22,415,206 members doing good!
share your passions, stories, inspirations, and more
Jun 9, 2009
Focus: GLBT
Action Request: Petition
Location: United States

The Federal Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009 (H.R. 1913) passed the U.S. House on April 29, 2009 by a vote of 249 to 175. The bill expands 1969 federal hate crime laws to include sexual orientation, gender expression or identity and disability. Previous hate crime laws gave the Justice Department authority to prosecute crimes motivated only by race, color, national origin and religion.

Race-based hate crimes leading up to the civil rights movement prompted federal legislation to help deter and prevent such acts. However, these law enforcement "definitions" of what makes a crime a hate crime have not been expanded since 1968. The need for the inclusion of sexual orientation and gender identity in hate crime legislation has become more apparent given the continual increase in LGBT-biased violence.

Including sexual orientation and gender expression into federal hate crime legislation would allow the Justice Department to assist with the investigation of state and local hate based offenses. Federal assistance alleviates overburdened and under funded local law enforcement officials, better enabling them to solve crimes based on sexual orientation and gender expression violence.

While all crimes are an affront to society, offenses rooted in animus toward a victim's real or perceived characteristics are especially pernicious. The fear of crime becomes an extra burden for members of these groups, who can feel that they are being hunted.  That is why it is imperative to bring perpetrators to justice, and for leaders and citizens to make clear that violence motivated by hate will not be tolerated.

It is time for the US Senate to step up to the plate and follow through on important legislation tailored to protect LGBT American citizens.  

 

http://www.change.org/actions/view/stop_hate_crimes_against_lgbt_american_citizens

Visibility: Everyone
Tags: , , , , , , ,
Posted: Jun 9, 2009 1:26pm
Dec 12, 2008

How can the US federal government randomly pick-and-choose how to hand out citizenship rights; and how can the federal government simply ignore mandates outlined in the Declaration of Independence and the US Constitution?

In this essay, I posit that religious ideology, and specifically Christianity, has severely harmed the architecture of our government.  Christianity has been infused into every branch of our government despite the fact that our nation was founded on religious tolerance and acceptance of all people.  The Puritans fled from the Old Country, in part, to escape religious persecution; however, when they arrived to the New World, they brought the instruments of intolerance and hatred with them.  They brought the religion that had been used to persecuted them-- Christianity.

Over time, the Puritans built a colony, and later as Americans, they created a nation entrenched in Christianity.  Interestingly enough, however, the founding fathers of this nation chose not to embrace or endorse a state religion and omitted it from the Declaration of Independence and the US Constitution.  These informed and intelligent men remembered the religious evils which existed in Great Britain, and instead they sought to create a nation built upon equal, secular values and beliefs. 

Nevertheless, the tentacles of Christianity created over time an unequal institutionalized tier of citizenship.  Blacks were at the bottom.  Kidnapped from Africa, they were enslaved, bred like animals, and bought and sold like every day commodities.  Women were a notch above blacks, however, they, too, were simply considered the property of their husbands.  Just as blacks suffered many painful and unjust moments in the history of our nation, so too did women. 

In 1865 following the Civil War, the 13th Amendment to the US Constitution granted blacks their freedom from slavery; and five years later,  the 15th Amendment to the US Constitution, prohibited states from preventing people of color from voting: “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude. [And] The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.” 

During the Jim Crow era, racial discrimination persisted and the disenfranchisement of blacks continued.  Despite the passage of the 15th Amendment, many states implemented unfair screening processes which denied blacks the right to vote.  Nevertheless, a century later, African-Americans finally secured the right to vote with the passage of The National Voting Act of 1965.

 In 1920, women were granted the right to vote with the passage of 19th Amendment to the US Constitution.  “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.  Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.”

The participation of the US federal government was crucial to creating and ultimately perpetuating equality for African-Americans and women. If individual states had been recruited to deal with racial and gender discrimination, there would be broad and staggering inequalities for African-Americans and women to this day.  Thankfully, our federal government did the right thing by taking control and correcting inequalities tolerated for far too long. 

