my care2
make a difference

community & fun

groups

get together & make a difference

 
 
This thread is archived. To reply to it you must re-activate it.
Will new executive pay rules cause a brain drain? October 22, 2009 7:46 PM

NEW YORK – The Obama administration's decision to cut the pay of top executives at companies on taxpayer life support will help quiet the popular outrage over excessive compensation. But it introduces a new concern: brain drain.

The 175 executives targeted by "pay czar" Kenneth Feinberg are not only the highest-paid but also considered among the most talented and productive. And competitors outside the restrictions are likely to woo them, recruiters and compensation expects say.

Losses like that could be devastating to the very companies the government spent so much money to save.

"These people are considered the brains of the machine. They are who can pull you through the tough times," said Steven Hall, who runs an executive compensation firm that bears his name. "This will give them reason to leave."

Feinberg announced Thursday that he has ordered seven companies that have received billions of dollars in taxpayer money to slash the base salaries of their top executives by an average of 90 percent and cut total compensation — cash, stock and perks — in half.

That applies to the five top executives and the next 20 highest-paid employees at Bank of America Corp., American International Group Inc., Citigroup Inc., General Motors, GMAC, Chrysler and Chrysler Financial.

Another 525 employees at the companies will also face new curbs on pay from Feinberg, but those details have not yet been released.

Those facing pay restrictions outside the executive suite hold leadership positions in areas like finance and investment banking at the banks, and in manufacturing, brand management and design at the auto companies.

They come with years of experience, whether it's making deals or overseeing car design. For example, Ford Motor Co., which is in far better shape than its two Detroit rivals, could lure auto executives who would be difficult for Chrysler and GM to replace.

"There will be a fallout," said Janice Reals Ellig, co-CEO of the executive search firm Chadick-Ellig. "Talent that is short-term-focused because they have big mortgages, college education payments and other things will feel more pressure to leave."

A Bank of America spokesman, Scott Silvestri, said competitors not subject to pay restrictions "already are exploiting this situation by identifying our top performers and using pay concerns to recruit them away for fair market compensation."

Feinberg, in speaking engagements over the last month, acknowledged the difficulty of balancing "conflicting principles" on pay: Compensation needed to be high enough to attract talent without rewarding risk.

But he also has to deal with Americans angry that their tax dollars have been used to save these companies. The Obama administration has blamed misplaced compensation incentives as one cause of the financial crisis.

Feinberg will limit cash salaries to $500,000. Executives who had been guaranteed certain compensation will have those payments made in company stock to be held over the long term.

Most other pay will also have to come in long-term stock awards, and executives won't be able to sell that stock until the company repays its bailout money. Incentive stock awards can only be paid if executives stick around for three years and the company pays back the government.

Feinberg also gets to sign off on any performance goals used as incentives.

The pay restrictions for all seven companies will also require any executive seeking more than $25,000 in special benefits — things such as country club memberships, private planes and company cars — to get permission for those perks from the government.

 [ send green star]
 
Part 2 October 22, 2009 7:47 PM

Feinberg did say exceptions were made "where necessary to retain talent and protect taxpayer interests." Base salaries above $1 million were approved for the new CEO of AIG, and for two employees of Chrysler Financial.

Under a package approved by Feinberg over the summer, AIG CEO Robert Benmosche will get a pay package of about $10.5 million.

Competitors of all seven companies that have repaid bailout money are free to pay whatever they want — although the Federal Reserve did propose Thursday to monitor executive pay at thousands of banks.

Goldman Sachs, which paid back its $10 billion in government bailout funds in June, has set aside $16.7 billion for compensation and benefits so far this year, on track for a record.

"People who produce the top revenues will always be in demand. They will always be wanted," said recruiter Danny Sarch, president of Leitner Sarch Consultants in White Plains, N.Y. "That's just capitalism."

 [ send green star]
 
Personal comment October 22, 2009 8:07 PM

What we need is to level the playing field for ALL companies, whether bailed out by the government or not. So we really need to do two things to make that possible.

  1. Abolish the minimum wage. It was intended to prevent the exploitation of workers, but it actually hurts the working class by limiting the ability of businesses to hire and keep employees. It is far better to have over 99% of workers employed at $3.00 an hour than it is to have only 80% of those workers employed at $7.00 an hour. With the minimum age, there is a gap between the employed and the unemployed that wouldn’t exist otherwise (which makes government welfare programs more necessary than they would be otherwise). We never needed a minimum wage because in a truly free market, companies can compete for workers. If workers feel they are being paid less than they are worth, they can search for and find another company that may pay them more per hour.
  2. Establish a MAXIMUM wage. Many corporate CEOs and other executives so vastly overpay themselves that they actually are parasites on their own companies rather than leading them to prosperity. If their pay is limited, then the company can hire more workers, increasing production. More production results in a stronger economy.

The minimum wage in the United States is $7.25  per hour.  What if a corporate executive is paid about $200 an hour? Doesn’t that sound like a lot? No, not really.

 

A typical work day is about eight hours long. Thus he’d be paid about $1600 a day.

 

A typical work week is about five days long. Thus he’d be paid about $8000 a week.

 

A typical work year might be 50 weeks long. Thus he’d be paid $400,000 a year.

 

Assuming he works that job for a lifetime, about 50 work years, he earn a total of about $20,000,000.

 

That’s only $20 MILLION over his lifetime. Not billion. Just 20 million.

So how did we end up with so many billionaires? Because they used the economy unfairly to enrich themselves at eveyone else’s expense, LITERALLY! And that limits economic growth. These exectives became parasites on their own companies!

 

If you cut the pay of ALL these executives to a reasonable limit, then the company will be able to hire and pay more workers, increasing productivity.  Profits for the company will actually rise as a result.

 

And what benefits those companies benefits the rest of us.



This post was modified from its original form on 22 Oct, 20:12  [ send green star]
 
 October 28, 2009 11:44 PM

 

I think it is better to have less people working at a higher wage.

The Minimum Wage is a safety standard.

I also think we should have higher prices on goods. It has been the push towards obscenely low prices that allows for such low wages, poorer quality, poorer standards and a general drift down in standards, including towards humans.

As for pay for executives. Limits should have been put in the original law. Yet, also, those working in these positions should realize they should only get such high pay once they accomplish the job, not now when they are laying people off.

Laws should be made so that such bailouts do not occur again. There should be no 'too big to fail'.

As for talent, they might possess it, but some are the same that got us into the mess~ which is why they can get us out~ but is it really a talent?


 [ send green star]
 
  New Topic              Back To Topics Read Code of Conduct

 

This group:
The Nolan Chart
196 Members

View All Topics
New Topic

Track Topic
Mail Preferences


Copyright © 2009 Care2.com, inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved