Hi I am introducing my Blog topic which is RULE 53 and caused the judge to have too much power in the court. As a result we have need to invent the term Partial Cross Consolidation, whih is what defines my case. My Political Complain could happen to anybody because the judges have a sanctioned preset didpoaition on the bench please read:http://www.petitiononline.com/families/petition.html I am so happy to find Care2.com and have several other http accounts and this one seems to offer more.
Here is a link to my other Blog unitll I learn how to use the RSS function: http://blog.myspace.com/dogettydoggonedo
Here is some wording of this petition, which is 22 pages long... All this is my story, too, but I never spoke to the author of this petition. When I read these words I knew I was right about my legal interpretations, but have been ignored by the courts while unlicenced women take over my life and threaten to take my grandbaby if I don't do what they say.... It has been two years since I have seen my son and I was not 'accused' nor brought to trial on that matter.... This is not justice.... Please help our nation.....
We the People of the United States of America hereby petition the Congress of the United States of America under article I of the Bill of Rights of the Constitution of the United States. This petition is to be construed as a formal Petition to the Government for Redress of Grievances and do here by Declare the following.
The history of the present Government is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations against the inherent sovereignty of the American family, designed to undermine the authority and control of parents over their children and to deprive their children of their inherent birthright. The right to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor. Parents often find that the witnesses they subpoena do not appear for court hearings, including social workers, Guardians ad Litem, and therapists. The court sanctions these violations without allowing the parents the remedies they need to compel these witnesses to appear.
Even when a parent is not criminally charged, they are ‘held to answer' for charges that are, in substance, the same as if they had been criminally charged. If the substance is the same as a crime, then the protections must likewise be the same.
The right to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense and the inherent right to effective counsel for his defense. Again, we are dealing with an important issue, THE most important issue to most parents; their children. A parent is denied court appointed counsel UNLESS his rights are being terminated or he is facing criminal charges. Too sadly, most charges do not meet the burden of proof for criminal charges and CPS agencies file charges in civil - or family - court. This is an illegal ruse to avoid the fact that they do not have a legitimate case against the parent. By the time parental rights are being terminated, too much time has passed, too many violations of the parents' and the children's rights have been perpetrated and too many opportunities have been missed due to lack of competent counsel. It becomes a slam-dunk for the CPS agency.
Additionally, most cases are lost, not because the parent was guilty, but because there is virtually no attorney out there who will effectively represent a defendant. By their own admission, attorneys have too much to lose by presenting a vigorous and effective defense. They advise their clients to accept a false plea bargain, to cooperate and give up all their rights, just to make their own jobs easier.
Many parents, having been drained of funds and unable to find competent counsel, attempt pro-se defenses, only to find the courts biased against them. Still others look for help outside the Bar Associations only to find that while their non-licensed counsel may be truly competent, he is not allowed to represent them in court.
The amendment states "Assistance of Counsel" and does not include the qualification that said counsel be licensed to practice law.
Even when a parent is not criminally charged, they are ‘held to answer' for charges that are, in substance, the same as if they had been criminally charged. If the substance is the same as a crime, then the protections must likewise be the same............. Please go read the rest of it and preserve you inlaienable rights.
Regarding: Legal Literacy, Your Pen Power, and the term 'WARD OF THE COURT'.
Dear American, (Not to be confused with Amer-eekan),
Miranda will be given for you to sign, reserve your rights on this instrument by not becoming in personam at Rule 12 (b). Do not give up your personam to "power of attorney" because you waive rights with each admission or tacit response answered by "persons standing in your stead," which makes you in personam for accepting this "benefit."
'in personam' = Person of unsound mind = WARD OF THE COURT --- Which translates to, "You ʽareʼ crazy if need or have a Court Appointed Attorney ʽrepresent youʼ, according to definition and Supreme Court decision, you are better off standing un represented to challenge jurisdiction on the matter the DA is trying to set in front of a judge, a topic for a Notice and Revocation of Power of Attorney & Rule 12 (b) argument which is filed upon the Court Clerk. Your arguments have to be entered, you ʽun representedʼ at the first appearance. So you need the CPS (free) HANDBOOK before Child Protective Services knock on the door. These facts next to the Supreme Court decision court appointed attorneys can not claim you have rights it is imperative you study and know what to do instead of tacitly complying to the whim of a bureaucrat!
