START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
Oct 11, 2013

The nuclear industry always has a 'next' better version of something. They make all kinds of promises about the next, new, better nuclear reactor design. Does that mean all of the dangers disappear? Does that mean humanity should now build thousands of 'new generation' nuclear reactors?

Arnie Gunderson, a nuclear expert, is trying to warn humanity about existing and newer nuclear technology. He worked inside the nuclear industry for many years. He knows the industry, from the inside. 

What people tell Arnie is that the promoters, designers, builders and operators of nuclear plants are safety conscious, they are good people, and they would NEVER allow an accident to happen. They are our neighbors, friends and community members. They have high integrity, are smart, go to church and have kids that go to school with everyone else's kids. They would not allow an accident to happen, because they LOVE their community and neighbors, and they lavish money on the community. 

Arnie says that this argument is false, because good intentions, good neighbors, smartness, and going to church does not do away with the dangers or hazards of nuclear radiation, nuclear accidents and human tendencies to make mistakes. 

The people living around Chernobyl, Three Mile Island, Santa Susana and Fukushima all said the same things before those 'accidents' happened. Those communities all argued FOR nuclear power based on their interaction with these good intentioned, well meaning, smart nuclear experts. All of the money they tossed around the community did not hurt either. That taxpayer money bought off a lot of people, as money most often does. 

This same dead end argument described above also applies to new generation reactors, no matter what they are called. The pro new generation nuclear reactor apologists argue the same way as the pro nuclear apologists did for the first generation nuclear reactors. 

They say that the new generation reactors are simple, easy, small, cheap, safe, and clean. They promise that nothing bad will ever happen, and no radiation will EVER be released. Have you heard these promises before anywhere? Hmmmm.... these promises seem to have a familiar ring to them. The same thing was promised about open air nuclear bomb testing.. The same thing was promised about nuclear reactors that have had over 100 accidents so far. 

But the reality of what actually happens when these things are built is quite different from how it all looks on paper or the verbal promises. 

One of the most fundamental problems with all of these promises and assurances is that whole nuclear industry was built on secrecy and lies from the very beginning, and this secrecy continues up to today. The whole industry cannot be and will not be transparent or truthful by it's very nature, organizational culture and industry practices from the beginning up until today. Yes, they can theoretically change, but most people judge other people and organizations based on what they have done in the past, and look at that as a track record. 

The odds of someone repeating what they have done in the past are MUCH greater than starting some new, different and better behavior, wouldn't you agree? Someone who has stolen and lied for 40 years, will most likely continue to do so, no matter how many promises they make to do the opposite. 

Someone who lies and deceives others as a general way of operating is generally viewed with suspicion and is avoided by those who want to deal with straight shooters. Most of humanity prefers to deal with honest, law abiding citizens and corporations, correct? So what is the track record of the nuclear industry, including the same players who are now proposing 'new' nuclear technology?

30 Ways The Nuclear Industry Deceives Everyone; via @AGreenRoad

A Primer In The Art Of Deception; via @AGreenRoad

Human Radiation Experiments Performed Without Consent Or Knowledge; via @AGreenRoad

On top of the lies, there is a basic truth with nuclear technology that cannot be avoided. Up front, these supposedly smart folks draw up simple, easy, cheap designs on paper. Those things on paper always appear wonderful, magical and easy to implement. But what actually happens when one tries to put money behind it and make it happen?

In Paper Reactors, Real Reactors (1953) by Hyman Rickover (Father of the nuclear navy and US nuclear power) warns humanity about new generation reactors;  â€œIt is incumbent on those in high places to make wise decisions and it is reasonable and important that the public be correctly informed. 

An academic (paper) reactor or reactor plant almost always has the following basic characteristics: (1) It is simple. (2) It is small. (3) It is cheap. (4) It is light. (5) It can be built very quickly. (6) It is very flexible in purpose. (7) Very little development will be required. It will use off-the-shelf components. (8) The reactor is in the study phase. It is not being built now. 

On the other hand a practical reactor can be distinguished by the following characteristics: (1) It is being built now. (2) It is behind schedule. (3) It requires an immense amount of development on apparently trivial items. (4) It is very expensive. (5) It takes a long time to build because of its engineering development problems. (6) It is large. (7) It is heavy. (8) It is complicated. 

The tools of the academic designer are a piece of paper and a pencil with an eraser. If a mistake is made, it can always be erased and changed. If the practical-reactor designer errs, he wears the mistake around his neck; it cannot be erased. Everyone sees it. 

The academic-reactor designer is a dilettante. He has not had to assume any real responsibility in connection with his projects. He is free to luxuriate in elegant ideas, the practical shortcomings of which can be relegated to the category of “mere technical details.” The practical-reactor designer must live with these same technical details. Although recalcitrant and awkward, they must be solved and cannot be put off until tomorrow. Their solution requires manpower, time and money. 

