22,611,947 members doing good!
about our ads
share your passions, stories, inspirations, and more
Constitutional Amendment for Writers, Artists, etc...
Jan 23, 2010
Focus: Civil Rights
Action Request: Petition
Location: United States
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/copyright-get-rid-of-the-3-year-statute-of-limitations

ANTI-PLAGIARISM 'BILL' - Vote For Honesty and Trust..!

Our 'Protected Rights' are supposed to be for 70 years after our death, they have drastically reduced this to a mere 3 years, and that's only if we catch someone stealing our writings, art, etc..., in time to file a Lawsuit.
The STATUTE of LIMITATIONS has no place in our society as it promotes Infringement/Theft, and proves that our Laws don't work for US.

Please help to restore our Copyright Protections to allow us to Sue in our lifetime and, Protecting our Rights for: "70 years past Death, not 3 years past theft"


We the undersigned agree to the following, and Petition for Judicial Review and Redress of
Grievances; and
Petition to Strike The Three Year Statute of
Limitations and Establish a Committee of Copyright
Litigators to Defend the Intellectual Property Rights
of The Common People

   Petition to Strike the Three Year 'Statute Of
Limitations' of Title 17, Section 506(a) of the United
States Copyright Laws and establish a fund for the
collaboration of a committee of Copyright Litigators
to defend the 'collective rights' of United States
citizens who cannot afford Representation on their
own, as long as 2/3rds of the criteria for such
litigation is met, not including willful and reverting
back to the 'United States Constitution' and the 'Bill
of Rights'.

The 3 year Statute of Limitations is Contradictory to
the established laws as outlined in the Constitution,
Bill of Rights, and the Copyright laws, respectively.

CITATION 1 - The Constitution of the United States

Powers Granted to Congress, ( as applies )

The Congress shall have power:

Article I, Section 8(8) To Promote the progress of
Science and useful Arts by securing for limited times
to Authors and inventors the exclusive right to their
respective writings and discoveries.

ARTICLE III; The Judicial Branch ( as applies )

SECTION 2(1)  The judicial power shall extend to all
cases, in law and equity, under this Constitution, the
laws of the United States, and treaties made, or which
shall be made, under their authority; ... to
controversies between citizens of different States,
etc.

NOTE: Equity as defined in the Merriam-Webster
Dictionary;

1a. justice according to natural law or right;
specifically: freedom from bias or favoritism.

2a: a system of law originating in the English
chancery and comprising a settled and formal body of
legal and procedural rules and doctrines that
supplement, aid, or override common and Statute law
and are designed to protect rights and enforce duties
fixed by substantive law.
b. trial or remedial justice under or by the rules and
doctrines of equity.
c: a body of legal doctrines and rules developed to
enlarge, supplement, or override a narrow rigid system
of law.

3a: a right, claim, or interest existing or valid in
equity.
b: the money value of a property or of an interest in
a property in excess of claims against it.
c: a risk interest or ownership right in property.
d: ( does not apply. )

ARTICLE VI: SECTION 1(2);

This Constitution, and the laws of the United States
which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all
treaties made, or which shall be made, under authority
of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the
land; and the judges in every state shall be bound
thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any
state to the contrary notwithstanding.

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/copyright-get-rid-of-the-3-year-statute-of-limitations

SECTION 1(3);

The Senators and representatives before mentioned, and
the members of the several state legislatures, and all
executive and judicial officers, both of the United
States and of several states, shall be bound by oath
or affirmation, to support this Constitution; ( but no
religious etc...., does not apply. )

CITATION 2; - The Bill of Rights, ( as applies )

Amendment 1: Freedom of religion, speech, and the
press; rights of assembly and petition

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment
of religion, or prohibit the free exercise thereof; or
abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press;
right of the people to peaceably assemble, and to
petition the government for redress of grievances.