Family Law is not about crime and punishment it is about, "Just say, 'Yes, Massa', if you 'Just Do' NOTHING'.
Remain SILENT and the reservation will command you to Justice. e-hem... (Which means, "Don't talk to your Court Appointed Attorney".
Are Court Appointed Attorneys Fully Advised? (Or as Fully Advised as my daughter was when Max R. Wall got a SECOND SET OF DOUBLE CONTINUANCES FROM JUDGE AVERA'S BENCH, Wall stating "Melanie is Fully Advised on the Premise" of the DHS (perjury), he never stating she Advised them, meaning, as it should have been, "DHS is Fully Advised and has forwarded a Premise because Melanie is a witness. But, no, Wall, got the Motive wrong in both directions, but nonetheless became seer, prophet. So, why not Fully Advise my daughter about Law instead?
WHY DON'T WE LEARN what UCC 1-207 is 'IN' PUBLIC SCHOOLS?
????????Why are we churning out Legally Illiterate caseworkers from colleges????????
IT IS ABOUT TIME SOMEBODY DID SOMETHING ABOUT IT!!!
I bet any kid, IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS could tell you that Marilyn Monroe did drugs and was a beautiful lesbian who had an adulterous affair with our favorite president. I bet none of those same children, who know about the iniquity of a Moooooovie Star, could tell you JFK wanted to return our Banking system back to the Gold Standard (Lawful Money) and abolish the Federal Reserve Bank ( Legal Tender ) like Ron Paul supporters state he will do if he becomes president.
Shhhhhhhhhhhhhh (Trade Secret).
If you are confronted with explaining what the "UCC 1-207" <---- Now UCC 1-308 does here is your answer. When you are going to sign a contract ( drivers license, lease, buying a automobile, snowmobile, a building permit, marriage license, devoice decree, or any other document).
BEFORE you sign!!! you have the right to draw a fine line through any thing that is not to your liking. It can be a number, a letter, a word or a group of words. At this time you can add any thing you want in the contract. Any changes you have made sign your name close to it and date it. A contract is to have all of the contract in full disclosure at the time of signing. If not the UCC 1-207 will stop you from giving up your rights on the contract you are about to sign and void out any part of the contract that you have not had the opportunity to view.
Now how the UCC 1-207 works.
After you put UCC 1-207 where your signature is going to be. " your signature" is the last you thing you put on the document. When you pick up your pen from the signed contract it is consummated, you have given up your right to change the contract. Here is some more UCC information. You can go to a public law library for more information.
case law available if you look it up on the web site:
Without Prejudice UCC 1-308 <-Formerly UCC 1-207 Marilyn LeBaron
This is a message from Judge_the_Bench:
Press Release for Julie A Witherspoon,
[Please forward to your private e-mail account if you are at work]
Since Oregon Code on Foster Care and Juvenile Matters are base off what is on the books in California where this evil is ongoing. We need to take a look at what needs revision with respect to the OAR & ORS with respect to our relationship to the State of Oregon, State of Oregon Courts, and their Court Appointed Attorneys. See Judge Sullivan in Deschutes County for the California inspired Oregon Charter on what we instated as an example to follow for Family Matters heard in Juvenile Venue (non Crime & Punishment resulting in the Equivalent of the Death Penalty to many many families in oregon.
Gender: Female Status: Single Age: 42 Sign: Pisces
City: portland State: Oregon Country: US
Signup Date: 02/13/07
Friday, December 14, 2007
Press Release for Julie A Witherspoon, Category: Automotive
Press Release for Julie A Witherspoon,
Attached is in edit for Roger Weidner on the Barbra Paramenter AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE regarding a Felon Attorney re instated by the Oregon State BAR. For a copy of the Attatchments contact ( e-for-mation@hotmail.com )
Regarding: Correspondence related to: See: Bottom of Blog.
The media will not believe it or cover the story. Now Julie has a (bogus) warrant out for her arrest for not following a pre-emptive court order to turn in her fire arm on false allegation rebutted by her lawyer which was not pressed or reported to the police but 'later' called an eminent thereat, future threat against a foster parent, the home where Julie's daughter reportedly got raped in.
Julie was out of town when the allegation arose she threatened the Foster Mother. That woman 'told' a Case Worker (days after the incident purportedly took place) then recanted and said, "I can't recall that happened". The BAR Association is attacking and Disbarring one of Julie's former Attorneys for a MOTION to protect her family from 'Hate Crimes' committed against her and her two children.
Bureaucrat protection is not child protection but they use the Juvenile Process ( non criminal venue ) to pre convict on criminal offenses when that is a violation of our right to a fair trial, a pattern and a practice in 'simulating legal process' against the right to the presumption of innocence,
"No Complaint, No Victim', because if there is "NO VICTIM, NO COMPLAINT" is possible, a crime has not been committed.
(Julie Fears For Her Life)
She thought she was going to be killed when they put her in an ICE CHAMBER AT THE ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE after being labeled a Belligerent, because she tried to fire he Child Protective Caseworker with a SUBSTITUTION OF POWER OF ATTORNEY placing her Pen Power as her Children's Voice.
When she comes to the courthouse to file with the Clerk they arrest her for trespassing.
Evil, sheer evil,
She has tape-recordings so most of it will allow you to be a first hand witness to this corruption and know you would never want to be in any entanglement with our current judiciary. They are sheer evil and "Just say, "Yes, Massa" is all they think is a citizen response when the CPS knock.
Psychology the 'Wild Card'.
Subject: RE: Real 'Life' drama, more 'Psychology the 'Wild Card'.
Can this story be accessed on the internet for verification? Would you want top post it in a bulletin?
----------------- Original Message ----------------- From: Roger Weidner Date: Dec 11, 2007 8:46 PM
Real 'Life' drama, more 'Psychology the 'Wild Card'.
Please forward to any news station in Orange County California and to the Governor of California.
(You Know Whom).
Please help Julie get this exposed. Those judges need to know 'We the People' are paying attention'.
This could happen to anybody.
It happened to me but not as bad.
The DA just invented a future crime and took my daughter.
The DHS still tried to take my grand baby with that non prosecuted future crime -never committed - and all the criminal charges I faced was dropped after I fired my Court Appointed Attorney and went right in there -communicating in the written format only- and made my own objections to the DA and told the judge he had a pre set disposition.
I did better than the 'lawyer'.
This is going on in California.
Wickedness sheer wickedness in political circles.
Reads like fiction:
Torture, lies, kidnapping, generals taking advantage of female subordinates (women who will not put up with bully tactics), Veteran mother raped at the time of Sheriff contact while being searched, a girl molested by the father's circle of friends, (father also a child molester and working for the public school system even if the Court issued a finding that kids were in danger around him,) A boy thrown to the ground by his throat after being seized by his IV in the hospital while protecting his mother. Veteran mother and children seized out of Germany Hospital.
Kids put on a plane to America, mother put in the mental hospital at the orders of an evil commander who showed up at the hospital with a blank order and accused Julie of being suicidal when she was ill (her and her children hospitalized for he same sickness).
She demanded a hearing and never got one. Her kids flown out of Germany to cause her to come here to fight for custody and win. Then her husband just drops the kids off at the Welfare Office and now they are going to be put up for adoption.
(??????)
The judge ignored all that.
(??????)
Julie is not going to kill herself, never was.
Her commander just said at the time he and a conspirator took her, "You was drunk the other day and we are taking the kids".
Motions to recuse the California judge are ignored and the Attorney who wrote the MOTION suffers retaliation from the BAR Assosiatoin.
This Judge is in the same Masonic Order Julie Witherspoon's ex husband is a member of. Her ex is a 33rd degree Mason.
