START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
Aug 12, 2011

CPS CORRUPTION VIDEOS AND OTHER LINKS:

CPS WHIRLWIND:

At one time, Daddy was told that he had signed his parental rights away. He had never signed anything related to his parental rights and after Daddy's lawyer confronted the social worker (Sandy Babbin), she seemed to have no knowledge of the alleged document and could not produce a copy of it. We will do everything we can, research everywhere we can and ask anyone we can until this is set right. Daniel belongs with the people who love him, Daniel belongs with his family.

 

 

HOW CPS 'painted me'.

 

How Child Protective Services painted me when they needed a witness...Here is an opportunity for me to be or not to be like CPS said I was going to be... Listen: "I'M AN EXTRA in a movie, Arched Wing, by Katherine Petersdorf (featherless productions) as a... a... a... villian named Bonnie-Kate: I guess I'm gong to have to think about all the heart-ache... pain... hatred I felt inflicted upon me from 2005 to the time I got my family back together...:"

 

The Proposed Parental Rights Amendment to the U.S. Constitution

SECTION 1 


The liberty of parents to direct the upbringing and education of their children is a fundamental right. 

SECTION 2

 Neither the United States nor any state shall infringe upon this right without demonstrating that its governmental interest as applied to the person is of the highest order and not otherwise served.

 SECTION 3

No treaty may be adopted nor shall any source of international law be employed to supersede, modify, interpret, or apply to the rights guaranteed by this article.

MY FACEBOOK

Visibility: Everyone
Tags: , , , , , ,
Posted: Aug 12, 2011 10:12pm
Dec 15, 2007

Regarding: Legal Literacy, Your Pen Power, and the term 'WARD OF THE COURT'.

Dear American, (Not to be confused with Amer-eekan),


Miranda will be given for you to sign, reserve your rights on this instrument by not becoming in personam at Rule 12 (b). Do not give up your personam to "power of attorney" because you waive rights with each admission or tacit response answered by "persons standing in your stead," which makes you in personam for accepting this "benefit."


'in personam' = Person of unsound mind = WARD OF THE COURT ---
Which translates to, "You ʽareʼ crazy if need or have a Court Appointed Attorney ʽrepresent youʼ, according to definition and Supreme Court decision, you are better off standing un represented to challenge jurisdiction on the matter the DA is trying to set in front of a judge, a topic for a Notice and Revocation of Power of Attorney & Rule 12 (b) argument which is filed upon the Court Clerk. Your arguments have to be entered, you ʽun representedʼ at the first appearance. So you need the CPS (free) HANDBOOK before Child Protective Services knock on the door. These facts next to the Supreme Court decision court appointed attorneys can not claim you have rights it is imperative you study and know what to do instead of tacitly complying to the whim of a bureaucrat!

Family Law is not about crime and punishment it is about, "Just say, 'Yes, Massa', if you 'Just Do' NOTHING'.


Remain SILENT and the reservation will command you to Justice. e-hem... (Which means, "Don't talk to your Court Appointed Attorney".


                Are Court Appointed Attorneys Fully Advised? (Or as Fully Advised as my daughter was when Max R. Wall got a SECOND SET OF DOUBLE CONTINUANCES FROM JUDGE AVERA'S BENCH, Wall stating "Melanie is Fully Advised on the Premise" of the DHS (perjury), he never stating she Advised them, meaning, as it should have been, "DHS is Fully Advised and has forwarded a Premise because Melanie is a witness. But, no, Wall, got the Motive wrong in both directions, but nonetheless became seer, prophet. So, why not Fully Advise my daughter about Law instead?

 
WHY DON'T WE LEARN what UCC 1-207 is 'IN' PUBLIC SCHOOLS?


????????
Why are we churning out Legally Illiterate caseworkers from colleges????????

                                   
 IT IS ABOUT TIME SOMEBODY DID SOMETHING ABOUT IT!!!

                  I bet any kid, IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS could tell you that Marilyn Monroe did drugs and was a beautiful lesbian who had an adulterous affair with our favorite president. I bet none of those same children, who know about the iniquity of a Moooooovie Star, could tell you JFK wanted to return our Banking system back to the Gold Standard (Lawful Money) and abolish the Federal Reserve Bank ( Legal Tender ) like Ron Paul supporters state he will do if he becomes president.                 



              Shhhhhhhhhhhhhh (Trade Secret).


If you are confronted
with explaining what the "UCC 1-207" <---- Now UCC 1-308
does here is your answer.

When you are going to sign a contract ( drivers license, lease, buying a
automobile, snowmobile, a building permit, marriage license, devoice decree, or any other document).

BEFORE you sign!!! you have the right to draw a fine line through any
thing that is not to your liking. It can be a number, a letter, a word or a
group of words. At this time you can add any thing you want in the contract.
Any changes you have made sign your name close to it and date it. A contract
is to have all of the contract in full disclosure at the time of signing. If
not the UCC 1-207 will stop you from giving up your rights on the contract
you are about to sign and void out any part of the contract that you have
not had the opportunity to view.

Now how the UCC 1-207 works.

After you put UCC 1-207 where your signature is going to be. " your
signature" is the last you thing you put on the document. When you pick up
your pen from the signed contract it is consummated, you have given up your
right to change the contract. Here is some more UCC information. You can go
to a public law library for more information.

case law available if you look it up on the web site:


Without Prejudice
   UCC 1-308    <-Formerly UCC 1-207
Marilyn LeBaron



This is a message from Judge_the_Bench:

Press Release for Julie A Witherspoon,

[Please forward to your private e-mail account if you are at work]

Since Oregon Code on Foster Care and Juvenile Matters are base off what is
on the books in California where this evil is ongoing. We need to take a look
at what needs revision with respect to the OAR & ORS with respect to our
relationship to the State of Oregon, State of Oregon Courts, and their Court
Appointed Attorneys. See Judge Sullivan in Deschutes County for the California
inspired Oregon Charter on what we instated as an example to follow for Family
Matters heard in Juvenile Venue (non Crime & Punishment resulting in the
Equivalent of the Death Penalty to many many families in oregon.

Please send your comments.

Judge_the_Bench


Last Updated:
Nov 16, 2007

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Unsubscribe
Invite to My Blog

Gender: Female
Status: Single
Age: 42
Sign: Pisces

City: portland
State: Oregon
Country: US

Signup Date: 02/13/07

Friday, December 14, 2007

 

Press Release for Julie A Witherspoon,
Category: Automotive

Press Release for Julie A Witherspoon,

Attached is in edit for Roger Weidner on the Barbra Paramenter
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE regarding a Felon Attorney re instated by
the Oregon State BAR. For a copy of the Attatchments
contact (
e-for-mation@hotmail.com )


For Julie A Witherspoon and her children:

 
 

Judge_the_Bench


Last Updated:
Nov 16, 2007

Post New Blog
Customize
Email to a Friend

 
Gender: Female
Status: Single
Age: 42
Sign: Pisces

City: [portland] pursuant to UCC 1-308
State: Oregon
Country: US

Signup Date: 03/03/07

 
 
Wednesday, December 12, 2007
 
 
Today we began to write the
Federal Injunction for Julie
A Witherspoon.


Category: Jobs, Work, Careers
Date: Dec 11, 2007 7:17 PM
Regarding: Correspondence related to:  See: Bottom of Blog.

The media will not believe
it or cover the story. Now
Julie has a (bogus) warrant
out for her arrest for not
following a pre-emptive
court order to turn in her
fire arm on false allegation
rebutted by her lawyer
which was not pressed
or reported to the police
but 'later' called an eminent
thereat, future threat against  
a foster parent
, the home
where Julie's daughter
reportedly got raped in.

Julie was out of town when
the allegation arose she
threatened the Foster Mother. 
That woman 'told' a Case
Worker (days after the
incident purportedly took
place) then recanted and
said, "I can't recall that
happened". The BAR
Association is attacking
and Disbarring one of
Julie's former Attorneys
for a MOTION to protect
her family from 'Hate
Crimes' committed
against her and her two
children.

Bureaucrat protection is
not child protection but
they use the Juvenile
Process ( non criminal
venue ) to pre convict
on criminal offenses
when that is a violation
of our right to a fair trial,
 a pattern and a practice
in 'simulating legal process'
against the right to the
presumption of innocence,

"No Complaint, No Victim',
because if there is
"NO VICTIM, NO COMPLAINT"
is possible, a crime has not
been committed.

(Julie Fears For Her Life)

She thought she was going
to be killed when they put
her in an ICE CHAMBER AT
THE ORANGE COUNTY
SHERIFFS OFFICE after
being labeled a Belligerent,
because she tried to fire he
Child Protective Caseworker
with a SUBSTITUTION OF
POWER OF ATTORNEY
placing her Pen Power
as her Children's Voice.

When she comes to the
 courthouse to file with the
Clerk they arrest her for
trespassing.

Evil, sheer evil,

She has tape-recordings
so most of it will allow you
to be a first hand witness
to this corruption and
know you would never
want to be in any
entanglement with our
current judiciary. They
are sheer evil and
"Just say, "Yes, Massa"
 is all they think is a citizen
response when the CPS
knock.

Psychology the 'Wild Card'.

Subject: RE: Real 'Life' drama, more 'Psychology the
'Wild Card'.

Body:
----------------- Original Message -----------------
From:
All Military, Special Services & Truckers Site
Date: Dec 11, 2007 7:17 PM


How are you familiar with this story?

How recent did all this take place?

Can this story be accessed on the
internet for verification? Would you
want top post it in a bulletin?


----------------- Original Message -----------------
From:
Roger Weidner
Date: Dec 11, 2007 8:46 PM


Real 'Life' drama, more
'Psychology the 'Wild Card'.

Please forward to any
news station in Orange
County California and to
the Governor of California.

(You Know Whom).
 
Please help Julie get this
exposed.
Those judges need to
know 'We the  People'
are paying attention'.

This could happen to
anybody.

It happened to me but not
as bad.

The DA just invented a
future crime and took
my daughter.

The DHS still tried to take
my grand baby with that
non prosecuted future
crime -never committed - 
and all the criminal charges
I faced was dropped after
I fired my Court Appointed
Attorney and went right in
there -communicating in
the written format only-
and made my own objections
to the DA and told the judge
he had a pre set disposition.

I did better than the 'lawyer'.


This is going on in California.

Wickedness sheer wickedness
in political circles.

Reads like fiction:

Torture, lies, kidnapping,
generals taking advantage
of female subordinates
(women who will not put up
with bully tactics), Veteran
mother raped at the time of
Sheriff contact while being
searched, a girl molested
by the father's circle of friends,
(father also a child molester
and working for the public
school system even if the
Court issued a finding that
kids were in danger around
him,) A boy thrown to the
ground by his throat after
being seized by his IV in
the hospital while protecting
his mother. Veteran mother
and children seized out of
Germany Hospital.

Kids put on a plane to
America, mother put in
the mental hospital at
the orders of an evil
commander who showed
up at the hospital with
a blank order and accused
Julie of being suicidal
when she was ill (her
and her children
hospitalized for he same
sickness).

She demanded a hearing
and never got one. Her
kids flown out of Germany
to cause her to come here
to fight for custody and win.
Then her husband just drops
the kids off at the Welfare
Office and now they are going
to be put up for adoption.

(??????)

The judge ignored all that.

(??????)


Julie is not going to kill
herself, never was.

Her commander just said
at the time he and a
conspirator took her,
"You was drunk the
other day and we are
taking the kids".

Motions to recuse the
California  judge are
ignored and the Attorney
who wrote the MOTION
suffers retaliation from
the BAR Assosiatoin.

This Judge is in the same
Masonic Order Julie
Witherspoon's ex husband
is a member of. Her ex is
a 33rd degree Mason.
 
The media will not believe
it or cover the story. Now
Julie has a (bogus) warrant
out for her arrest for not
following a pre-emptive
court order to turn in her
fire arm on false allegation
rebutted by her lawyer
which was not pressed
or reported to the police
but 'later' called an eminent
thereat -future threat
against a 'foster parent'-
the one where Julie's
daughter reportedly got
raped in. -Julie was out
of town  when the allegation
arose that she threatened
the Foster Mother.-The  
foster mother talked with
a Case  Worker -days
after the incident  purportedly
took place- then the  purported
complaint was recanted and
 the foster mother said,
"I can't  recall that happened". 

The BAR  Association is
attacking and Disbarring one
of Julie's Attorneys  for a
MOTION to protect her family
from 'Hate Crimes' committed
against her and her two
children.

When she comes to the
courthouse  to file with the
Clerk they arrest her  for
trespassing.

Evil, sheer evil. 

She has tape-recordings
so most of it will allow you
to be a first hand witness
to this corruption and
know you would never
want to be in any 
entanglement with our
current judiciary.

They are sheer evil and
"Just say, "Yes, Massa" is
 all they think is a citizen
 response when the CPS
 knock.

Psychology the 'Wild Card'.

Oh, btw


My name is Marilyn LeBaron.

I am the Author of the
above Political Complaint on
behalf Julie A Witherspoon
and believe this ADMINISTRATION
needs a severe immediate
reprimand.

This arrogant reply from/on behalf
Thomas Fiorello is in violation of
our right to have a neutral judiciary.

Message ID: 17032982
Date Sent: 12/11/2007 7:17:00 PM

Body: How are you familiar with this story? How recent did all this take place?
Can this story be accessed on the internet for verification? Would you want top post
it in a bulletin?


----------------- Original Message -----------------
From:
Roger Weidner

8:14 AM - 2 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment - 
 

Judge_the_Bench


Last Updated:
Nov 16, 2007

 
A link to the Blog you
selected has been sent to
the following addresses:

blawglawg@yahoo.com

e-for-mation@hotmail.com

juliebrinko@yahoo.com

madatcps@aol.com
Posted by AuntyBLAWGwar on Wednesday, December 12, 2007 at 8:28 AM
[
Reply to this]
For a copy of the Attatchments contact ( e-for-mation@hotmail.com )

10:37 PM - 0 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment

Imported from external blog

Visibility: Everyone
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted: Dec 15, 2007 5:52am
Jul 27, 2007
           To the Honorable Ron Paul for President 

                              View Current Signatures   -   Sign the Petition
                              http://www.petitiononline.com/34652011/petition.html
To:  Ron Paul 2008 campain

We thank you The Honorable Congressman Ron Paul for your wisdom voting against the Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997. As Parents we are concerned about the corruption and usurping of constitutional rights in the name of the children. State CPS agencies are legally kidnapping childen for federal dollars. Parents who had there kids taken with no evidence to support the allegations. When they appear in Family/Juvenile Courts. The accused are deprived of a trial by jury. Also Deprived of the Fifth Amendment rights not answer questions they can use against them. There is no due process and rights to any fair trial under the color of law. Children have no rights under the writ of Habeas Corpus being held in Foster care with no evidence of a crime. We ask you as a contender for the President of the United States of America. If Elected you will do everything in power under the US Constitution has delegated to the executive branch. You will cut of the money encouraging this unconstitutional practice of the States CPS agencies of taking children from loving parents. We understand the Family unit is the back bone of our society and the strength of our nation. CPS through this Federal Money under CAPTA(Child Abuse Protection Treatment Act of 1974), The Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997 and the social security act has corrupted our local police,local government and politicians because of the money they get per child. We have petitioned our governors,our state legislators and our county government about this rogue operation taking kids with no due process. To no avail the abuse in foster homes, the lawlessness of the CPS workers,the judges and the police violating our civil rights fell on deaf ears and have failed the people they are supposed to represent. We ask you do everything in your power to put an end the CPS as we know and keep government out of the family. We acknowledge real Child Abuse,Neglect and Abandonment is a criminal act that should be dealt with in criminal court under State laws. And the Child should be removed for the child's safety and put with close kin and a foster home as a last resort. We ask you again to stop the funding and return it as a local/State issue and no longer subsidised by the Federal Government.

Sincerely,
 

The Undersigned 

HERE IS ANOTHER REASON: RULE 53 REFROM

                    http://journals.aol.com/reformcps/RULE-53-REFORM-BLAWG-LAW-OAR-ORS/

Visibility: Everyone
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted: Jul 27, 2007 12:04am
Jun 8, 2007
My Kids
 
Album: My Family
My Kids

by 73 totalMarilyn LeBaron (63)
Visibility: Everyone
Tags: , , , ,
Posted: Jun 8, 2007 6:57pm
Jun 8, 2007
Dear Blog Reader,



I have not seen my son in almost three years...



Dear ACLU,

Please look into this case.

The DHS is not supposed to take action on behalf of themselves
and then purport to protect the child.
My kids were no where around
when the DHS claim was purported to have happened. They could
not have been affected even if what they said was true.  DHS is not
the BPS, (Bureaucrat Protection
Services), but supposed to Petition
on behalf of their 'a Child', Client, as in CPS (Child Protective S
ervices).

They do this to lots of people.

Please send this link to all your contacts...





There are 172 other petitions to sign right her at Care2.com regarding CPS Reform


Please read and endorse http://www.PetitionOnline.com/families/petition.html



MOTION TO QUASH POLK COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT



On Behalf of Melanie Victoria LeBaron, in Propria Persona.
 [97233] 
DHS Legal Department – C/O Jennifer Heldt

Social Service Specialist

Rockwood CW

CPS Unit

 

Munltinomah County, District 2

3552 SE 122nd Ave.Portland Oregon, 97236    


I, Melanie LeBaron, do herby respectfully ask Jennifer Heldt to recuse as CPS Advocate for the case she assigned to herself seeking my offspring, Victoria Couvillion, as a Client, pursuant to the Substantive Due Process rights. Assigning the case is ‘judicial in its nature’ and my daughter and I have a right to and independent judiciary, as it is written in the Declaration of Independence.  Remaining on the case as the assessor, or Advocate, is in violation of Victoria’s Counsel of Choice, which I assert for her now by asking that Jennifer Heldt recuse as a CPS Agent, as my mom, Victoria’s grandmother, has objected prior.  I also respectfully request to STRIKE her notes and to QUASH the current report form her case file. I also respectfully demand that all matters linked to Polk County Circuit Court, Petition III, Melanie V. LeBaron, a Child, 7163-J, be QUASHED, since
Supreme Court rule prohibits prejudice as Probable Cause to become a Premise for court action and Matt L. Hawkins, subjected Melanie to prejudice questions, regarding a book her read. There was no emergency there like there is no emergency here today.
    Since the American Inalienable rights include an independent judiciary, which means CPS Agents do not get to assess upon performing judicial duties just prior to the assessment for the same case, pursuant to Judge Horner saying “The Courts are not an investigative body”, O5P2064 & O5P2176, Polk County Circuit Court, Child Custody Case, Singleton VS. LeBaron. I will expect Jennifer Heldt, while acting in the capacity as CPS Agent and judge, not to knock on my door, at MY REGISTERED ADDRESS, [97233], again. I, nor my daughter, authorize Jennifer Heldt to Attest in open court or DHS staff meetings or otherwise submit judicial reports for either me or my daughter based on BEST INTERESTS, especially if pursuant to any Polk County Adjudication, since REASONABLE EFFORTS should not subvert our American Declaration of Independence, adjacent to the fact that Chandra Snyder has acted as judge and prosecutor in the same violations enumerated in this MOTION TO QUASH POLK COUNTY. Furthermore, multiple violations of the right to a SPEEDY TRIAL, compounded by conflicts of interests circumvent both the Oregon and the US Constitution. Therefore pursuant to the Inalienable Right, I do not authorize CPS agents to act outside their limitations, for any purpose, especially for that of a Municipal Contract sought under mass duress upon the American population, who, legally illiterate have not pre disposition to notice, not having any legal training in Contractual Law… Due to the American population being in ignorance ‘We the People, have not considered our Legal and Natural Rights before we agreed to assign them to the DMV or abandon them therein, and since the ‘Municipal as well as the Administrative systems’ include noncriminal prosecution, wherein there is no justice sought ‘Life’ is considered with too little regard. Thereto ‘Liberty’ and ‘The Pursuit of Happiness’ provide America with equal opportunity, which includes the right to ‘Life’, and said phrase provides a remedy for that which being Administrative, subject to contractual agreements and contractual law, causes the phrase, ‘Ignorance is no excuse’ to be irrelevant, which pertains to Criminal Justice System, leaving noncrime and lots of nonpunishment to inspire the disintegrated phrase, ‘Legal Illiteracy Is The Excuse For Such a Power Position’, and collusion. ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGES, have ignored their Oath of Office, to subvert our Sovereign status before God. Our public education system, our government is at fault for not Fully Advising the ‘sheep’ like people they dominate, when enforcing ORS as the Supreme Law of the Land, then say, “You get no Lawyer, or Privileged relationships”, and call it BEST INTERESTS when the CPS come to take our kids, who are worth more that $20.00 dollars, in any century.  When in opposite, ‘Sometime this Century’ the power of the parent’s pen had been devaluated. It’s like having a pseudo religious leader, when compared to Webster’s Dictionary definition of the context of the word Religion, ‘A mans way of life’, which is also covered in the laws that govern the protection of diversified cultures everywhere, even while commercialization of that which was forbidden by the Holy Book used to define licensed religion, today. Yet, while considering, all the diversity, Sovereignty is not included as a venue or jurisdiction easily, even before we are born, considering Roe vs. Wade and the assign of the Power of Attorney to abortion clinics authorized by the Health Departments agreements, including them as a pseudo Law Firm, which retains nurses and clerks to advise children to exercise Power, assigned by partial emancipation practices, to their inexperienced use of the pen without the supervision of parents, and all accountability thereto nullified for abortionists. But, in opposite a child cannot get their ears pierced without accountability to the licensee, which is a conflict of the applications of laws, wherein legislature has failed us, which does not promote respect for religious leadership in the home, or allow for the protection of the unborn not being included in the phrase ‘We the People’.

    Since ‘We the People’, have the right to equal protection of the laws, I insist that an assessment is the equivalent to and investigation due to the nature of CPS ‘representation’ being prosecutory and in violation of the Separation of Powers, at noncriminal Administrative rule, whereas the Oregon State Bar has denied that Max R. Wall is subject to a PRC violation, in the instance when he Attested the DHS Fully Advised Melanie LeBaron.  Thereto, the Office of Noncriminal Prosecutor is one step off that which defines Representation, as when compared to the role of the Criminal Prosecutor, who directly representing the victim, as well as the voice of the people, which left Melanie LeBaron without Counsel subject to the full protection of Max R. Wall’s license agreement. Whereas the State of Oregon’s Agency claimed to have been assailed because of a dead bolt and a call to the State Police, when a call was logged to complain about Chandra Snyder circumventing the OAR, which is equivalent of overturning a judge if he said there is no case and the DA went to trial anyway, getting another judge to see where his Probable Cause had aim, and the other judge missed the mark, without any new and relevant information, considering the compounded violation of he right to a Speedy Trial & the No Teeth Factor. But, Max R. Wall is not handed to prosecute the voice of the State of Oregon, unless it is the victim and can be named the damaged party, like in the case assigned to Mark Allen Heslinga, where Max R. Wall had no jurisdiction over the criminal allegation. He is left to represent the voice of the DHS, which represents the will of the DMV, and what DHS give as Legal Advise to a teen in the form of a prognosis, so he just misses the responsibility of naming a victim the obligation to give Proper Counsel, while gaining from the lack thereof. Which is convoluted since Judge Horner did appoint Melanie a law firm, at first. But, I wonder why DHS is not held to accountability to Fully Advise their clients regarding all the aspects of the Supreme Law of the Land pertaining to a second set of double CONTINUANCED, when getting a Child’s nod to allow it. But, Fully Advisement on the Premise is insufficient as to omit Full Advisement of how the disregard to the right to a Speedy Trial, would adversely affect her the rest of her life, considering, Max R. Wall intended to prophesy her mother would hurt the unborn at the upcoming Trial. As directly thereto, Melanie’s voice was not represented, or preserved or even sought, neither her right to establish a home with the parent of her choice. So I wonder, were the pharmaceutical companies profit margins are or the overly protected CPS Caseworker, which not the voice of grass roots ambition, are identified as the voice of the people, in the Office of the DA, Max R. Wall’s action for suit in this case? If so, how was that also representing the ‘a Child’s needs, if not the grass root right, as Melanie herself would have to declare she believed her mother might assail a bureaucrat, where there was no contact between them, and be invited to meetings with Supervisory Staff and her CPS Advocate, which was not the case. Where is it documented that Melanie was invited to and extra clinical diagnosis session? And were in any case studies has the clinician treated one patient to resolve the propensity for criminal activity in another subject not in his care, while never examining the diagnosed? It is illegal to prosecute and represent, too, especially the accused when your action is directed at somebody else. Moreover, where DHS/CPS Agents are not members of the Oregon State Bar or Medical Doctors not having privilege in either capacity, do give Medical Advise while failing give the proper Legal Advise, when not qualified in either capacity to report Melanie to have been Fully Advised on the Premise, to which Max R. Wall attested. Since Melanie was not his Client, congruent, to the standard practice not to represent the Client of another law firm to say, by second hand, Full Advise was given, making the DHS Agency his Client, and the damaged party, and Melanie their damaged property, intended for the prosecutory action, since DHS is licensed to Advise anybody, especially when there was a conflict of interest between the CPS and the child, as well as with the mother, who had no Privilege, both being under duress. Thereto, Melanie had no Privilege with them either, they never asked. Max R. Wall was not Melanie’s Defender in the case were there was a conflict of interest between Melanie and Chandra Snyder, at the beginning, which is centered around the right to freedom of religion. And by such, like as in this case, Chandra Snyder, DHS Supervisory Staff, did so perform judicial duties, and also act in the capacity of prosecutor by signing the Petition she presented to Polk County Circuit Court after she had circumvented the Probable Cause stage of the American Due Process rights and assigned the case after it had already been closed a screening. When later, in half of Max R. Wall’s duties, did overturn the assigned caseworkers intention to allow visitation and prevented visitation on behalf of her own malicious allegation, that there was a physical confrontation initiated against her in court by Marilyn LeBaron, when in fact it was initiated by herself when she seized the signature pages of the AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS, which is perjury and prejudice. It should not remain unheard that the judge is bias to take the side of a bureaucrat, without inquiry, after Max R. Wall had gained a unfair advantage, prior, seeking a second set of double CONTINUANCES over the matter considering court had not been called to order, and people were still sitting down. What happened is in no way evidence someone would be attacked, especially the protected expectant mother, who with DHS diagnosis her protection sought through improper channels. Max R. Wall’s slanderous intentions are misapplied a bureaucratic protection suit, and not relevant to the Mother in absence of a history of violence on the intended felons part, which was over the same caseworker Chandra Snyder had personally assigned to the case to prior, which impeaches her, beforehand, considering the history of the Exhibits and when they got ‘mailed funny’ and when the began to get ‘mailed even funnier’.  In conclusion, Marry Anne E. Miller was Max R. Wall’s Client in Fact, but the Oath of Affirmation would fall under Mark Allen Heslinga’s call, if he would dare retain a Client before the actual damaged party presented her self seeking justice. Melanie LeBaron was not represented on any count with respect to either the MOTION FOR A CONTINUANCE or the MOTION FOR TELEPHONIC TESTIMONEY since she could not have been damaged by the Premise because the timeline of Exhibits would not be congruent to contact by and between her mother for CPS to present an assessment of the same. Marilyn LeBaron was not represented, as she had no physical contact with CPS or DHS Supervisory Staff which could be considered a clinical evaluation pursuant to any Exhibit purported as support of said MOTIONS.

     Please ask the question, if you ever examine, the preponderance of evidence, “Is there such a thing as extra judicial testimony, like unto the equivalent of extra judicial evidence?” which goes to Judge Avera and the possibility that he has credentials in psychology, which is used like a ‘Wild Card’ in place of holy knowledge of future happenings. Only after you weigh in the fact that, if Melanie would have been properly appointed Counsel of Choice, as she did request it from her caseworker many times, and Chandra Snyder would not have sized her right to the security of her papers, the request for proper representation would have been validated, and could have been honored, or the case DISMISSED because it is illegal to proceed without Proper Representation, and grounds for the CONTINUANCE requested by Charles Douglas Berg, would have firmly been established, considering no one should have to give up there right to a Fair Trial no matter how many CONTINUANCES are granted. Next, and including the fact that Marilyn LeBaron’s pen was impeached of Power, but if not, Judge Avera would have been forced to allow a CONTINUANCE so Melanie could get the Lawyer or Attorney she requested early in her detainment while in Coos Bay instead of CASA. Next to the fact that you consider REASONABLE EFFORTS circumvents the Fifth and Sixth Amendment, in that a parent has no Privilege (Attorney Client Privilege with a bureaucrat), but if they don’t show up to CPS ordered meetings a parent loses by default, which points to a sanctioned preset disposition a the judicial level even while there is a violation of the Separation of Powers in the OAR when a CPS Supervisor can overturn a case closed at screening, a violation of Canon, since CPS Agents exercise judicial powers, too, but, of course, not Judge Avera’s responsibility, not here at least. But, what about the rest of it, shall we just call it Sanctioned Judicial Discretion? Because, allowing the CONTINUANCE, and Fully Advisement from Counsel of Choice for Melanie could have resulted in the exercise of her right to a Speedy Trial and could have got the AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS empowered, as Marilyn LeBaron did the criminal charges against herself resultant of act of resisting Chandra Snyder’s prejudice power position citing a judge, who finally did recuse, though not until a licensed attorney finally demanded it of him. But, no Attorney was appointed to Melanie, which unconscionable as well as illegal, whereas a conflict of interest between her and Chandra Snyder existed at the earliest stage of her case, while ignoring her Clients will and severing her from that which is the conscience of men, her faith in God, which is not Proper Representation. Being that said case was closed at screening on November 14th, 2005 and then having the same, Chandra Snyder, who impeachable, did act as judge and co-prosecutor by both assigning the case and then presenting it after she herself got a different screener when assigning the case, circumventing the probable cause stage of this case, when intending to get in the middle of all that was already being done imposing CPS Activity, in lieu of honoring the parent’s efforts, which was omitted in all the reports, and is not Proper Representation either, sending the message with her Supervisory Capacity, that only a bureaucrat can approve how a family sorts out their private matters and nothing a citizen does is good enough until DHS puts their stamp of approval on it. Prejudice should not over run Privilege, while relieving the parent of their child and imposing compliance tactics, Social Pressure as a Service with police force against the Fifth Amendment right, and later also stepping in as caseworker, too, while adlibbing about the passions of the child, in that Melanie was the ‘a Client’ of the other caseworker, who was denied the power to allow reconciliation, because of what she said was done to her in Court. Again, second handed Client sharing for a case not assigned your desk or Office.     What a team Judge Avera and Chandra Snyder make. He read the seized AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS, a day after or the day of the Trial as it is a Point in Fact Avera declared DHS jurisdiction over the matter after the Trial commenced and did proceed to SUMMON Marilyn LeBaron to PERSONNALLY APPEAR shortly after ten days had passed. So, the legally inclined should wonder if that is a RULE 53 move or it that is an automatic MOTOIN available to the judge, because I don’t think the CPS Agent is inclined to identify a jurisdictional argument or if they read the MOTOION and then said, “We better get her to a Dependency hearing”, now that the Trial is over, by so, present a MOTION, after the meeting to veto Nicole K Halls reconciliation plans, without replacing her as Advocate, too, so they could have Judge Avera validate ‘them’, and have him declare, “Yes, I see the STRAW MAN here, “I find DHS has jurisdiction”, once and twice into court record at a dependency / pseudo sentencing herring, but keeping the muted Caseworker, but assign to her a pen kept in the inkwell somewhere at the DHS Office, ordering, again by second hand, the representation of DHS Staff as the protected, allowing the supervisory veto to go forward as a “No Contact Order”. So in the end, Nicole K. Hall was never really Melanie’s true Advocate, and has no Power to Appeal, because a judge should not, and has no Power to argue her own opinion but is instructed what her Attestation is therefore having no real power in her pen, just limited to do the will of whoever took offence in support of Chandra Snyder’s allegation regarding her will when subject to verbal objections from the non-defendant as DISHONOR to Marilyn LeBaron, which actually DISHONOR to the American flag.     Max R. Wall’s visualization of the future, whoever else was involved in the non-clinical diagnosis, and Nicole K. Hall’s vacant signature, said late jurisdiction hearing, is a demonstration of bias considering the Chandra Snyder sized Melanie’s right to the Security of her Papers preventing her signature upon the AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS, which would have empower her mother’s dormant pen, where in said motion Melanie’s mother attested Melanie had demanded a lawyer, and was threatening to bring a claim against the State of Oregon. But, then again Melanie’s representation was split between Max R Wall and everybody else but Nicole K. Hall, so the seer of Polk County Court superseded Marilyn LeBaron account of actual events. That attestation would have proved there was a conflict on interest between her and the woman that seized the document Marilyn LeBaron filed upon each involved party as required she do. Moreover, due to the fact that Max R. Wall ‘represented’ Melanie’s mother as well as Melanie, both by second hand, had split his duties as Counsel or Advisor to Melanie with the DHS, making the State of Oregon’s interests in promoting the gain of pharmaceutical up sell his Client in Fact, leaving his primary objective within such a duo second handed ‘Client relationship’ without the equal protection of the PRC in all three directions, when including the interests of the ‘State of Oregon’, Max R. Wall, not being subject thereto according to the Oregon State Bar. Further out, next to the fact that there is no right to have your whole case tried before a jury of our peers the US and Oregon State Constitution is circumvented on the mass, since lousy parenting is not a crime, and an investigation called an assessment having all the definitions of our Due Process rights circumvented in the OAR, replaced by new definitions, and a venue changed into noncrime, which circumvents all the right to equal protection of Counsel of Choice while the bureaucrat becomes the parent of all, and gets to look over the shoulders of everybody else, too, including that of God. Considering the value of the American Due Process rights, and considering the value 'We the People' place on our children, in comparison Administrative Judges do not value the place of the parent, at least not very much when a bureaucrat can condemned our bloodline and then the seer of the court can condemned our future behavior. Congruent to the Supreme Court Rule which has shown they don’t care that we have a bloodline or the right to have our seed protected and put in line for an inheritance, when paternal parents are deemed unfit, giving foster parents the advantage or at least equal footing as contenders for custody when consideration as adoptive placement next to grandparents is given. We should all seriously consider this in light that, in the case, Melanie LeBaron ‘a Child’, the Juvenile Department, 7163-J, who was not assigned a case to work at the time of giving orders about her placement, had condemned her mother’s bloodline after previously arranging, without telling Marilyn LeBaron, a DHS caseworker would be attend at her daughter’s meeting with him, which was directed at the mother instead of the child, which tied in the Independence Police Department as well, because they violated Melanie’s right to a Speedy Trial on something else, then used it like a lasso with a slip knot to loop her mother in. But, the caseworker, the future non-client of Max R. Wall’s Future Prognosis, attended that meeting late for an assessment with no supervisory extensions in the Exhibit against the adversely affected. PRESENTMENT of that which is not authorized by the OAR in the form of questions is confusing to the subject and not proper. Since, better late than never is not better than not being there at all, after she said “Police are not needed”, seems to be the mode of operation, never mind the game of leap frog that gets played at a later date after the completion of the belated report, and the close of a case. See: Valentines Day 2005. And to that I add Mat L. Hawkins of the Juvenile Department, who once attested Melanie had not been abused by her mother, wanted the DHS to find some teeth but said they had none, but, the DHS continued to make demands on a closed case anyway, both of which happened after his Attestation Melanie had suffered from third party abuses, but not at home. Which gets us back to Chandra Snyder and he conflict of interest between her and Melanie LeBaron. Well to that I say, “If it ‘Takes a whole village to raise a child’, now any body in the collective Foster Village is a candidate to be an adoptive parent’ especially since a foster parent is the only option the CPS Caseworker has as placement according to Statute. And to that I ask, what is the zip code of ‘THE WHOLE VILLAGE’, and did that village sprout up around ‘a Castle’? An with bureaucrats condemning the bloodline of any given parent without proper DNA screening or access to the Privilege with the doctor, a power struggle for the Privilege Information should be a hot topic at this point and goes to the Point in Fact that there is not actual complaint documented, just the mere fact that a relationship with a doctor exists. We must object or every body will be a slave to their doctor and become a gunny pig, and the whole world a clinic. That power struggle is surrounded around our right to privacy and freedom of religion. Therefore we must at least seek to uphold Separation of Powers, especially when parents have no Privileged relationship with respect to the State of Oregon, the Municipal Police, or the DHS, which is unconstitutional in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment pursuant to the Point in Fact that being denied all our Privileged relationship is the equivalent of being equity, treated as though we are property of the ‘State of Oregon’. In example, how could a chair have Privilege with a lawyer or a doctor, or have an attachment to offspring for that matter? In conclusion, ‘We the People’ are not property, but Sovereign unto God, which no Contractual agreement should sever, Separation of Powers is the key to this argument, because a proper investigation includes incommunicado which is supposed to happen at the earliest stage, but cannot when there is not Privilege to speak of, especially when Psychology the Wild card is the only law left, and a child is being robbed of her freedom of religion, which is a matter of Sanctioned Prejudice, but not a matter for the State or an iron clad grip of pseudo parenting of parents, since children have their pen assigned to their parents until they turn eighteen. So, instead of opening my Bible should I open the ORS and start reading it to my offspring? Because there seems to be no room for God here, in this pseudo secular godhood granted to the opinion of the prognosis.       Also, pursuant to the Sixth Amendment right, and the right to rebut an allegation at the earliest stage of an assessment, the demands placed upon Marilyn LeBaron’s PERSON were in the written format, but made on a closed case, with the disposition of UNABLE TO DETERMINE, were Chandra Snyder was not authorized by the OAR to send such demands, and also refused the parent the evidence, a grievance process, and access to the attestation from the witnesses though that witness was not attainable for cross-examination, nor was the timeline of events established to link relevancy. So all that is left is a violation of the inference upon inference rule, while CPS Agents taught their authoritative position as Social Service Experts, proving “Just say, ‘Yes Massa”’, is the only rule of thumb, they full knowing it is to be REASONALBLE EXPECTED, in Polk County, since RULE 53, can allow Partial Cross Consolidation between two separate venues, At Law and AT LAW, crime and noncrime, and turn you into a criminal for committing a lesser non ticket able parenting offense, so non punishment turns out to innonfit the non sentence, since it is preventive, so why the arduous prolonged separation tactics and all the condemnation? Chandra Snyder did in fact make her future premise known, but on the other hand, she would not otherwise allow for PRESENTMENT or a REBUTAL of the same because the case was closed and refused to answer the volumes of the letters sent to the DHS office. Said letter of intimidation is in Exhibit for the Custody Case, Singleton Vs. LeBaron, 05P2176 and 05P2064, Judge Horner, Polk County Circuit Court. Marilyn LeBaron to receive any and all demands, which are called ‘Letters of Expectation’, after a case is FOUNDED is contingent upon timely Due Notice, mailed by CERTIFIED MAIL according to the OAR, but the one that came did not contain all applicable ORS and OAR pursuant to a Summary of Points Raised and Authorities Relied Upon. But, DHS cited a Judge that FOUNDED, the UNABLE TO DETERMINE, disposition and he has no RULE OF COURT to do so, since the Judge is not an assess-t-gative body, e-hem, the Judge is not the assessor, nor do the OAR allow for the case to be upgraded after the case is closed so he is out of line and Polk County Liable, for his lack of adhesion to his Cannon. He not appointing Proper Counsel to Marilyn LeBaron, when he demanded to hear from the DHS is the equivalent of assigning the case and then taking the seat of the DA and ordering him to skip the Petition, and just send in the rap sheet, or judicial report, he would be accustomed to getting if a Petition had been filed by DHS. But, no, he left the Parent to study law, Law, and all the OAR, and all the ORS, and all the RULES OF COURT, only to ignore the Attestations that Thomas Alexander Bleu LeBaron wanted to come back to his established home, which was entered into record by favored party, hence, “No Complaint, No Victim”, not a contractual law term, belonging in Crime and Punishment & the Justice System, so the State of Oregon is the only, officially named victim at a later date, Judge Horner the leader of a lynch mob to be offended by the words, “Get a Search Warrant” due to Marilyn LeBaron reading the OAR all by herself,  without Counsel of Choice to help her. So in essence, the fact that the DHS had ‘No Teeth’, they delayed the Court Process while just looking for a reason to take a bite, but in lieu of their own teeth used Judge Horner as a set of falsies, which Judge Avera recognized in that he did not include that point in his JUDGMENT, including only the condemnation instigated at the Juvenile Department. In the meantime there was no way to examine relevancy and make objections without duress, and lawyers were asking for retainer agreements up to $10, 000. While Judge Horner included the ‘State of Oregon’, as an involved party after Judge Luukinen, when applying RULE 53, said, ‘Get a lawyer or get a broken arm’ when the Child Custody Case 05P2064 / O5P2176 was denied the Partial Cross Consolidation Marilyn LeBaron requested. Instead of upholding the right to face the State of Oregon that request was denied because of a tiny word ‘in’, which produced the first violation of the Right to a SPEEDY TRIAL for the matters that pertain to Thomas Alexander Bleu LeBaron, and proves we have no right to Counsel at all, being that Judge Horner ORDERED to hear from the DHS and did not appoint Thomas Alexander Bleu LeBaron or either his parents Counsel of any kind when he finally decided he was going to make Marilyn LeBaron read a judicial report from them, but not face them, which circumvents that which is ORDER pursuant to the OAR, in that DHS had not filed a Petition of there own. But, Judge Horner DEMANDED to he wanted a report, though three months late did he do so. I guess, it does not matter that the opposing party did not require they show and that Judge Sullivan forwarded the MOTION FOR DISCLOSURE, though Judge Luukinen said, “No Facing The DHS” at the time of CONSOLIDATION. Now, including the two sets of DOUBLE CONTINUANCES granted Max R. Wall while DHS tried to figure out what they wanted to do with all the Exhibits mailed to them ‘sort of funny’, I’d say Judge Horner has to go crawl up into Judge Avera’s lap and say, “I told you so”, and so did our prophet”! But, if he does one should consider Judge Avera did not allow him to on the point in Petition III where DHS had insinuated that he could. Now all that remains is, “Go do what Judge Avera ORDERED, even against your right to Privacy, and Doctor Patient Privilege, or the DHS will come and take your grandchildren, too. Said custody dispute came before Polk County Court, under the opposing parties duress filled actions, with letters form DHS in hand, that were admitted into record, but, they had not had a legal assessment completed within the limitations of the OAR, and said letters should not have mailed out in the first place nor provide for RULE 53, though a popular move in Polk County, as Partial Cross Consolidation between Criminal Prosecution and Noncriminal matters, one having bearing on he other, but not applicable if between two cases when the citizen MOTIONS for it to allow for a new judge to be appointed in the case were DHS may prejudice the former. But, instead two cases squished together not subject to proper presentment is what commenced and not a complete CONSOLIDATION, where the Substantive Due Process right is circumvented, and objections struck thereto, a show of disregard to the Oath of Office, when the example used by Judge Luukinen could have been followed, and used to QUASH DHS allegation. But, instead it is used to oppress the Fifth Amendment and delay the complaint of a citizen against a bureaucrat who misused RULE 53, to tip the scale in one case to build the other, while assessing. Said, complaint is FOUNDED in the ORS, where Zachariah Singleton is not Melanie LeBaron’s father and not allowed Privilege, therefore, being late, DHS was prohibited from disclosure over the facts of her activity, which had no bearing on Thomas Alexander Bleu LeBaron, so in lieu of Teeth on any matter, the fax sent out was unauthorized. Which is where Chandra Snyder is the blame because she continued a closed case all the way to into Petition III in support of her subordinate where no documentation of supervisory extensions was documented properly or in Exhibit. Thereto, while I sought to complain about Judge Horner, and his sanctioned preset disposition, all I got from on Civil Rights lawyer is, “Well, it’s his courtroom”, and a improper diagnosis accompanied by conjecture as punishment. Proper Counsel pursuant to UCC 1-207, my right to a rebuttal at the earliest stage of an investigation / assessment, {‘asses-ti-gation’}, accomplished with police involvement, could have offered order to this matter, but, in violation of the OAR since there is not rule that allows for the upgrading of a disposition from UNABLE TO DETERMINE to FOUNDED, DHS activity is mute on its face. Judge Horner had no grounds to ORDER to hear from the DHS, or the DHS cite Horner without presenting a case for Adjudication, even if he wanted to hear from them any reports would have been inappropriate and QUASHABLE. But, all those arguments were completely left in the sideline because Judge Horner, knew the case was closed and assigned DHS to represent the Thomas Alexander Bleu LeBaron anyway, and not granting lawyers to the parent in question, while Marilyn LeBaron, barred from placing evidence into the record, has grounds to negate the responsibility to have to go bring DHS to Court herself, when she is the subject and they the opposing party. Furthermore out of order, since she asked for discovery and that was denied, too, as well as not allowed to cross-examine the comments made by her opponent over the Exhibited letters from the DHS, which were placed into court record. She was shut down, Judge Horner saying, “What does that got to do with this?”, even before he ORDERED it now would. At every turn the right to face the allegation and offer a rebuttal was denied by Polk County Court Judges, who seem to be dependent on the opinion of an Agency before they ever actually had on to share on the matter.     Finally, I will not speak to any CPS Agent in PERSON again, as DHS cannot prepare my documents giving Legal Advise, not my Counsel of Choice, and next to the Point in Fact that DHS Agents hold no license to practice law, their intended ‘Client relationships’ are both left without Constitutional representation, protection of the PRC, or a Plea Bargain available to offer parents. In that the ORS, is not a law firm, it extends no Power of Attorney unless the contract bears your signature, but your offspring is where that contract directs the conflict of contractual agreements, because, who in this nation is aware, Fully Advised on the Premise that Legal illiteracy is has prevented parents from noticing their not named as a respondent, subject to the relief sought by DHS, when DHS only intend to relieve them of parenthood, yet assessed and not accused, in the Petitions filed upon the Court. Furthermore, DHS and all CPS Agents are not legally qualified to give Legal Advice pursuant to equal protection of the PRC, which is not possible for ‘a Child’, which would dictate the lack of a retainer agreement between the CPS Agent which is circumvented by the ORS which declares the CPS Agent the Child Advocate, unless you cite the whole ORS in haste, making the DMV is a noncriminal prosecutory law firm sanctioned and designed to circumvent the right to Counsel of Choice. People are coerced by the Municipal Police on the mass to enter into that Municipal agreement or they get thrown into jail. Nearer to the point, since it is not plausible or possible that there be a retainer agreement by and between the CPS Agent, the child and the parent, too, not even at the DMV, because even Legal Aid can identify a conflict of interest and will deny the opposing party representation. So, the DMV should not get to tell the parent and the child who their Counsel is, especially one that is called ‘a Child Advocate’ and has judicial powers, too, while forcing parents to attend Family Unity Meetings, which is a prolonged and compounded sanctioned conflict of interest, but would not be rectified even if the Nature of Representation was declared directly to the Child, because the Child has no contract with the DMV, or capable of comprehending such a concept. If not subject to contractual settlement attempts prior to the trial at noncriminal matters, which severs parents of their every Privileged relationship. Needless to say, Melanie LeBaron was not born under Marriage Licensing Agreements and not property, so entitled to Privileged relationships. But, due to the fact that the DA is also pre-retained as the voice of the people to enforce an action at non criminal law, and leaves all parties involved unprotected by Constitutional Privilege Client relationship guarded by the PRC, and the child without a Defender for his or her right to his inheritance, both legal and genealogy, like Melanie LeBaron was, all parties but the State of Oregon, who is not entitled, which has no right to an inheritance or power to assign a contract agreement over a party not holding a Driver’s License, hence again, Melanie LeBaron had a right to Counsel of Choice since not deemed property of the State of Oregon. The uninhabitable, the contractual agreement is the DA’s true Client, because the DHS is the Agent of the State of Oregon.      There should be the equivalent of being read the Miranda Warning when considering the extended length a child is detained in foster care and the parent subject to DHS control and a child’s stay in care should be deemed the equivalent of ‘house arrest’. In opposite, with respect to the Point in Fact that parental avowal is not subject to the protection of Miranda warning, in the sense that the DHS intend to use what the parent say against them, wherein the fact that suspicion is the consequence if the parent is to ‘remain silent’, and the conclusion of ‘guilty’ even were there is no Plea attached to the initial Probable Cause, which is a declaration of a stressor, which was irrelevant to their assertions after the second set of double CONTINUANCES. The DA adding the reason for their future case, which could not have been FOUNDED until the case was actually tried and Marilyn LeBaron found guilty of a crime. So, innocent until proven guilty is no longer due to ‘Psychology the Wild Card’, if compared to the rules of a limited search warrant, they were late in declaring their Premise anyway, which not purported until after the first set of double CONTINUANCES upon review of Colombo style communication in Exhibit with no questions asked to her by anyone. Said conflict of interest is compounded into collusion especially when a conflict of interest between the a Child and CPS Agent automatically exists, which produces a conflict of theories at law regarding the application or the term ‘Reasonable Doubt’ and the term ‘Innocent Until Proven Guilty’, which should become ‘Condemned Until Proven Competent’, but let us come up with some disease first, which is not due here, or even application of the REASONABLE EFFORTS clauses being effectual as a default judgment, and the burden of proof in this case shifted, without actual cause. And the clear message heard in this case is, ‘Show proof of obedience of doctors orders’ or you get no parent child relationship, but, let us diagnose you first, and until you do I am your only nonprivilege. In effect treating the parent as property, and more so that their offspring, because the CPS Agent will honor the right to her Privilege with her client, and so will the Governor’s Advocacy Office, the DHS boomerang, misrepresented as an Ombudsman’s Office.      The future of our children’s outcome is the government’s property, against the fact that Commercial Destruction of this Planet has the constant rebuttal to complaints against cancer causing emotions, the future outcome of this planed it not sanctioned as a cause for action though value is attached to Land, like the equity attached to the child and the expense of juvenile crime on the taxpayer. So there is a conflict of theories, were preventive remedy had become law, whereas a child is a commodity, and the consumed world produces now for his destroyer, both a resource subject to regulation. So, why not allow ‘a Child’ a suet in the BEST INTEREST, of  ‘a Children’s’ future world, which has been barred from court action, as well as the both the unborn in this story in both venues of law?    So, that which is not subject to a contract yet, or even the Right to Life, has no right to cry from the womb, to protect its planet, even while God is knitting. Thereto, Judicial discretion should not be overlooked after dissertations can be written upon the conflicts of laws they produce. Next to that, what would be the limitations of the unborn voice with respect to Melanie LeBaron, ‘a Children’, as Max R. Wall entitled her in one of his motions? “I’m not under your jurisdiction yet!’ ‘I don’t have a Social Security Number, or a Driver’s License, and I don’t even have the right to be born so how can I enter into an agreement if there is possibility to stipulate the beginning or termination of said contract, or terms of agreement enumerated by us, for us’, or between me and my mother to be’, ‘You have too many Clients already, and I need to meet my grandmother before I decide where to log your expected complaints about her!’ ‘Besides, If I am born with the same condemnation the Juvenile Department imposed as defective blood, with respect to my great grandpa, I am only going to be a disappointment to anybody else who notices, so why don’t you just let us stay together, we will understand each other, and since, as Mat L. Hawkins said, it is inherited, we won’t even notice, like you do’, ‘We will be accustomed to each other’, ‘We will be so much alike I will feel accepted and valued just the way I am’, ‘Oh, Leave me alone!’ ‘I am Sovereign unto God, and He decides if I am cursed or blessed according the Scripture and He is the Author of my DNA’, ‘I am in his hand, so non of you represent me and cannot be retained because I cannot be enumerated as a party to an action if I have no agreement with the State of Oregon, as of yet, especially if you declare a complaint to gain another client whereas I declare a conflict of interest like Judge Horner did to my mom and my grandma’, ‘He appointing the same law firm and then reassigning CASA in lieu of a Proper Defense, an indication that he declared a conflict of interest after he declared my and my mother co-complainant against the State of Oregon’, ‘Besides, a law firm cannot represent both sided of the arguments’, while they benefit directly form starting the complaint process’, ‘A conflict of interest will exist between both your intended clients, if you follow Horner’s example, appoint a client at the other end of the argument unto the same psudo firm’, ‘both my mom and me have a right to our own lawyer, after Horner’s example’, ‘I can not be retained’, ‘because you cannot represent another complaint when you’re the only one there to raise the objection’, Not only that, but, because I have no rights to ‘Life, ‘Liberty’, or the ‘Pursuit of Happiness’ yet, you have not grounds to claim jurisdiction over any right to be upheld on behalf of a voice I don’t have until I get to the whatever hospital I am born in, and my mother signs away that which was born Sovereign unto God’, ‘So, pharmaceutical companies and there profit margins cant dictate that I be a consumer of their products yet, not just yet’, ‘So, at least wait till I take my first breath, and my own diagnosis, before you say you speak for me’, ‘I have no benefit of any kind, nor do I have a Straw Man from were you can assess a nonclaim, and nothing to gain from a conflict of interest compounded on two directions from where my mother stands’, ‘We have no Privilege’, ‘I'm going to need an Civil Right Lawyer, as soon as I get out of this place, which is what my grandma will say on my behalf, and she has more to say for me that you do!’”      How is the Supreme Court, in either of the two venues to gain jurisdiction over that which has been abandoned it’s authority of protection and deemed the ‘Undamaged’, ‘The Nonadjoined’, with no right to an no action at law due to “No Complaint Audible, No Right Enumerated” as the discarded fetus, that which has no right unto itself to propel the inevitable into existence, as if the law of predictability did not apply in a prognosis of an obviously unrecognized prophecy that keeps coming true over and over again, ‘In every century’. Why has not some clever lawyer or scientist invented a scientific definition like the law of gravity, by Isaac Newton, to protect the unborn and the right to eminent force? Is ignored concept of the birth of every human being not more obvious than gravity? But, like unto that which has disregarded its sanctity, evolutionary science cannot document or explained how the birth process began, or what force propelled it into existence, from the first conception, because humans do not divide like the amoeba, nor is the first contraction documentable, or if painful relations evolved into pleasure to guard the survival of the fittest ideology? And in ‘honor’, of one of our Presidents, who said in his own defense, “That depends of the definition of sex, which shows if it has not been defined it is not a judiciable topic. Thereto, what definition has been enumerated that did not include the work of the Sovereign hand? Like in the applicable use of the definition for Marriage, which President Bush he got in the wrong direction when he raised the promise of a Constitutional Amendment to define Marriage between a man and a woman, because all the State does is exclude God, impose itself, and claim your offspring its property, which is a contractual agreement, like that to Domestic Partnerships, which is what people objected to and missed the most important point, never mind the one missed by the President of the United States of America. But, with regard to eminent force, it does not take a prophecy to say which way a ball will bounce, but it does take a backwards thinking mind to confuse the laws of God, because the theories of evolution seem to preach that which has not been defined, but only define change as he only law to which all things are united by the same probability. Yet the eminent force of birth, which is even more constant than the evidence of change, but has not been sanctioned due to the promise that future variables are its only definitive parameter, and in contempt of that witch, is unmovable. Said evolutionary promise to change, is constantly the only constant in the theory of evolution, and in defiance of that which exists and existed and will always be, which is an unattested and undocumented, hypothesis because no body lived ‘anytime all those centuries ago’, to document all the changes’, and contrary to its competing theory, who has not been honored as the giver of life, though a law of, ‘I will be born’, is without a doubt present, and has been left to invent its own definition preventing man to honor a precept subject to holy regulation and judgments, which are called Statutes, even to God, because both the laws of gravity and buoyancy are in effect and predictable, both defined and applicable as cause and effect in relationship the physical world. Yet, but both can not be labeled, as an Exhibit, because one is honored, as physical evidence and one is honored as cause and effect, from whence we can draw logical conclusions form a given set of parameters, of which neither should be premonition. Hence the word expectant is attached to that which is loved, and not valued unless wanted? Yet, on the other hand, what if the Very Protected was scheduled for an abortion and Max R. Wall’s prophecy came true? What would Marilyn LeBaron’s, arraignment look like? Or for another point of reference, like for instance, from the first unborn to be included in this history of events, which has not right, according Supreme Rule to be protected under contractual law, how could Max R. Wall be assigned to it’s representation to be protected under that jurisdiction in which the mother intends to extends her control and Max R. Wall has no authority, since Criminal Matters are tried elsewhere, by another Officer, in a separate trial. So, what would the unborn cry from the mother’s womb have been, from the Criminal Justice Systems venue beforehand, if her mother had been assailed, and she was not scheduled to terminate the pregnancy? ‘You just wait till I am born and I’ll get Mark Allen Heslinga to put you in jail so Max R. Wall can declare you guilty today?’ Would the Supreme Court empower the Justice System to apply a proper punishment, bringing justice to that which Max R. Wall had declared without a sound definition in the OAR to do so, or contractual authority to adjoin another party to the action without jurisdiction over the matter her presented? Because if the unborn were a ball, its right to bounce would not have been defined yet therefore not applicable in the which has not been legislated. If the unborn were a ball, and somehow, the definition of eminent force though undeclared compels all the other definitions pertaining to existence has not been defined as a precept subject to Supreme Court Rule, except the part which makes it start bouncing, we would declare it had not right to sit in one place, as if Marry Anne E. Millers unborn had been entered into her contractual agreements because she did not schedule the termination, where as Max R. Wall had leveraged a damaged party before the fact though it had not definable value, unless there is a conflict of laws, and the Supreme Court can have it both ways, “Rock, Paper, Scissors” style being the rule of thumb, in a childlike game, where one play always supersedes the other, depending on the order of the draw. No one can make objections to the outcome, which is the underlying rule of thumb in that game besides those that define the power of the Rock over Scissors, the Paper over Rock, and so forth, each power assigned their station. If Max R. Wall represented the unborn of a CPS Agent, who could hold not position over the grandchild, how did Max R. Wall retain the Power of Attorney over something undefined, which I deem an eminent force, yet not honored by Congress as such, yet deemed as thought assessable and therefore valuable and subject to settlement attempts prior to the Criminal Trial at noncriminal matters. The Office of the DA, congruent to ORS and DHS can have no Privilege with that which has not been defined. So, Max R. Wall overstepped the Supreme Court Rule into religiosity, because, God does enumerate the value of the unborn, when damaged by wrongdoings. Whereas, if the Nature of Representation, if declared, CPS Agents would reveal an equivalent of the Citizen Arrest Powers assigned to the traffic police over ‘We the People’. But, the CPS powers are assigned to all our Privileged relationships, even whereas there is no crime to arrest a parent for, because CPS is about preventing juvenile crime without arraignment, yet a secondary accountability built in to the parents amalgamation, but that Citizens Arrest Power is applied directly over the most privileged and private matters, making CPS the opponent of the parent’s sense of responsibility, circumventing the plea process as in Melanie’s mom’s case. Marilyn LeBaron’s Plea being entered by the Prosecution and her opponent in the form of a prophecy & diagnosis naming a bureaucrat the intended future victim negating the possibility of a plea at the criminal level, extending his Affidavit beyond his venue at law overstepping into Mark Allen Heslinga's duty and his Oath on Affirmation misplaced and inapplicable, as well as in contempt of God, because I don’t think Max R. Wall quit berating while he wrote his Affidavit, but may have scratched a mirror or two with spit and called upon a slug to fall out of his mouth, so he did not have to lick his own stamp after he put his pen down. Oh, what are the Postal Regulations on intimidating by way of false prophecy? Oh, excuse me, phony prognosis to gain access to the same?  Now in that the Nature of Representation, In that the CPS Agents ‘Power’ or ‘Authority’ was the only intended victim even prior to the psudo diagnosis when the mother was arrested when at the criminal level incommunicado should have applied, but did not, the DHS still intend to represent the woman who DHS claim assailed them by closing her front door.  At another level, unlike the Municipal Policeman, who acts as, Judge, Complainant, and Prosecutor, the CPS takes more than your money at the County level, whereat the police effect at drop in your bank account at the Municipal level in the form of fines. In that direction, the CPS take your character, which is also your property according to Black’s Law Dictionary, and very valuable indeed, but, add to that, the loss of your character affects your next parent child relationship as well, instead of just your credit and your insurance rates… The CPS Agent is much more empowered that the traffic cop, because in most cases, estimated at 2600 a day out of 3000, CPS Agents are the opponent the child at onset, which indicated the problem is at the judicial level in the Sanctioned Pre Set Disposition Judge Horner revealed when he demanded to hear from the DHS, and said, “What does that have to do with this”, and shut down the cross-examination of the party that should have gone second. Since DHS are not named as a respondent or a party to the action though included as an interested party in custody cases, like in opposite, the parent is not when DHS author a Petition, bringing the conclusion, the State of Oregon is the true Client in all cases at Family Law in all Child Custody Cases and Child Protective Services nationwide. Moreover to the biggest point, where there is a conflict of interest between a CPS Agent and any given parent, like myself, they should not prepare any documents for a parent to sign, which is done under duress since the child is held a hostage while the CPS activity circumvents the ‘right to remain silent’ by the application of REASONABLE EFFORTS, which sort of makes the advise of William Dixon, to remain silent, a risky avenue instead of an option when asserting theories at Due Process at noncriminal matters. Isn’t it like mixing oil and water, crime and noncrime through RULE 53: Hmmmm, so why don’t people have to sign the COMPLAINT and SUMMON when a cop presents a CITATION anymore? Hmmmm, Due Process, minus UCC 1-207, into REASONABLE EFFORTS at noncrime in Family Law while the State Agent claims to be the victim but does not want incommunicado at the criminal level? A parent in essence is put through a confession process in very incriminating Safety Agreements while forcing the pressing of charges and testifying against spouses, and other kinds of agreements; demands for the Release of Information, or by a parent attending referrals to drug and alcohol treatment, parenting or anger management classes, psychological examinations, and all sought against the right to Counsel of Choice in the disclosure of the same, without PRESENTMENT being limited to what actually got them to your door. This leaves the CPS Agent to decide relevancy while they also control all the witnesses testimony, who remain anonymous, completely circumventing the right to rebut or face your accuser and the chance to plead the Fifth Amendment, when giving a release of information to their opponent who intends to speak to the judge for them in court or judicial reports. So what good is a lawyer then when he is not required to attend the meetings or keep a verification of conversation while the WHOLE VILLAGE IS GOSSIPING regarding the propensity for ... See: Comment # 1 ... Continued...
Visibility: Everyone
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted: Jun 8, 2007 5:28pm
Mar 17, 2007
To Fred Avera C/O We the People (e-for-melanie@hotmail.com)
To:uccman@yahoo.com; hammill.renee@co.polk.or.us; judgeofpolkaveray@hotmail.com; governor@state.or.us;ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov; Judgethebench@hotmail.com; Judge_of_Polk_Avera_y@hotmail.com; dogetty.dogegonedo@gmail.com

Subject: non mock law... 'in' at ....."E-HEM" & 'e-hem'.....,

rights 'in legal'

&

're'alienated".

Re: Lord of Prosecution, where no jury is available, 'in' 'Fellowship of the duplicit': i.e. Judges Luukinen, Horner, & Avera <---> who also, at least known to me as, Avera-y, and Avery, too: 'as', Polk County Circuit Court judges 'in' 'Twin Tower's of Technicalities' & the kiss-a-muly-Club: [e-hem: kiss-a-muly- Club: Lawyers, who don't care unless we pay them to care, while we pay them 'way to much' because they don't do anything about the problem because they directly benefit from not addressing anything but the $$$$$$$ & the $$$$$$$ and what the courts costs will be in "$$$$$$$" those problems bring in......... Can't you tell.....? ???? See: Miranda Rights for comparison.

Is that why cops are not accountable to any one but their own supervisory staff while judges 'compell you to enter plea bargain agreements she accepted, when the city attorney never personally offered them to the accused, not needing to personally appear though adjoined as an interested party some how, & that same judge enter's your plea 'for you' even if you object to her offering a plea bargain which takes your jury or right to representation away. Even if you object to her 'representation of you or your cause?', while she intends to prosecute you too, without giving you proper notice of the nature of her representation, and will throw you in jail for objecting, then also will be the collection agent vouching for her horner and credibility and that of the city attorney as well as that of Judge Todd Mccadd because he vouched for the credibility of the cop who bruised you, when that judge does not care that the other judge threw you in jail prior to her recuse or that a cop did in fact say, "She went to her knees let out a prolonged yell then she was over there and over here and then she went to her knees again. While that judge will not care to give me a jury I demanded when the law I was accused of breaking is not posted properly.

Please see the 'tiny' word 'in', 'e-hem', & rights 'in ‘alienated',

as opposed

to the tiny word 'in'. 'e-hem'. & rights 'in’ alienable'.

Oh, I got 'bent up' by a cop and went to my knees twice, for the allegation that I 'repeatedly', displayed that lovely gesture some people have on their profile. 'non'lol, <--?

I go stuck for almost two days in the 'rubber' room in 'Polk County Jail' refusing to 'book' while complaining about a cop who did not allow me to walk away, unsupervised, form his USE OF PRESENCE, while he was not 'detaining' me for questioning.

But, what I get when he got to court, I am awakened by his interpretation to the bench, over his use of 'FORCE' from the point of my intending to walk away from 'non'detainment, now wondering how did I ever get it in my mind that cops are about 'crime and punishment?’ Because form from the specific point, where that cop reports to have 'non' used 'POLICE FORCE' to 'non'detain me, he goes on to explain just the opposite charge against me was criminal. But, not interpreted in light of his initial intention and incongruent with his statements to the judge regarding why he disregarded his intention upon approach, this was not to charge me.

That cop was 'non'detaining, me for a 'non'criminal activity, which was according to his testimony, in court, not a crime of any kind, at least not at the time of his approach, but none the less, 'robable cause' at 'non'criminal matters which led to his use of 'robable cause' on a criminal level, because I exercised my right to 'just walk away', not being questioned or suspected for criminal activity, and all.

That cop stated that his non'robable non'cause', at 'non'crime was 'a Concern'; [I gues.] Which was not dicounted as a non consern by the judge which consernes me very much. Well, Judge Todd Mccadd ignored my request for his recuse, too, along with all my other objections and the fact that I asked for representaion.

e-hem, sos sos sos sos sos sos sos sos the above is the same reasoning the CPS Agent can take your kids away form you and you don't get a jury or a 'search warrant from a 'Criminal Justice System Judge', because Criminal Justice System Judgees' are about crime and punishment, which is the same reason, at noncriminal prosecution all the definitions are changed, and is the Point 'in' Fact the DHS or the Judiciary don't have to understand the word "in" because it has not been 'defined' yet, though lawyers and judges are compleetly obseses whith the dot over the letter 'i' 'in' that tinny word Judge Luukinen deliberatly ignored. {Well, MAYBE, "i" should or SHOULD not HAVE doted IT. lol & non'LOL, too and non'TOO!!!!!! Because, while the DHS use judicial ignorance to skip out on PRESENTTMENT & CAN TAKE YOUR KIDS AWAY FORM YOU, they also can intimidate you to do so, if you say, 'I HAVE A RIGHT', and they do so under the authority of REASONABLE EFFORTS, to do so while intineding to do so again no matter how many generations they intned to 'in'tend to non'represent. CPS Agents can keep your kids and keep you from your kids 'in' this day and age while a judge will say, "Somethime this century is reasonable arguements to allow future prediction as cause enought to violate your Privileged relatinships and turn your 'rivate matters' over a PUBLIC OFFICAL's SUPERVISORY STAFF because they say you are obsessed whith bureaucrat who commited perjury aginst you. Hmmmmm

'Privacy' Privileged Relatinships and Imcommunicado... See Sheriff Wolf and the FBI. See: Judge Avera, Avera_y & or Averay for and explanation. But don't let them speak to eachother while you ask them lots and lots of questions. But, you are going to need to ask Max R. Wall to honor a MOTION FOR POINTS RAISED AND AUTHORITIES RELIED UPON first and then you are going to have to do the same to the IPD, CASSA, HOST, Matt L. Hawkins of the JUVENILE DEPARTMENT, as well as Patricia Redding, Michelle Felton of the GOVERNOR' ADVOCACY OFFICE, because RDUBOISIE, is ignoring her e-mail, Michelle Faulkner and Irvine Minton of the Child Abuse Hotline, {who I reserver as my withness aginst Chendra Snyder, Jane Ammon, Marry Anne I. Miller,  Max R. Wall, & Srg. IGA, Chief Well, Allison Stegetti, if that is the 'case' you use to write that motion 'in'/ or IN. They may ignor it if you use all  capital letters. MAYBE BECAUSE THE 'I's ARE NOT DOTED. <--- LOL I mean non'lol... <--- That was an 'in 'legal' lol/LOL in both juresdictions. But, put your questions 'in'/IN the in a Freedom of Information and Privacy Act Request.

The 'reported' use of 'speech' one IPD cop identified as a 'non'criminal 'concern' was also the non'robable cause', that I was going to cause 'harm to come upon myself', but, the bruises he put on me don't count as the 'harm' he predicted would fall on me. I'm the one that got the ticket. I'm still fighting this issue... and the LONG OVER DUE issue, leveraged in the same context by Judge Horner OF POLK COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, when no petition was placed before him, a judge who adjoined himself as party to the action on a closed case and 'ORDERED' to hear from an agency, who closed the case and had never called upon him directly. Moreover, that agency can not take action on a 'CLOSED MATTER'. So, they never did, COMPLEETLY 'i'NOR'IN'G the Judge, but he dotted their 'i' for them and silenced me 'IN' DO'i'NG 'iT.

'i', who am seen as, 'a I', to JUDGE HORNER, have not been allowed to see my son for 'non'crime that was never 'roved in open court'........ & The cops were used to threaten to bust down my door, and THAT WAS SEEN AS REAONABLE TO THE INDEPENDENCE POLICE DEPARTMENT, while they HANDCUFFED 'my'MY daughter and got JUDGE HORNER as probable cause, at 'non'criminal 'law' at a late date, almost nine months later, and JUDGE HORNER agreed to be PROBABLE CAUSE AND DID NOT STEP DOWN AS JUDGE THOUGH the DHS used him as a direct witness while he preside the bench, and declared a conflict of interest between my daughetr and 'i' though they cops durg her away screamain. "Your a bunch of liars", to back up why they intended to threaten me with court actin in the past but did not and closed the case. The CPS Agents took my daughter away form me, and have threatende to take may grandbavy awery form my daughter, too.

JUDGE HORER, allowed DHS to cite and unproved matter, 'in' an new case against me after he 'i'gnored the fact that 'in' the past 'i'I asked them to allow me to face the DHS and he did not, then erased my court record, where I viced my objections over his USE OF RULE 53, 'in' opposite, will, half 'in' opposite, what JUDGE LUUKINE did nad didn to ORDER. DHS fully intend to cite the the other case, as well as call Matt L. Hawkins to testify, because he condemed my bloodline, which is evidence the DHS and the Juvenile Department have a standared procedure wint the DHS and Primaface Evidence that POLK COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ARE NOT INEPENDENT OF THE DHS, because JUDGE HORNER, insist to adjoin, DHS as a standraer pricudure, too, thoug the rule of court explicityl express that a case subject to an involuntary dismiss according to the rules of court. .... sos!

Take a long look at this case and ask; "Do I have the right to an independent judiciary?" When your done with looking at what 'Liberty' and 'Life', means to us as 'America'... Take a long look at your bureaucracy and then look back at your flag to see if your stars and stripes means the same thing to your local court system as it appears to mean to the judiciary in Polk County, which I am moving the hell out of!!!!! After you are through with taking a long look at your flag go look at the Statue of Liberty, and ask the FIRST AMENDMENT STUDY TEAM's uccman@yahoo.com how to reserve your 'inalienable rights' because you have somehow assigned them to the cops, to the Health Department, to Abortion Clinics, to CPS Agents, and to the judges that tries their 'etitions and requests, even when there is not case against you, while you, not Fully Advised that you have somehow unwittingly given up your rights 'in’ alienable!

'in'.... Goes to: Judge Luukinen does not understand the use of the tiny word 'in'. 'e-hem'... --- 'in’ alienable rights' & you being alienated from them and called a 'non'resident alien with respect to the state you live in...

I guess we could poke fun ant the judges in 'Polk' County because Judge Luukinen said, "I don't understand the word 'in' and denied me the right to face my assessor, who not accusing me of a crime, did not have to appear for a cross-examination. So, I guess I get no jury either, though I requested one, and was denied both a day in court and the right to face my assessor....

Please take notice.... Please take action.... or .... sos....<- "Just say, 'Yes, massa', if you ‘Just do nothing.’

dogettydoggonedo....... <- Just said, "No way!" Do, "We the People" just say, "Yes, massa!" Remember...... What all those people said to George Bush while standing in the rubble? "WE FIGHT BACK!" "WE FIGHT BACK!" "WE FIGHT BACK!" "WE FIGHT BACK!"

NOW I THINK IT IS TIME TO FIGHT BACK AGAINST TYRANNY ‘in’ your own lands...... PLEASE ARM YOURSELF WITH THE TRUTH. CHECK YOUR ‘ink well’ ‘again’ & ‘AGIN’ AND SEE WHAT HAS BEEN  PUT IN THEM ‘both’, AND CALLED, “INK to you” WHILE LAWYERS AND THE RULING CLASS SPEAK ‘A WHOLE DIFFENT LANGUAGE’ AND ‘you’ DON’T UNDERSTAND THAT THEY DON’T HAVE TO UNDERSTAND ‘in’ with respect to ‘you’, [though that is a word you learned to use ‘IN’ ‘KINDERGARDEN’ THE WORDS ‘THEY’ PICKED TO TEACH YOU WHILE THEIR IGNORANCE WILL BE ‘used against you’ in the Court of ‘NONCRIMINAL PROSECUTION’. MOREOVER THE JUDGE IS FULLY ADVISED OF THE ‘speech’ you LEARNED TO ‘use’ ‘IN’ KINDERGARDEN. So, for 'tat' t'REASON' ALONE PLEASE ‘arm’ yourself and ask what ‘UCC’-s are and what UCC 1-207 is IN/’in’ LIGHT OF Title 28 AND THEN ‘you’ WILL BE ABLE TO ‘understand’ & IDENTIFY WHAT THE ‘EMANCIPATION PROCLAMATION PETITION’ IS TRYING  TO ‘give back to “YOU” BY REDEFINEING WHAT YOU/’you’ ALREADY ‘had’ BUT WAS NOT RESERVED FOR YOU WHEN ‘you’ when “YOU” GOT A BIRTH CIRTIFICATE, A DRIVER LICIENCE, A MARRIAGE LICENSE, etc… Please ‘arm’ yourself with the knowledge of what the UNIVERCIAL COMMERCIAL CODE IS and what UCC 1-207 is then read:

http://www.petitiononline.com/families/petition.html


uccman@yahoo.com said that I should study Title 28, TOO, TO SEE where those judges are not authorized unless ‘we’/WE authorize them.

So, I have fired them all... Will you?

This is a sos to the world..... From: judgethebench@hotmail.com

Please ask yourself.... e-hem.... after taking a long look at the current system?

"Who is 'Daddy DHS'?"

dogettydog
Visibility: Everyone
Tags: , , , , , , , ,
Posted: Mar 17, 2007 11:20pm
Feb 25, 2007
Mormon Manson's daughter subjected to 'question' due to Mormon history. The DHS think they can butt in to my religious beliefs. But I say, & "It takes a 'WHOLE NATION'  to keep CPS off a POWER TRIP". http://PetitionOnline.com/families/petition.html
Visibility: Everyone
Tags: , , , ,
Posted: Feb 25, 2007 9:36pm
Feb 25, 2007
Partial Cross Consolidation & Rule 53 'ursuant in' POWER & PREJUDICE:
Mormon Manson's daughter subjected to 'question' due to Mormon history. I matter and the government thinks they can butt in to my religious beliefs. But I say, "Injustice In The Name Of Law & Order!" & "It takes a  WHOLE NATION  to keep a bureaucrat off a POWER TRIP" . Let the will of the people say, "NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"  CPS REFORM NOW! TYRANNY IS NOT DEMOCRATIC!!! One hundred and seventy two petitions authored. We have raised the pen against despotism. Please raise yours. My name is Marilyn LeBaron. My father was the Mormon Manson.  I'm here for one reason. To send an SOS into the world regarding CPS reform. This is the best solution yet. Please read it.  http://PetitionOnline.com/families/petition.htmMy testimony, "Injustice 'in' the Name of Law and Order" posted on Care2.com as well  ar b-LAWg at MySpace. 

We need to address political reform of RULE 53, which is in the best interests of 'Liberty'. The judiciaries of Polk County are out of control. WE ARE NOT A POLICE STATE.......POLICE --P-O-W-E-R WAS NOT legislated to be 'THE LONG ARM OF THE DHS'.
 Please read:  http://www.petitiononline.com/families/petition.html  THE BEST ON OUT THERE!  William Dixon, UCCMAN, recommended a well written affidavit as a place to start when looking for a way to defend my Due Process rights, and gave me some insight at to legal interpretations of the following UCC laws posted at the following site in order to help me seek relief from CPS:  http://www.authorhouse.com/BookStore/ItemDetail.aspx?bookid=20674  "Without Prejudice" UCC 1-207: Sovereign Covenant: By William Dixon  If you did not learn this stuff in your training you need to step back and wonder why!  About the content of William Dixon's book:  This treatise does not contain fancy words, only the tongue of the "serpent" and to be "as wise" you must Know it, for the words are soothing to the old Dragon's lobes and your Grace is Peace. This information is Scribe of Black's Law 5th Edition and Thee King James Bible.  Personam is your individual God given silk purse, as free as your Creation. You give up your silk purse each time you sign an agency sow's ear contract, because you waive another contract, Thee Bill of Rights and New Covenant. I have all my purses in silk; mine are just dirtier than yours should be. You will be collecting many ears as you stutter through this material, and it is my prayer that all your Covenants are silk purses with pearls.  

To become 'subject' and 'made liable' to Article I Legislated and Article II Executor/Admiralty is as easy as signing your children into pre-school. Enrollment office will show our proud flag, Admiralty. The signing of the corporate birth certificate, the Child's assignment of SS#, is where the birthright switch is made from "entitled" Rights to 'subject' civil Liberties. Under the Common Law a parent may contract a Child's name to an instrument, seeking faith and fairness, but agency has not the power. This activity does not take much practice because we sign contracts all the time. The W-4 instrument was by far the best Dragon lobe I ever pinched, because it was the most obvious and worrisome 'devise.' .......

We collect the 'engraft' sow's ear by agency fiat of 'unconscionable' contract, license, and enrollments. The signing at UCC 3-104.1, which if "unconditional" at UCC 3-104.2 gives agency police power to access your property by executing negotiable "dishonored" instruments of "promise" per UCC 3-104.3. This power does not extent to the shopping mall, because not all Citizens are contracted in the same permissive manner and street citizens wiggle more than contracted children with parental consent to use "public policy, " as protective 'devise.'

No Citizen may sign an 'unconditional promise' without waiving Rights and becoming in personam to actions of non criminal issue. 'Without prejudice' UCC 1-207 turns the sow's ear instrument into a silk purse for the state Citizen, because all Rights are reserved and in personam is restored to personam. A resident alien gets the sow's ear whether he wants it or not. He must assent to his master, as we must Obey God. God's silk purse has the Choice. We must give credit to 'civil' Law of man at Article I and use our 'reserved' rights to God's Judicial law of Article III and Separation of Powers to complete our work via Acts 22:25 and avoid Article II altogether......

Marilyn LeBaron

dogettydonggonedo <-- non accused mock tried at non criminal lawlessness’s

Visibility: Everyone
Tags:
Posted: Feb 25, 2007 8:32pm
Feb 25, 2007
Partial Cross Consolidation subject to POWER & PREJUDICE
Mormon Manson's daughter subjected to 'question' due to Mormon history. I matter and the government thinks they can butt in to my religious beliefs. But I say, "Injustice In The Name Of Law & Order!" & "It takes a  WHOLE NATION  to keep a bureaucrat off a POWER TRIP". Let the will of the people say, "NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"  CPS REFORM NOW! TYRANNY IS NOT DEMOCRATIC!!! One hundred and seventy two petitions authored. We have raised the pen against despotism. Please raise yours. My name is Marilyn.  I'm here for one reason. To send an SOS into the world regarding CPS reform. This is the best solution yet. Please read it.  http://PetitionOnline.com/families/petition.htmMy testimony, "Injustice 'in' the Name of Law and Order" posted on Care2.com as well  b-LAWg ,  We need to address political reform of RULE 53, which is in the best interests of 'Liberty'. The judiciaries of Polk County are out of control. WE ARE NOT A POLICE STATE.......POLICE --P-O-W-E-R WAS NOT legislated to be 'THE LONG ARM OF THE DHS'.  Please read:  http://www.petitiononline.com/families/petition.html  THE BEST ON OUT THERE!  William Dixon, UCCMAN, recommended a well written affidavit as a place to start when looking for a way to defend my Due Process rights, and gave me some insight at to legal interpretations of the following UCC laws posted at the following site in order to help me seek relief from CPS:  http://www.authorhouse.com/BookStore/ItemDetail.aspx?bookid=20674  "Without Prejudice" UCC 1-207: Sovereign Covenant: By William Dixon  If you did not learn this stuff in your training you need to step back and wonder why!  About the content of William Dixon's book:  This treatise does not contain fancy words, only the tongue of the "serpent" and to be "as wise" you must Know it, for the words are soothing to the old Dragon's lobes and your Grace is Peace. This information is Scribe of Black's Law 5th Edition and Thee King James Bible.  Personam is your individual God given silk purse, as free as your Creation. You give up your silk purse each time you sign an agency sow's ear contract, because you waive another contract, Thee Bill of Rights and New Covenant. I have all my purses in silk; mine are just dirtier than yours should be. You will be collecting many ears as you stutter through this material, and it is my prayer that all your Covenants are silk purses with pearls.  To become 'subject' and 'made liable' to Article I Legislated and Article II Executor/Admiralty is as easy as signing your children into pre-school. Enrollment office will show our proud flag, Admiralty. The signing of the corporate birth certificate, the Child's assignment of SS#, is where the birthright switch is made from "entitled" Rights to 'subject' civil Liberties. Under the Common Law a parent may contract a Child's name to an instrument, seeking faith and fairness, but agency has not the power. This activity does not take much practice because we sign contracts all the time. The W-4 instrument was by far the best Dragon lobe I ever pinched, because it was the most obvious and worrisome 'devise.' .......

We collect the 'engraft' sow's ear by agency fiat of 'unconscionable' contract, license, and enrollments. The signing at UCC 3-104.1, which if "unconditional" at UCC 3-104.2 gives agency police power to access your property by executing negotiable "dishonored" instruments of "promise" per UCC 3-104.3. This power does not extent to the shopping mall, because not all Citizens are contracted in the same permissive manner and street citizens wiggle more than contracted children with parental consent to use "public policy, " as protective 'devise.'

No Citizen may sign an 'unconditional promise' without waiving Rights and becoming in personam to actions of non criminal issue. 'Without prejudice' UCC 1-207 turns the sow's ear instrument into a silk purse for the state Citizen, because all Rights are reserved and in personam is restored to personam. A resident alien gets the sow's ear whether he wants it or not. He must assent to his master, as we must Obey God. God's silk purse has the Choice. We must give credit to 'civil' Law of man at Article I and use our 'reserved' rights to God's Judicial law of Article III and Separation of Powers to complete our work via Acts 22:25 and avoid Article II altogether......


Marilyn LeBaron

dogettydonggonedo <-- non accused mock tried at non criminal lawlessness’s
 Thank you, 

Marilyn LeBaron

Visibility: Everyone
Tags:
Posted: Feb 25, 2007 8:24pm
Feb 25, 2007
 Mormon Manson's daughter subjected to 'question' due to Mormon history. I matter and the government thinks they can butt in to my religious beliefs. But I say, "Injustice In The Name Of Law & Order!" & "It takes a  WHOLE NATION  to keep a bureaucrat off a POWER TRIP". Let the will of the people say, "NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"  CPS REFORM NOW! TYRANNY IS NOT DEMOCRATIC!!! One hundred and seventy two petitions authored. We have raised the pen against despotism. Please raise yours. My name is Marilyn.  I'm here for one reason. To send an SOS into the world regarding CPS reform. This is the best solution yet. Please read it.  http://PetitionOnline.com/families/petition.htmMy testimony, "Injustice 'in' the Name of Law and Order" posted on Care2.com as well  b-LAWg ,  We need to address political reform of RULE 53, which is in the best interests of 'Liberty'. The judiciaries of Polk County are out of control. WE ARE NOT A POLICE STATE.......POLICE --P-O-W-E-R WAS NOT legislated to be 'THE LONG ARM OF THE DHS'.  Please read:  http://www.petitiononline.com/families/petition.html  THE BEST ON OUT THERE!  William Dixon, UCCMAN, recommended a well written affidavit as a place to start when looking for a way to defend my Due Process rights, and gave me some insight at to legal interpretations of the following UCC laws posted at the following site in order to help me seek relief from CPS:  http://www.authorhouse.com/BookStore/ItemDetail.aspx?bookid=20674  "Without Prejudice" UCC 1-207: Sovereign Covenant: By William Dixon  If you did not learn this stuff in your training you need to step back and wonder why!  About the content of William Dixon's book:  This treatise does not contain fancy words, only the tongue of the "serpent" and to be "as wise" you must Know it, for the words are soothing to the old Dragon's lobes and your Grace is Peace. This information is Scribe of Black's Law 5th Edition and Thee King James Bible.  Personam is your individual God given silk purse, as free as your Creation. You give up your silk purse each time you sign an agency sow's ear contract, because you waive another contract, Thee Bill of Rights and New Covenant. I have all my purses in silk; mine are just dirtier than yours should be. You will be collecting many ears as you stutter through this material, and it is my prayer that all your Covenants are silk purses with pearls.  To become 'subject' and 'made liable' to Article I Legislated and Article II Executor/Admiralty is as easy as signing your children into pre-school. Enrollment office will show our proud flag, Admiralty. The signing of the corporate birth certificate, the Child's assignment of SS#, is where the birthright switch is made from "entitled" Rights to 'subject' civil Liberties. Under the Common Law a parent may contract a Child's name to an instrument, seeking faith and fairness, but agency has not the power. This activity does not take much practice because we sign contracts all the time. The W-4 instrument was by far the best Dragon lobe I ever pinched, because it was the most obvious and worrisome 'devise.' .......

We collect the 'engraft' sow's ear by agency fiat of 'unconscionable' contract, license, and enrollments. The signing at UCC 3-104.1, which if "unconditional" at UCC 3-104.2 gives agency police power to access your property by executing negotiable "dishonored" instruments of "promise" per UCC 3-104.3. This power does not extent to the shopping mall, because not all Citizens are contracted in the same permissive manner and street citizens wiggle more than contracted children with parental consent to use "public policy, " as protective 'devise.'

No Citizen may sign an 'unconditional promise' without waiving Rights and becoming in personam to actions of non criminal issue. 'Without prejudice' UCC 1-207 turns the sow's ear instrument into a silk purse for the state Citizen, because all Rights are reserved and in personam is restored to personam. A resident alien gets the sow's ear whether he wants it or not. He must assent to his master, as we must Obey God. God's silk purse has the Choice. We must give credit to 'civil' Law of man at Article I and use our 'reserved' rights to God's Judicial law of Article III and Separation of Powers to complete our work via Acts 22:25 and avoid Article II altogether......


Marilyn LeBaron

dogettydonggonedo <-- non accused mock tried at non criminal lawlessness’s
 Thank you, 

Marilyn LeBaron

Visibility: Everyone
Tags:
Posted: Feb 25, 2007 8:21pm

 

 Next >
 
Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of Care2.com or its affiliates.

Author

Marilyn LeBaron
, 1
Vancouver, WA, USA
Shares by Type:
All (13) | Blog (12) | Photo (1)
SHARES FROM MARILYN'S NETWORK
Jan
19
(0 comments  |  discussions )
\\n\\n \\\"Blessed are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth.\\\"  (Matthew 5:5)Who are the meek?  I guess it depends who you ask, but I think the meaning implied in the passage above has somehow been lost over the years.  Perhaps t...
Jan
12
(0 comments  |  discussions )
  It is said that the eyes are the windows to the soul.  There is much to be said about this.  You can see emotion through the eyes, can you not?  You can often tell if a person is lying or not by looking into their eyes.  Wha...
Jan
11
(0 comments  |  discussions )
When we are born, we are aware of our spiritual self.  Actually, this is the part of ourselves with which we are most aware!  The body is new.  Wow!  Look at those fingers and toes!  As to the mental aspect of self, we were ha...
Jan
5
(0 comments  |  discussions )
\\nI no longer choose to trust the medical system with caring for my health in any significant way.  If I need stitches or an emergency accident occurs.  But for my ongoing health care, no thank you.  I do not believe in their ways.\\nI o...
Dec
31
(0 comments  |  discussions )
\\nThe turning of the calendar year \\nbrings hope of new things, but the truth is that new things occur every \\nmoment in time.  And just as we have the tradition of making resolutions\\n on New Year\\\'s Day, we can also resolve to change how we exp...
Dec
29
(0 comments  |  discussions )
\\nChristmas is for everyone, whether Christian or not.  Christmas is an occurrence of something available to everyone, regardless of their indoctrination.  It is rather according to faith.  Faith in what?  Faith in the Power of God...
Dec
22
(0 comments  |  discussions )
\\n\\n\\n\\n\\n\\n\\n \\n\\n\\n\\\"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.\\\" (John 1:1)\\nEVERYTHING begins with spoken word.  It is words which bring thoughts into the distinguishable world to be perceived by others.&n...
Dec
19
(0 comments  |  discussions )
\\n\\n\\nThank you so much to Pilar Farnsworth, our dear friend and Associate Minister at Essentials of Life Holistic Enrichment Center, for writing this week\\\'s message for us.  I asked Pilar to write to us in preparation for the Winter Solstice on...
Dec
8
(0 comments  |  discussions )
I would like to take this opportunity to thank all those who have helped me along the way.  In other words, everyone I\\\'ve ever met, and many I haven\\\'t.  I believe everyone who crosses our path or our mind is there for a reason, whether we ...
Dec
2
(0 comments  |  0 discussions )
\\nSpirituality is, of course, different from religion.  This is in part why we changed our description to that of being an interspiritual church rather than an interfaith church, because interfaith hints at religion, meaning we are a church of al...