NOTE: Merriam-Webster dictionary defines 'redress' as;

1a: a relief from distress, b: means or possibility of
seeking a remedy
2: compensation for wrong or loss.
3: ( does not apply. )

Amendment 14: Civil Rights

All persons born or naturalized in the United States,
and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens
of the United States and of the state wherein they
reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which
shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens
of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any
person of life, liberty, or property without due
process of law; nor deny to any person within its
jurisdiction the equal protection under the laws.

NOTE: The Copyright Laws as established and amended,
"Guarantee" the "Protection" of these rights to be for
seventy years after the death of the Author. The 3
year Statute inhibits and undermines the growth and
progress of the 'Arts' as a whole.

Large Corporations have little fear of Prosecution
and/or Civil Litigation arising from acts of
Infringement with the 3 year Statute acting as a
shield from Justice and encourages Infringement
against Authors, Artists, etc., who are without the
monetary means in which to defend such a claim,
therefore reducing " and Justice For All  ", and
" Equal Protection Under The Law " to just plain
rhetoric.

Therefore, the 3 year Statute is discriminatory and
biased as it promotes Infringement and is
contradictory to the established laws of ' The
Constitution of The  United States ', ' The Bill Of
Rights ' and  the ' Copyright Law ' in its entire
essence and undermines our legal system, leaving the
common people with no ' Guaranteed Protection under
the law.'

CITATION 3. - The  'Intellectual Property Protection
Restoration Act of 2003', (H.R.2344), 108th Congress,
1st Session, June 5th 2003 was meant, "To restore
Federal remedies for infringements of intellectual
property by States, and for other purposes."

Section 2. PURPOSES, The purposes of this Act are
to... (as applies)

(2) promote technological innovation and artistic
creation in furtherance of the policies underlying
Federal laws and international treaties relating to
intellectual property;

(3) reaffirm the availability of prospective relief
against State officials who are violating or who
threaten to violate Federal intellectual property
laws;

NOTE: The 3 year Statute undermines 'artistic
creation', and uses our court Justices as pawns to
break the established laws by barring litigation and
diminishing our ' Copyright  Protection ' to a mere 3
years.

CITATION 3(b) - Section 5. LIABILITY OF STATES FOR
CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS INVOLVING INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY. ( as applies )

(a) DUE PROCESS VIOLATIONS - Any State or State
instrumentality that violates any of the exclusive
rights ...  of a copyright owner, author ... under
title 17, United States Code, in a manner that
deprives any person of property in violation of the
fourteenth amendment of the United States
Constitution, shall be liable to the party injured in
a civil action in Federal court for the harm caused by
such violation.

(b) TAKINGS VIOLATIONS - ( as applies )

(1) IN GENERAL - (This paragraph is exactly like the
previous DUE PROCESS VIOLATIONS, except that it adds
to it violations under the fifth amendment as well.)

(2) EFFECT ON OTHER RELIEF - Nothing in this
subsection shall prevent or affect the ability of a
party to obtain declaratory or injunctive relief under
section 4 of this Act or otherwise.

(c) COMPENSATION - Compensation under subsection (a)
or (b), [as described previously],
(1) may include actual damages, profits, statutory
damages, interest, costs, expert witness fees, and
attorney fees, as set forth in the appropriate
provisions of title 17 or 35, United States Code,
etc.

SECTION 6. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION. ( as applies )

(b) BROAD CONSTRUCTION - This Act shall be construed
in favor of a broad protection of intellectual
property, to the maximum extent permitted by the
United States Constitution.

NOTE: By limiting Infringement Prosecution and
Litigation  the United States Justices become liable
for the infringements committed by others if they
uphold the Statute as it stands by disallowing such
suits and the prosecutions, thereof.

The 'Intellectual Property Protection Restoration Act
of 2003'  invalidates the 3 year Statute as it stands,
by reverting  the Rights back to the 'Constitution of
The United States', and  should not be allowed as a
means for defense and escape from litigation in the
courts of the United States, as it has already become
null and void.

CITATION 4 - Private Property Rights Restoration Act
(S 145 I, 104th Congress, 1st Session; -

To provide appropriate protection for the
Constitutional guarantee of private property rights,
and for other purposes.