The struggle of gay Americans  for equal rights is really no different than the struggles of  blacks or women.  Once again, he US federal government will have to step in and strip away the last remnants of apartheid in our nation.  The federal government will need to return to the US Constitution and the Declaration of Independence for unbiased insight and remedy the injustices which have been supported, in part, by discriminatory Christian practices and beliefs.  The federal government cannot stand by idly and do nothing.  All Americans regardless of race, gender, or sexual orientation should be guaranteed the unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness as outlined in the Declaration of Independence and the US Constitution.

I often wonder what some Americans will do when they wake up from their cognitively impaired,  heartless slumber, and realize how they have, actively or in silence, carried out, or tolerated, the many heinous and irrevocable injustices perpetrated on gay Americans….and often times in the name of their own God.  Will God-fearing Americans feel the shameful anguish of their action, or inaction, to the suffering of God’s gay children?  Will their experience be similar to the Germans who have had to live with their monstrous fingerprint on the history of the Jewish people?

It really amazes me how some individuals rationalize hatred and intolerance for certain groups of people.  To advance and legitimatize absurdities, many invoke the will of God to strengthen their argument, and to frighten others into accepting and adopting a code of morality which segregates, harms and disenfranchises other fellow Americans. Why do we do this?  Why do we refuse to learn from our mistakes?  Clearly, the mantra of our history teachers has fallen on deaf ears. 

Here’s some food for thought.  Voltaire, a French philosopher, stated, “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."
Visibility: Everyone
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted: Dec 12, 2008 11:56pm
Dec 11, 2008
American history conveniently chronicles countless examples of injustice, intolerance and discrimination perpetrated upon non-white, non-Christian, and non-straight people. In fact, our history clearly illustrates how religion, notably Christianity, has been involved in many, if not all, of these occurrences.

Protestant reformers made history by burning suspected witches at the stake and southern Christians used Christianity to defend slavery. It was preached from the pulpit that the master class was charged with the burden of Christianizing heathens in exchange for rewards in the after-life; and slaves were tricked into believing that disobedience to their white masters would be perceived by God as disobedience to Him. Later, racial segregation in the South became the standard of accepted societal discrimination supported once again by Christian scriptures.

Many other groups continue to use Christianity to defame, discriminate, and harm minority individuals. They include, but are not limited to, the White Aryan Nation, the Neo-Nazis, the Ku Klux Klan , and the Westboro Baptist Church. These groups believe that Christian scriptures condone the killing of Jews, gays, and gypsies; or the lynching, and murdering of black people.

The Catholic church, in concert with other Christian churches, continues to fight to repeal a woman’s right to have an abortion even if the mother’s life is in danger. And the Catholic church has also been a fierce supporter of abstinence-only sexual education programs for children; they blatantly refuse to accept and endorse the use of condoms despite scientific studies that have concluded that condoms can save lives by preventing the spread of deadly sexually transmitted diseases as well as preventing unnecessary abortions.

Sadly, Christianity, and especially the Catholic and Mormon churches have not always been a friend to women. The inequalities and injustices that women have had to endure over the centuries due to the patriarchal hierarchy entrenched in Catholicism and the Mormon church are indeed staggering. Women, like black slaves, were the property of their husbands or white masters; women could not own property, they were frequently traded or purchased as if they were commodities, and they could not vote. For all intensive purposes, women were objects of convenience for men. They were baby-making-machines, mothers to their husbands children that they carried in their wombs, cooks, cleaners, and receptacles for their husbands pleasure and seed.

What a nasty walk down memory lane! I find it thoroughly amazing how Christianity can rewrite itself according to the times. I have come to call such revision, morality of convenience. For if one carefully reads Christian scriptures, one might be surprised to find that it shares many similarities with what many Americans refer to as radical Islam.

Last month we witnessed the Mormon church in Utah hijack the state of California after pumping millions of dollars into the California November elections to help repeal Proposition 8. This religiously-motivated political coup resulted in the redefining of marriage as a union between and man and a woman prohibiting the marriage of same-sex couples in California. Again Christianity resurfaced to steal the full citizenship of gay Americans in California.

Christianity also prevented gay Americans from equal protection under federal law. Just this year, The Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2007, commonly known as The Matthew Shepard Act, was a bill introduced in the US Congress. This bill would have extended the 1969 United States federal hate crime law to include among other things crimes motivated and committed solely based on the perpetrator’s hate for the victim’s sexual orientation. Although the bill was passed by both the House and the Senate, it never reached the Oval Office since our Christian President, Mr. Bush, had made it known that he would veto it. Imagine, a nation founded in part on religious tolerance for all people, becomes the schizophrenic, divinely-inspired oppressor of gay people. So much for the separation of church and state.

Full citizenship should not be dependent and contingent upon one’s sexual orientation. American history has chronicled the painful and unjust suffering of women (gender discrimination), Native Americans and African-Americans (race discrimination). The plight of gay Americans centers around sexual orientation. We’ve been a minority group disenfranchised from full citizenship ever since the founding of this nation. Legal, religious, and social roadblocks and detours have always stood in our way when we, like women and African-Americans, challenged the white Christian and straight status-qua. Indeed, America needs to erase the last remnants of apartheid that plague the our nation.

As Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. so eloquently stated, “When the architects of our republic wrote the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, they were signing a promissory note to which every American was to fall heir.” All Americans regardless of race, gender, or sexual orientation should be guaranteed the unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Just as America defaulted on its “ promissory note ” with African-Americans, it continues to default on its “ promissory note ” to gay Americans. And instead of honoring this “ promissory note,” the US government simply writes “ bad checks ” to gay Americans, and these checks always come back with “insufficient funds” stamped on them. Still, we endure this inequality even as we pay our taxes which are then used to subsidize the full citizenship of our straight neighbors who live on Main Street USA. Talk about forced tithing!

Although Christianity does not have a monopoly on intolerance, injustice and discrimination, the United States was founded on Christian principles and beliefs. Therefore, it’s crucial to consider and review our history through the looking glass of Christianity. There are many denominations found in Christianity-- liberal, moderate and conservative. It’s imperative that the liberal and moderate Christians come forth and speak out against the injustices being committed to gay people by their conservative Christian brothers and sisters. Just as many Americans expect peace-loving Muslims to speak out against terrorist atrocities committed in the name of Allah, we expect and welcome liberal and moderate Christians to stand up and fight against those whose interpretations of God’s words only seek to do harm to God’s children. Not only is it the responsibility of gay Americans to mobilize and combat the injustices in our nation, it is the obligation of all Americans to stand up for those whose causes have yet to be resolved. Remember, silence is indifferent acceptance, and ultimately the fuel that fires all evils.

I am optimistic that Barack Obama will make gay rights an important issue in his first year in office. Often it takes another minority person to recognize the needs and injustices faced by others who live across town, not on Main Street, USA. Nevertheless, while we wait, we will continue to be creative and productive tax-paying citizens of this nation. However, we will also continue to fight for what is rightfully ours and we will settle for nothing less. And just as women and African-Americans finally secured their full citizenship through amendments to the US Constitution, gay Americans soon will, too.
Jul 31, 2006
 
One of the many jobs I had while in graduate school was teaching English as a Second Language to foreign graduate students, visiting researchers, and teaching assistants. I really enjoyed teaching ESL, and I particularly enjoyed the sincere desire of these students to learn and use American English. Most, if not all, of these students had studied British English, so they tended to have a rather good grasp of the syntax of the English language. However, the semantics of the English language both written and spoken often times presented a challenge for these individuals.  And of course, the English that was used in the US only further complicated this dilemma.

Unlike my other colleagues who focused solely on safe, accepted topics of discussion and exploration, I frequently introduced highly controversial topics embedded with a plethora of culturally charged notions which attempted to present an American scenario of a given topic. Often times these lessons dealt with politics, religion, race, sexual orientation, etc. The purpose of these lessons was not only to learn about the English language of the US, but also to engage in a meaningful dialogue allowing the students to share their ideas based in their respective cultures with me as well as with each other.


I thrived on student participation, and in fact, incorporated into the syllabus a designated day when I would I would present a topic that was submitted by one of the students. Each student had the opportunity to submit one topic each Tuesday that we later explored on Friday. This gave both the other students and myself sufficient time to prepare for the topic. Although all the topics were extremely interesting and engaging, the topic that was handed in by a 42 years-old robotics engineer (who was a visiting researcher from Japan) was my favorite and definitely the most challenging lesson that I ever had to give in my native language. He wanted us to explore the meaning(s) of the word fuck.


The word was not unfamiliar to me. I had heard the word used in films, television shows, plays, novels, poetry, magazine articles, songs etc. And yes, I even used the word as well as many derivatives of the word myself. However, I never stopped to think about how the word was being used grammatically. Obviously I understood the semantics that were conveyed when using the term, but when I considered the word under a linguistic microscope, I learned that this four letter word was one of the most remarkable and versatile words in the English language. Furthermore, I understood completely the confusion that many non-English speaking people may have when hearing or seeing this word employed in spoken or written language.


In short, here’s what we considered and reviewed in my ESL class of adult learners. I hope you find this as entertaining and thought provoking as I did.


Out of all the words in the English language, fuck is the only one referred to as the F-word. And although there are a number of four letter words in English, fuck is often times referred to as the four-letter-word, or the F-bomb. It is considered to be one of the most offensive words in the English language, however, as I mentioned, there are many more potent words that could rival it. The students had expressed and interest in knowing if the word was always considered to be offensive, or if it was simply a more recent linguistic phenomena. Unfortunately, I did not know, but I did encourage them to investigate the question further.

As a transitive verb, to fuck generally means to have sexual intercourse with someone, or to take advantage of someone. As a intransitive verb, to fuck generally means to have sexual intercourse, to behave in a foolish manner, or to meddle in the affairs of another person.


Examples:


Dick fucks Jane. (transitive verb)

Dick has sexual intercourse with Jane.


Dick fucks around too much. (intransitive verb)

Dick has sexual intercourse too much, or Dick fools around too much.


It is important to note that the word fuck and it’s derivatives do not always have a sexual connotation. The use of fuck is further enhanced by the use of a prepositions to create idioms. I am sure that there are a lot of these, however, the ones that commonly come to mind include: to be fucked up (messed up, drunk as in intoxicated), to be fucked over (to mistreat), to fuck with (to mess with, joke with, play with).


Examples:


John began drinking as soon as he arrived at the party. Five hours later, he was really fucked up.


John began drinking as soon as he arrived at the party. Five hours later, he was really intoxicated.


As usual when John drinks too much he becomes so aggressive and hateful. Last Saturday, he really fucked over his wife. John gave her a bloody nose.


Last Saturday night, he really mistreated her. John gave her a bloody nose.


Look, I didn’t mean to scare you like that. I was just fucking with you.


Look, I didn’t mean to scare you like that. I was just joking/playing with you.


Fucking can be used as an adjective modifying a noun. Likewise fucking can be used as an adverb modifying an adjective. Fuck can also be used as an interjection.


Examples:



Dick is a fucking idiot. (adjective)

Dick is a foolish idiot.


Jane is fucking beautiful. (adverb)

Jane is very beautiful.


Fuck! This insect is really disgusting.
(interjection)


Wow! Or perhaps Yuck! This insect is really disgusting.



Fuck can also be used as a noun to convey a wide variety of meanings which include, but are not limited to, aggression, apathy, confusion, difficulty, dismay, dissatisfaction, fraud, incompetence, inquiry, and sexual encounter, trouble. Let’s consider the following examples:

Don’t fuck with me! (aggression)

Don’t mess with me!


I don’t give a fuck! (apathy)

I don’t care!


What the fuck is going on here? (confusion)

What is going on here?


I can’t figure this out. Fuck it! (dismay)

I can’t figure this out. I give up!


I don’t like what the fuck is going on here. (dissatisfaction)


I don’t like what is going on here.


I got fucked over by the street vendor. He sold me a broken watch. (fraud)


I got taken by the street vendor. He sold me a broken watch.


What a fuck he is! He didn’t even see the ball coming. (incompetence)


What an idiot he is! He didn’t even see the ball coming.


Who the fuck is he? (inquiry)

Who is he?


John said that Mary was a good fuck. (sexual encounter)


John said that Mary was a good sexual encounter.


John lost his term paper. He is really fucked now. (trouble)


John lost his term paper. He is really in trouble now.


I also discovered in my two days of research pertaining to the word fuck, that it is a word that can be placed within certain words. In English, the linguistic term used to explain this phenomena is infix. Consider this sentence:


Mary is infuckingcredible! She got all the answers correct.


Mary is incredible! She got all the answers correct.


Obviously, the insertion of fucking simply adds further emphasis to how incredible (or smart in this case) Mary is. When fucking is omitted the sentence still conveys meaning.

Visibility: Everyone
Tags: , , , , , ,
Posted: Jul 31, 2006 2:16pm

 

 
 
Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of Care2.com or its affiliates.

Author

Eco M.
male , committed relationship
New Hope, PA, USA
Shares by Type:
All (114) | Blog (78) | Alert (36)

Showing shares tagged with: us [show all]
SHARES FROM ECO'S NETWORK
May
23
(0 comments  |  discussions )
We all know that we're expected to be on our best behavior at church, but do we really know why that is?  Shouldn't we be on our best behavior all of the time?  Is behaving as if we're something we're not when we're not being a hypocrite wh...
May
15
(0 comments  |  discussions )
When I think of the word, "Mother," many things come into my mind.  My own sweet mother, of course, who to me, will always be the perfect embodiment of motherhood.  I think, too, of myself, for I am the mother of three, the step-mother ...
May
14
(0 comments  |  discussions )
KDC Solar and North Jersey Media Group Cut Ribbon on Large Solar Facilityby Staff WritersBedminster NJ (SPX) May 10, 2013The solar operation will cover more than 60 percent of the power needs at North Jersey Media Group's printing plant. KDC Sol...
May
12
(0 comments  |  discussions )
Dear Friends - please accept my sincere apologies for n ot answering any of your msgs and kind thoughts. Unfortunately I lost my password and have been unable to get into my account for ages - probably with all the moving house etc., but you were all ...
(1 comments  |  discussions )
Mama's Day Cards You Won't Find at the Drugstore Society & Culture  (tags: mothersday, mothers, families, queer, transgender, immigrants, strongfamilies ) BMutiny  - huffingtonpost.com The group...commissioned a group of artis...
May
9
(0 comments  |  discussions )
The largest genocide in human history happened where? Most people would answer Germany, and the Jewish Holocaust. Actually though, the largest genocide happened in the USA, with the native American Indians, with estimates of 19 million to 100 millio...
May
8
(0 comments  |  discussions )
Official Nuclear Radiation Study; Tokyo University Hayno, R.S., et al (2013) Internal Radiocesium Contamination of Adults and Children 7 to 20 Months After the Fukushima NPP Accident as Measured by Extensive Whole-Body-Counter Surveys, Proc. Jpn....
May
6
(0 comments  |  discussions )
Toxic radiation accumulates in water supplies after nuclear accidents. Radiation bioconcentrates in fish that live in fresh water and salt water. Runoff of fresh water from land which has been contaminated ends up contaminating oceans, and salt wate...
(0 comments  |  discussions )
66 Atomic Bombs were exploded on the Bikini Island Atolls. Hundreds of islanders were removed from the islands, but not from harms way. One hydrogen bomb exploded near the islands, and the children played with the dust from the bomb, as it fel...
(0 comments  |  0 discussions )
"Give Folk Medicine Back to the Folks!"  This is one of our favorite slogans here at the Essentials of Life Holistic Enrichment Center.  It's more than a slogan, in fact; it's one of our primary goals!The classes we teach here are practical...

Copyright © 2013 Care2.com, inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved