My case was a San Diego Family Court case where I had petitioned the court for custody of my Granddaughter I had raised for nearly seven years in Missouri.
Oberholtzer claimed I virtually didn't have any rights to this child, ignoring his bench-guide codes 100.40 which say Grandparent's are preferential consideration as well as section 361.3 so he handed my Granddaughter over to a daycare where she was abandoned for nearly a year and where blood was found in her panties two weeks before our first commencement in San Diego Family Court, May 4, 2005. He didn't even investigate the daycare owners financial's nor the blood in our Granddaughters panties.
According to 3041 C it was a detriment to order this child to live with anyone whom did not have the most substantial amount of time on a day to day basis of raising the child. This child insisted on calling me, "Mom" and her Grandfather, "Dad" because her birth mother of San Diego gave her up for adoption in 1997 and never had any contact with her till a Missouri visit in August of 2002. The adoption in 1997 never took place because my son got custody of the child and I was ordered by the court to assist in raising the child and to protect her from her violent father. Craig was absent most of the time so I did more than assist, I fully raised her in his absence.
Craig has records but his criminal records are violence to women and theft which is not as severe as the schizophrenic birth mother whom also had records of violence as well as drugs being LSD & POT. She couldn't even come to meet her daughter in 2002 without being stoned out of her mind which may have caused her schizophrenic episode which scared our Granddaughter.
My religion became an issue in Oberholtzer's court as I am Presbyterian, my husband is Catholic and we both believe in the gifts of the, "Baptism Of The Holy Spirit" so due to our beliefs we were persecuted in Edlene C. Mckenzie's guardian ad litem report where she described us as being unable to reason due to our religious beliefs while at the same time describing us as excellent, loving Grandparents whom provided a beautiful bedroom for our Granddaughter as well as her nearly perfect attendance at school with her school lunch's and attending her school functions, being well dressed as well as putting her at the top of her class. She was reading third grade level in first grade with no challenges this was because I had started our granddaughter on phonics programs at age two and she was advanced on computers as well.
In February of 2005 Oberholtzer described us as being Littlebug's parents, again in March of 2005 Oberholtzer defined us as Littlebug's parents but during our May 4th, 2005 hearing David described us as eccentric. Oberholtzer allowed the others, (gays & Jews) to manifest their biased motivated verbal hate-crimes in his court as well so we were called corky and offensive along with criticism that her coming to visit us in Missouri for two weeks may be too risky. He did not exclude the guardian ad litem's report knowing her decision to place our granddaughter in a day care center, (where blood was found in her panties) was based, accessed on Edlene C. Mckenzie's religious discrimination. The entire ad litem report should have been thrown out of his court but what did Oberholtzer do? HE ADOPTED ALL OF IT! Exclusion of Edlene's report was the only just procedure to take if this judge truly cared about his oath to uphold & protect Civil Rights.
Evidence had not been presented to show that placement with me would be detrimental in order to overcome the preference required by section 361.3.
I love my Granddaughter and I know we both are hurt tremendously because the exclusion of our civil rights is irreparable due to the immunities and his minions Bonnie Dumanis & the Commission Of Judicial Performance's failure to take decisive action.
By July of 2006 the day care couldn't afford to raise our Grandaughter so they were done with it and it went back to court, this is when we learned the new Guardian ad litem, (Terence M. Chucas) had been trying to get the day care to adopt our Granddaughter.
During this hearing the guardian ad litem presented witness statements that were perjury and when we tried to get Oberholtzer to let us present evidence that it was perjury Oberholtzer said, "I don't allow evidence & cross-examination in my court room."
What perhaps is worse... is that Oberholtzer had in his possession certified criminal records of my son and my sons friends whom perjured and these records were evidence that these people were not credible to be giving statements.
Due to my website launched in May of 2005 that exposes the religious discrimination, Oberholtzer re-characterized his religious discrimination in our July 2006 hearing by concocting a ruse that I was too toxic to have visitation with my Granddaughter due to my calling the police once in November of 2003 to protect my Granddaughter from her violent Father whom had hit her, then attacked me, then had an altercation with the police when they arrived and a second call to the police upon returning my Granddaughter to the daycare July of 2006 where she was torn from her paternal Grandfather's hand and flung behind, (John Liss) the daycare baby sitter man while witnessing John shout at her Grandfather, "Leave her things in the yard we have nothing to discuss!" Littlebug had never been man-handled before and the shock on her face when John slammed the door in her paternal Grandfathers face. I watched her go to the nearest window and watch her Grandfather leave her belongings in the yard the look on her face draws tears to this day. I was ordered no contact until I get a PHD another re-characterization of his 2005 religious discrimination of which he expected me to forget that he defined me eccentric due to my religious beliefs and now in 2006 expected me to believe he wanted a PHD for calling the police twice to protect this little girl.