22,410,299 members doing good!
share your passions, stories, inspirations, and more
Nov 12, 2011

I have been meaning to show you this Forbes article since November, 2011. Here are some excerpts. The National Film Board of Canada motion picture referred to in the article has now been released. Thank you for your attention, F.Conde (March 2, 2012.)

http://www.forbes.com/sites/amywestervelt/2011/11/04/the-pinkwashing-debate-empty-criticism-or-serious-liability/2/


Contributor
Amy Westervelt

Ms. Westervelt describes her work

I am a freelance journalist covering the environment from various angles for
publications such as Slate.com, Sunset, and Consumers Digest. In the recent
past I've worked as the Managing Editor of Earth Island Journal and a
cleantech reporter for SolveClimate, Earth2Tech and Sustainable Industries.
Back in 2007, my feature on the potential of algae as a feedstock for
biofuel won a gold Folio Eddie. I'm still obsessed with chemicals and
materials--the focus of my Material Witness blog here at Forbes. 


November 4th, 2011
 


http://www.forbes.com/sites/amywestervelt/2011/11/04/the-pinkwashing-debate-empty-criticism-or-serious-liability/



The Pinkwashing Debate: Empty Criticism or Serious Liability?

Each year as Breast Cancer Awareness Month draws to a close there are mixed emotions amongst women’s health advocates. On the one hand, all those walks, runs and pink ribbons raise billions of dollars for charity. On the other, in some cases it’s hard to trace what’s being done with that money and the list of companies that seem to be promoting breast cancer awareness while profiting from less-than-healthy products grows every year.

...


In the Beginning, There Was Peach


What is now the pink ribbon actually began as a peach ribbon, tied in its early days to specific policy work. Charlotte Haley, a woman who’s grandmother, sister and daughter had all dealt with breast cancer was inspired by the red ribbons she had seen for AIDS awareness, and began pinning peach ribbons to cards that read, “The National Cancer Institute annual budget is $1.8 billion, only 5 percent goes for cancer prevention. Help us wake up our legislators and America by wearing this ribbon.”



...


The term &ldquoinkwashing” was coined by Breast Cancer Action in reference to companies that either promote breast cancer awareness without donating at all, are deceptive or not transparent about where any funds raised go, or put a pink ribbon on a product with known or suspected links to cancer. The group launched its Think Before You Pink campaign in 2002 and has found at least one product every year since to be the poster child of pinkwashing. In 2007, the campaign targeted car companies, including Ford, BMW and Mercedes, that “sell cars to raise money for breast cancer, while the cars themselves produce air pollutants linked to breast cancer.” In 2008, Think Before You Pink targeted Yoplait for putting pink lids on yogurt containing milk from cows treated with the hormone rGBH, which has been linked to breast cancer. After hearing complaints from tens of thousands of consumers, Yoplait removed rGBH from its products.


...


The new documentary, Pink Ribbons, Inc., due out in 2012 and based on a book by the same name, highlights not only the more obvious examples of pinkwashing, but some of the undercurrents of the pink ribbon movement in general. A group of women living with Stage 4 breast cancer talk about how difficult it is to find support in a movement that’s all about being upbeat and strong enough to beat cancer. The film’s narrator takes us through the history of the breast cancer movement, which started with advocacy and a push for better public policy, but that some feel has lost both its edge and its purpose in the quest for more corporate funding.

Is Pinkwashing Really a Problem?


...




According to Elizabeth Thompson, president of Susan G. Komen for the Cure, Komen’s process for selecting corporate partners effectively weeds out any company or product that is not in sync with the charity’s mission, which is, according to its website, “to save lives, empower people, ensure quality care for all and energize science to find the cures.”




Just under 5,000 companies a year come to us to do business, and we have a very solid process to review ingredients in products, we follow IARC [International Agency for Research on Cancer] standards and if we don’t understand the ingredients of a product, we have as a back-up a group at Harvard that helps us vet them,” Thompson says. “Out of those 5,000 we only partner with about 275. The others are not selected either because of an ingredient list or because they don’t match up with our philosophy. We’re looking for companies and organizations that want to do more than just slap a ribbon on something.”







Message In a Bottle

“We need to be focused on prevention,” says Stacy Malkan, author of Not Just a Pretty Face: The Ugly Side of the Beauty Industry, founder of the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics, which has taken companies like Estee Lauder, Avon, and Revlon to task for being huge backers of pink ribbon campaigns and walks for the cure while at the same time refusing to discuss phasing out toxic chemicals in their products. “Despite all these multiple billions of dollars we’re no closer to a cure than we were. A cure is very elusive. There are so many contributing factors to cancer that the idea that there could be a magic pill that addresses all the different forms and be done with it is a fantasy. It’s nice to hope for a cure, but we can take action right now with prevention.”


 


Breast Cancer Action’s Karuna Jaggar echoes these concerns.

In the beginning, the pink ribbon campaigns were part of solving a visibility problem, but today the pink ribbons are blinding us to the real issues,” Jaggar says. “The issue is no longer awareness, the issue is understanding the root causes of the disease. Awareness is often channeled into screening and mammography, with no recognition of the limits of mammography. Mammography is a tool, an important tool, but it is not the solution to the epidemic. It detects cancer after it has already occurred. Even women diagnosed early may die of the disease, and too often do.





A New York Times article last month highlighted the limits of mammography as well, interviewing doctors about their concerns that pink ribbon campaigns have led women to believe that mammograms in and of themselves can prevent breast cancer. Komen’s Thompson points out, however, that many women continue to skip these basic screenings. “A study released two months ago surveyed 1.5 million women and found that 50 percent of eligible women (meaning they were over 40 and insured) were not taking advantage of annual screenings,” she says. “That means that there are early-stage cancers that aren’t being detected. So that’s very much an important part of where we are.”




Thompson also notes that the jury is still out on the science around environmental causes of breast cancer. “For many years there have been people who believe there are links between environmental causes and cancer, but we don’t have scientific evidence to back that up,” Thompson says. “There are a lot of beliefs and emotions, but we are an evidence-based organization and right now the evidence isn’t there.”




Nonetheless, Thompson says Komen did recently fund the largest ever study to the Institute of Medicine to review the correlation between environmental factors and breast cancer. That study is due out in two months. In the meantime, Jaggar and Malkan note that while it’s difficult to say that this particular chemical causes that specific cancer, the evidence is mounting against certain ingredients (bisphenol-A, phthalates, mercury and lead to name a few) to the point where the precautionary principle should be invoked.




“In the absence of scientific consensus, while we’re conducting the research, what do we do in the meantime?” Jaggar says. “When the weight of the evidence suggests a threat of harm, we believe you act to prevent harm before it occurs. You take every precaution to preserve women’s health. Just fifty years ago, the liftetime risk (if you lived, as the average woman did, to 85) of getting breast cancer was one in twenty. In 1984 it was one in fourteen, today it’s one in eight. That means it has grown from a personal risk of 5 percent to over 12 percent. That’s approaching over a 250 percent increase in just 50 years. In the face of that alarming statistic, that’s where we take issue with Komen and others. When in doubt, leave it out.”




Malkan adds that more of the funds raised by pink ribbon campaigns need to be going to fund research into causes. Komen does donate millions of dollars a year to research and prevention, but it’s still a percentage of the billion or so dollars raised annually. “There are many useful ways in which women have been helped by better treatment options and early detection, but we need to look at why so many women are getting breast cancer in the first place,” Malkan says. “There are some important indicators that have been discovered – like the fact that breast cancer rates dropped slightly when so many women stopped using hormone replacement therapy –that’s huge, and that’s the sort of thing we should be investing research money in. Synthetic estrogens is another big one.”





Good Business


In a perfect world, everyone advocating for women’s health would be on the same team. As media and consumer attention around pinkwashing grows, that may just happen. “We’re absolutely seeing more attention to the idea of prevention,” Malkan says. “A very good example is the President’s cancer panel – they made a very strong statement that prevention is important and that we need to be doing more to regulate carcinogens, and those were mainstream scientists appointed by Bush saying we need to do something about this.”


stem what they see as a surge of pinkwashing, Breast Cancer Action encourages consumers to first consider donating directly to a charity or research foundation they want to support, and then to ask five key questionsbefore buying a pink ribbon product: How much money goes toward breast cancer, and is the company transparent about it? What is the maximum amount that will be donated? How are funds raised? Where does the money go and what sorts of programs does it support? What is the company doing to ensure its products aren’t contributing to the breast cancer epidemic?



More research is being conducted into environmental causes as well, and the results of those studies are becoming more and more public. With so many such reports surfacing, and Komen’s own study of environmental links to cancer due out shortly, companies may voluntarily become more careful about the sorts of products they put pink ribbons on for fear of consumer backlash or even legal action.





“The reason companies put pink on their stuff is likely to imply some sort of association with Komen or the cure, or breast cancer research in general,” says Chris Cole, a partner at Manatt, Phelps & Phillips and a leading authority on false advertising. ”The idea is to create a sense around their brand, and if they’re not actually doing anything, then that’s false advertising plain and simple. Moreover, if they’re implying to consumers that if they buy this product the company will give some profits to a charity then they’re implying an association that’s not there and I think the Federal Trade Commission would definitely get involved in a particularly egregious case.”

 

Visibility: Everyone
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted: Nov 12, 2011 3:27am
Sep 4, 2011


I love movies and I love this type of discussion. Point number 9 is especially important. Thank you for your attention, Filomena C. 



The Wall Street Journal

from SMART MONEY

December 30, 2009

http://www.smartmoney.com/spend/family-money/10-things-movie-theaters-wont-tell-you/#articleTabs  


By SARAH MORGAN


Hard to believe, but movie theaters have been holding their own, despite intense competition from cable, the Internet and other media. After a 2005 slump, box office revenue increased over the past few years, and it's likely 2009 will have set a new record. But that growth is due largely to inflation; the number of tickets bought has stayed close to 1.4 billion since 2005, while the average ticket price has climbed from $6.41 to $7.46.


Looking for new ways to make money, theaters are exploring options like more in-house advertising and expanded concessions. But the biggest potential lies in digital technology and the flexibility it affords programming. For starters, events like live opera or college bowl games can draw 75 percent capacity on slow days, when theaters are usually "lucky to fill 10 percent of their seats," says Richard Herring, consultant for Davidson Theaters in Virginia. The trend is still young: Just a quarter of the more than 375 theaters using digital-projection company Cinedigm's technology, for example, are set up to show live events, but that number is growing quickly. Eventually, says Herring, as much as half a theater's revenue could come from this type of special programming.


2. "We get rich selling your eyes."

Theaters are drawing a bigger portion of their revenue these days from the on-screen advertising shown before the previews start. Revenue from these ads has been increasing by roughly 10 to 15 percent a year for the past several years, says Patrick Corcoran, spokesperson for the National Association of Theater Owners, and it's not going away anytime soon. That's because industry insiders rely on surveys like the one conducted in 2003 by marketing firm Arbitron that found two-thirds of audience members didn't mind them.


Some moviegoers do mind, of course-more than 3,400 of them cared enough to sign a recent online petition demanding Regal Cinemas stop showing ads before movies. "I'm wondering why ticket prices are going up, and we're being forced to watch these ads at the same time," says Jason Thompson, who started the petition after growing frustrated with sitting through a string of ads before showtime. "The preshow presentation has been a part of theater exhibition for many years," says Dick Westerling, senior VP of marketing and advertising at Regal. What's more, thanks to digital technology, the preshow has become "more upscale and attractive."


3. "If you're getting tired of blockbusters, you may be in luck."

Special-events programming isn't the only change digital technology may be ushering into your local cineplex. It also makes film distribution cheaper and easier, thus potentially opening up more opportunities for independent filmmakers to get their work screened. "It's like a big iPod," explains Cinedigm CEO Bud Mayo. Movies are shipped on hard drives or downloaded from a satellite, without the cost or inconvenience of transporting heavy film canisters, and the theater can cue them up with the click of a mouse. That means theater owners can set up their schedules by "trial and error," says Lauren Goffio, manager of the Pavilion Park Slope theater in Brooklyn, N.Y.


The trend toward digital could also mean a move away from blockbusters. Hollywood has been offering mass-market products while most industries are directing specialized products to smaller groups, says Rashi Glazer, professor of marketing at the University of California, Berkeley: "The one-size-fits-all approach is the past, it's not the future." And digital lowers "the barrier of entry," since distribution is no longer an expense to be reckoned with, says Corcoran.


4. "We really prefer you didn't come on opening night."

Contrary to the way Hollywood considers opening-weekend box office numbers the ultimate test of a movie's success, theaters themselves are far less worried about packing the house for new releases. That's because they pay a percentage of ticket sales as a fee to studios, and the cut is typically bigger earlier in a film's run.


How does it work? Studios negotiate separate agreements with each theater chain for each film, so the conditions vary. But generally speaking, theaters pay somewhere between 35 and 70 percent of box office receipts to the studio as a film-rental fee, says consultant Herring. In most cases, the studio takes the biggest cut in the first week, and the percentage drops from there. "If you have a movie like Titanic that lasts for months and months, that's what we all dream about," says Bruce Taffet, the owner of The Pearl Theatre at Avenue North, in Philadelphia. He says that by the third or fourth week of a given film's run, the exhibitor begins paying lower film-rental fees to the studio. Unfortunately for theater operators, "most movies don't last that long," Taffet says.


5. "We're all about the bells and whistles."

Noticed lately that the moviegoing experience has become a lot more, well, experiential? It's a result of theaters including more "premium experience" screenings in their lineup, including the use of IMAX and updated 3-D technology. And the trend seems to be accelerating. Regal Cinemas, for one, had 168 digital 3-D screens out of a total 6,782 screens nationwide by the end of 2008 and plans to up that number to 1,500 in the next few years. Meanwhile, about 175 Regal theaters have installed IMAX in the past six years, with more than half of those within the past year.


The lure is profit, naturally: After initial upgrades and outlays-such as special screens and IMAX's imaging process-theaters can charge $2 to $3 more for these tickets. And customers like it, says IMAX CEO Rich Gelfond; he cites 2009's Star Trek, for which IMAX made up 2 percent of total screens but 12 percent of box office over a two-week period. Similarly, 3-D screenings have won up to half the total audience for films like Pixar's Up. But Glazer chalks up the excitement to novelty, since "the films themselves don't particularly have anything to commend them compared to others."


Recessions come and go, but it seems concessions are here to stay. The average amount each customer spends at the candy stand keeps heading steadily upward, from $2.51 in 2004 to $3.09 in 2008. In fact, for major theater chains, concessions typically account for about a quarter of total revenue. So how is it that theaters get away with charging as much as $10.50 for a large popcorn and soda? First and foremost, movie concessions are a monopoly, since most theaters don't allow patrons to bring in outside food or beverages. (It's "not a requirement" to buy popcorn when you go to the movies, says Corcoran, of the National Association of Theater Owners. "People who want concessions can order them or not.")


 







But there's also an important emotional component, says Richard McKenzie, professor of economics at the University of California-Irvine and the author of Why Popcorn Costs So Much at the Movies. When you buy Junior Mints or another favorite treat, you're buying a piece of the moviegoing experience, along with "the opportunity to laugh with a crowd and everything else people go to the movies for," McKenzie says.


7. "...so we might put in a bar."

SOME THEATER owners are trying alternative concessions, offering menus that include more than the usual candy and popcorn fare, and even serving alcohol at some locations. For example, Regal Cinemas partners with Cinebarre at five venues serving beer, wine, mixed drinks, appetizers, burgers and pizza. And while there are only about 400 theaters across the country that serve liquor, the numbers have been slowly but steadily increasing. Terrell Braly, CEO of Cinebarre, says his company will expand to 20 theaters by 2011.


But that doesn't mean your local multiplex will be adding a bar anytime soon. There are inherent problems with serving drinks at the movies-for one thing, it precludes teenage audiences, a key demographic for many theaters. There was even resistance from studios until the late '90s, says Corcoran, including refusal to allow first-run films to be shown in theaters serving alcohol, for fear patrons wouldn't pay attention. Braly says Cinebarre has proved it can deliver the same quality of viewing experience as a traditional chain and says leaving out teenagers isn't a flaw in the business plan, it's a boon to adult patrons by removing "the middle-school mafia."


8. "Actually, your neighbor's cell doesn't bother us that much."

We've all been there: sitting in the theater, our attention consumed by the drama unfolding on screen-only to have the spell broken by a ringing cell phone or the distracting glow of a text message. And with the cultural shift toward personal technology well under way, such disturbances are becoming a regular part of the theater experience, says Toon van Beeck, senior analyst at market-research firm IBISWorld. "People are so glued to their cell phones that it's become a big problem for theaters," he says.


A major check on theaters attempting to police these and other sorts of audience disturbances is the fear of customer backlash, says van Beeck. Movie houses don't want to lose younger audiences-who are primarily responsible for disruptions-by cracking down too hard. "But they've got to at least show the baby boomers that they're trying," says van Beeck. Kerasotes Theatres, a Midwest chain with 94 theaters, has taken steps toward offering an escape from rowdy crowds with its "enchanted evening" policy. At select locations on Friday and Saturday nights, no one under the age of 17 is permitted without an adult into movies that start after 9 p.m. The policy, says a spokesperson for Kerasotes, is intended to get people to attend the movies as a family. "When Mom and Dad are around, everyone tends to be on their best behavior."


9. "Going to the movies could be hazardous to your hearing."

