my care2
make a difference

community & fun

shares

share your passions, stories, inspirations, and more

Dec 27, 2009
Focus: Human Rights
Action Request: Other
Location: United States

"It all begins with a story..."

That's how actor, Morgan Freeman described the powerful effect of a leader who puts everything on the line to stand up for human rights. He joined us in spotlighting December as Human Rights Month on YouTube.

Today, we're premiering our video homage to you – the supporters who help spread human rights stories far and wide. You use your words to make real change happen and in our new video, you can see the incredible effect that your actions have.

Watch our new video "The Power of Words" and tell a friend (or five) about it.



We're aiming to get the whole YouTube community talking about justice, fairness and human rights. But we need your help to kick off the conversation.

Please join us in celebrating the words that make our fight to protect human rights stronger.

Best wishes,

All of us at Amnesty International USA
Visibility: Everyone
Tags: ,
Posted: Dec 27, 2009 8:16am
Dec 22, 2009
"A mouse in a cookie jar . . . doesn't make him a cookie." ~ Barbara Duval
And, I guess, an internet-bestowed title is similarly meaningless, without actions to prove its worth.

In my lowest hours, two people -- yes, linked to me by you -- reached out their hands and rescued me.

Although it was a hard transition, my other prospects were few.  But, I learned much from dwelling in the house of two people who, although they still believe in a religion I've abandoned, personified its strengths.  They have been kind, loving, and forgiving.  Unbelievably, they feel that my presence in their lives is a Godsend.  (And I, surely, do not deserve that much commendation.)

But, I love and honor them -- and would, willingly, lay down my life for these two people, who reached out a hand to me when others withdrew theirs.

The disrespect you've shown them is beyond reproach.  You took a roof they provided over your head; expenses they paid for you and your pet; chauffeuring and paying for doctors; footing the bill for untold other expenses (including drugs); assisting with groceries; giving you access to their home, while providing you with the privacy of your own.  You did NOTHING to contribute to caring for the household, yet, they accepted your excuses.  [Worse?  These two people are -- as you are well aware -- challenged by their own health problems.]

How did you repay them?  By leaving them with an unimaginable pig sty that the Health Dept. would condemn.  Grown men from a farming community (who've, no doubt, seen the worst), who we had to contact to remove the appliances, were reduced to retching, and forced to use gloves and bandanas over their mouths/noses before they would enter.   The stench of human/animal feces and urine is still trying to be eliminated. 

For weeks, I labored to remove your filth (insect larvae/mildew imbedded on both refrigerators, oatmeal clogging the kitchen drain, with standing water; animal fat from the microwave and toaster oven, that you allowed to flow over the counters and floors, urine-saturated mattress, carpeting, shower, and furniture).   We even had to put the pots and pans you'd left on the counters (for  months) and in the refrigerator in a wheelbarrow overnight, filled with bleach and water, and scour them with steel wool before bringing them into the household to run (twice) through an extra hot dishwasher cycle.

WHY did I do it?  To convince them that their efforts were not in vain -- although your callous, selfish, slovenly ways spoke otherwise.

YEARS of filth, so inconceivable that even Stephen King would be challenged to describe the stench and lack of hygiene, you left.  And, even with days back here, before your return to your "new life," you did NOTHING to clean it.  (You, in fact, were so self-obsessed that you asked them to even pack your personal belongings for you . . . which, as Christians, they did.)

SHAME ON YOU!


Do I now believe you are sick?  ABSOLUTELY!  (But not physically.  No sane person could continue to willingly live in that self-perpetuated "Haz-Mat" level squalor.)

Do NOT ever address me publicly or privately.  I am a witness (with proof) to your true nature.


Hypocritical, self-serving, so-called "adherents" to a religion (who do not understand that the Word was intended as a guide to living -- not a weapon, to be meted out by reciting selective Scripture verses), have done the most damage, and caused more people to turn away in disgust, than anything.

[Ya know, several times, you tried convincing me that your postulating was for my "own good," because you were afraid I would go to Hell.  If I were to truly believe that, the scariest part would be that I'd have to see you there.]


Visibility: Everyone
Tags:
Posted: Dec 22, 2009 1:39pm
Dec 21, 2009

Top Censored Stories of 2009/2010

Visibility: Everyone
Tags:
Posted: Dec 21, 2009 8:45am
Dec 21, 2009

By Sara Flounders


Global Research, December 19, 2009

In evaluating the U.N. Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen -- with more than 15,000 participants from 192 countries, including more than 100 heads of state, as well as 100,000 demonstrators in the streets -- it is important to ask: How is it possible that the worst polluter of carbon dioxide and other toxic emissions on the planet is not a focus of any conference discussion or proposed restrictions?

 

By every measure, the Pentagon is the largest institutional user of petroleum products and energy in general. Yet the Pentagon has a blanket exemption in all international climate agreements.

 

The Pentagon wars in Iraq and Afghanistan; its secret operations in Pakistan; its equipment on more than 1,000 U.S. bases around the world; its 6,000 facilities in the U.S.; all NATO operations; its aircraft carriers, jet aircraft, weapons testing, training and sales will not be counted against U.S. greenhouse gas limits or included in any count.

 

The Feb. 17, 2007, Energy Bulletin detailed the oil consumption just for the Pentagon's aircraft, ships, ground vehicles and facilities that made it the single-largest oil consumer in the world. At the time, the U.S. Navy had 285 combat and support ships and around 4,000 operational aircraft. The U.S. Army had 28,000 armored vehicles, 140,000 High-Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicles, more than 4,000 combat helicopters, several hundred fixed-wing aircraft and 187,493 fleet vehicles. Except for 80 nuclear submarines and aircraft carriers, which spread radioactive pollution, all their other vehicles run on oil.

 

Even according to rankings in the 2006 CIA World Factbook, only 35 countries (out of 210 in the world) consume more oil per day than the Pentagon.

 

The U.S. military officially uses 320,000 barrels of oil a day. However, this total does not include fuel consumed by contractors or fuel consumed in leased and privatized facilities. Nor does it include the enormous energy and resources used to produce and maintain their death-dealing equipment or the bombs, grenades or missiles they fire.

 

Steve Kretzmann, director of Oil Change International, reports: "The Iraq war was responsible for at least 141 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MMTCO2e) from March 2003 through December 2007. ... The war emits more than 60 percent of all countries. ... This information is not readily available ... because military emissions abroad are exempt from national reporting requirements under U.S. law and the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change." (www.naomiklein.org, Dec. 10) Most scientists blame carbon dioxide emissions for greenhouse gases and climate change.

 

Bryan Farrell in his new book, "The Green Zone: The Environmental Costs of Militarism," says that "the greatest single assault on the environment, on all of us around the globe, comes from one agency ... the Armed Forces of the United States."

 

Just how did the Pentagon come to be exempt from climate agreements? At the time of the Kyoto Accords negotiations, the U.S. demanded as a provision of signing that all of its military operations worldwide and all operations it participates in with the U.N. and/or NATO be completely exempted from measurement or reductions.

 

After securing this gigantic concession, the Bush administration then refused to sign the accords.

 

In a May 18, 1998, article entitled "National security and military policy issues involved in the Kyoto treaty," Dr. Jeffrey Salmon described the Pentagon's position. He quotes then-Secretary of Defense William Cohen's 1997 annual report to Congress: "DoD strongly recommends that the United States insist on a national security provision in the climate change Protocol now being negotiated." (www.marshall.org)

 

According to Salmon, this national security provision was put forth in a draft calling for "complete military exemption from greenhouse gas emissions limits. The draft includes multilateral operations such as NATO- and U.N.-sanctioned activities, but it also includes actions related very broadly to national security, which would appear to comprehend all forms of unilateral military actions and training for such actions."

 

Salmon also quoted Undersecretary of State Stuart Eizenstat, who headed the U.S. delegation in Kyoto . Eizenstat reported that "every requirement the Defense Department and uniformed military who were at Kyoto by my side said they wanted, they got. This is self-defense, peacekeeping, humanitarian relief."

 

Although the U.S. had already received these assurances in the negotiations, the U.S. Congress passed an explicit provision guaranteeing U.S. military exemption. Inter Press Service reported on May 21, 1998: "U.S. law makers, in the latest blow to international efforts to halt global warming, today exempted U.S. military operations from the Kyoto agreement which lays out binding commitments to reduce 'greenhouse gas' emissions. The House of Representatives passed an amendment to next year's military authorization bill that 'prohibits the restriction of armed forces under the Kyoto Protocol.'"

 

Today in Copenhagen the same agreements and guidelines on greenhouse gases still hold. Yet it is extremely difficult to find even a mention of this glaring omission.

 

According to environmental journalist Johanna Peace, military activities will continue to be exempt from an executive order signed by President Barack Obama that calls for federal agencies to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions by 2020. Peace states, "The military accounts for a full 80 percent of the federal government's energy demand." (solveclimate.com, Sept. 1)

 

The blanket exclusion of the Pentagon's global operations makes U.S. carbon dioxide emissions appear far less than they in fact are. Yet even without counting the Pentagon, the U.S. still has the world's largest carbon dioxide emissions.

 

More than Emissions

 

Besides emitting carbon dioxide, U.S. military operations release other highly toxic and radioactive materials into the air, water and soil.

 

U.S. weapons made with depleted uranium have spread tens of thousands of pounds of microparticles of radioactive and highly toxic waste throughout the Middle East, Central Asia and the Balkans.

 

The U.S. sells land mines and cluster bombs that are a major cause of delayed explosives, maiming and disabling especially peasant farmers and rural peoples in Africa, Asia and Latin America . For example, Israel dropped more than 1 million U.S.-provided cluster bombs on Lebanon during its 2006 invasion.

 

The U.S. war in Vietnam left large areas so contaminated with the Agent Orange herbicide that today, more than 35 years later, dioxin contamination is 300 to 400 times higher than "safe" levels. Severe birth defects and high rates of cancer resulting from environmental contamination are continuing into a third generation.

 

The 1991 U.S. war in Iraq , followed by 13 years of starvation sanctions, the 2003 U.S. invasion and continuing occupation, has transformed the region -- which has a 5,000-year history as a Middle East breadbasket -- into an environmental catastrophe. Iraq 's arable and fertile land has become a desert wasteland where the slightest wind whips up a dust storm. A former food exporter, Iraq now imports 80 percent of its food. The Iraqi Agriculture Ministry estimates that 90 percent of the land has severe desertification.

 

Environmental War at Home

 

Moreover, the Defense Department has routinely resisted orders from the Environmental Protection Agency to clean up contaminated U.S. bases. ( Washington Post, June 30, 2008) Pentagon military bases top the Superfund list of the most polluted places, as contaminants seep into drinking water aquifers and soil.

 

The Pentagon has also fought EPA efforts to set new pollution standards on two toxic chemicals widely found on military sites: perchlorate, found in propellant for rockets and missiles; and trichloroethylene, a degreaser for metal parts.

 

Trichloroethylene is the most widespread water contaminant in the country, seeping into aquifers across California , New York , Texas , Florida and elsewhere. More than 1,000 military sites in the U.S. are contaminated with the chemical. The poorest communities, especially communities of color, are the most severely impacted by this poisoning.

 

U.S. testing of nuclear weapons in the U.S. Southwest and on South Pacific islands has contaminated millions of areas of land and water with radiation. Mountains of radioactive and toxic uranium tailings have been left on Indigenous land in the Southwest. More than 1,000 uranium mines have been abandoned on Navajo reservations in Arizona and New Mexico .

 

Around the world, on past and still operating bases in Puerto Rico, the Philippines , South Korea , Vietnam , Laos , Cambodia , Japan , Nicaragua , Panama and the former Yugoslavia , rusting barrels of chemicals and solvents and millions of rounds of ammunition are criminally abandoned by the Pentagon.

 

The best way to dramatically clean up the environment is to shut down the Pentagon. What is needed to combat climate change is a thoroughgoing system change.

 

Sara Flounders is Co-Director of the International Action Center

 


Visibility: Everyone
Tags:
Posted: Dec 21, 2009 8:41am
Dec 18, 2009

10 Good Things About 2009

By Medea Benjamin


My almost annual list of ten good things about the waning year has never before posed such a tremendous challenge. In the face of this challenge, I decided to try a minimalist thought experiment, blocking out the many baneful events that colored 2009, and instead seeking out the small, yet powerfully bright notes to inspire and give us hope for the year head.

1. Tens of thousands of people from around the world took to the streets of Copenhagen to call for meaningful action to address climate change, despite continuous attempts to squelch it. Inside Copenhagen’s meeting halls, indigenous peoples from small island nations and the Himalayas spoke powerfully about their rights and their needs. 

