The Unanimous
Declaration of Independence
made by the
Delegates of the People of Texas
in General Convention
at the town of Washington
on the 2nd day of March 1836.
When a government has ceased to protect the lives, liberty and
property of the people, from whom its legitimate powers are derived,
and for the advancement of whose happiness it was instituted, and so
far from being a guarantee for the enjoyment of those inestimable and
inalienable rights, becomes an instrument in the hands of evil rulers
for their oppression.
When the Federal Republican Constitution of their
country, which they have sworn to support, no longer has a substantial
existence, and the whole nature of their government has been forcibly
changed, without their consent, from a restricted federative republic,
composed of sovereign states, to a consolidated central military
despotism, in which every interest is disregarded but that of the army
and the priesthood, both the eternal enemies of civil liberty, the
everready minions of power, and the usual instruments of tyrants.
When, long after the spirit of the constitution has
departed, moderation is at length so far lost by those in power, that
even the semblance of freedom is removed, and the forms themselves of
the constitution discontinued, and so far from their petitions and
remonstrances being regarded, the agents who bear them are thrown into
dungeons, and mercenary armies sent forth to force a new government
upon them at the point of the bayonet.
When, in consequence of such acts of malfeasance and
abdication on the part of the government, anarchy prevails, and civil
society is dissolved into its original elements. In such a crisis, the
first law of nature, the right of self-preservation, the inherent and
inalienable rights of the people to appeal to first principles, and
take their political affairs into their own hands in extreme cases,
enjoins it as a right towards themselves, and a sacred obligation to
their posterity, to abolish such government, and create another in its
stead, calculated to rescue them from impending dangers, and to secure
their future welfare and happiness.
Nations, as well as individuals, are amenable for
their acts to the public opinion of mankind. A statement of a part of
our grievances is therefore submitted to an impartial world, in
justification of the hazardous but unavoidable step now taken, of
severing our political connection with the Mexican people, and assuming
an independent attitude among the nations of the earth.
The Mexican government, by its colonization laws,
invited and induced the Anglo-American population of Texas to colonize
its wilderness under the pledged faith of a written constitution, that
they should continue to enjoy that constitutional liberty and
republican government to which they had been habituated in the land of
their birth, the United States of America.
In this expectation they have been cruelly
disappointed, inasmuch as the Mexican nation has acquiesced in the late
changes made in the government by General Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna,
who having overturned the constitution of his country, now offers us
the cruel alternative, either to abandon our homes, acquired by so many
privations, or submit to the most intolerable of all tyranny, the
combined despotism of the sword and the priesthood.
It has sacrificed our welfare to the state of
Coahuila, by which our interests have been continually depressed
through a jealous and partial course of legislation, carried on at a
far distant seat of government, by a hostile majority, in an unknown
tongue, and this too, notwithstanding we have petitioned in the
humblest terms for the establishment of a separate state government,
and have, in accordance with the provisions of the national
constitution, presented to the general Congress a republican
constitution, which was, without just cause, contemptuously rejected.
It incarcerated in a dungeon, for a long time, one of
our citizens, for no other cause but a zealous endeavor to procure the
acceptance of our constitution, and the establishment of a state
government.
It has failed and refused to secure, on a firm basis,
the right of trial by jury, that palladium of civil liberty, and only
safe guarantee for the life, liberty, and property of the citizen.
It has failed to establish any public system of
education, although possessed of almost boundless resources, (the
public domain,) and although it is an axiom in political science, that
unless a people are educated and enlightened, it is idle to expect the
continuance of civil liberty, or the capacity for self government.
It has suffered the military commandants, stationed
among us, to exercise arbitrary acts of oppression and tyrrany, thus
trampling upon the most sacred rights of the citizens, and rendering
the military superior to the civil power.
It has dissolved, by force of arms, the state
Congress of Coahuila and Texas, and obliged our representatives to fly
for their lives from the seat of government, thus depriving us of the
fundamental political right of representation.
It has demanded the surrender of a number of our
citizens, and ordered military detachments to seize and carry them into
the Interior for trial, in contempt of the civil authorities, and in
defiance of the laws and the constitution.
It has made piratical attacks upon our commerce, by
commissioning foreign desperadoes, and authorizing them to seize our
vessels, and convey the property of our citizens to far distant ports
for confiscation.
It denies us the right of worshipping the Almighty
according to the dictates of our own conscience, by the support of a
national religion, calculated to promote the temporal interest of its
human functionaries, rather than the glory of the true and living God.
It has demanded us to deliver up our arms, which are
essential to our defence, the rightful property of freemen, and
formidable only to tyrannical governments.
It has invaded our country both by sea and by land,
with intent to lay waste our territory, and drive us from our homes;
and has now a large mercenary army advancing, to carry on against us a
war of extermination.
It has, through its emissaries, incited the merciless
savage, with the tomahawk and scalping knife, to massacre the
inhabitants of our defenseless frontiers.
It hath been, during the whole time of our connection
with it, the contemptible sport and victim of successive military
revolutions, and hath continually exhibited every characteristic of a
weak, corrupt, and tyrranical government.