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/copyright-get-rid-of-the-3-year-statute-of-limitations

SECTION 2 PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS RESTORATION.
( as applies )

(a) CAUSE OF ACTION - (1) The owner of ANY real
property shall have cause of action against the United
States if;

(A) the application of a statute, regulation, rule,
guideline, or policy of the United States restricts,
limits, or otherwise takes a right to real property
that would otherwise exist in the absence of such
application; and

( such application described in subparagraph (A)
would result in a discrete and non-negligible
reduction in the fair market value of the affected
portion of real property.

NOTE; Fair market value is always diminished where
infringement occurs.

SECTION (2)(2)

RECOVERY - In any action filed under this Act, the
owner may elect to recover --

(1) a sum equal to the diminution in the fair market
value of the portion of the property affected by the
application of a statute, regulation, rule, guideline,
or policy described under subsection (a)(1)(A) and
retain title; or

(2) the fair market value of the affected portion of
the regulated property prior to the government action
and relinquish title to the portion of property
regulated.

NOTE; Government action in this case would be to bar
litigation after 3 years have passed in  a possible
infringement case.

SECTION. 3. APPLICATION; STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.

(a) APPLICATION - This Act shall apply to the
application of any statute, regulation, rule,
guideline, or policy to real property, if such
application occurred or occurs on or after
January 1,1994

SECTION 5. CONSTITUTIONAL OR STATUTORY RIGHTS NOT
RESTRICTED.

Nothing in this Act shall restrict any remedy or any
right which any person (or class of persons) may have
under any provision of the United States Constitution
or any other law.

NOTE; It states, "or class of persons". This includes
people that cannot afford litigation.

Citations 3 and 4 were found at;
Click here:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c108:H.R.2344:

To get to the 'Private Property Rights Restoration
Act'
from the 'Intellectual Property Restoration Act of
2003'
you should click on the 'New Bills Search', then click
'104th'. On the new page you go to the 
'Word/Phrase' box and insert 'Private property rights
restoration act', it will take you there.

CITATION 5 - FEDERAL PROSECUTION VIOLATIONS OF
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS, pg. 27,
SECTION  E. STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS,
(lines 3, 4 & 5, as applies)

United States v. Shabazz, 724 F.2d 1536, 1540 (11th
Circuit 1984 )   In copyright infringement actions,
the period of limitations begins on the date of the
last infringing act..., etc.

Citation 5 was found in the pages of the offices
of the United States Department of Justice at;

http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/cybercrime/intell_prop_rts/toc.htm

Click on Criminal Remedies for Copyright Violations,
Section E; for ' STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS '


Equal justice under the law cannot be met with a 3
year statute barring legitimate litigation if the
monetary means to protect it cannot be found within
that short period of time. The statute is
Unconstitutional and biased, and therefore should be
stricken from the laws as a means of defense against
litigation. Most Copyright Infringement cases against
large Corporations may well prove  to be Felonies with
the monetary value far exceeding that  which is
required by the copyright laws, and yet they are not
prosecutable because they hinge on civil litigation
taking place first. Was a Felony still committed? It
is my belief that it still was, and it should still be
prosecutable.

In conclusion, the 3 year statute has no place in our
current Judicial system, as it is used as  a means to
escape justice, and thus, it promotes the acts of
infringement that the laws were purportedly  made to
protect us from.

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/copyright-get-rid-of-the-3-year-statute-of-limitations

Thank you for your time and consideration. 
 
(0) | () | | send green star | flag as inappropriate
Visibility: Everyone
Tags: , , , , , , , ,
Posted: Jan 23, 2010 3:08pm
Colorado Residents
Aug 26, 2009



http://www.care2.com/c2c/people/profile.html?pid=485813252



 


 


Hi,  


I am in the middle of a Civil Rights dilemma and I am trying to add friends from the State of Colorado. I have been on Care2 for at least 3 years, but I have this new Profile specifically to help within the State of Colorado, though it was originally set up because I got locked out of my other Account.


