An article in the Washington Post On Faith section in response to their question: Hamas leaders claim that their understanding of Islam makes Israel's survival a theological and moral impossibility. What's your response to that? How should Israel respond? How should other Muslims respond?
To some extent we have all fallen prey to the overblown, semi-hysterical notion of a war on terror. As soon as ideology entered into the picture, truth suffered at the hands of the right-wing agenda. In the same vein, Hamas has become part of the competing agendas of Israel and the Arab world. The oil-producing countries could have alleviated the grinding poverty in Gaza and the West Bank using a fraction of their oil profits annually. Instead, the Palestinian conflict has been cynically used as a tool of anti-Semitism and a sop to the Arab street, which likes nothing better than an enemy to be inflamed against. For its part, Israel plays the card of being a beleaguered state threatened by remorseless enemies -- many commentators notice how well timed Israel's actions are with upcoming elections. A weak government in Tel Aviv likes nothing more than a show of force against the enemy to bring the nation to its side.
Several truths have been buried beneath these crisscrossing agendas.
1. Hamas has no power to destroy Israel. 2. Moderate Arabs and almost all Sunnis are opposed to Hamas's politics. 3. The deeper issue is about Iran and its desire to become a dominant force in the Middle East by backing Shia extremists. 4. The Palestinian question will ultimately be solved through politics and economics, not war. 5. Tolerating the intolerant is a chronic problem in every society and every age. It must be managed as best as society can, the way it deals with crime and drugs, the other chronic ills.
Making Hamas into a unique demon is pure propaganda. They owe their slim power to two things: the untold misery of life in the Palestinian territories, which fans rebellion at its most extreme, and the sufferance of Israel and the Arab world, together who could bypass Hamas and reach meaningful accords without them. If both parties, with the help of the U.S., went on with the business of peace, Hamas would prove manageable in the short run and would disappear in the long run.
But no form of Islamic extremism will end until moderate Muslims stand up for their religion. The rich Arab countries feel that they can afford to bribe the terrorists to leave them alone, or to suppress them with secret police and the army should they get out of hand. Poor Muslim countries have little ability to cure the endemic poverty and ignorance that is the seedbed of terrorism. The only solution is long-term and self-generated. No one can extirpate extremism from without. The U.S. and its global allies can only police the problem for the foreseeable future.
It's a sobering development in our own society that the religious right was able for almost thirty years to leverage its intolerance into power -- and a deep shame that so-called moderate Republicans enabled them. So we cannot afford to be self-righteous in this matter. The burden of a civilized society is to tolerate the intolerant. There are limits, of course, and Hamas pushes against those limits outrageously. The undeniable fact is that Israel is seen by the entire Arab world as an extension of European imperialism. The West created Israel by fiat in 1948 without consulting the Arabs. That insult fuels long-held resentments about their own colonial past in many countries. For this there is no outside cure, either. Islam is being used to justify eternal grudges, and not just by the extremists.
In the end, every religion must tend to its own beliefs. Thirty years ago the West was caught off guard when the Shah of Iran, a symbol of modernized, Western-facing progress, was overwhelmed by the tide of anti-modernist, Western-hating reactionaries. We have never recovered from that shock, nor have we remotely solved the problem. The West marches on. India and China join in. But Islam massively holds out for an anti-future, and it can back up its medieval delusions with oil riches and suicide martyrs. This is the prevailing situation that's being handled globally while we wait for Muslims to find their own tipping point in favor of a realistic tomorrow instead of fatal nostalgia for the past.
Saturday January 10, 2009, 4:19 am
The most popular verse quoted is the fabled Verse of the Sword: "Fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them: seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war)." (9:5) On the surface, this verse seems to confirm Islam's perceived intolerance of non-Muslims. It may even lead one to conclude that all the talk about Islam being a religion of "peace" is a ruse, and that the real Islam is the violent, repressive faith practiced by Osama bin Laden and the Taliban.
But hold on. The truth is quite different from what these Islam's attackers want us to believe.