Movies sure can get loud, but could they actually be harmful to your ears? Individual theaters' decibel levels vary, but special effects-laden action flicks, for example, can hit the same dangerous territory as a loud rock concert, thus potentially contributing to hearing loss, according to the Center for Hearing and Communication. In fact, any sustained noise over 85 decibels (roughly the level of city traffic) can damage your hearing, says Amy Boyle, director of public education for the center.


"We've received complaints" about noise level in movie theaters, but those who have taken it up with theater staff "have been met with resistance," says Boyle. If you're concerned about volume, you can buy a sound level meter at retailers like RadioShack to measure the decibels around you. Meanwhile, if you experience any ringing in your ears after seeing a movie, then that means it was too loud. "Remember, even the sounds that we like can be damaging to our hearing," she says.


10. "It may soon be safe to go to the movies in February."

Moviegoing has traditionally been a seasonal activity. According to Herring, theaters bring in 40 percent of their yearly revenue in just three months: May, June and July. The winter holidays are another big period for box office revenue, while spring and fall have been dumping grounds for low-budget movies and potential flops. But things are slowly changing, as studios seek to spread their quality releases more evenly throughout the year. With the old calendar in flux, some smaller films are debuting with less competition and doing far better than expected.


Last year's surprise late-January hit Mall Cop, for instance, would probably not have been as successful had it been released in the summer against bigger films, Herring says. Indeed, we've started seeing more major releases off season in the past few years, says Alan Stock, CEO of the Cinemark theater chain. For example, September 2009 brought the release of family film Cloudy With a Chance of Meatballs. And if the trend continues, moviegoers might eventually see some high-caliber films come out in the dead zone of the major-release calendar: the postholiday doldrums of January and February.




Visibility: Everyone
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted: Sep 4, 2011 4:11pm
Aug 27, 2011

 

[The following opinion was written between August 12th and October 4th, 2009, then I thought about it some more on November 24, 2009. That is correct. I am only making this public today - twenty-one months later.]

By: Filomena Conde

What's a "testimonial"? Just a second, I'm going to get my dictionaries...I'm back!

testimonial, n., adj. - n. 1 a certificate of character, conduct, qualifications, or value; recommendation: The boy looking for a job had testimonials from his teachers and former employees. Advertisements of patent medicines often contain testimonials from people who have used them. syn: credential, voucher. 2 something given or done to show esteem, admiration, gratitude, or worthiness: The members of the church collected money for a testimonial to their retiring pastor. - adj. given or done as a testimonial: a testimonial letter, a testimonial dinner.

from The World Book Encyclopedia Dictionary, p. 2168

testimonial n. A proof of character or worth. - test-i-mo-ni-al

from Webster Dictionary, p. 578.

I'm not really asking. I know what it is and I understand the symbolism of it here at Care2. This Community has a Green Star system so that people can show others their appreciation and/or admiration. The testimonial is one step above the Green Star attribution. That makes the testimonial pretty important, I would say. A testimonial - and especially here at Care2 with the Green Star "system" - is like a Green Star but in words. It is a Green Star... but put into words. 

On July 5th, 2009 (two years ago) I received a "Testimonial" from Care2 member Sheldon Johnson. I can accept it or reject it. I decided to do neither. I have made that decision and I now leave my thoughts about it here in My Sharebook.

I knew this testimonial was coming my way sooner or later. I knew it would have to be as soon as possible, before giving me time to add so much information to my page that this "Testimonial" would not stand out or would be difficult to notice by other Care2 members. Care2 member Sheldon Johnson sends other members "testimonials" where he writes: "I noticed..." Of course I am here to support a Cause. Is there anyone here at Care2 not here to support a cause? This is just one reason why I think this is an abusive use of the testimonial feature of Care2. When I saw Mr. Sheldon Johnson's "testimonial" practically everywhere in sight, I felt like the "predator" was catching the "prey". That is the feeling I was (and am) left with, sorry to have to put it so bluntly. The "predator" is a member who knows his or her way around the Care2 community and the "prey" is the member who is really new to all of this and accepts anything that comes his or her way out of shyness or because the newcomer is worried about hurting the "predator's" feelings

The biggest problem with Care2 member Sheldon Johnson's "testimonial" is the way it is clouded by the John F. Kennedy shooting animation. The good intentions this Care2 member may have - in order to help his family and us all - are totally wiped out in my mind by this bad taste in animation at the bottom of his Care2 Page presentation. It reminds me of the Associação Abraço, a Portuguese charity association which organizes bullfights to raise funds for the fight against AIDS... No way, Josephina. Unacceptable. Disrespectful. Disturbing. Bad taste. Clever though. Yeah, too clever. I think it is too clever to use the Care2 testimonial feature in this way. That is the other reason why I have to reject this. When I analyze a Care2 page, I may not read everything but I do run through the whole page right down to the bottom to get a general view. I'm wondering how many Care2 members do at least that before they accept a testimonial? I wonder if more people had done that, would Care2 member Sheldon Johnson have so many stars? ... Mr. Sheldon Johnson's choice of animation scares me. I could add it to my "What scares me" list and it would be the truth. Why it has not scared more Care2 members is still a mystery to me. 

I learned with age to put myself in other people's shoes and so I think of the Kennedy family when I recall that animation. I think of the daughter Caroline Kennedy and the Kennedy grandchildren. No, no and no. Not for me. I have seen the documentaries. I have textbooks. I've seen the news footage. I don't need this animation. No more, thank you. This is not the way to see it. This is not the way to find out about it ("it" the John F. Kennedy assasination). For that part of the world or a part of the American population who never knew this happened to the 35th President of the United States, well, they should learn about it through respectful means. 

Then there are the Golden Notes at Care2. Has no one noticed? How can a Care2 member who uses this type of animation have been attributed so many Golden Notes? Am I the only one offended by this moving picture of John Fitzgerald Kennedy's final moments? - and he wasn't even my President, I'm not American as you know. Isn't that animation in itself psychological torture? What irony! Care2 member Sheldon Johnson is warning us about psychological torture. For those Care2 site visitors who love violence, you must be having a field day - every three seconds... 

Now let us make the comparison with the Benigno Aquino, Jr (1932-1983) Wikipedia text. It also has a moving "gif". Yet it does not show the shooting - over and over again... Why? Because this way, respect is shown. Very effective - it shows the hypocrisy of the Philippines military without showing the suffering of a man who did not deserve to be assassinated. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benigno_Aquino,_Jr  This is done with good taste. 

Does Care2 member Sheldon Johnson honestly want to make the point that the United States president who could have effectively ended these torture procedures was John F. Kennedy - then is this how to remember that former head of state? Doesn't anyone out there feel offended (by this irony)? Give it a thought please, Care2 member Sheldon Johnson. You keep repeating and repeating the shooting. I don't like to see it. It is not right. 

Words have to have meaning. Testimonials have to have meaning. Or putting it another way, words have to mean things, testimonials have to mean things. People can play around with words some of the time but people cannot play around with words all of the time - and there comes a time when you cannot play with words at all - not here at Care2. It is not easy to reject something at Care2 but when you have to do it, you just have to do it - and we have the right to do it. I learned that with time here at Care2, but I learned that. I cannot feel guilty about it and newcomers should not either. It is okay to say "no". It is okay to consider things over. My final decision back in 2009 was to neither reject nor accept the "testimonial". I rejected it without pressing the reject box. A testimonial has to be specific about the person it is directed at, and this testimonial says nothing specific about me or any other person who received it. Therefore, just on that level, anyone can reject this text sent by Care2 member Sheldon Johnson.

 

Visibility: Everyone
Tags: , , , , ,
Posted: Aug 27, 2011 11:35am
Aug 27, 2011

 

Dear Care2 members,

I have been meaning to SHARE this article - by Claire Suddath - with you since April 2010 but I am only making it public on my SHAREBOOK today. I have always valued readable handwriting and especially readable signatures. I can say I have these two features in my favour - over the years a number of people have pointed out to me that my handwriting is neat. I'm from the old school, not everything was bad about it, I see. We had those exercise books, yes, with the two lines. I feel those books should make a comeback - and in Portugal, too. Discussions/debates/articles about handwriting interest me enormously. Boys shouldn't have sloppy handwriting just because they are boys. Also, it is unexcusable that for too long the unreadable writing of doctors was considered chic... 

Thank you for reading this.  

FConde

__________________________________________________________

From Time Magazine (Aug. 3, 2009)

"Mourning the Death of Handwriting" 

by: Claire Suddath

I can't remember how to write a capital Z in cursive. The rest of my letters are shaky and stiff, my words slanted in all directions. It's not for lack of trying. In grade school I was one of those insufferable girls who used pink pencils and dotted their i's with little circles. I experimented with different scripts, and for a brief period I even took the time to make two-story a's, with the fancy overhang used in most fonts (including this magazine's). But everything I wrote, I wrote in print. I am a member of Gen Y, the generation that shunned cursive. And now there is a group coming after me, a boom of tech-savvy children who don't remember life before the Internet and who text-message nearly as much as they talk. They have even less need for good penmanship. We are witnessing the death of handwriting.

People born after 1980 tend to have a distinctive style of handwriting: a little bit sloppy, a little bit childish and almost never in cursive. The knee-jerk explanation is that computers are responsible for our increasingly illegible scrawl, but Steve Graham, a special-education and literacy professor at Vanderbilt University, says that's not the case. The simple fact is that kids haven't learned to write neatly because no one has forced them to. "Writing is just not part of the national agenda anymore," he says.

(See pictures of the college dorm's evolution.)

Cursive started to lose its clout back in the 1920s, when educators theorized that because children learned to read by looking at books printed in manuscript rather than cursive, they should learn to write the same way. By World War II, manuscript, or print writing, was in standard use across the U.S. Today schoolchildren typically learn print in kindergarten, cursive in third grade. But they don't master either one. Over the decades, daily handwriting lessons have decreased from an average of 30 minutes to 15.

Zaner-Bloser, the nation's largest supplier of handwriting manuals, offers coursework through the eighth grade but admits that these days, schools rarely purchase materials beyond the third grade. The company, which is named for two men who ran a penmanship school back when most business documents were handwritten, occasionally modifies its alphabet according to cultural tastes and needs.

(See pictures of a public boarding school.)

Handwriting has never been a static art. The Puritans simplified what they considered hedonistically elaborate letters. Nineteenth century America fell in love with loopy, rhythmic Spencerian script (think Coca-Cola: the soft-drink behemoth's logo is nothing more than a company bookkeeper's handiwork), but the early 20th century favored the stripped-down, practical style touted in 1894's Palmer Guide to Business Writing.

The most recent shift occurred in 1990, when Zaner-Bloser eliminated all superfluous adornments from the so-called Zanerian alphabet. "They were nice and pretty and cosmetic," says Kathleen Wright, the company's national product manager, "but that isn't the purpose of handwriting anymore. The purpose is to get a thought across as quickly as possible." One of the most radical overhauls was to Q, after the U.S. Postal Service complained that people's sloppy handwriting frequently caused its employees to misread the capital letter as the number 2.

Read TIME's 1942 article "Handwriting As Character."

See TIME's education covers.

 

Read more: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1912419,00.html#ixzz1WDwM7WUk

 (2 of 2)

I entered third grade in 1990, the year of the great alphabet change. My teacher, Linda Garcia at Central Elementary in Wilmette, Ill., says my class was one of the last to learn the loops and squiggles. "For a while I'd show my kids both ways," she says. "But the new alphabet is easier for them, so now I just use that one."

Garcia, who has been teaching for 32 years, says her children consider cursive a "rite of passage" and are just as excited to learn it as ever. But once they leave her classroom, it's a different story. She doesn't know any teachers in the upper grades who address the issue of handwriting, and she frequently sees her former students reverting to old habits. "They go back to sloppy letters and squished words," she says. "Handwriting is becoming a lost art."

Why? Technology is only part of the reason. A study published in the February issue of the Journal of Educational Psychology found that just 9% of American high school students use an in-class computer more than once a week. The cause of the decline in handwriting may lie not so much in computers as in standardized testing. The Federal Government's landmark 1983 report A Nation at Risk, on the dismal state of public education, ushered in a new era of standardized assessment that has intensified since the passage in 2002 of the No Child Left Behind Act. "In schools today, they're teaching to the tests," says Tamara Thornton, a University of Buffalo professor and the author of a history of American handwriting. "If something isn't on a test, it's viewed as a luxury." Garcia agrees. "It's getting harder and harder to balance what's on the test with the rest of what children need to know," she says. "Reading is on there, but handwriting isn't, so it's not as important." In other words, schools don't care how a child holds her pencil as long as she can read.

(Read "No More Pencils, No More Bics.")

Is that such a bad thing? Except for physicians — whose illegible handwriting on charts and prescription pads causes thousands of deaths a year — penmanship has almost no bearing on job performance. And aside from the occasional grocery list or Post-it note, most adults write very little by hand. The Emily Post Institute recommends sending a handwritten thank-you but says it doesn't matter whether the note is in cursive or print, as long as it looks tidy. But with the declining emphasis in schools, neatness is becoming a rarity.

"I worry that cursive will go the way of Latin and that eventually we won't be able to read it," says Garcia. "What if 50 years from now, kids can't read the Declaration of Independence?"

I am not bothered by the fact that I will never have beautiful handwriting. My printing will always be fat and round and look as if it came from a 12-year-old. And let's be honest: the Declaration of Independence is already hard to read. We are living in the age of social networks and frenzied conversation, composing more e-mails, texting more messages and keeping in touch with more people than ever before. Maybe this is the trade-off. We've given up beauty for speed, artistry for efficiency. And yes, maybe we are a little bit lazy.

Cursive's demise is due in part to the kind of circular logic espoused by Alex McCarter, a 15-year-old in New York City. He has such bad handwriting that he is allowed to use a computer on standardized tests. The U.S. Department of Education estimates that only 0.3% of high school students receive this particular accommodation. McCarter's mother tried everything to help him improve his penmanship, including therapy, but the teenager likes his special status. "I kind of want to stay bad at it," he says. These days, that shouldn't be a problem.

Read TIME's 1970 article "Pen-and-Pencil Therapy." 

Read "Cause of Death: Sloppy Doctors." 

  

Read more: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1912419,00.html#ixzz1WDweYohL

Visibility: Everyone
Tags: , , , , , , , ,
Posted: Aug 27, 2011 12:58am
Jul 2, 2011
Focus: Sustainable Development
Action Request: Petition
Location: Portugal
The following environmental groups of Portugal -

(1) Amigos dos Açores – Associação EcológicaAvenida da Paz, 14, 9580-053 Pico da Pedra.

(2) Gê-Questa – Associação de Defesa do Ambiente, Forte Grande de São Mateus da Calheta, 9700-702 Angra do Heroísmo.

wrote a very straightforward petition calling on the Regional Government of the Açores (Portugal) - http://www.azores.gov.pt  - to make its agricultural areas transgenic free zones. 

You do not have to be Portuguese to sign this petition. E não é preciso ser natural dos Açores, claro. If this issue which relates to so many facets of our daily lives - food safety, environment, farm life - is important to you, sign the petition. 
Go to the link here:
http://www.peticaopublica.com/PeticaoVer.aspx?pi=P2011N9685
You can take a look at the text below, too.
Petição Pela proibição do cultivo de variedades de organismos geneticamente modificados (OGM) na Região Autónoma dos Açores Para:Assembleia Legislativa da Região Autónoma dos Açores, (ALRAA) Sua Excelência Presidente do Governo Regional dos Açores

Sua Excelência Presidente da Assembleia Legislativa da Região Autónoma dos Açores (ALRAA) 

Sua Excelência Presidente do Governo Regional dos Açores 

Suas Excelências Presidentes dos Grupos Parlamentares à ALRAA 

Considerando que os Açores primam pela sua singularidade no contexto nacional e internacional no que respeita às práticas da actividade agrícola, caracterizadas por uma associação com os valores naturais e agro-ambientais. 

Considerando que o arquipélago dos Açores dado às suas características edafoclimáticas - solos férteis, chuvas frequentes e clima ameno - se revela uma zona rica em agricultura tradicional, onde incluso se destaca pela qualidade dos produtos regionais certificados, servindo de exemplo a Meloa de Santa Maria, o ananás de São Miguel, o alho da Graciosa, as laranjas da Terceira ou os vinhos do Pico. 

Considerando que as sementeiras convencionais utilizadas na agricultura tradicional, constituem uma herança genética de valor intrínseco incalculável que cabe a todos nós preservar para as gerações vindouras.

Considerando que a introdução e o cultivo de organismos geneticamente modificados são frequentemente contestados como colocando sérias ameaças para a saúde pública, o ambiente e o desenvolvimento da agricultura tradicional

Considerando a falta de estudos científicos por parte de entidades de reconhecida competência técnica que comprovem a não existência de riscos para a saúde pública relativamente ao cultivo e consumo de organismos geneticamente modificados. 

Considerando que o cultivo de organismos geneticamente modificados está baseado num modelo de agricultura intensiva com forte recurso a produtos agro-químicos, de fabrico exterior à região, cujo uso frequente constitui uma séria agressão ao ambiente. 

Considerando que tanto o tipo de agricultura de produção massiva à qual os OGM estão intimamente associados como a coexistência de cultivos convencionais em simultâneo com cultivos contendo OGM colocam em causa as tradições agrícolas locais regionais, bem como o facto de sujeitarem as variedades de cariz local a uma contaminação genética irreversível, levando a que as variedades tradicionais acabem por converter-se também em transgénicas. 

Considerando tratar-se de numa região que se faz enaltecer por um turismo de natureza não se podem assumir atitudes susceptíveis de hipotecar a sensível e característica biodiversidade arquipelágica

Assim, atendendo ao Principio da Precaução, os signatários da presente petição solicitam

- A proibição da introdução no Arquipélago dos Açores de variedades vegetais geneticamente modificadas. 

- A proibição da introdução na região de material de propagação (vegetativo ou seminal) que contenha organismos geneticamente modificados, mesmo quando destinados à sua utilização em campos de carácter experimental. 

- A definição de um regime contra-ordenacional e de sanções acessórias, tais como a interdição do exercício da actividade principal, para as infracções associadas a estas proibições. 

- A declaração da Região Autónoma dos Açores zona livre de cultivo de variedades de organismos geneticamente modificados.

 

 

Visibility: Everyone
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted: Jul 2, 2011 10:01am
Jun 23, 2011
Focus: Science
Action Request: Petition
Location: Netherlands
If you have not signed this Dutch petition yet, please do. The deadline is January 1st, 2012 (a little over six months from now). There are instructions in the English and French languages you can follow.
http://gentechvrij.petities.nl/
The Dutch Minister of the Environment has agreed to a genetically engineered (GM) vaccination study on 3-day-old to six-month-old foals.

A GM-bacterium will be used. The little horses will stay with their mothers in stables and on grassland. The menure with GMO will go into the land. The little horses will eventually be killed in order for biopsies to be performed. The European GMO-free Citizens do not want this and have put forth this protest.

 

[Note: Painting by Dutch artist Miep Bos]

 

 

 

 

 

Visibility: Everyone
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted: Jun 23, 2011 8:22am
Apr 7, 2010
Focus: Health
Action Request: Visit - in person
Location: Portugal

http://stopogm.net/content/coloquio

Alimentação Hospitalar - Transgénicos e Saúde

Quer saber mais sobre o que se come nos hospitais? Pretende perceber por onde andam os transgénicos? Quer conhecer as implicações destes alimentos para a saúde? Então deve vir ao colóquio "Alimentação Hospitalar: Transgénicos e Saúde", a realizar no sábado dia 22 de Maio de 2010 entre as 9:30 e as 14h no Anfiteatro do Edifício Egas Moniz da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa. A entrada é livre.

Oradores presentes:
HELENA JERÓNIMO, socióloga, professora auxiliar no Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão da Universidade Técnica de Lisboa
PATRÍCIA ALMEIDA NUNES, Dietista, Pós-graduada em Gestão de Serviços de Saúde e em Doenças Metabólicas e Comportamento Alimentar, doutoranda na Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa
JOSÉ LUÍS GARCIA, Doutor em sociologia, investigador do Instituto de Ciências Sociais da Universidade de Lisboa, professor na licenciatura de Ciências da Saúde da Universidade de Lisboa
ISABEL DO CARMO, Médica, Doutora pela Faculdade de Medicina de Lisboa, especialista em Endocrinologia e Nutrição, directora do serviço de endocrinologia do Hospital de Santa Maria
MARGARIDA SILVA, Bióloga, doutorada em biologia molecular, professora auxiliar da Universidade Católica

Paralelamente ao colóquio estará patente ao público a exposição "Agricultura, Alimentação e Ambiente."

Segue em anexo folheto com programa detalhado.

Haverá emissão de certificado de presença mediante inscrição prévia para o email eventos@stopogm.net com indicação de nome, idade e contacto (até 18 de Maio).

 


 

Aug 10, 2009



OPEN LETTER
 to the people who live in the same building I do. 

    One of my main CAUSES here at Care2 is Peace and Non-Violence but that does not mean that I do not have a temper. One of the things that infuriates me the most... (one more for the "WHAT BUGS ME" list)... is: PEOPLE WHO DO NOT RECYCLE. I thought of leaving the Open Letter that follows on the bulletin board of the entrance of the building where I live but it will probably be removed or the glass vandalized. I thought of sending this tough-worded open letter to the local newspaper but for now the web, via Care2, will do just fine. 
    I live in what can be considered a decent neighbourhood. You know, you can get a good night's sleep most of the time (unless you suffer from insomnias). During building meetings you hear a lot of "nurse-this", "engineer-that", "teacher-this" and "attorney-that", etc., so you can describe the neighbourhood as lower middle-class.
    Out of town students make up a third of the dwellers. Students today - nurses, engineers, teachers, attorneys tomorrow. What I am trying to get at is that there really is no reason why people in this building on this street where I live should not recycle the (unwanted) publicity they find in their OWN mailboxes.
    How did I conclude that this group of people does not recycle? No, I have never sat by the mailboxes waiting to see how my neighbours deal with their mail. For a number of years I saw the paper advertisements scattered all over the entrance floor. And this is what used to happen until about two years ago when my next door neighbour suggested a waste paper bin be added by the hall.
    At the time I did not oppose the idea because there was no voting on the matter. The stunning suggestion was pronounced and unlike many other suggestions this one actually materialized.
    This supposedly educated part of Portuguese society used to leave the unwanted publicity on the floor of the entrance to the building. Now they leave it in the waste paper bin, but when the basket is completely full, the litter can be seen on the floor - again. This waste paper bin is now also used for objects such as plastic bottles, small milk cartons (not to mention pieces of sandwiches).
    Allow me to let it all out here at Care2 PLEASE... But this could only be said in Portuguese, if only I could explain it to you, if only I could make You, non-Portuguese speakers, understand how this cannot be translated. I mean, it can, but it can't. The feeling really does get «lost in translation»....

My message is tough-worded for various reasons. We must realize that in the end the women hired to clean the stairs of the building are not going to take that extra step of recycling because it is not theirs to take. In this country we are often reminded on newscasts that there are 2 million poor people in Portugal and I write here that what they are in fact is... poor recyclers. Television commercials presented by celebrities encourage the Portuguese people to contribute to campaigns against cancer by simply leaving paper, glass, and plastic in nearby recycling depots. (See the three links I have furnished about this campaign to fight cancer.) My temper shows through when I ask in the open-letter: Haven't you ever heard of cancer, you poor people?...

CARTA ABERTA aos moradores do prédio onde moro.

[Esta mensagem no entanto pode servir para todos aqueles que habitam em Portugal...]

Os Portugueses são pobres a reciclar.

Pensar que foi preciso colocar um cesto à entrada do prédio para que a publicidade indesejada de cada um não fosse parar ao chão de todos é revoltante. E agora quando o cesto está cheio, o lixo volta a estar espalhado pelo chão. (E vós moradores inventaram um novo uso para o cesto da publicidade indesejada, agora também serve para colocar garrafas de plástico e cartões de leite para não falar dos bocados de sandes que já vi...)

Recicle, meu pobre povo. Os ecopontos não estão assim tão longe. Faça exercício físico, reciclando. E com essa reciclagem ajude na campanha de luta contra o cancro (para nomear apenas uma maneira de ajudar o país com o gesto).

www.pontoverde.pt/

http://ultimahora.publico.clix.pt/noticia.aspx?id=1326051

http://www.laco.pt/site/files/Wed281419372009Diario_as_Beiras_Lixo_que_valem_ouro.pdf

Nunca ouviu falar em cancro, meu pobre povo?

Pobres são os Portugueses a reciclar.

Assina, 

Filomena Conde

Imported from external blog

Jun 16, 2009
Name: Georg Gressenbauer & Markus Haipl
Type: Tribute (for the living)
To Honor: Individual(s)
Location: Vienna, Austria

I still cannot believe how up-to-date the work of Architect Georg Gressenbauer and Architect Markus Haipl is - 16 years later. In 1993 they studied the town where I was born. They warned the People of Nazaré about bad architecture. They made suggestions. They had ideas - good ones. What they predicted happened. In fact they asked in their 1993 Urban Study and the journalists of the daily newspaper Público wrote about it in the «A vila que o turismo mata» September 25th, 1993 article: What is going to happen, if nothing happens?...

... Nothing happened... And so ugly buildings continued to me constructed. These Austrian architects pointed out the importance of maintaining an area for vegetable growing. The agricultural areas are shrinking even more today.

The local government at the time should have welcomed the efforts of Gressenbauer and Haipl but it did not. The present local government wants to build a mega-marina and a couple of golf courses with at least 18 holes. (Find the map of the land area that will be submerged and covered by grass as explained by Fábio Salgado in my profile section.)

Golf courses can really be illusionary for those of us who like nature. They are green. You can find a tree here and there - maybe some birds because of those here-and-there trees. Anybody can easily be fooled into thinking that golf courses are ecologically sane. But I have to ask, Would you really like to visit Nazaré, Portugal to play golf? Would it not make more sense to learn about the town history? See its museums and the architecture of the churches? Discover the paintings of artist Mário Botas(Dec. 23, 1952-Sept. 29, 1983)? The cobblestone streets? Well, yes, those cobblestone streets can really be bad for high-heel shoes, but let us all hope that the women wearing them have a regular salary so they can buy a new pair just in case those heels get damaged.   

North-American writer Mark Twain(1835-1910) said of golf courses: "Golf is a good walk spoiled." 

www.quotegarden.com/golf.html

Words are just not enough to express how much I appreciate what these two Austrian architects did for Nazaré. Still I could go on and on here expressing it. I thanked them for the first time only very recently - two and a half months ago (and in English) - yet I have had the Público article framed and hanging on the wall of my room soon after publication.

I think it takes a lot of courage for somebody(two young architects in this case) to go to another country and say something along the line of: "Look, I like this town and you should follow some simple steps to maintain what makes you unique or else... say goodbye to that uniqueness." 

I never got the chance to attend the 1993 Presentation of the Urban Study which means that I never got the chance to meet Architect Gressenbauer and Architect Haipl but I want to make up for that right here at Care2 Tribute Share section.

You can study the site of Architect Georg Gressenbauer here: http://www.gressenbauer.com/

 You can study the site of Architect Markus Haipl here:  http://www.architekt.bz/

The full newspaper article can be read in my Photo Album section.

 Thank you for reading about my TRIBUTE.

Filomena Conde

 

 


 

 
 
Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of Care2.com or its affiliates.

Author

Filomena Conde
female , single
Coimbra, Portugal
Shares by Type:
All (9) | Blog (5) | Alert (3) | Tribute (1)
SHARES FROM FILOMENA'S NETWORK
Dec
1
(0 comments  |  discussions )
source: Animal Defenders International ‘Duty of care and responsibility of owners to be tested in landmark case’ Today at a preliminary hearing at Corby Magistrates Court, Bobby and Moira Roberts pleaded not guilty to offences unde...
(0 comments  |  discussions )
Message from: Danica Mirkovic – President - is as follows: Winter is approaching fast, it is getting colder and colder every day and this chilly, wet weather affects almost all of my kitties so they are getting sick more often. Espec...
Oct
21
(2 comments  |  discussions )
From: Dr.chem. CARMEN ARSENE Scientific Researcher and Member of FNPA in Romania18 October 2011Dear all,  Yesterday, PL 912 on the management of stray dogs has been debated in the Chamber of Deputies and the form containing aberr...
Oct
20
(0 comments  |  discussions )
ml PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC -html4
(0 comments  |  discussions )
ml PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC -html4
(0 comments  |  discussions )
ml PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC -html4
Oct
19
(0 comments  |  discussions )
ml PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC -html4
(0 comments  |  discussions )
ml PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC -html4
(0 comments  |  discussions )
ml PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC -html4
Oct
18
(0 comments  |  0 discussions )
ml PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC -html4

Copyright © 2013 Care2.com, inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved