Joanna D made a post on my petition in a group she is in and it negatively commented on my petition telling people not to sign. Because the petition was to ban gas chambers in my local shelter. It promotes injection over gas chambers. In my opinion no animal should be killed however if shelters must do it than it must be more humane than multiple dogs in a gas chamber waiting to inhale enough gas to finally die while their brain is telling the not to breathe and try to escape they are in a fight against certian death. I couldn't even imagine the horror. I don't want any to be killed but injection is much more humane and I would choose injection over a filled chamber, I'm sure you would too. My Goal with the petition was to stop the gassing and make the killing humane. Which in my county and state it is a miracle it passed and they banned the chamber. Our AC director is a manufacturer of the chambers and makes tons of money from them and trainning classes. So winning the ban was a huge win. And no one should have told anyone not to sign it who really loves animals, anyone should have realized that injection is better than gas. If you read my profile you'll know I'm against all killing. I'm just realistic in the fights I choose and when I choose them.
Joanna D Your actions could have caused this anti-gas law to not have happened, meaning you in part would have been responsible for more torturous deaths. Good thing I wasn't the only one in my area who cared and we got it passed, no thanks to people like Joanna D. who call themselves animal lovers but make posts telling people not to sign b/c my petition wasn't against injection as well. To you Joanna D one fight at a time. I realize what realistic goals are in my community and state. I you were a dog and had to choose gas chamber with multi dogs or a quick injection and quick death instead of a drawn out horrific death what would it be???