Wednesday April 1, 2009, 10:49 am
The notion that peace can or should be a matter for US oversight reminds me of having the fox watch over the henhouse. If the US (govt) wanted peace in that zone, there "would be" peace in that zone. This unrest, just as many other situations of unrest, war, and genocide, are just fine with the US as long as it contributes to the often unspoken goals and agendas of the US.
Perhaps this is a place to also state that the notion that there is no self to change, has woven into it a key ideological undertone toward government and other power structures. Nevertheless, the self cannot be changed, for it is whole, and thus already complete...and being non-separate, has no means for change.
Behavioral choices and the ideologies that drive them are very changeable; however willingness to do so is required. Such willingness arises from the self and does so only as the self sees itself as it is, rather than as a separated self among many, perhaps relating to an alledgedly higher idea called Self.
Much more than thinking for oneself (which is a good first step in the interim), is the matter of knowing oneself...which does not require nor even include thought. We fail to notice that every single choice, without exception, is an action against (not for). Since the self is whole, and thus there being nothing other than this, any mental action against is reflected in the psyche as action against self. Unrest in any region, unrest in any group, or unrest in any individual...can only be alleviated from partaking of rest (where unrest is absent), which is directly equivalent to knowing the self. This can be assisted, but not taught.
So-called freedom of choice is oft cited as important, and yet freedom not to choose is ignored and denegrated. Just the same, at the root of absolutely every instance of unrest, of every situation of unrest, and of every intolerant tragedy...is choice. We are taught that we must make better choices, but mostly we are completely unaware that all choices are the problem itself. A choice to do is an extension of a thought to do, which thought resides in separation ideation. Not doing is denegrated by thought, for thought is the mental covering which prevents noticing that we know, and could consciously know. (Note that not choosing is not a choice, but a quiet observational resting "from choice.") At the point at which one notices that one knows, that which is noticed as known...is found to be peace, and thus becomes that which is shared. Thinking and choosing, always denies and deprives that which is chosen against. On the surface, that seems desirable...but it embeds in the psyche as being against the self. The idea that peace will be found through politics and economics, completely sidesteps the simple fact that both of these are symtoms and tools used to create and perpetuate the disparity and conflict in the first place. These are systematic choosing...and are always against.
So am I saying "don't choose"? No...our habit quite well prevents such a "choice." One can start today, noticing the self as it is. That does not mean thinking about it, feeling about it, reviewing and rationalizing its behavior (good or otherwise). To look brings noticing. To notice opens the attention (if we allow it to by not choosing). To have open attention while noticing the self, brings realization of existent knowledge of self (i.e.-knowing). To know confronts thought, belief, feeling, and situational perception...causing these and their power and reliance structures to weaken, in order to allow knowing its rightful place. When knowing has, by attrition, superseded these, effectively washing them away, there is no longer anything left in conflict. Knowledge of self is knowledge of peace, and peace begets peace. Nonviolence is simply a byproduct of being fully cognizant of one's own reality. This cannot be mass produced, but as each one notices, and smiles, it is shared...for all recognize its signature.
Wednesday May 27, 2009, 3:12 pm
Dr Chopra,
How often have we awakened from an unpleasant dream, a terrifying dream, to discover anew the reality in which we really do exist? It seems to me that we are inured to sleepwalking a primitive pasture... to interpret everything that commands our attention into over-simplified excuses for the very Mental sicknesses that will continue to afflict us. We are for the most part BLIND to anything that is not part of the easy conventional wisdom to which we are accustomed. We have multiple issues which might be seen as problems. We also are controlled by institutional ideals which interfere with good reasoning because of our reluctance to discard nonsensical ideas of how we should apply these assets of knowledge to arrive at a better state of affairs between factions and create the Peace we love to envision. What have Politics to do with the innate nature of human beings to flock together or to disagree with each other as to what kind of society is best? Why has religion and pageantry become the most common 'excuse' for any negotiation of the wellbeing of any segment of humanity? It seems that a true desire for Peace should have proposed a feasible platform upon which to negotiate it; and, what is wrong with common respect for humanity and simple reverence for the principles and safety of familial brotherhood, the supreme value of LIFE? Religion...which organized ancient Tribal culture into a cohesive Unit instead of an abstract residue of blind superstition and fear is good, if it is not sated with the drunken somnolence that keeps us living in the past like collections of bumbling ghouls perpetuating obsolete notions. Polity in its turn, which sprang from Religion, defined methods and rules; laws, which were designed to protect the organized community and educate us all to the reality of Humanity's nascent quality of interdependence. I like your proposal for Peace in the Middle East and other places, but it lacks a format for its application. I could join ranks with anyone as deeply thoughtful as are you.... May I?
