Start A Petition
Group Discussions
Obama and the Counterrevolution
4 years ago

Just  before the 2008 presidential election, Barack Obama said, "We're five days away  from the fundamental transformation of the United States." Immediately after he  became president, Obama began fulfilling that prediction. Five-and-one-half  years later, the U. S. is well on the way toward becoming a European-style  welfare state, just as some European countries -- the latest being Holland --  are moving away from hideously expensive welfare-state programs. 

The  central government's budget consumes almost a quarter of the nation's Gross  Domestic Product, and ObamaCare means government takeover of another one-sixth  of our economy. Add state and local government spending to Washington, DC's  outlays, and the percentage of GDP now  going to the public sector tops 40. Once ObamaCare fully kicks in, well over  half of America's GDP will go in to the public till.

The  U.S. national deficit is over $17 billion, which is a tad more than 100% of GDP.  (If Congress votes to increase the national debt limit in October, the nation's  debt as a percentage of GDP will go up.)

The  Obamians are forging a hollow military, and the U.S. has become a laughingstock  in the international arena. America surrendered in Iraq and Afghanistan, "led  from behind" when Gaddafi was overthrown in Libya, could not, or would not,  protect its diplomatic facilities and personnel in Benghazi, stood by while  Vladimir Putin seized center stage on the issue of chemical weapons in Syria,  and cannot, or will not, prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons. Yes, the  U.S. -- employing tools developed during George W. Bush's presidency -- killed  Osama bin Laden, and used drones to murder American citizens in Yemen, but the  nation faces a very bleak future given its much weakened military and lack of  backbone in the White House.

The  changes the Obamians have inflicted on America since January 20, 2009 are little  short of revolutionary -- absent the violence usually associated with profound,  rapid, alterations of a nation's socio-political order. This process is  sometimes referred to as a "silent revolution," and although it did not begin  with Obama -- some date it back to FDR's New Deal, others as long ago as the  presidencies of Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson -- it has been  substantially accelerated since Obama was first inaugurated.

We  may be seeing signs of a nascent counterrevolution against Obama and the  Obamians. The Tea Parties' emergence in 2009 and the Republican successes in the  2010 off-year elections may have been harbingers of a conservative swing in the  nation's mood.

Unhappily,  country club Republicans, who aspire to ally with the Democrat ruling class,  were able to blunt, and even somewhat reverse, gains made in 2010. 

After  a period of relative quiescence -- following Obama's reelection and Democrat  retention of the Senate in 2012 -- Tea Partiers and unaffiliated conservatives  appear once again to be on the march.


4 years ago

Obamacare  remains unpopular. The most recent poll (9-4-8/13) for the Pew Research Center  for The People & The Press shows that  53% of the respondents disapproved of Obamacare, 42% approved, and 5% said they  did not know. Several recent polls of "likely voters" by Rasmussen Reports also  show majorities (of varying size) dislike  this or that facet of Obamacare. Similarly, polls listed by  also show larger percentages dislike the law than like it.

During  the month of September, ten of the twelve major polling organizations listed by reported larger percentages disapproved of how Obama was  handling his job than approved. Not one of the twelve organizations that asked  for approval or disapprove of Obama's job performance found him "above water" in  September.

Virtually  all of the major polls listed by have shown him "below water"  throughout most of the summer. His job approval rating was last (barely) above  50% last May.

Although  most reelected presidents have a "honeymoon" period of several months after they  are reinaugurated, Obama appears to be an exception.

When  pollsters ask if people like or approve of Obama personally, his ratings are  generally higher than his job approval ratings, but recent polls listed by show slippage of opinions about him as a person. Some of us  have known for some time that Obama is not "a nice guy."

We've  already seen gun-grabbing Democrats in Colorado sent packing, and -- inspired by  Ted Cruz, Mike Lee, Rand Paul, and other conservatives in Congress -- the GOP  leadership has refused to fund Obamacare, at least for now. Looking ahead to  2016, the Republican "bench" is loaded with young talent. (Democrats seem to be  limited to Hillary Clinton [who will be 69] or Joe Biden [who will be  74].)

One  could point to polls plumbing other topics that also seem to show more public  backing for what most of us would recognize as "conservative" opinions. For now,  let just one suffice.

A  recent (9/4-8/13) poll conducted for the Pew Research Center asked the following  question: "If you had to choose, would you prefer a smaller government providing  fewer services, or a larger government providing more services?" Fifty-one  percent of the respondents opted for a smaller government, 40% wanted a bigger  one, two percent replied "it depends," and seven percent either said "don't  know" or refused to answer.

The  rightward tilt of responses to this query continues a pattern to public opinion  manifested on polls for Pew since 2009.

The  apparent public rejection of some of Obama's favorite policies isn't the first  time a sizable slice -- amounting probably to a majority -- of the populace  reacted against a Chief Executive's attempts to move America to the Left.


4 years ago

After  he was elected -- albeit with only 43% of the popular vote -- Bill Clinton  sought to govern from the Left. (Remember "Hillarycare?") After the GOP captured  both houses of Congress in the 1994 off-year elections, Clinton grudgingly  tacked to the center, and began the Dick Morris-inspired practice of  "triangulation," designed to locate the Clinton Administration between the  Democrat Left and the Republican "Right." Clinton went so far as to declare "the  era of big government is over" during his State-of-the-Nation address in 1996.  After vetoing it twice, Clinton reluctantly signed the Newt Gingrich-inspired  welfare reform bill in 1996.

Clinton's  shift toward the political center helped get him reelected in 1996, although --  again -- with less than 50% of the popular vote.

So  far, Obama displays no political dexterity à la Clinton. Rather, he has  continued rigidly to cling to ultra Left-wing policies. (Is Obama a "bitter  clinger?") During the run-up to the imbroglio over congressional passage of the  latest Continuing Resolution, and during the ensuing government shutdown, Obama  has used the most uncivil language to characterize conservatives generally, and  Tea Partiers specifically.

In  retrospect -- like him or not -- Clinton should be viewed as a crafty  politician, one who "knows when to hold 'em, and knows when to fold 'em."  (Clinton makes my skin crawl, but give the devil his due.)

Obama  is a rigid ideologue, wedded to his ultra Left-wing view of the world, and  completely unwilling to compromise. And the U.S. is stuck with him until January  20, 2017.

It  is absolutely essential that he be turned into a lame  duck.


Read more: Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

This thread is archived. To reply to it you must re-activate it.

New to Care2? Start Here.