22,429,053 members doing good!
about our ads
share your passions, stories, inspirations, and more
MPs sign up to the campaign against excess packaging
Jul 10, 2007
Focus: Environment
Action Request: Various
Location: United States
MPs sign up to the campaign against excess packaging


By Martin Hickman, Consumer Affairs Correspondent


Published: 27 April 2007

More than 100 MPs have backed The Independent's campaign against excessive packaging as political support grows for action to reduce the millions of tonnes of wrappers and cartons dumped in the nation's bins.

A Commons motion condemning the sheer waste of such large quantities of plastic and paper, and urging manufacturers to cut their use of packaging has been signed by 112 MPs from all parties and parts of the United Kingdom.

Now The Independent is calling for people to have their voice heard on the issue by lobbying their MP to join the protest.

A groundswell of parliamentary support for Early Day Motion 814 will show the Government the force of public opinion on the issue and increase the chances of legislation reaching the statute book.

Tabled a few days after we began our Campaign Against Waste on 22 January, EDM 814 commends the campaign against excessive packaging run by The Independent and calls on shops to tackle the problem and to encourage suppliers to do likewise.

It points out that packaging takes up 17 per cent of the annual food budget and generates 4.6 million tonnes of household rubbish a year.

So far, The Independent's campaign has exposed how scores of everyday products are over-packaged in wrappers, trays and cartons made from finite natural resources such as oil.

In a sign that pressure on the issue is increasing, two MPs who have signed are now threatening to table private members' Bills to eradicate unnecessary packaging once and for all.

One Bill would directly confront shops with the problems their waste causes by requiring them to take back packaging from shoppers. Another would tighten regulations that offer loopholes to manufacturers. Parliamentary questions and a Commons debate are also being planned.

The willingness of MPs to legislate is evidence of a hardening of attitudes among politicians to packaging, which is deeply unpopular with many voters.

Public concern has already forced retailers to show they are serious about halting the plastic detritus accumulated on shopping trips. The main supermarket groups have announced targets for reductions in packaging of between 5 and 25 per cent.

This week Sainsbury's put on sale 20,000 cotton bags by the designer Anya Hindmarch as an alternative to disposable bags, prompting shoppers to begin queuing at 2am. Yesterday, Asda announced that it was asking shoppers at two of its northern stores to dump unnecessary packaging in wheelie bins.

But MPs are concerned that the voluntary Courtauld commitment, agreed to by retailers to reduce packaging by 2010, does not go far enough. A survey of Easter eggs last month found that they consisted of as much as 90 per cent packaging.

Questions have been asked in Parliament about why statutory and voluntary measures have failed to prevent examples of excessive packaging appearing in almost every high street store.

The Liberal Democrat MP Norman Baker, whose persistence led to the disclosure of MPs' travel expenses after a two-year battle, is one of the parliamentarians agitating for change. Mr Baker, chairman of the All-Party Parliamentary Environment Group, said: "I think the public out there and the MPs in here resent excess packaging."

A fellow campaigner, Andrew Stunnell MP, has introduced a 10-minute rule Bill that would allow customers to take back packaging to the shops. He intends to enshrine the proposal in a private members' Bill unless there is a dramatic improvement in packaging or a seismic political event alters his plans. Mr Stunnell said: "You and I are spending £470 on packaging each year which we throw away, which is not needed. And then someone else is paying a lot of landfill tax to put it in a hole in the ground, which is not needed.

"Putting a little bit of pressure on the commercial companies to act is what's needed."

Jo Swinson, of the Liberal Democrats, who tabled the EDM, is also considering bringing forward a bill.

"In six months' time there might be other pressing issues that come to the fore but I will be seriously, seriously considering packaging and be encouraging others to do so," she said.

First, the MP will investigate why only a handful of companies have been prosecuted under the 2003 Packaging (Essential Requirements) Regulations. The law is intended to prevent excess wrapping but has loopholes allowing excess waste where there is "consumer acceptance", or where it is needed to "provide identification" or for "stimulating purchase".

"We have got these regulations: why aren't they working?" asked Mrs Swinson. She and her fellow MPs will learn whether they can table legislation in November after the annual ballot of places for private members' bills.