Alternative Medicine is
Mainstream Medicine
Deepak Chopra - January
09, 2009
Co-authored by Dean
Ornish, Rustum Roy and
Andrew Weil
In mid-February, the
Institute of Medicine of
the National Academy of
Sciences and the
Bravewell Coll...
Deepak Chopra interviewed
by Gotham Chopra on MTV
(Part 1)
Intent - January 06,
2009
Deepak Chopra takes on a
one-on-one interview with
his son, Gotham, and gets
to the bottom of youth
culture in India, China
and the Middle East.
Dear Mr. Obama,
It’s Time For a
Peace Plan That Works
Deepak Chopra - January
05, 2009
Israel's massive assault
on Gaza is the worst sort
of déjà vu
all over again. As news
commentators wearily
point out that the
Israeli-P...
YOU HAVE KILLED
YOU HAVE STOLEN
YOU HAVE DESTROYED.
DEVOURER OF LIVES
DEVOURER OF SOULS
YOU ARE DEFEATED!
ROAR O LION OF JUDAH
PROCLAIM YOUR VICTORY!
CHILDREN OF ADAM
BEHOLD...
BEHOLD THY SALVATION.
FOR GREAT IS THE DAY OF
THE LORD.
TURN AND FOLLOW...
ANOTHER BODY ON AN EMPTY
STREET.
NO WAVE OF FLAGS FOR THIS
CHILD.
NO RED WHITE AND BLUE.
NO STREETS LINED WITH
MOURNERS.
NO DRUM BEAT OR TRUMPET
CALL.
NO RED FLOWERS OR
WREATHS.
NO MOMENTS SILENCE OR
VIGIL MASS.
WORST OF ALL:
NO FAITH
NO HOPE
NO LOVE...
Sean Goldman is still in
Brazil! Please make sure
that you have signed the
petition demanding the
return of this child to
his father. Currently,
the petition has over
55,000 signatures but
needs as much support as
possible.
click here
Also, please v...
Posted via email from
soulhangout’s
posterous
addthis_url =
'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.soulhan
gout.net%2Fto-question-or
-not-to-question-that-is-
the-answer%2F';
addthis_title =...
[[ This is a content
summary only. Visit my
website for full...
The author is Professor
Robert Watson of Lynn
University who was
once a writer for the New
York Times.
Professor Watson writes:
Hi friends,
I am always being asked
to grade Obama's
presidency. In place of
offering him a grade, I
put togethe...
Blog: AP IMPACT: A stream of WH health care visits by HM S.
(0 comments
|
discussions
)
— WASHINGTON -- President
Barack Obama's top aides
met frequently with
lobbyists and health care
industry heavyweights as
his administration pieced
together a national
health care overhaul,
according to White House
visitor records obtained
Wednesday by ... more
Blog: Activist group posting 573,000 9/11 pager messages by HM S.
(0 comments
|
discussions
)
— NEW YORK -- An activist
group has begun posting
573,000 pager messages
purportedly sent on Sept.
11, 2001, from "Second
World Trade Center tower
collapses" to "I'm ok
& love
you..xoxoxoxoxoxoxoxox." more
Blog: More remains found at home of missing Calif. teen by HM S.
(0 comments
|
discussions
)
— HEMET, Calif. --
Investigators found more
charred human remains at
the home of one of two
missing Southern
California boys as a
third teen turned up safe
Wednesday. more