The media will not believe it or cover the story. Now Julie has a (bogus) warrant out for her arrest for not following a pre-emptive court order to turn in her fire arm on false allegation rebutted by her lawyer which was not pressed or reported to the police but 'later' called an eminent thereat -future threat against a 'foster parent'- the one where Julie's daughter reportedly got raped in. -Julie was out of town when the allegation arose that she threatened the Foster Mother.-The foster mother talked with a Case Worker -days after the incident purportedly took place- then the purported complaint was recanted and the foster mother said, "I can't recall that happened".
The BAR Association is attacking and Disbarring one of Julie's Attorneys for a MOTION to protect her family from 'Hate Crimes' committed against her and her two children.
When she comes to the courthouse to file with the Clerk they arrest her for trespassing.
Evil, sheer evil.
She has tape-recordings so most of it will allow you to be a first hand witness to this corruption and know you would never want to be in any entanglement with our current judiciary.
They are sheer evil and "Just say, "Yes, Massa" is all they think is a citizen response when the CPS knock.
Psychology the 'Wild Card'.
Oh, btw
My name is Marilyn LeBaron.
I am the Author of the above Political Complaint on behalf Julie A Witherspoon and believe this ADMINISTRATION needs a severe immediate reprimand.
This arrogant reply from/on behalf Thomas Fiorello is in violation of our right to have a neutral judiciary.
Message ID: 17032982 Date Sent: 12/11/2007 7:17:00 PM
Body: How are you familiar with this story? How recent did all this take place? Can this story be accessed on the internet for verification? Would you want top post it in a bulletin?
----------------- Original Message ----------------- From: Roger Weidner
Subject: non mock law... 'in' at ....."E-HEM" & 'e-hem'.....,
rights 'in legal'
&
're'alienated".
Re: Lord of Prosecution, where no jury is available, 'in' 'Fellowship of the duplicit': i.e. Judges Luukinen, Horner, & Avera <---> who also, at least known to me as, Avera-y, and Avery, too: 'as', Polk County Circuit Court judges 'in' 'Twin Tower's of Technicalities' & the kiss-a-muly-Club: [e-hem: kiss-a-muly- Club: Lawyers, who don't care unless we pay them to care, while we pay them 'way to much' because they don't do anything about the problem because they directly benefit from not addressing anything but the $$$$$$$ & the $$$$$$$ and what the courts costs will be in "$$$$$$$" those problems bring in......... Can't you tell.....? ???? See: Miranda Rights for comparison.
Is that why cops are not accountable to any one but their own supervisory staff while judges 'compell you to enter plea bargain agreements she accepted, when the city attorney never personally offered them to the accused, not needing to personally appear though adjoined as an interested party some how, & that same judge enter's your plea 'for you' even if you object to her offering a plea bargain which takes your jury or right to representation away. Even if you object to her 'representation of you or your cause?', while she intends to prosecute you too, without giving you proper notice of the nature of her representation, and will throw you in jail for objecting, then also will be the collection agent vouching for her horner and credibility and that of the city attorney as well as that of Judge Todd Mccadd because he vouched for the credibility of the cop who bruised you, when that judge does not care that the other judge threw you in jail prior to her recuse or that a cop did in fact say, "She went to her knees let out a prolonged yell then she was over there and over here and then she went to her knees again. While that judge will not care to give me a jury I demanded when the law I was accused of breaking is not posted properly.
Please see the 'tiny' word 'in', 'e-hem', & rights 'in ‘alienated',
as opposed
to the tiny word 'in'. 'e-hem'. & rights 'in’ alienable'.
Oh, I got 'bent up' by a cop and went to my knees twice, for the allegation that I 'repeatedly', displayed that lovely gesture some people have on their profile. 'non'lol, <--?
I go stuck for almost two days in the 'rubber' room in 'Polk County Jail' refusing to 'book' while complaining about a cop who did not allow me to walk away, unsupervised, form his USE OF PRESENCE, while he was not 'detaining' me for questioning.