These, and other grievances, were patiently borne by
the people of Texas, untill they reached that point at which
forbearance ceases to be a virtue. We then took up arms in defence of
the national constitution. We appealed to our Mexican brethren for
assistance. Our appeal has been made in vain. Though months have
elapsed, no sympathetic response has yet been heard from the Interior.
We are, therefore, forced to the melancholy conclusion, that the
Mexican people have acquiesced in the destruction of their liberty, and
the substitution therfor of a military government; that they are unfit
to be free, and incapable of self government.
The necessity of self-preservation, therefore, now decrees our eternal political separation.
We, therefore, the delegates with plenary powers of
the people of Texas, in solemn convention assembled, appealing to a
candid world for the necessities of our condition, do hereby resolve
and declare, that our political connection with the Mexican nation has
forever ended, and that the people of Texas do now constitute a free,
Sovereign, and independent republic, and are fully invested with all
the rights and attributes which properly belong to independent nations;
and, conscious of the rectitude of our intentions, we fearlessly and
confidently commit the issue to the decision of the Supreme arbiter of
the destinies of nations.
Richard Ellis, President
of the Convention and Delegate
from Red River.
Charles B. Stewart
Tho. Barnett
John S. D. Byrom
Francis Ruis J. Antonio Navarro
Jesse B. Badgett
Wm D. Lacy
William Menifee
Jn. Fisher
Matthew Caldwell
William Motley Lorenzo de Zavala
Stephen H. Everett
George W. Smyth
Elijah Stapp
Claiborne West
Wm. B. Scates
M. B. Menard
A. B. Hardin
J. W. Burton
Thos. J. Gazley
R. M. Coleman Sterling C. Robertson
James Collinsworth
Edwin Waller
Asa Brigham
Geo. C. Childress
Bailey Hardeman
Rob. Potter Thomas Jefferson Rusk
Chas. S. Taylor
John S. Roberts
Robert Hamilton
Collin McKinney
Albert H. Latimer
James Power Sam Houston
David Thomas
Edwd. Conrad
Martin Palmer
Edwin O. Legrand
Stephen W. Blount
Jms. Gaines
Wm. Clark, Jr.
Sydney O. Pennington
Wm. Carrol Crawford
Jno. Turner
Benj. Briggs Goodrich
G. W. Barnett
James G. Swisher
Jesse Grimes
S. Rhoads Fisher
John W. Moore
John W. Bower
Saml. A. Maverick (from Bejar)
Sam P. Carson
A. Briscoe
J. B. Woods
H. S. Kimble, Secretary
Hard to see, sorry, but the darker area is the orginal Republic.
The first Congress
of the Republic of Texas met on October 3, 1836, in a two-story building
that, before its designation as the Capitol building, was a grocery store.
The building had space to accomidate the 14 senators and 29 members of
Congress and, as such, was a marked improvement over the cramped quarters
at Washington-on-the-Brazos. In addition, the lawmakers had a printing
press, which greatly aided their ability to disseminate information.
At the meeting, the
Congress elected Sam Houston president and Mirabeau B. Lamar vice-president.
With a governing body intact, the next challange was to select a permanent
capital of Texas.
With news of the Texan victory at
San Jacinto, the Burnet government hastened to the battlefield
and began negotiations to end the war. On May 14 at Velasco, Texas
officials had Santa Anna sign two treaties, one public and one
secret. The public treaty ended hostilities and restored private
property. Texan and Mexican prisoners were to be released, and
Mexican troops would retire beyond the Rio Grande. By the terms
of the secret treaty, Texas was to take Santa Anna to Veracruz
and release him. In return, he agreed to seek Mexican government
approval of the two treaties and to negotiate a permanent treaty
that acknowledged Texas independence and recognized its boundary
as the Rio Grande.
Congress approved
the issuance of paper money and, on June 9, 1837, authorized $500,000
in promissory notes bearing 10 percent interest and redeemable
in twelve months.
[send green star]
National defense and frontier protection also claimed
Houston's attention. Threats of a Mexican invasion and the fear
of Indian raids kept the western counties in turmoil. Congress
passed several acts dealing with frontier defense.
In the Texas presidential race of 1844, Vice President
Edward Burleson faced Secretary of State Anson Jones, who had
the support of Houston. Jones won by a large vote. After he was
inaugurated on December 9, he launched a policy of economy, peaceful
relations with the Indians, and a nonaggressive policy toward
Mexico.
As his administration also tackled the issue of annexation,
Jones earned the sobriquet "Architect of Annexation."
He, Houston, and their supporters knew that proper timing was
essential in securing annexation. Upon taking office, Jones instructed
Isaac Van Zandt,qv Texan chargé d'affaires to the United States, to decline
all offers to negotiate an annexation treaty until it was known
that the United States Senate definitely would ratify it. When
President John Tyler reopened negotiations on annexation, Mexico
became friendly to Texas.