I am Electra Cy.  

Recent problems have me determined to try to change Colorado Laws that affect all of us in this State. It will take time to draft this up, but I would like to add friends for this future event to occur.

I believe that we need better Civil Rights Laws as they pertain to Policing, Zoning, and other areas that affect our daily lives.

This will take time, and how much depends on the outcome of my dilemma. I would also like to become an Civil Rights Attorney for the People, but at present time I cannot afford the funds. No I am not asking for money, and my intentions are good.

I have saved lives in this State since I was a child, and some of you may even have been 'Witnesses' to this.

My Constitutional Rights were Violated.

I may need your help if you turn out to be one of these 'Witnesses,' but at present all I am asking for is a friends request.

Thank you either way.
Respectfully and sincerely,
Electra   


(0) | () | | send green star | flag as inappropriate
Visibility: Everyone
Tags: , , , , , , , ,
Posted: Aug 26, 2009 5:36am
Information that you may need!
May 2, 2007
Focus: Civil Rights
Action Request: Petition
Location: United States
"Thank you so much for your time and consideration, it's greatly appreciated!" http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/264941759 If the link doesn't work you can click on my picture for my profile page, click on one of the tags, or cut and paste if you would like to read or sign the Petition. Please read the 'Full' Petition. There's a lot of information in it that you are probably not aware of. ["We, the Undersigned, endorse the following petition: Copyright - Get Rid of the 3-year Statute of Limitations Target: Congress "By placing the Limitation of 'Civil' litigation coming before 'Criminal' we are stating that it's okay to steal as long as we either don't get caught or the person owning the Copyright cannot for financial or other reasons file suit. So then, doesn't that in essence make Copyright theft Legal? The 'Crime' was still committed, but if you are not a large Corporation, then good luck trying to fight it. Why is there no 'Statute of Limitations' on Patents? These are mainly 'Corporate' owned. They are 'Ideas' and not completely 'tangible' as a finished work, such as a book, photograph, musical composition, etc... IP theft has been linked to Terrorism by our own Government. The Science community is in constant turmoil over 'Plagiarism.' Bad Science can lead to bad medicine, etc... My Petition has nothing at all to do with the 'Sonny Bono Act,' which should have Never passed through Congress. I have No problem with my 'Work' hitting the 'Public Domain' after myself and my children have had the opportunity to reap the rewards of My Hard Work. A large Corporation should not be allowed to reap the benefits of stolen 'Works!'" Thank you all so much for your responses, and have a wonderful week! Respectfully and sincerely, Electra [As seen @ thepetitionsitecenter]
(0) | () | | send green star | flag as inappropriate
Visibility: Everyone
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted: May 2, 2007 9:00am
Protect our Right to Petition-Colorado Voters
Oct 27, 2006
Focus: Civil Rights
Action Request: Read
Location: Colorado, United States
Please read the following links. Our first Amendment Rights are on the line!!!

Please note the following News Article. Our Government is trying to take away our Right to Petition with a misleading Ad..!

Protect Our Right to Petition in Colorado visit site
US Politics -  - pra2006.com
submitted by

">
2

Protect Our Right to Petition in Colorado visit site
US Politics  -
Electra

PRA2006 Open in a new browser window
Petition Rights Amendment 2006.
http:/www.pra2006.com/
New Window - Similar Sites - Archived

The Craig Daily Press: Douglas Bruce: Vote ?yes' on Amendment Open in a new browser window
PRA2006.com. That means you can't petition trivial government decisions to paint
buildings, ... PRA2006.com and then vote "yes" on 38. Douglas Bruce ...
http:/www.craigdailypress.com/section/letters/story/23814
New Window - Similar Sites - Archived