But, what I get when he got to court, I am awakened by his interpretation to the bench, over his use of 'FORCE' from the point of my intending to walk away from 'non'detainment, now wondering how did I ever get it in my mind that cops are about 'crime and punishment?’ Because form from the specific point, where that cop reports to have 'non' used 'POLICE FORCE' to 'non'detain me, he goes on to explain just the opposite charge against me was criminal. But, not interpreted in light of his initial intention and incongruent with his statements to the judge regarding why he disregarded his intention upon approach, this was not to charge me.
That cop was 'non'detaining, me for a 'non'criminal activity, which was according to his testimony, in court, not a crime of any kind, at least not at the time of his approach, but none the less, 'robable cause' at 'non'criminal matters which led to his use of 'robable cause' on a criminal level, because I exercised my right to 'just walk away', not being questioned or suspected for criminal activity, and all.
That cop stated that his non'robable non'cause', at 'non'crime was 'a Concern'; [I gues.] Which was not dicounted as a non consern by the judge which consernes me very much. Well, Judge Todd Mccadd ignored my request for his recuse, too, along with all my other objections and the fact that I asked for representaion.
e-hem, sos sos sos sos sos sos sos sos the above is the same reasoning the CPS Agent can take your kids away form you and you don't get a jury or a 'search warrant from a 'Criminal Justice System Judge', because Criminal Justice System Judgees' are about crime and punishment, which is the same reason, at noncriminal prosecution all the definitions are changed, and is the Point 'in' Fact the DHS or the Judiciary don't have to understand the word "in" because it has not been 'defined' yet, though lawyers and judges are compleetly obseses whith the dot over the letter 'i' 'in' that tinny word Judge Luukinen deliberatly ignored. {Well, MAYBE, "i" should or SHOULD not HAVE doted IT. lol & non'LOL, too and non'TOO!!!!!! Because, while the DHS use judicial ignorance to skip out on PRESENTTMENT & CAN TAKE YOUR KIDS AWAY FORM YOU, they also can intimidate you to do so, if you say, 'I HAVE A RIGHT', and they do so under the authority of REASONABLE EFFORTS, to do so while intineding to do so again no matter how many generations they intned to 'in'tend to non'represent. CPS Agents can keep your kids and keep you from your kids 'in' this day and age while a judge will say, "Somethime this century is reasonable arguements to allow future prediction as cause enought to violate your Privileged relatinships and turn your 'rivate matters' over a PUBLIC OFFICAL's SUPERVISORY STAFF because they say you are obsessed whith bureaucrat who commited perjury aginst you. Hmmmmm
'Privacy' Privileged Relatinships and Imcommunicado... See Sheriff Wolf and the FBI. See: Judge Avera, Avera_y & or Averay for and explanation. But don't let them speak to eachother while you ask them lots and lots of questions. But, you are going to need to ask Max R. Wall to honor a MOTION FOR POINTS RAISED AND AUTHORITIES RELIED UPON first and then you are going to have to do the same to the IPD, CASSA, HOST, Matt L. Hawkins of the JUVENILE DEPARTMENT, as well as Patricia Redding, Michelle Felton of the GOVERNOR' ADVOCACY OFFICE, because RDUBOISIE, is ignoring her e-mail, Michelle Faulkner and Irvine Minton of the Child Abuse Hotline, {who I reserver as my withness aginst Chendra Snyder, Jane Ammon, Marry Anne I. Miller, Max R. Wall, & Srg. IGA, Chief Well, Allison Stegetti, if that is the 'case' you use to write that motion 'in'/ or IN. They may ignor it if you use all capital letters. MAYBE BECAUSE THE 'I's ARE NOT DOTED. <--- LOL I mean non'lol... <--- That was an 'in 'legal' lol/LOL in both juresdictions. But, put your questions 'in'/IN the in a Freedom of Information and Privacy Act Request.