2. Michelle Obama planted the White House’s first organic vegetable garden, a garden that provided food for her own family’s table and helped to educate the nation’s children about healthy eating.

3. According to recent polls a majority of Americans now see the war in Afghanistan as not worth fighting, and seventy-five percent say no new troops should be sent to that country. Public opinion is on our side.

4. Last year, CODEPINK launched a campaign calling upon the FBI to add Luis Posada Carilles, a ruthless terrorist who was responsible for downing a Cuban airplane in 1976, to the Most Wanted List and arrest him. On April 8, he was indicted on 11 counts. 

5. The creative use of Twitter by protesters in Iran brought thousands of people into the streets of Teheran, including students, young people and thousands of young women.  Their courageous and innovative use of social media kept the rest of the world informed of events, slipping out from under the country’s blanket of censorship.

6. The Global Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions Movement to pressure Israel to respect Palestinian rights garnered the support of many groups around the world. The growing list of BDS successes is too long to enumerate here, but to choose only one: In February South African dockworkers, remembering the long history of Apartheid in their country, refused to offload an Israeli ZIM Lines ship in Durban.

7. One of Obama’s first acts in office was to lift the Global Gag Rule, which ended restrictions on U.S. funding for organizations that provide family planning services and that are often the first responders for women in the fight against HIV.

8. The Washington, DC City Council voted in mid-December to legalize same-sex marriage, making it the first jurisdiction south of the Mason-Dixon Line to do so.  Same-sex marriage is now legal in Iowa, Vermont, Massachusetts and Connecticut and will be legal in New Hampshire on January 1st. DC Mayor Fenty signed the bill on December 18, 2009.

9. 2009 may go down as the beginning of the end of the failed “War on Drugs”. The Obama administration announced that the federal government would no longer arrest and prosecute medical marijuana patients and caregivers as long as they were following their state’s medical marijuana laws.

10. Obama’s Nobel Prize victory sparked a global debate about what it takes to be a real peacemaker. Obama will donate the 1.4 million prize to charity (undisclosed as of yet which).There is no more “wait and see.” The election of Obama signaled a national thirst for fundamental change, and a great many pinned their hopes on just one man, one President. But big events seldom seed big change, and after nearly a year, it is clear that real change still comes over time, not overnight; from the many, not the one or the few; and through persistence and pushing from the bottom, not the top.

I looked around and saw the women of CODEPINK, the impassioned environmental activists in Copenhagen, the young Israeli refuseniks, Afghan parliamentarian Malalai Joya, and all our friends and allies working for peace and social justice around this country and the world, and realized that WE are the hope and change we have been waiting for. 

Even after all the disappointments of this year, the items on this list and our own strength and persistence give me immense hope in the possibilities to come as we greet the New Year. 

So here's a toast to our power and our passion—we have our work cut out for us in 2010!

Visibility: Everyone
Tags:
Posted: Dec 18, 2009 12:03pm
Dec 4, 2009

Dear Friends,

Congressman Kucinich is making a major impact in his challenge to the escalation of the war in Afghanistan. See the following:

MSNBC, The Ed Show, December 1, 2009  
FOX News, The O'Reilly Factor December 1, 2009  
CNN, AC360 - Anderson Cooper December 1, 2009  
Democracy Now - Amy Goodman December 2, 2009   Read Dennis' Quote in the Washington Post:
"Obama's Afghanistan Speech and Strategy"
Visibility: Everyone
Tags: ,
Posted: Dec 4, 2009 11:06am
Dec 1, 2009
Focus: Human Rights
Action Request: Write E-Mail
Location: United States
Amnesty International USA: TAKE ACTION NOW!
Writing letters may not sound like the key to freeing prisoners and saving lives, but it works!
The Global Write-a-thon begins December 5th -- pledge to write letters on behalf of people who need your help.

The Global Write-a-thon is the biggest Amnesty International event all year. It also uses one of the oldest (and most powerful) weapons of the human rights movement -- writing letters. In other words, it's a BIG deal.

We've already shattered our original goal of gathering pledges for more than 250,000 letters. We're confident that with your help, we can challenge ourselves to hit more than 300,000 letters this year! Add your letters to our list -- pledge your support for this year's Global Write-a-thon.

Last year around this time, people from more than 70 countries stood together for human rights. That overwhelming solidarity and support were key reasons why Ma Khin Khin Leh, a school teacher in Myanmar and Hana Abdi, a women's rights advocate in Iran, were both released from prison soon after Write-a-thon letters overwhelmed their respective government offices.