President Tyler, a Whig with Southern
views on slavery, had indicated in October that he wanted to open
discussions leading to the annexation of Texas by treaty. An annexation
treaty was completed on April 12, 1844, and signed by Secretary
of State John C. Calhoun, Isaac Van Zandt, and Van Zandt's assistant,
J. Pinckney Henderson.
In his annual message on
December 2, he urged Congress to approve annexation by a joint
resolution, which Congress passed on February 28, 1845, and Tyler
signed on March 1. He then dispatched Andrew Jackson Donelson,qv a nephew of Andrew Jackson, to Texas with instructions to press
for its acceptance. The terms were generous. Texas would be annexed
as a slave state rather than as a territory. She would keep her
public lands and pay her own public debts. She could divide herself
into as many as four additional states. The terms of annexation
had to be accepted by January 1, 1846. In May 1845, the United
States dispatched a fleet of warships to protect the Texas coast.
The British chargé d'affaires and the French
minister asked President Jones to postpone action on the annexation
agreement for ninety days because they wanted to arrange a settlement
of matters between Mexico and Texas. Jones agreed to do so on
March 29. The British and French emissaries reached Mexico City
in mid-April. Luis G. Cuevas, minister of foreign relations, placed
their proposals before the Mexican Congress, and in late April
Mexico recognized Texas independence. The British minister handed
a copy of the document to Jones on June 4, and he immediately
announced a preliminary peace with Mexico. On the same day Jones
signed a peace treaty with the last Comanche chief whose tribe
had been at war with Texas, thus ending Indian hostilities for
the republic.
President Jones issued a call on May 5 for a convention
to be elected by the people to meet in Austin on July 4. At his
call, the Texas Congress assembled on June 16 in special session
at Washington-on-the-Brazos and rejected the Mexican offer for
peace. They accepted the annexation agreement and approved elections
for a convention. The convention met in Austin on July 4 and passed
an ordinance to accept annexation. It then drafted the Constitution
of 1845qv and submitted both the annexation agreement and proposed constitution
to a popular vote. On October 13 annexation was approved by a
vote of 4,245 to 257, and the constitution by a vote of 4,174
to 312. The United States Congress approved the Texas state constitution,
and Polk signed the act admitting Texas as a state on December
29, 1845.
Basically what it came down to was The Republic was too large, too sparsly populated, surrounded by hostile armies, and felt unable to defend itself. Not trusting the peace treaties with Mexico or Commanches to last, the leaders of Texas agreed to joining the United States. What the above copy of Texas history doesn't go into enough detail about is how much of the frontier population did not want annexation primarly due to distrust of U.S. govt and the slavery issue. For many Texans it is still an issue.
http://www.republic-of-texas.net/index2.shtml We, the people of the Republic of Texas by the grace and beneficence of Creator
God, do ordain and reestablish our nation's lawful position among the sovereign
nations of the earth in accordance with common law and the Law of Nations, and
by these articles do reestablish the government of the Republic of Texas in this
its Interim mode. This action formally dissolves the military rule that has existed
over Texas since 1865.
The people of the Republic of Texas shall promote freedom, peace, friendship,
and respect for all cultures and religions as private and sacred to all peoples.
It is to that end that we and our posterity are now committed.
[send green star]
this is the constitution writen and signed after joining becoming a part of the United States. i put in bold the text that deals with our being and independant state and self governing subject only to US consitution. to this day there are texans who hold to the ideal of being an independant state and think we should return to our own republic. CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF TEXAS.
PREAMBLE.(1876)
Humbly invoking the blessing of Almighty God, the people of the State of Texas do ordain and establish this Constitution.
ARTICLE I.
Bill of Rights.
That the general, great and essential principles of liberty and free government may be recognized and established, we declare:
This was always my favorite part of Texas History to teach. Kids love details, like Travis being a red-headed actor, and Lamar being an Indian-eradicating racist, who put a $100. bounty on their scalps, and now we call him the father of education, all the drunks...Give them the juicy stuff and they eat it up!
[send green star]
[
accepted]
you are a great teacher, understanding how kids learn. we need so many more like you in our kids schools.
i did horrible in school in the 60's esp history where teacher read straight from book, we had to memorize dates places names but they never seemed real. in college i got so lucky both in history and pol science courses. i got profs that didn't care about memorizing but by understanding cause and effect of events that shaped our world. history class consisted of prof telling us the "gossip" of people and times--it made them real and exciting. my pol science prof had been a page at white house so we got all kinds of inside gossip there. in both instances learning was so much easier.
made me a firm believer in teaching kids not rote memory things but by stories that bring history to life. not much has changed in the 20 yrs either, my youngest in fifth grade and i have to be the one to really teach her. she in turn tells the stories to her friends.
I quit teaching 2 years ago. I miss and love the kids, but admin here is more concerned with test scores and dress codes. I hope to go back to it one day, alternative school for at-risk, if I go back at all. I had few good teachers in public school, but some awesome ones in college. I had a Civil War history teacher who had us marching in regiments and firing muskets, that ruled!
[send green star]
[
accepted]
have you thought about the new virtual schools for home schooled kids? some of them are pretty cool. actual teaching with web cam hook ups. everytime i get mad at our local school i check into them for my 5th grader. though she is so social i never really go through with it. i did home school my 26yr old from jr high on. just you have such a talent and gift. and sounds like you miss it.
[send green star]