The 'reported' use of 'speech' one IPD cop identified as a 'non'criminal 'concern' was also the non'robable cause', that I was going to cause 'harm to come upon myself', but, the bruises he put on me don't count as the 'harm' he predicted would fall on me. I'm the one that got the ticket. I'm still fighting this issue... and the LONG OVER DUE issue, leveraged in the same context by Judge Horner OF POLK COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, when no petition was placed before him, a judge who adjoined himself as party to the action on a closed case and 'ORDERED' to hear from an agency, who closed the case and had never called upon him directly. Moreover, that agency can not take action on a 'CLOSED MATTER'. So, they never did, COMPLEETLY 'i'NOR'IN'G the Judge, but he dotted their 'i' for them and silenced me 'IN' DO'i'NG 'iT.
'i', who am seen as, 'a I', to JUDGE HORNER, have not been allowed to see my son for 'non'crime that was never 'roved in open court'........ & The cops were used to threaten to bust down my door, and THAT WAS SEEN AS REAONABLE TO THE INDEPENDENCE POLICE DEPARTMENT, while they HANDCUFFED 'my'MY daughter and got JUDGE HORNER as probable cause, at 'non'criminal 'law' at a late date, almost nine months later, and JUDGE HORNER agreed to be PROBABLE CAUSE AND DID NOT STEP DOWN AS JUDGE THOUGH the DHS used him as a direct witness while he preside the bench, and declared a conflict of interest between my daughetr and 'i' though they cops durg her away screamain. "Your a bunch of liars", to back up why they intended to threaten me with court actin in the past but did not and closed the case. The CPS Agents took my daughter away form me, and have threatende to take may grandbavy awery form my daughter, too.
JUDGE HORER, allowed DHS to cite and unproved matter, 'in' an new case against me after he 'i'gnored the fact that 'in' the past 'i'I asked them to allow me to face the DHS and he did not, then erased my court record, where I viced my objections over his USE OF RULE 53, 'in' opposite, will, half 'in' opposite, what JUDGE LUUKINE did nad didn to ORDER. DHS fully intend to cite the the other case, as well as call Matt L. Hawkins to testify, because he condemed my bloodline, which is evidence the DHS and the Juvenile Department have a standared procedure wint the DHS and Primaface Evidence that POLK COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ARE NOT INEPENDENT OF THE DHS, because JUDGE HORNER, insist to adjoin, DHS as a standraer pricudure, too, thoug the rule of court explicityl express that a case subject to an involuntary dismiss according to the rules of court. .... sos!
Take a long look at this case and ask; "Do I have the right to an independent judiciary?" When your done with looking at what 'Liberty' and 'Life', means to us as 'America'... Take a long look at your bureaucracy and then look back at your flag to see if your stars and stripes means the same thing to your local court system as it appears to mean to the judiciary in Polk County, which I am moving the hell out of!!!!! After you are through with taking a long look at your flag go look at the Statue of Liberty, and ask the FIRST AMENDMENT STUDY TEAM's uccman@yahoo.com how to reserve your 'inalienable rights' because you have somehow assigned them to the cops, to the Health Department, to Abortion Clinics, to CPS Agents, and to the judges that tries their 'etitions and requests, even when there is not case against you, while you, not Fully Advised that you have somehow unwittingly given up your rights 'in’ alienable!
'in'.... Goes to: Judge Luukinen does not understand the use of the tiny word 'in'. 'e-hem'... --- 'in’ alienable rights' & you being alienated from them and called a 'non'resident alien with respect to the state you live in...
I guess we could poke fun ant the judges in 'Polk' County because Judge Luukinen said, "I don't understand the word 'in' and denied me the right to face my assessor, who not accusing me of a crime, did not have to appear for a cross-examination. So, I guess I get no jury either, though I requested one, and was denied both a day in court and the right to face my assessor....
Please take notice.... Please take action.... or .... sos....<- "Just say, 'Yes, massa', if you ‘Just do nothing.’
dogettydoggonedo....... <- Just said, "No way!" Do, "We the People" just say, "Yes, massa!" Remember...... What all those people said to George Bush while standing in the rubble? "WE FIGHT BACK!" "WE FIGHT BACK!" "WE FIGHT BACK!" "WE FIGHT BACK!"
NOW I THINK IT IS TIME TO FIGHT BACK AGAINST TYRANNY ‘in’ your own lands...... PLEASE ARM YOURSELF WITH THE TRUTH. CHECK YOUR ‘ink well’ ‘again’ & ‘AGIN’ AND SEE WHAT HAS BEEN PUT IN THEM ‘both’, AND CALLED, “INK to you” WHILE LAWYERS AND THE RULING CLASS SPEAK ‘A WHOLE DIFFENT LANGUAGE’ AND ‘you’ DON’T UNDERSTAND THAT THEY DON’T HAVE TO UNDERSTAND ‘in’ with respect to ‘you’, [though that is a word you learned to use ‘IN’ ‘KINDERGARDEN’ THE WORDS ‘THEY’ PICKED TO TEACH YOU WHILE THEIR IGNORANCE WILL BE ‘used against you’ in the Court of ‘NONCRIMINAL PROSECUTION’. MOREOVER THE JUDGE IS FULLY ADVISED OF THE ‘speech’ you LEARNED TO ‘use’ ‘IN’ KINDERGARDEN. So, for 'tat' t'REASON' ALONE PLEASE ‘arm’ yourself and ask what ‘UCC’-s are and what UCC 1-207 is IN/’in’ LIGHT OF Title 28 AND THEN ‘you’ WILL BE ABLE TO ‘understand’ & IDENTIFY WHAT THE ‘EMANCIPATION PROCLAMATION PETITION’ IS TRYING TO ‘give back to “YOU” BY REDEFINEING WHAT YOU/’you’ ALREADY ‘had’ BUT WAS NOT RESERVED FOR YOU WHEN ‘you’ when “YOU” GOT A BIRTH CIRTIFICATE, A DRIVER LICIENCE, A MARRIAGE LICENSE, etc… Please ‘arm’ yourself with the knowledge of what the UNIVERCIAL COMMERCIAL CODE IS and what UCC 1-207 is then read:
PLEASE PASS THIS FORWARD
- DECEMBER 16, 2009Once
again, we are being
threatened with a forced
eviction due to the
Department of the
Interior/Bureau of Indian
Affairs ineptness of
actions to do anything to
assist or protect our
Tribe. The
governments&...
I am wishing
you a heart felt, memory
building and life
improving holiday
season. My
wish is that all of you
find in your loved ones a
reflection of joy, love
and support.
Promises of a new year,
for change ...
I wanted to pass this
along in hopes that we
can keep the Crow Creek
Oyate in our
thoughts/prayers.
Pilamayayapi.
Saturday 2pm Crow Creek
Ceremony PLEASE
FORWARD
Please join us on
Saturday at 2pm at Crow
Creek/Ft.
Thompson. W...
When asked what I'm
grateful for, it's the
basics of life...love,
air, water, food, herbs,
aroma, movement, touch,
sound, song, laughter,
the creative power to
make my own life together
with the Power that moves
through me in order to do
any good tha...
Cautions from
the Better Business
Bureau
Be Cautious About
Giving Info to Census
Workers!!!!
With the U.S. Census
process beginning, the
Better Business
Bureau
(BBB) advises p...
WMS wolves were used to
create animation for
Twilight - New Moon! Did
you know? Tippet Studios
came to WMS a while back
and took pictures and
videos of our wolves to
use for the animation for
TWILIGHT - NEW MOON..
That is why the main wolf
SA...
Cleaning for A Reason
Foundation
Cleaning for A Reason
Foundation
Health &
Wellness
(tags: cancer,
women,
help ) MADARTIST -
1 minute
ago -
cleaningforareason.org
Fightin...
CONTACTTina Malave(818)
982-1789tina@shatteredgla
ss.tvFOR IMMEDIATE
RELEASE
Former Child Sex Slave
and Anti-Slavery
Advocate, Maria Suarez
Finally Finds Freedom
Press Conference For
Maria Suarez, Thursday,
November 12th at 11 AM
LOS AN...
How is health
created? Health is
created by living in
accordance with that
which we were meant to
be. Good health is
a natural thing! We were
created in perfection in
the image and likeness of
God, and we were placed
in an atmosphere cond...