Unfortunately for those who must make far-reaching decision without the benefit of an intimate knowledge of reactor technology, and unfortunately for the interested public, it is much easier to get the academic side of an issue than the practical side. 

For a large part those involved with the academic reactors have more inclination and time to present their ideas in reports and orally to those who will listen. Since they are innocently unaware of the real but hidden difficulties of their plans, they speak with great facility and confidence. Those involved with practical reactors, humbled by their experiences, speak less and worry more. 

Yet it is incumbent on those in high places to make wise decisions and it is reasonable and important that the public be correctly informed. It is consequently incumbent on all of us to state the facts as forthrightly as possible.”

The translation of something from paper to reality is hard enough. But when one adds on the lack of honesty and transparency, it makes the obstacles and difficulties plus negative consequences orders of magnitude greater. 

The regulatory, scientific and academic nuclear community is not known these days for being honest, straightforward and transparent. Rather, the opposite is the case... 

Scientific Nuclear Fraud At Major Universities; Uncovered And Analyzed; via @AGreenRoad

Dr. Conrad Miller MD - Covers Fraudulent Scientific Studies About Effects Of Radiation via @AGreenRoad

Project Paper Clip; USA Imported And Hired Hundreds Of Nazi War Criminals To Develop Nuclear Industry; via @AGreenRoad

The Art of Deception: The Cult of Nuclearists, Uranium Weapons and Fraudulent Science; via A Green Road

IAEA, WHO, NRC And Others; A Web Of Deception? via A Green Road

Ann Harris; Exposes TVA, NRC, And NEI Corruption And Coverups; via A Green Road

Greg Palast; The Lies and Fraud Behind Nuclear Plant Emergency Diesel Generators; via A Green Road

30 Ways The Nuclear Industry Deceives Everyone; via A Green Road

Nuclear Disaster Lessons NOT Being Learned By GE, Westinghouse Electric, Hitachi, Toshiba; via A Green Road

What the pro nuclear apologists ALWAYS promise is that there is less than a 1 in one million chance of something bad happening. But that promise and statistical argument is also based on false data, false assumptions and bad data. Click on the following link to find out why this promise is also a lie based on fallacies and bad assumptions. 

What Is The Statistical Probability Of A Major Nuclear Accident Like Fukushima In The USA? via @AGreenRoad

What the proponents of the new generations of nuclear technology will promise cannot be delivered on, just like the previous promises that they assured would be delivered, were NOT delivered. The pro nuclear apologists assured us that nuclear was safe, clean, cheap and green. Those promises all turned out to be false. 

Nuclear Power; EXPENSIVE, Dirty, Dangerous And Toxic; via @AGreenRoad

Nuclear Plants Are Six Times More Expensive To Operate Than ANY Other Type Of Power Plants; via @AGreenRoad

Not only did the promises turn out to be false, but the very industry itself threatens the future existence of humanity and poses a life extinction event to all life on the planet. So instead of adding value, the nuclear industry turned into something much worse than the worst terrorist threats. 

Super Solar Storm To Hit Earth; 'Carrington Effect'; 400 Nuke Plants Will Melt Down/Explode; via @AGreenRoad

Dr. Helen Caldicott MD On Nuclear Weapons, MAD/Nuclear Armageddon; via @AGreenRoad

New nuclear technology has many problems, and some nuclear experts have been warning humanity about the problems with these new technologies for years. Here are just a few of the many new 'promises' being made by the monopolistic nuclear industry, and the problems with them that are being exposed by nuclear experts. 

Thorium Reactor Fort St. Vrain Power Station Experiment Failed; via @AGreenRoad

Thorium Nuclear Bomb Proliferation Risks; via @AGreenRoad

Dr. Caldicott MD; Radioactive Thorium Dangers, Half Life, Health Hazards; via @AGreenRoad

Sodium Cooled Monju Nuclear Fast Breeder Power Plant Accidents; via @AGreenRoad

Bottom line, what we need in every community, in every nation, is to have a discussion about the best options for seven generations of our children, not what is 'good' here and now financially speaking. Anything can be made to look good for now, by just throwing a bunch of money at it. The discussion changes when we look at things long range, for seven future generations. 

Does this 'solution' cause any harm to any of the seventy future generations coming behind us? Does it leave radioactive waste behind for them to deal with? Do we have a right to make them deal with our messes? Shouldn't we have to clean up our own messes and leave future generations with a cleaner, better world? When we start asking and answering questions like this, we will automatically end up with the best answers, even with partisan differences included. 

The monopolies (like nuclear) do not like long range discussions or bottom's up locally based and decentralized or zero carbon solutions, because it takes away from their profits, their power and their control. 

So if you like community based, jobs creating, seven future generations friendly solutions, you will have to fight for them, because the 1% at the top only like solutions that make them money, that keep them in control and that serve their interests. What are we all fighting for? Here is a reminder, from the mouth of a child.

