty word.”

This is nothing new from a thuggish administration that has vocally derided Rush Limbaugh repeatedly, pushed secondary boycotts of Limbaugh through its extragovernmental allies, and targeted Fox News as illegitimate for daring to question The One’s agenda. But with Obama’s re-election, he obviously feels that his cross-hairs can be safely placed on his media opposition.


5 years ago

I remember when Axelrod and Rahm made the rounds saying that Fox is not a legitimate news outlet. And then had the audacity to tell 'legitimate' news media to dismiss FOX. ( mind control, mein kampf ).
Bush faced attacks from everyone BUT FOX. And even they asked tough questions to his administration. I don't recall Bush ever whining.
Liberals are big, whiny, controlling babies.

If you can't beat, silence them.

5 years ago

This is Obama's attempt to destroy everything "republican" in his way.   Obama expects 100% cooperation to get his socialist agenda crammed down our throats over the next four years.


However, Obama is forgetting something very important:   47% OF AMERICANS DID NOT VOTE FOR HIM IN EITHER ELECTION.

5 years ago

Right now he reminds me of Hitler, actually.  He has those that are challenging him and fighting back.  If allowed to fully establish his plan, he will then become Stalin; either way, he has to go.

5 years ago

Actually it was more than 47% didn't vote for Dear Leader since there were a fair number of people that just didn't vote at all for one reason or another. However, this just another move to kill all opposition to King Barack the Worst and his Demagogues. They are working in all areas right now to push every segment of their agenda and to push everyone who disagrees with them in one or more issue. We have the gun grab, the radical appointments, the continued illegal actions by agencies like the NLRB and Consumer Protection, push of the gay agenda in all areas, push for women in combat, legislation like Sandy relief that has pork, "immigration reform", more moves from HHS and ObamaCare, more stonewalling on Benghazi, education standards "reform" (that one is moving stealthily along), cuts in military spending and vet benefits, pushing arms to various islamic groups in the Middle East and North Africa, more tax increase talk in the Senate and from the administration, more action on "global climate whatever" by executive action if required, and now attacking football just for starters that are designed to divide and/or overwhelm the opposition.

5 years ago

John, I could not believe that Obama is now going to criticize the NFL, but he sure did.  He is hitting below the belt now, LOL.  I am an avid football fan, have been my whole life thanks to my Father; not much choice if that is what we watched; baseball and football and Westerns. But seriously, the only reason he is speaking out is that he is too whimpy to play the sport.  

Now I will be serious; I for one feel that Congress holding hearings on steroids is ridiculous; it is not something that should be taking Congressional time and energy; let the sports leagues and doctors fight this one out and do their own penalizing for abuse. So, again we find the Government, through the President, trying to interfere with football.  Let the NFL, Coaches and players argue this one out and work it out; it does not need the voice or interference of the President; he is to be getting a budget prepared, not worrying about whether football is too violent or not.  Does anyone else feel or see how ridiculous this is?

This thread is archived. To reply to it you must re-activate it.

New to Care2? Start Here.