This year, we want you to know that incredible feeling of pride in knowing that your letters helped save lives. Join us for this year's Global Write-a-thon -- help us send 300,000 letters for human rights.

It's so simple! We've got everything you'll need to make your letters effective and your letter-writing events memorable.
Help us meet our NEW goal of 300,000 letters.

  • Get your resources: Find out more about this year's Write-a-thon cases, read sample letters, and find tips for organizing a successful event.
  • Connect with others: Check out the Write-a-thon events happening in your community.
  • Spread the word: Share your support for Write-a-thon with your friends online.

In just 4 days, you can experience a tradition that connects generations of human rights activists -- sending messages of hope.

Please join us for this special event.

In Solidarity,

Michael O'Reilly
Program Director
Individuals at Risk Campaign
Amnesty International USA
Visibility: Everyone
Tags: , ,
Posted: Dec 1, 2009 4:40pm
Nov 30, 2009

Monday, November 30th, 2009

Dear President Obama,

Do you really want to be the new "war president"? If you go to West Point tomorrow night (Tuesday, 8pm) and announce that you are increasing, rather than withdrawing, the troops in Afghanistan, you are the new war president. Pure and simple. And with that you will do the worst possible thing you could do -- destroy the hopes and dreams so many millions have placed in you. With just one speech tomorrow night you will turn a multitude of young people who were the backbone of your campaign into disillusioned cynics. You will teach them what they've always heard is true -- that all politicians are alike. I simply can't believe you're about to do what they say you are going to do. Please say it isn't so.

It is not your job to do what the generals tell you to do. We are a civilian-run government. WE tell the Joint Chiefs what to do, not the other way around. That's the way General Washington insisted it must be. That's what President Truman told General MacArthur when MacArthur wanted to invade China. "You're fired!," said Truman, and that was that. And you should have fired Gen. McChrystal when he went to the press to preempt you, telling the press what YOU had to do. Let me be blunt: We love our kids in the armed services, but we f*#&in' hate these generals, from Westmoreland in Vietnam to, yes, even Colin Powell for lying to the UN with his made-up drawings of WMD (he has since sought redemption).

So now you feel backed into a corner. 30 years ago this past Thursday (Thanksgiving) the Soviet generals had a cool idea -- "Let's invade Afghanistan!" Well, that turned out to be the final nail in the USSR coffin.

There's a reason they don't call Afghanistan the "Garden State" (though they probably should, seeing how the corrupt President Karzai, whom we back, has his brother in the heroin trade raising poppies). Afghanistan's nickname is the "Graveyard of Empires." If you don't believe it, give the British a call. I'd have you call Genghis Khan but I lost his number. I do have Gorbachev's number though. It's + 41 22 789 1662. I'm sure he could give you an earful about the historic blunder you're about to commit.

With our economic collapse still in full swing and our precious young men and women being sacrificed on the altar of arrogance and greed, the breakdown of this great civilization we call America will head, full throttle, into oblivion if you become the "war president." Empires never think the end is near, until the end is here. Empires think that more evil will force the heathens to toe the line -- and yet it never works. The heathens usually tear them to shreds.

Choose carefully, President Obama. You of all people know that it doesn't have to be this way. You still have a few hours to listen to your heart, and your own clear thinking. You know that nothing good can come from sending more troops halfway around the world to a place neither you nor they understand, to achieve an objective that neither you nor they understand, in a country that does not want us there. You can feel it in your bones.

I know you know that there are LESS than a hundred al-Qaeda left in Afghanistan! A hundred thousand troops trying to crush a hundred guys living in caves? Are you serious? Have you drunk Bush's Kool-Aid? I refuse to believe it.

Your potential decision to expand the war (while saying that you're doing it so you can "end the war") will do more to set your legacy in stone than any of the great things you've said and done in your first year. One more throwing a bone from you to the Republicans and the coalition of the hopeful and the hopeless may be gone -- and this nation will be back in the hands of the haters quicker than you can shout "tea bag!"

Choose carefully, Mr. President. Your corporate backers are going to abandon you as soon as it is clear you are a one-term president and that the nation will be safely back in the hands of the usual idiots who do their bidding. That could be Wednesday morning.