Rocky Mountain Neo-Con Open in a new browser window
PRA2006.com). P.O. Box 1776 , Arvada , Colorado 80001 Douglas Campbell, Chairman
... For more information, e-mail info@PRA2006.com or call 303-753-5050. ...
http:/rockymountainneocon.blogspot.com/
[CREDIT TO NETZERO/YAHOO SEARCH and PRA2006]
(0) | () | | send green star | flag as inappropriate
Visibility: Everyone
Tags: , , , , , , , ,
Posted: Oct 27, 2006 9:12am
12-Human/Civil Rights groups a few Arts/Entertainment
Jul 16, 2006
Hi, I've actually received several messages from people that would like to help with Human and Civil Rights, but they were having trouble finding groups like this. So I Compiled a small list of groups that I've joined, some are fairly new. Please take a look and join the ones that interest you. More to come at a later date.
Respectfully and sincerely, Darlene

Phillip C. Hosts:
I'm a member of the Labour Unions United, to help Stop Global Extreme Poverty group on the Care2 Connect network, and think it's worth checking out. Please join!
http://www.care2.com/c2c/invite.html?id=1642417A4NT

                 Sonja's Group, 'Seekers Of Justice'
  Custom Invite Link: http://passport.care2.net/invite.html?g=7030
Use the above address for newsletters, websites and general invitations. Members who join Care2 Connect via this address will see your group's custom header/brand.
Homepage: http://www.care2.com/c2c/group/Seekers_of_Justice

World Against Child Molesters Group:WACM - Del's group:
Please Join Here<<<<<<<<   <----- click here.

There is now a group called 'None Yet' Hosted by Ray L. Apparently anything goes, just Please no mud slinging, you'll clog up the Sponge.
Please join!
http://www.care2.com/c2c/invite.html?id=16378213OTM


I'm a member of the Grassroots Global Activism group on the Care2 Connect network, and think it's worth checking out. 
http://www.care2.com/c2c/invite.html?id=1640654AyYT

"THIS IS YOUR INTRODUCTION TO CHERIE\'S GROUP. CHERI IS DILEGENTLY WORKING ON THE BERNADETTE SPADE AND MU\'TASIM RAI\'ID FAISAL (AKA MUSI FAISAL) CASE. KINDLY INVITE ALL OF YOUR FRIENDS, \"WATER RISES TO ITS OWN LEVEL\" Thank you! - colleen o.
 
'Smack Down', Arts and Entertainment group. Thank you Sherrie B.
http://www.care2.com/c2c/invite.html?id=16408061NDU

2 New Groups Hosted by, Joseph G. Help him make the difference that we'd all like to see..!Free, Gods Amendment to the Constitution

'Green Taxes' This looks to be a very interesting group..!
http://www.care2.com/c2c/invite.html?id=1635943OGI0

Goerge L. - Peace and non-Violence Group, 'World without Barriers'
http://www.care2.com/c2c/invite.html?id=1632368jBmN

Sherrie B. is one of the Hosts of this group: I'm a member of the AMERICA: Freedom or Fascism?
http://www.care2.com/c2c/invite.html?id=1627259NDhj

Get out your Videos, and 'Video Blog' at Omar's Group
http://www.care2.com/c2c/invite.html?id=1634006iZGU

Rebecca D. wants us to help in 'Reforming Our Democracy'
http://www.care2.com/c2c/invite.html?id=1639745zNTF

Have a great day. Respectfully and sincerely, Darlene
(0) | () | | send green star | flag as inappropriate
Visibility: Everyone
Tags: , , , , , , , ,
Posted: Jul 16, 2006 7:54am
Dangerous Science and Plagiarism.
May 16, 2006
Focus: Human Rights
Action Request: Petition
Location: United States
The question was posed to me that, 'What if I did 95% of the research on Cancer, someone stole my research and did 5%. They made millions and millions of lives were saved.' I say that even though it may appear that way, it's probably just one in a long list of Science gone wrong.

I was told that I was being selfish even though I contributed the 95% and wanted it back. The wrong information in the wrong hands can be Dangerous!

This was my answer!

The person who contributed 95% has the knowledge, skill, ambition, drive, and the brains to continue research in their area of expertise. If something goes wrong they can go back over their notes in an attempt to make things right. They know the sequences of events, reactions to their research, etc...