Nuclear power is one of those 1%, top down, short term solutions. So far, we have not seen anything come from the nuclear industry that works without causing harm to seventy future generations. Have you?

The Paper Fantasy And Real  Dangers Of New Generation Reactors; via @AGreenRoad

Imported from external blog

Visibility: Everyone
Posted: Friday October 11, 2013, 10:21 am
Tags: [add/edit tags]

Group Discussions
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:


Good H.
male , single, 1 child
Santa Rosa, CA, USA
(0 comments  |  discussions )
\nNorthern California Beach Reading 500 CPM on 12/20/2013 - Fukushima Radiation Is Here. Via @ AGreenRoad. \r\nFrom Rense; \"The above video was taken today with an Inspector Plus Geiger counter by \'Dave\', giving readings on a Northern California bea...
(0 comments  |  discussions )
\n\n\nAntimatter \n\ nAccording to wiki; \"A classic staple of science fiction and superhero stories, anti-matter  is matter composed of antiparticles, subatomic particles that have mostly exactly the same properties (mass, intrinsic angular mo...
(0 comments  |  discussions )
\nBeginning in the 1950s, American and Soviet scientists engaged in a dangerous race to see who could build and detonate the world\'s largest bomb. In the Soviet Union, Andrei Sakharov was the architect of this bomb. \n\nAccording to the movie, Andre...
(0 comments  |  discussions )
\nAccording to NIRS; \"Marine life in all forms, from endangered manatees and sea turtles to essential microscopic organisms, is being harmed and killed by once-through cooling systems, used to remove waste heat at nuclear power stations. \n\nA typic...

(1 comments  |  discussions )
\\nZEN was suspended by Eric with no warning. We don\\\'t know any reasons nor how long it will last....\\r\\nI asked about it on the forum but my post was immediately deleted. 2 threads and petitions about Zen also. And 2 her help-groups. :-(\\r\\nUntill to...
(0 comments  |  discussions )
\\r\\nCOME TO: \\r\\nTucson\\\' s 32nd Annual Peace Fair and Music Festival2014 Theme: Climate JusticeThis FREE event is Arizona\\\'s largest gathering of Peace, Justice, and Environmental groups, with Live Music, Tables, Food, Entertainment, Children\\\'s ...
by Barb K.
(0 comments  |  discussions )
\\n\\r\\nHello my C2 Family, \\r\\nFirst let me say Thank You to those of you who have so sweetly fwd my posts. You are SO AWESOME!! I will never forget your help. Anytime I can repay the favour, please tell me. Second, my Submit button has disappeared lea...
(0 comments  |  discussions )
My little Valentine, Lily, loves taking pictures. She said \\\"Mom, let\\\'s do a Valentines photo shoot, so I can send the pics as cards to our friends\\\" lol.  I can\\\'t believe she\\\'s 5 yrs old! Looking back at my 1st album of her: \\\"Lilyanna Jane, ...
by Rock H.
(0 comments  |  discussions )
\\n \\r\\nIn recognition of the environmental benefits of a plant-based diet, the Sierra  Club  is  pleased  to announce a week  long  vegan “volunteer  vacation”  in  Yosemite National Park, Calif...

Mar 31
Blog: How to Extend the Life of your TRIAD Boilers by Kayleigh L.
(0 comments  |  discussions ) — \\nHow to Extend the Life of your TRIAD Boilers \\r\\n \\r\\nCorliss Engine Review\\r\\nEvery user desires to prolong the life of a unit. TRIAD assists their clients in achieving this important objective by informing them of ways they can avoid problems... more
Feb 27
Blog: Dr Oz Weight Loss - The 100% Natural And Very Efficient Diet Pill by Debra S.
(0 comments  |  discussions ) — \\nYes, Dr. Oz called Garcinia Cambogia Extract (HCA) the Holy Grail of Weight Loss. He went on to say, “Anytime I see a scientist get this excited about something like Garcinia Cambogia Extract and when I looked through some of this research and... more
Blog: My Favorite Websites by krysta I.
(0 comments  |  discussions ) — \\nIFAW:\\r\\nOCEANA:\\r\\nPETA:\\r\\nEARTH 911:\\r\\nANI MALs ASIA:\\r\\n \\r\\n\\r\\n\\n more
Feb 21
Blog: testing one two three by Geoff M.
(0 comments  |  discussions ) — hello world more
Blog: Garcinia Cambogia Reviews From Actual People Garcinia Pure Extract Is A Huge Success February 20 by Dany M.
(0 comments  |  0 discussions ) — \\nGarcinia Cambogia Reviews From Actual People Garcinia Pure Extract Is A Huge Success February 20\\r\\nGarcinia Cambogia System The Dr. Oz Lose Weight Quick Process Without Having Side Effects\\r\\nHe went on to say, “At any time I see a researcher... more
Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of or its affiliates.