We the people still love you. We the people still have a sliver of hope. But we the people can't take it anymore. We can't take your caving in, over and over, when we elected you by a big, wide margin of millions to get in there and get the job done. What part of "landslide victory" don't you understand?

Don't be deceived into thinking that sending a few more troops into Afghanistan will make a difference, or earn you the respect of the haters. They will not stop until this country is torn asunder and every last dollar is extracted from the poor and soon-to-be poor. You could send a million troops over there and the crazy Right still wouldn't be happy. You would still be the victim of their incessant venom on hate radio and television because no matter what you do, you can't change the one thing about yourself that sends them over the edge.

The haters were not the ones who elected you, and they can't be won over by abandoning the rest of us.

President Obama, it's time to come home. Ask your neighbors in Chicago and the parents of the young men and women doing the fighting and dying if they want more billions and more troops sent to Afghanistan. Do you think they will say, "No, we don't need health care, we don't need jobs, we don't need homes. You go on ahead, Mr. President, and send our wealth and our sons and daughters overseas, 'cause we don't need them, either."

What would Martin Luther King, Jr. do? What would your grandmother do? Not send more poor people to kill other poor people who pose no threat to them, that's what they'd do. Not spend billions and trillions to wage war while American children are sleeping on the streets and standing in bread lines.

All of us that voted and prayed for you and cried the night of your victory have endured an Orwellian hell of eight years of crimes committed in our name: torture, rendition, suspension of the bill of rights, invading nations who had not attacked us, blowing up neighborhoods that Saddam "might" be in (but never was), slaughtering wedding parties in Afghanistan. We watched as hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians were slaughtered and tens of thousands of our brave young men and women were killed, maimed, or endured mental anguish -- the full terror of which we scarcely know.

When we elected you we didn't expect miracles. We didn't even expect much change. But we expected some. We thought you would stop the madness. Stop the killing. Stop the insane idea that men with guns can reorganize a nation that doesn't even function as a nation and never, ever has.

Stop, stop, stop! For the sake of the lives of young Americans and Afghan civilians, stop. For the sake of your presidency, hope, and the future of our nation, stop. For God's sake, stop.

Tonight we still have hope.

Tomorrow, we shall see. The ball is in your court. You DON'T have to do this. You can be a profile in courage. You can be your mother's son.

We're counting on you.

Yours,
Michael Moore
MMFlint@aol.com
MichaelMoore.com

P.S. There's still time to have your voice heard. Call the White House at 202-456-1111 or email the President.
Visibility: Everyone
Tags: , ,
Posted: Nov 30, 2009 6:05am
Nov 24, 2009


Keep up the good work!


Washington can be a very lonely place when you are fighting for progressive ideas like Medicare for All and an end to the occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan.  It is for that reason I wanted to thank all my friends at PDA for your hard work this past week. 

Last Wednesday, I had an opportunity to meet with your national director Tim Carpenter, following his visit to the White House, and PDA’s political director Steve Cobble. They met with five other members of Congress that day in an effort to save my amendment.

Later that evening, as a result of the leadership and grassroots work of Progressive Democrats of America and its allies, the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) affirmed their support for a states' right to enact single-payer healthcare in their letter to Speaker Pelosi and Majority Leader Reid.  Read the letter here

We succeeded in putting the CPC on record supporting states like California, Pennsylvania, Ohio and others across the country to continue the fight for single-payer healthcare at the state level.  I know without PDA leading this fight we would have not won this important battle in the struggle for Medicare for All.

I also want to congratulate the California Democratic Party, which voted last week to end the U.S. occupation and air war in Afghanistan.  I commend the authors of this resolution, especially my friend Norman Solomon, the national co-chair of PDA's Healthcare NOT Warfare campaign, and Marcy Winograd, PDA candidate for Congress.  I also commend the leadership of Karen Bernal and the Progressive Caucus of the California Democratic Party, and I applaud the work of PDA’s California chapters in helping to pass this timely resolution.

What a great week we had together! Please keep fighting to build the movement for Healthcare NOT Warfare.


In peace,

Congressman Dennis Kucinich


Progressive Democrats of America is a grassroots PAC that works both inside the Democratic Party and outside in movements for peace and justice. Our goal in 2009: Expand progressive influence in Congress as we build on our 2008 electoral successes. PDA's advisory board includes seven members of Congress and activist leaders such as Tom Hayden, Medea Benjamin, Thom Hartmann, Jim Hightower, and Lila Garrett.

Join a PDA Issue Organizing Team; learn more here.

More info | Find Chapters | Find Local Events


Visibility: Everyone
Tags: , , ,
Posted: Nov 24, 2009 4:35am
Nov 5, 2009
Focus: Health
Action Request: Write E-Mail
Location: United States
Public Citizen

Over the past week, we've asked you to make calls to your representative and Speaker Nancy Pelosi to demand a vote on the only real health care reform that can cover all Americans: single-payer. You are being heard!

A caduceus umbrella symbolizing health care for all Contact your rep. today! It's time for a vote on single-payer!
We just learned that there is a strong possibility that Speaker Pelosi WILL allow a vote on single-payer. The vote may happen as early as tomorrow (Friday) morning. Whether it is offered as a stand-alone bill or as an amendment to the health care reform package, this will be the FIRST vote ever held on single-payer health care in the full House of Representatives.

Urge your representative NOW to stand with you and the American people on this historic vote. Tell your representative to vote "YES!" to Rep. Anthony Weiner's (D-N.Y.) single-payer bill!

In the past, many members of Congress have said they would support single-payer "if it came to a vote" but that a vote just wasn't politically feasible. Now, a vote is here, and it is our job to urge lawmakers to do the right thing. They cannot miss this historic opportunity to cast their votes for real health care for all - a single-payer system.

Time is short, so please click here to send a quick email to your representative now!

Among all the reform proposals, a single-payer, Medicare-for-All system is the only "option" for health care reform that will end the domination of the insurance industry and ensure that every one of the more than 45 million uninsured will receive quality health care.

Let's not back down now. Continue to stand up for health care for all!

Thank you for all you do!

Rick, Angela and Glenn
Your advocates at Public Citizen
action@citizen.org
Visibility: Everyone
Tags: ,
Posted: Nov 5, 2009 9:35am

 

 Next >
 
Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of Care2.com or its affiliates.

Author

Just Carole
female, age 109, single, 1 child
Mosheim, TN, USA
Shares by Type:
All (367) | Blog (265) | Alert (101) | Tribute (1)
SHARES FROM JUST'S NETWORK
Dec
27
(0 comments  |  discussions )
MAY WE WIN MORE THIS COMING YEAR
(0 comments  |  discussions )
BE GREENGO BLUE
by Team O.
(0 comments  |  discussions )
http://www.commondreams.o rg/headline/2009/12/25-0h ttp://freepage.twoday.net /search?q=Fannie+Maehttp: //freepage.twoday.net/sea rch?q=Freddie+Machttp://f reepage.twoday.net/search ?q=Zachary+A.+Goldfarb
by Team O.
(0 comments  |  discussions )
http://www.commondreams.o rg/view/2009/12/27-1http: //freepage.twoday.net/sea rch?q=airstrikehttp://fre epage.twoday.net/search?q =dronehttp://freepage.two day.net/search?q=Glenn+Gr eenwald
by Team O.
(0 comments  |  discussions )
http://www.commondreams.o rg/view/2009/12/26-1http: //freepage.twoday.net/sea rch?q=Sarah+Lazare
by Team O.
(0 comments  |  discussions )
Kirk Nielsen, Miller-McCune: "Did America slip into a semiliterate, polarized, pre-fascist state over the past decade or so, allowing greedy oligarchs and corporate elites to run the government? Two books I recently read offer reasonably persuasive ev...
(0 comments  |  discussions )
by Team O.
(0 comments  |  discussions )
- "Antenas de Telefonía e Impuestos Territoriales: Iniquidad" - JUICIO del Tribunal Antenas Telefonía Depreciación del Patrimonio. http://www.next-up.org/Fr ance/Taxes_Foncieres.php# 1
(0 comments  |  discussions )
Sending wishes of love - happiness and good cheer to all of you. May 2010 change all of our lives for the better.  Have a safe and blessed NEW YEAR.Love Kathryn
by Team O.
(0 comments  |  0 discussions )
Noch immer glauben die Meisten, die Wirtschaftskrise wäre überwunden . Doch mit Maßnahmen wie der Kurzarbeit konnten gröÃ& #159;ere Entlassungswellen vermieden werden. Noch einmal hat die Bu...

Copyright © 2009 Care2.com, inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved