A friend on another social network posted an article about climate change measurements. I see it has been posted on Care2 too by someone else. Well, I am trying help the non-believers become better informed with scientific sources (not political ones). Some people believe climate change is propaganda while still others believe the no-change perspective is the propaganda. I am seeking reliable scientific input for this debate.
Do you have reliable sources that I could "share forward" and help increase important knowledge?
Your help will be greatly appreciated!!! Thank you!
WHY ISN'T THIS ALL OVER IN HERE?!? National Guard troops were going door to door...checking on families...Gov. Steve Beshear called "the biggest natural disaster that this state has ever experienced in modern history. THE STATE IS STILL WITHOUT ELECTRICITY!!!!!
Hi! I believed this is worth sharing~~~ Kathleen R With Congress back in session, the Bush Administration is pushing hard to pass another trade agreement based on the failed NAFTA model, this time with Colombia. The Administration is in a race against public opinion, which is quickly turning against the kind of neoliberal trade deals that have worsened poverty and inequality in every country where they have been implemented and led to a massive loss of jobs in the United States. The proposed Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with Colombia promises more of the same. The deal will also strengthen Colombia's government, which is responsible for severe human rights violations.
With more and more people--in Latin America and in the US--becoming aware of the repercussions of unfair trade rules, now is the time to take action and demand change.
Please sign our petition asking Congress to vote No on the US-Colombia FTA. Let your representatives know that a vote for this trade agreement is a vote for:
1. Worsening Rural Poverty and Hunger
The FTA cuts tariffs on food imported from the US but benefits only the few Colombian farmers who export to the US. Moreover, the deal bars the Colombian government from subsidizing farmers, while large-scale US corn and rice growers enjoy billions in subsidies. These double standards guarantee that US agribusiness can undersell Colombian farmers, who will face bankruptcy as a result. Many of Colombia's small-holder farmers are women and Indigenous Peoples who are losing their livelihoods and being forced off their lands.
2. Fueling Armed Conflict and Drug Trafficking
The intertwined crises of poverty, landlessness and inequality are at the root of Colombia's 50-year armed conflict. The FTA will further concentrate wealth in the hands of a few while worsening poverty for millions of people. Many Colombian farmers, whose livelihoods will be destroyed by the FTA, will be compelled to cultivate coca (the raw material for producing cocaine) to earn a living.
Continuing a trend begun in the wake of 9-11, the US has cast the FTA as a matter of its "national security," and the Colombian government has followed suit by treating anyone opposed to the deal as a terrorist. Colombia's workers, Afro-Colombians and Indigenous Peoples have taken a clear position against the FTA. Their peaceful protests have been met with severe repression, including murder.
3. Repressing Labor Rights
Colombia is already the world's deadliest country for trade unionists, with more than 2,000 labor activists killed since 1991. The FTA does not require Colombia to meet international core labor standards; it merely calls on the government to abide by its own weak labor laws. Without enforceable labor protections, the trade deal will put more workers at risk. US workers' power to negotiate better wages will also be weakened by a deal that allows corporations operating in Colombia to keep labor costs down through sheer violence.
4. Exacerbating Climate Change and Threatening Biodiversity
The FTA will increase logging in the Colombian Amazon, weakening the rainforest's capacity to stabilize the Earth's climate. Under provisions sought by the US, corporations that have bought the rights to a country's forests, fishing waters, mineral deposits or oil reserves can totally deplete these resources, with grave consequences to ecosystems and the many species that inhabit them. Small-scale farmers and Indigenous Peoples who depend directly on these natural resources will be the first people to suffer.
5. Subordinating National Sovereignty to Corporations
By allowing corporations to sue governments for passing laws that could reduce profits, the FTA erodes Colombia's prerogative to regulate foreign investment and undermines citizens' chances of improving health, safety and environmental laws. In anticipation of the FTA, the US pressed Colombia to pass a law that would expropriate land from Indigenous and Afro-Colombians and allow multinational corporations to gain control of millions of hectares of rainforest. The forestry law was part of a series of constitutional "reforms" undertaken to meet the conditions of a US trade agreement. In January 2008, Colombian civil society won an important victory: the forestry law was struck down as a violation of Indigenous rights. Had the FTA already been in place, US corporations would now be allowed to sue the Colombian government for "lost future profits."
6. Deteriorating Public Health
By extending patent rights on medicines produced in the US, the FTA hinders the use of far cheaper generic drugs and puts life-saving medicines out of reach for millions of Colombians. Women, who are over-represented among the poor and primarily responsible for caring for sick family members, are particularly harmed by this provision.
7. Loss of Vital Public Services
The FTA requires the Colombian government to sell off critical public services, including water, healthcare and education. Elsewhere in Latin America, this kind of privatization has resulted in sharp rate increases by new corporate owners that deny millions of people access to essential services. Women are hardest hit because it is most often their responsibility to meet their families' needs for such basic services.
8. Harming Indigenous Women
The FTA would enable corporations to exploit Indigenous Peoples' traditional knowledge by allowing companies to patent seeds, plants, animals and certain medical procedures developed and used by Indigenous women over centuries. Under the FTA, Indigenous women could lose access to important medicinal plants and agricultural seeds unless they pay royalties to patent holders. Indigenous women's role as the protectors of their community's natural resources and traditional knowledge would be eroded, threatening Indigenous cultures and women's status within the community.
There Are Viable Alternatives to Free Trade Agreements
Despite more than a decade of failed NAFTA-style trade deals, the US continues to insist that its trading partners adhere to rigid neoliberal economic policies. But Latin America's social movements are articulating viable alternatives for regulating trade and economic integration in ways that benefit women, families, communities and the environment. The women of MADRE's sister organizations in Colombia and throughout Latin America affirm the need for Fair Trade Agreements that:
1. Are negotiated through democratic processes with effective participation from communities that will be impacted, including women's organizations. 2. Ensure that life-sustaining resources such as water, food staples and medicinal plants are guaranteed to all people and not reduced to commodities. 3. Ensure that access to basic services, including health care, housing, education, water and sanitation, are recognized as human rights that governments are obligated--and empowered--to protect. 4. Institute the region's highest, rather than lowest, standards for labor rights and health, safety and environmental protections. 5. Adopt principles of "fair trade," including social security and development assistance programs that protect small farmers and workers and that recognize the economic value of women's unpaid labor in the household. 6. Require foreign investors to contribute to the economic development of the communities where they have a presence. 7. Promote policies that respect local cultures and collective Indigenous rights and that preserve traditional agricultural techniques and biodiversity in agriculture and nature. 8. Recognize the links between economic growth, environmental sustainability and building peace.
Federal court rules against dying medical marijuana patient
A medical marijuana patient whose doctor says marijuana is the only medicine keeping her alive does not have a constitutional right to stay alive, a federal appeals court ruled today.
Angel Raich, a California mother of two, uses marijuana to treat life-threatening wasting syndrome, seizures, an inoperable brain tumor, and severe chronic pain. "The court has just sentenced me to death," she said after the ruling. "My doctors agree that medical cannabis is essential to my very survival, and the government did not even contest the medical evidence ... If we don't have a right to live, what do we have left?"
Raich's lawyers argued that because her doctors believe medical marijuana is essential to her survival, prosecuting her would violate the U.S. Constitution's Fifth Amendment guarantee that no person may be "deprived of life ... without due process of law."
In its decision, the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that there is not yet a constitutional right "to make a life-shaping decision on a physician's advice to use medical marijuana to preserve bodily integrity, avoid intolerable pain, and preserve life, when all other prescribed medications and remedies have failed."
But — significantly — the court suggested that a right to medical marijuana could eventually be recognized as fundamental. The ruling says: "For now, federal law is blind to the wisdom of a future day when the right to use medical marijuana to alleviate excruciating pain may be deemed fundamental. Although that day has not yet dawned, considering that during the last ten years eleven states have legalized the use of medical marijuana, that day may be upon us sooner than expected."
MPP's grants program has paid for much of Raich's litigation. Visit www.mpp.org/news to read some of the news coverage of the decision.
Because the federal courts have refused to protect medical marijuana patients from arrest, it's all the more imperative that Congress act to change federal law. MPP has led the fight in Congress over the last four years, with a record 163 House members voting for a medical marijuana amendment last summer. And, since the Democratic takeover of Congress in November, the congressional outlook for medical marijuana is now better than it has been since I co-founded MPP 12 years ago.
In fact, we have a real chance of passing federal legislation to protect medical marijuana patients this year, but we need you to stand with us. If you agree that seriously ill people should not have to live in fear of armed federal agents breaking down their doors to take away their medicine, would you please make a financial contribution to our lobbying work today?
Our track record of success is growing every year, and we can get the job done. But we're 100% dependent on supporters like you to fund our work.
Rob Kampia Executive Director Marijuana Policy Project Washington, D.C.
P.S. Today also brought happier legal news, when a federal judge in San Francisco dismissed charges against marijuana policy activist Ed Rosenthal on grounds of "vindictive prosecution." Rosenthal was sentenced in 2003 to a single day in prison after a jury found him guilty of violating federal law by growing marijuana for patients. That conviction was overturned last year, and the government filed new charges, including four counts of tax evasion and one count of money laundering. U.S. District Court Judge Charles Breyer today dismissed those charges, ruling that the prosecutors appeared to be retaliating against Rosenthal for publicly criticizing the government.
P.P.S. As I've mentioned in previous alerts, a major philanthropist has committed to match the first $3.0 million that MPP can raise from the rest of the planet in 2007. This means that your donation today will be doubled.
Angel Raich can be arrested for using the only medicine that keeps her alive, court rules.
Small Print … You are receiving this e-mail because you subscribed to MPP's e-mail alerts. To unsubscribe, click the link at the bottom of this message. Removal may take up to 48 hours. To contact MPP, please click here or reply to this e-mail. Our mailing address is MPP, P.O. Box 77492, Capitol Hill, Washington, D.C. 20013.
We are required by federal law to tell you that any donations you make to MPP may be used for political purposes, such as supporting or opposing candidates for federal office.
PLEASE HELP TRUTHOUT.ORG HOWEVER YOU CAN. THANK YOU!!! Peace, KathleenR ~The Angel Power Emporium~
TO is supported by a very small core of dedicated readers who actually donate. They, by themselves, support the entire project. We only need a few to come through. If what we do matters to you, hit the link below. TIA.
Just click this link for our donation options page:
Bush's Rush to Armageddon/Female Soldiers, Sexual Assault Remains a Danger/House Seeks Lower Drug Costs for Medicare/Global Warming Adds to Oil Volatility/Tax Cuts Offer Most for Very/War Could Last Years, Commander Says/more... The Angel Power Emporium
Hurricane Katrina was quite a wake-up call to all of us of the damages we may endure. Currently, we are receiving many climate warnings from nature, Al Gore's new movie, and, special on TV from the History Channel and the Discovery Channel, etc. However, back in the late 1970s, I was becoming aware of possible severe changes in weather patterns. There was information available on the changing climate back that far, yet few took it seriously. Now, we are learning it is quite idiotic to ignore up-coming climatic changes. Therefore, besides wishing people would move away from coasts, major fault lines, and volcanic areas, I would like to start a "movement" to relocate all of our great treasures away from our coasts. I cannot bear the thought of losing museums and libraries, etc., from ignoring vast factual warnings!
PLEASE, share this idea with everyone you know and, perhaps, we will actually be able to save some such treasures! Thank you!
Sexually conservative men
are more swayed by sexual
images than more
according to a new study
that might help explain
why the sexually
paradoxically, tend to
take sexual risks.
The robotic European
cargo ship Albert
Einstein was opened
Tuesday morning (June 18)
at the International
Space Station, a day late
because of concerns that
mold may have grown
inside the vehicle, NASA
Yes, mom may really be
pushing you into marching
band because she always
wanted to be drum major.
New research finds that,
consistent with what kids
may believe, parents
really do hope to live
out unfulfilled ambitions
through their children.
chief of obesity surgery
at Lenox Hill Hospital in
New York City, holds
several patents for the
treatment of obesity and
designed a method for
treating relapse after
gastric bypass. Roslin
has expertise in
Day care may reduce the
risk of emotional
problems in children at
high risk of such
problems, according to a
new study from Canada.
The researchers found
that among children of
women with symptoms of
depression, those who
went to day care had