People
>
Care2 Share
>
's Sharebook
>
idiot misogynistic assholes want to withhold the cure for cancer fromwomen because itmight make them "promiscuous"
CALLS to make a world-first cervical cancer drug available to girls as young as nine have been criticised because of fears it would promote teenage promiscuity.
Trials of the vaccine, developed over 15 years by Australian of the Year Ian Frazer, showed it to be 100 per cent effective in protecting women against infection with four strains of human papilloma virus that together cause 70 per cent of cervical cancers.
But experts concede it raises sensitive issues because it cannot cure existing HPV infections and, for maximum effectiveness, it has to be given before women first become sexually active. As a result it is likely to be recommended for girls aged nine to 15.
The vaccine already has the backing of John Howard but Nationals senator Barnaby Joyce said MPs should be allowed to debate its "social implications".
Honouring Professor Frazer this week, the Prime Minister said he would discuss with federal Health Minister Tony Abbott making the vaccine, to be marketed under the brand name Gardasil, available to young women across Australia.
"We are looking at the implications of that and I expect to be talking to Mr Abbott about it quite soon," Mr Howard said.
The vaccine's maker, CSL, lodged an application last month to allow the sale of the vaccine in Australia with the Therapeutic Goods Administration. The TGA will consider the issue in June.
If approved, it could be available privately in the second half of this year at an expected cost of up to $400 for a three-dose course.
An application for a Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme subsidy would be likely shortly afterwards.
But Senator Joyce said the decision whether to approve the vaccine should not be left to the TGA because "they will talk about the therapeutic aspects - they are not there to talk about the psychological implications or the social implications".
"There might be an overwhelming (public) backlash from people saying, 'don't you dare put something out there that gives my 12-year-old daughter a licence to be promiscuous'," he said.
Senator Joyce - who has four daughters - said he would be "personally very circumspect" about giving such a vaccine to girls who were too young to cope with the potential consequences of sexual activity.
But others said young women should not be denied a life-saving vaccine.
Susan Robertson of Melbourne said she would not hesitate to give her three daughters the vaccine if it was shown to be safe.
"I don't see why parents would feel uneasy ... personally I would have absolutely no qualms protecting my daughters against anything that I could," she said.
Gerry Wain, director of gynaecological oncology at Sydney's Westmead Hospital - who also chairs CSL's advisory board on Gardasil - said statistics showed girls in Australia were now often sexually active at the age of 15 and parents were "putting their heads in the sand" to pretend otherwise.
"Sooner or later parents have to confront the fact their children will become sexually active ... no parent wants their children to die from cervical cancer," he said.
CSL's director of public affairs Rachel David said young children were already vaccinated against rubella - which can cause abnormalities in a developing fetus - "but we are not suggesting they will go and become pregnant".
"Vaccination is something we have adjusted to as a society - it's an important health measure," Dr David said.
Note this: cervical cancer is the only cancer that affects only women. If it affected men as well, Iam sure this discussion would not happen
Visibility:
Everyone
Posted: Thursday February 2, 2006, 2:01 pm Tags: [add/edit tags]
Thursday February 2, 2006, 2:19 pm
*swearing*
It's typical for the opponents of this potential life-saving vaccine to say something as retarded as 'Don't put something on the market that will allow my child to become promiscuous' and the hundreds of other assanine comments. If a person's child is likely to become promiscuous, vaccine or no vaccine, it has nothing to do with the availability of a cure. Why is it parents choose to absolve themselves of responsibility for how their children turn out?
Thursday February 2, 2006, 2:23 pm
Agreed Susan!!! Thats a great question btw.
This is totally insane!!!! I would rather my girls have the drug to help them live, i wouldn't really care about the side effects unless it harms their bodys ( do you know what i mean lol)
peace
thanks to Amanda at
www.pandagon.net for
thisSociety teaches that
children are made by men
and merely borne by
women, which is evidenced
by not only the tradition
of naming the children
after the parent who
didn’t actually
have them, but also by...
ourword.orgThe War
Between Heart and Mind,
the Rev. Tom Davis,
Clergy Advisory Board
Chair for Planned
Parenthood Federation of
America, suggests that
the Religious Right do
some soul-searching about
abortion. If, God forbid,
the "right to ...
Some 16 months ago, an
USA marine by the name of
Christopher VanGoethem,
stationed at the US
Embassy in Bucharest, got
himself very drunk whilst
in BUcharest, went
driving drunk, drove into
a Romanian taxi and
killed the client in the
taxi,a musician ...
Blog: What is identity theft ? by Joseph T.
(1 comments
|
discussions
)
— What is identity theft?
Learn how identity theft
works - Here we define
identity theft and give
some statistics on
identity theft.
Protecting yourself from
identity theft. more
Blog: Dear President Obama and the First Family... by Spencer W.
(0 comments
|
discussions
)
—
Happy Thanksgiving...
Nov 25, 2009
fetching data...
Happy
Thanksgiving...
&
nbsp; &n
bsp; May it
be
healthy, nutritious,
loving, and pleasant for
all...
... more
Blog: Happy Thanksgiving... by Spencer W.
(0 comments
|
discussions
)
—
Happy
Thanksgiving...
&
nbsp; &n
bsp; May it
be
healthy, nutritious,
loving, and pleasant for
all...
&
nbsp;
God Bless...
&nbs... more