The person who stole the 95% is greedy and lazy. They cannot back up any of the stolen research. If or when complications arise they will have no way to 'right' their 'wrong.' This could cause great bodily harm to the consumers and contribute to future health risks such as low birth weight, stillborns, deformities, etc...

This could probably be one of the main causes of medicines that are already in our Marketplace that are already causing seizures, strokes, heart-attacks, etc... as well as the aforementioned maladies. At least thousands of people die every year from instances like these.

I do not believe that this practice of theft is helping with the 'Progress of Science', if anything it's a deterence. Anyone trying to fix what the theif did would come upon too many obstacles and roadblocks due to the lack of substancial information and faulty research. Trying to fix what was done could have grievious consequences as well.

The point is about having your work 'Stolen'.  Our Laws claim that we are 'Protected' from this. The 3-year Statute that is biased for the rich, and Large Corporations. This Statute does nothing to promote the 'Arts' or the 'Sciences.' With the Internet, theft becomes easier. I believe this Statute is wrong, and outdated. It should no longer exist. Copyright Law covers a vast area.
You are supposed to learn from the 'Masters', not steal from them.
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/264941759 

I surely would not hire a Plumber to work on my Electricity, and that is the essence as I see it. If these Corporations find talent, they should hire them, not steal their work.

Here's an example that gone awry could really do harm.
A scientist discovered that you can add  acid to water?
Do you know what happens if you do this in reverse?

Disclaimer: don't try this at ALL!!!
If it's backwards,depending on the acid and respective strength, you could kill yourself doing it! I am Not an expert and could have this reversed myself, and I was told that I did originally.

The person contributing 5% is selfish, they are stymying the 'Progress of Science', and in many instances this can be dangerous! Take a look at these examples.

" [ Reno News and Review January 19, 2006 Open in a new browser window
In fact--and this may be troubling for Gibbons, who has a history of plagiarism--science]"
"[reporter Chris Mooney suggests that two of the graphs"],etc..."
[Advance bar, Yahoo/Netzero.com Search]
This above article ["Pombo/Gibbons Article"]first states that ["Mercury is harmless" and there is no harm to pregnant women"],etc... then it completely changes.
Credit the Author of the report goes to ["Dennis Myers, and RN&R newsreview.com"]
Dennis Myers observes that, "Their ads are filled with misleading information",etc... 
We are being mislead on the Dangers of Mercury? Due to Plagiarism? Not good!!!

[" When Scientists Go Bad - - science news articles online technology ... "]  ["Researchers can take some solace from knowing that science has recovered from many other",etc... By Susan Kruglinski, and Discover Magazine Online"][Google Search]["DISCOVER Vol. 27 No. 03 | March 2006"]

Look at this:["  Click here if you want to go directly to http://www.doctorfreeride.blogspot.com/2005/11/talking-talk-vs-walking-walk.html "]

CREDIT BELONGS TO:
["Janet D. Stemwedel (whose nom de blog is Dr. Free-Ride) is an assistant professor of philosophy at San Jose State University. Before becoming a philosopher, she earned a Ph.D. in physical chemistry."]
[Advance bar, Yahoo/Netzero.com Search]

[" Science Ethics Bibliography Open this result in new window "]
["Bibliography of books, articles, and resources on ethics and misconduct in science. ... MISCONDUCT: Chinese Researchers Debate Rash of Plagiarism Cases" Science 1996 October 18; 274 (5286):337 (in ... G. Taubes. Bad Science: The Short Life & Hard Times of Cold Fusion ..."]
["Originally compiled by Vince Hamner. Updated by Brian Tissue."]
[Yahoo toolbar, Yahoo/Netzero Search]

[" ALA | Plagiarism and cyber-plagiarism Open in a new browser window "]
Credit goes to:["Patience Simmonds, The 'American Library Association', and 'Association of College and Research Libraries."]
["Advance bar, Yahoo/Netzero.com Search"]

[" http://www.ourstolenfuture.org/Myths/2002-0120avery.htm "]
["The book is Authored by, Theo Colborn, Dianne Dumanoski, and John Peterson Myers  - 'Our Stolen Future' "]
[Advance bar, Yahoo/Netzero.com Search]
CREDIT FOR THE ARTICLE IS THEIRS.

[(" Perspectives on the Professions Open in a new browser window"]
["Plagiarism in Science: The Experience of NSF". Donald E. Buzzelli,"] ["Office of
Inspector General, National Science Foundation ..."]
[Advance bar, Yahoo/Netzero.com Search]

This seems to be an ongoing problem in the Science Community.

The point is about having your work 'Stolen' by someone that wants to make 'Big Bucks' regardless of the consequences. Our Laws claim that we are 'Protected' from this, yet they blocked our path for retributions with a 3-year Statute that is biased for the rich, and Large Corporations.  'Work for hire' has a longer protection than for the 'Individual' Writer, Artist, ect...

This Statute does nothing to promote the 'Arts' or the 'Sciences', it's a deterrent for the 'thinkers' that are afraid to put out any work for fear of theft. There are a lot more of them than you would think.

With the Internet, theft becomes easier. I believe this Statute is wrong, and outdated. It should no longer exist.

Copyright Law covers a vast area, not just the 'Authors' of  books. And my reasons for trying to change this law have greater meaning and significance to myself now, because of the implications that it has on the Science Community. Plagiarists only know enough to pass on what they took, they pass on the errors and misleading information in Science, as well as the correct 'work.'

Strike the Statute of Limitations @CARE2.com
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/264941759
There is no charge and you can remain anonymous to the Public

Have a great day! Respectfully and sincerely, Darlene

(5) | () | | send green star | flag as inappropriate
Visibility: Everyone
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted: May 16, 2006 10:26pm

 
 
 
Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of Care2.com or its affiliates.

Author

Electra Cy
female, age 113, committed relationship
AA, USA
Shares by Type:
All (598) | Blog (280) | Alert (231) | Message (87)

Showing shares tagged with: civil [show all]
ads keep care2 free
SHARES FROM ELECTRA'S NETWORK
Jun
19
(0 comments  |  discussions )
                                                                 
(1 comments  |  discussions )
Pet food maker Natura has announced a massive voluntary recall of its brands of dry pet food due to salmonella concerns. The recall includes all Innova, California Natural, EVO, Healthwise, Mother Nature and Karma branded dry pet food ...
Jun
18
(0 comments  |  discussions )
The Rule of the British Empire                                           Quote:   Marcahuasi Project The Georgia Guidestones is a granite mon...
(0 comments  |  discussions )
The ‘Standing Man’ Of Turkey: Act Of Quiet Protest Goes Viral                             http://www.npr.org/blogs/ thetwo-way/2013/06/18/193 183899/the-standing-man-o f-tu...
(0 comments  |  discussions )
Essentials of Life Holistic Enrichment Center is a home-based interfaith church.  We choose this designation for many reasons, mostly to preserve our freedom.  Freedom of religion...and from religion...is very important to us.  We beli...
Jun
17
(0 comments  |  discussions )
                  http://www.youtube.com/wa tch?v=ikxDnMI7kDM&fea ture=em-subs_digest-vrecs
Jun
16
(0 comments  |  discussions )
eventux
(1 comments  |  discussions )
–Teachi ngs of the Tree People: IslandWood Cultural History Series, Teacher Resources (from personal photo collection) Native American Products Tanka Bar – 12 Pack Amazon Price: $36.99 Native American Herbal Tea Samp...
Jun
15
(0 comments  |  discussions )
    Miguelito Acosta sensual and splendid acrobatic dance     Oh my God.. Wow wow wow..This is just amazing Oh my God.. Wow wow wow..This is just amazing ========================= ============== - PNP Media Length: 6:19
(0 comments  |  0 discussions )
      Government Explained                 http://www.youtube.com/wa tch?v=EUS1m5MSt9k       Government Explained / Or The Big Lie !    

Copyright © 2013 Care2.com, inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved