Freedom of the press extends only to those who own one -- or so the saying goes. It once rang true in a world ruled by radio and television broadcasters, newspaper chains and cable networks.
But the Internet has changed all that, delivering the press -- and in theory its freedoms -- to any person with a good idea and a connection to the Web.
This extraordinary twist to "mass media" has catapulted many an everyday YouTube auteur to celebrity-status while turning ideas born in a garage or dorm room into Fortune 500 companies. It is the reason so many Americans are now passionate about protecting their right to choose on the Internet. But it's also triggered a backlash from the old regime -- media corporations that built their empires upon controlling the ebb and flow of information in America.
This list of media giants includes the nation's largest phone and cable providers, who provide a portal to the high-speed Internet for more than 98 percent of residential users in America. Now they want to be more than just a window to the Web. These companies have proposed a closed scheme of Internet fees and filters that affords them the final say over which ideas make it to the top of the heap.
This closed business model has proven a financial windfall for the gatekeepers of traditional media. But it comes at a too heavy a cost to the millions of Americans who see the open Internet as the 21st Century's catalyst for free speech and opportunity.
It's against the backdrop of this clash of cultures -- open versus closed -- that an unusual series of official events have occurred this year.
Washington -- where lobbyists for Comcast, AT&T and Verizon have long had the home-field advantage -- recently witnessed an extraordinary series of public meetings and congressional hearings on the fate of the Internet. If you listen carefully, you might actually hear the people's interests being represented. They are certainly being expressed.
The 110th Congress has called Sir Tim Berners-Lee, the inventor of the World Wide Web, and Chad Hurley, the founder of YouTube, to testify in favor of Net Neutrality -- the principle that safeguards the Internet against blocking and censorship from Internet service providers. In recent weeks, leading consumer and Internet rights advocates, Silicon Valley's top entrepreneurs and Hollywood's creative community have testified that an open Internet is vital to the health of our economy and democracy.
The Federal Communications Commission has gone one further, venturing beyond the Beltway to take the public temperature on the Internet. At hearings in Cambridge, Mass., and Palo Alto, Calif., the agency got an earful; hundreds of Net Neutrality supporters stood before the microphone to condemn Comcast's recent efforts to block people from using peer-to-peer applications that allow then to share videos and other rich media without relying upon corporate media to broker the content. One after the other. people called on the federal agency for basic protections against Comcast's brand of online discrimination.
The New Free Speech Movement
They are not alone. A growing movement of Internet users is pushing for legislation to stop would-be gatekeepers from re-routing the free-flowing Web. It has attracted millions of supporters ranging from MoveOn.org to the Christian Coalition of America, from independent rockers OK Go to the executive producer of the TV show "Hannah Montana."
Our voices are starting to rise above the din of lobbyists that too often drowns out genuine public debate in Washington. It's now up to our elected officials to act.
The official inquiry on Net Neutrality has given a public voice to the remarkable consensus in favor of free speech and user choice on the Web. And it may turn out to be more than show. The bipartisan "Internet Freedom Preservation Act" is making its way through the House at this very moment. It is a bill that takes into account the many voices that have spoken out since Net Neutrality became a much-debated principle.
Fundamentally, this bill recognizes that we must establish baseline protection for an unfettered Internet. It doesn't call for Web regulation, but gives the public the power to stop the old regime from turning the Internet from a revolution of the many into a funnel for the few.
Dear Friends,
Congressman Kucinich is
making a major impact in
his challenge to the
escalation of the war in
Afghanistan. See the
following:
MSNBC, The Ed Show,
December 1, 2009
FOX News, The O'Reilly
Factor December 1, 2009
C...
Writing letters may not
sound like the key to
freeing prisoners and
saving lives, but it
works!The Global
Write-a-thon begins
December 5th -- pledge to
write letters on behalf
of people who need your
help.
The Global Write-a-thon
is the biggest ...
Monday, November 30th,
2009
Dear President Obama,
Do you really want to be
the new "war president"?
If you go to West Point
tomorrow night (Tuesday,
8pm) and announce that
you are increasing,
rather than withdrawing,
the troops in
Afghanistan, ...
Keep up the good work!
Washington can be a very
lonely place when you are
fighting for progressive
ideas like Medicare for
All and an end to the
occupations of Iraq and
Afghanistan. It is
for that reason I wanted
to thank all my friends
at...
LOVE IS 100%
RESPONSIBLESometime back
I read a wonderful piece
written by Burt Harding
called "There is only
YOU!", embracing
One(My)Self of course. I
found the article
profound in its
simplicity.
"YOU" are LOVE. That is
who/what "YOU"ARE. There
is...
Mounting Debilities and
Deaths from H1N1 Vaccine
"Seriou
s side effects are now
being reported around the
world, from anaphylactic
shock, to sudden blood
pressure plunge, to death
-- causing a sense of
panic in those who got
the sh...
Blog: Dubai debt woes may cut CO2 but much more needed
(AFP)
by mark s.
(0 comments
|
discussions
)
—
AFP - Dubai's debt crisis
may make a small dent in
its greenhouse gas
emissions but the Gulf
emirate faces an enormous
task to cut carbon to the
levels to be proposed at
the UN climate summit
starting this week.
more