START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
Oct 1, 2007

kopia-av-phoenix.jpg

Parasha: Genesis 1:1 - 6:8 Haftarah:Isaiah 42:5 - 43:10 - Sefardim reads: Isaiah 42:5 - 42:21

Focal Point Bereshit 2:15-17; 3:1-3

And the L-RD G-d took the man, and put him into the garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it. And the L-RD G-d commanded the man, saying: 'Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat; but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it; for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.' [...]Now the serpent was more subtle than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman: 'Yea, hath God said: Ye shall not eat of any tree of the garden?' And the woman said unto the serpent: 'Of the fruit of the trees of the garden we may eat; but of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said: Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.'

I have always found the traditional (Xian) interpretation of this story fishy to say the least. It seems that Chava was set up here. First of all - she wasn't present when the command not to eat of the Tree was given - in fact she didn't even exist yet! Secondly G-d didn't command her - He commanded Adam, who creates the first "gereizah" and adds "...neither shall you touch it..." when he passes the command on.

Chava really didn't stand a chance. She probably has already tried touching before the snake creeps up and talks to her, and nothing happened, which is as it should be, since G-d never said "...neither shall you touch it...", so how can she trust that the "eat and die" part is true - her only source of this is Adam - if the "no touching" just proved to be a lie? It turns out that it isn't bollocks - but who is responsible and in what way?

Chava has traditionally been made to bear the guilt alone - both Jewish and Xian Traditions have in some way or other based a misogynist world view in this singular idea, that it was all Chava's fault.

Tradition has made Adam an innocent victim of Chava's "female viles", and that according to the Story is simply not an accurate image. It turns out he played a very crucial role in this domestic drama. He sets himself up as the authority of the Law, and causes his wife to have reason to distrust what G-d has actually said, adding to G-d's command in a manner that makes clarity of Torah difficult to reach.

Chava on the other hand does try the limits of what she perceives to be the Law - that it wasn't the Law doesn't change the fact that she tested it. She feeds her own doubt by not turning to G-d and ask for a clarification when part of what she thinks is the Law turns out to be untrue, instead she assumes that all she has heard is untrue, and throws out the baby with the bathwater.

Both are equally culpable according to the recorded events, and in the eyes of G-d they certainly are.

What's in this Story for us?

Don't mess up Torah - if it's clear and understandable - don't try and make it "clearer", chances are you'll just make a mess that causes someone else to stumble. Don't make additions to Torah, It works fine as It is.

Check the facts for yourself, don't trust Authorities blindly, just because you love them or they seem sensible. Don't throw out the baby with the bathwater - yes, some things you hear may be nothing but bullocks, but that doesn't mean everything similar is bullocks too.

Amen

This article, including artworks and photos in this Blog is Copyright © Henric C. Jensen aka Shadow Bear/Silly Old Bear and are NOT public domain - unless otherwise specified.

Visibility: Everyone
Posted: Monday October 1, 2007, 5:09 pm
Tags: adam genesis torah bereshit bereshit2:15-173:1-3 chava [add/edit tags]

Group Discussions
Comments
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:

Past Member (0)
Monday October 1, 2007, 7:53 pm
As I understand it, Xtian teachings DO blame Adam for the Original Sin more than Eve, for they say he should have asserted his leadership by rejecting Eve's (Chava) and remaining loyal to G_d.
The whole concept of Original Sin looks like an attempt to make issues of morality apply to all things in nature, not just human doings. We need to grow up and recognize that morals are either entirely a product of human thinking or that G_d only intended for humans to suffer the consequences of their sins and that things like predation and death are just natural things, not good or evil.

Past Member (0)
Monday October 1, 2007, 8:02 pm
It is correct that they say that sin came with Adam, but the underlying misogynist attitude, from Thomas of Aquino and on is derived from laying all the blame on Chava.

Judaism have traditionally taken a similar route, though it has made up for some of it through assigning a positive role for women on some levels.

F.i the idea that women are a higher spiritual being than men etc.

OleGreyMike K. (170)
Friday November 2, 2007, 9:35 pm
As a devout Xtian, I have to agree wholeheartedly with your conclusions, which I had come to also :-)

Author

,

'S SHARES
Jun
24
(5 comments  |  discussions )
I have decided to take an indefinte break from Care2. There's too much sh!t, horsemanure and pig feces going on, and I am tired of it. It's always the same idiots targetting the same targets, and it's growing old. I am sure this will caus...
Jun
8
(0 comments  |  discussions )
Link to PetitionWe the undersigned respectfully request your attention in the name of Human Rights, The United Nations is the outstretched arm of the global, International Community, and each UN Peacekeeper is, in reality, a representative for eac...
Jun
6
(0 comments  |  discussions )
Remember this entry?: Women Would NEVER…or? Some of the comments on those two news items in that entry coincide with a comment made on another News Item I posted today: Young People Have Unwanted Sex World (tags: Children, sex, dissertation,...
(0 comments  |  discussions )
In the News News from Swedish Text TV and News you don’t find on BBC or CNN I often come across News in Swedish that I want to share with a broader audience than the 9 Million Swedes out there - which mean that I have to translate them to Englis...


SHARES FROM 'S NETWORK
No shares


MORE MEMBER BLOGS
Mar 31
Blog: How to Extend the Life of your TRIAD Boilers by Kayleigh L.
(0 comments  |  discussions ) — \\nHow to Extend the Life of your TRIAD Boilers \\r\\n \\r\\nCorlis Engine Review\\r\\nEvery user desires to prolong the life of a unit. TRIAD assists their clients in achieving this important objective by informing them of ways they can avoid problems... more
Feb 27
Blog: Dr Oz Weight Loss - The 100% Natural And Very Efficient Diet Pill by Debra S.
(0 comments  |  discussions ) — \\nYes, Dr. Oz called Garcinia Cambogia Extract (HCA) the Holy Grail of Weight Loss. He went on to say, “Anytime I see a scientist get this excited about something like Garcinia Cambogia Extract and when I looked through some of this research and... more
Blog: My Favorite Websites by krysta I.
(0 comments  |  discussions ) — \\nIFAW: www.ifaw.org\\r\\nOCEANA www.oceana.org\\r\\nPETA: www.peta.org\\r\\nEARTH 911: www.earth911.org\\r\\nANI MALs ASIA: www.animalsasia.org\\r\\n \\r\\n\\r\\n\\n more
Feb 21
Blog: testing one two three by Geoff M.
(0 comments  |  discussions ) — hello world more
Blog: Garcinia Cambogia Reviews From Actual People Garcinia Pure Extract Is A Huge Success February 20 by Dany M.
(0 comments  |  0 discussions ) — \\nGarcinia Cambogia Reviews From Actual People Garcinia Pure Extract Is A Huge Success February 20\\r\\nGarcinia Cambogia System The Dr. Oz Lose Weight Quick Process Without Having Side Effects\\r\\nHe went on to say, “At any time I see a researcher... more
 
Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of Care2.com or its affiliates.