In the meantime, Mrs Swinson intends to call a Commons debate on packaging that would be answered by a government minister.

"I think that packaging is something that increasingly resonates across society," she said.

"Every time you go to the supermarket checkout it confronts you. A lot of the time there are things going into bins that aren't even recyclable. And there's too much going in anyway."

Concern about levels of rubbish are shared by local politicians, who are facing a 33 per cent rise in landfill next year. Sandy Bruce-Lockhart, chairman of the Local Government Association, which represents councils, warned yesterday that, at the present rate of dumping, landfill space would run out in nine years.

"Britain is the dustbin of Europe with more rubbish being thrown into landfill than any other country on the continent," Mr Bruce-Lockhart said. "For decades people have been used to being able to throw their rubbish away without worrying about environmental consequences or rising costs. Those days are now over."

The Early Day Motion and the MPs who have signed it

That this House notes with concern the excessive levels of packaging used by manufacturers and retailers, accounting for 4.6 million tonnes of household waste every year and 17 per cent of the average household food budget; commends the recent campaign against excessive packaging run by The Independent newspaper; and urges supermarkets to reduce where possible packaging on goods sold, encourage the re-use of plastic bags, recycle packaging waste and encourage suppliers to reduce packaging further up the supply chain.

The following 112 MPs have signed the Motion:

David Anderson Blaydon, Lab

Norman Baker Lewes, Lib Dem

Kevin Barron Rother Valley, Lab

AlanJ Beith Berwick-upon-Tweed, Lib Dem

Peter Bottomley Worthing West, Con

Tom Brake Carshalton and Wallington, Lib Dem

Colin Breed South East Cornwall, Lib Dem

Jeremy Browne Taunton, Lib Dem

Malcolm Bruce Gordon, Lib Dem

David Burrowes Enfield Southgate, Con

Lorely Burt Solihull, Lib Dem

John Butterfill Bournemouth West, Con

Vincent Cable Twickenham, Lib Dem

Gregory Campbell East Londonderry, DUP

Martin Caton Gower, Labour

Katy Clark North Ayrshire and Arran, Labour

Nick Clegg Sheffield Hallam, Lib Dem

Derek Conway Old Bexley and Sidcup, Con

Frank Cook Stockton North, Lab

Jeremy Corbyn Islington North, Lab

Stephen Crabb Preseli Pembrokeshire, Con

David Crausby Bolton North East, Lab

Ann Cryer Keighley, Lab

John Cummings Easington, Lab

Edward Davey Kingston and Surbiton, Lib Dem

Ian Davidson Glasgow South West, Lab

Dai Davies Blaenau Gwent, Ind

Janet Dean Burton, Lab

Andrew Dismore Hendon, Lab

Jeffrey Donaldson Lagan Valley, DUP

David Drew Stroud, Lab

Philip Dunne Ludlow, Con

Mark Durkan Foyle, Social Dem and Labour Party

Jeff Ennis Barnsley East and Mexborough, Lab

Bill Etherington Sunderland North, Lab

Nigel Evans Ribble Valley, Con

David Evennett Bexleyheath and Crayford, Con

Timothy Farron Westmorland and Lonsdale, Lib Dem

Lynne Featherstone Hornsley and Wood Green, Lib Dem

Don Foster Bath, Lib Dem

Neil Gerrard Walthamstow, Lab

Andrew George St Ives, Lib Dem

Sandra Gidley Romsey, Lib Dem

Julia Goldsworthy Falmouth and Camborne, Lib Dem

Mike Hancock Portsmouth South, Lib Dem

Nick Harvey N. Devon, Lib Dem

David Heath Somerton and Frome, Lib Dem

John Hemming Birmingham, Yardley, Lib Dem

David Heyes Ashton-under-Lyne, Lab

Sharon Hodgson Gateshead East and Washington West, Lab

Paul Holmes Chesterfield, Lib Dem

Kevin Hopkins Luton North, Lab

Lindsay Hoyle Chorley, Lab

Chris Huhne Eastleigh, Lib Dem

Mark Hunter Cheadle, Lib Dem

Brian Iddon Bolton South East, Lab

Glenda Jackson Hampstead and Highgate, Lab

Brain Jenkins Tamworth, Lab

Lynne Jones Birmingham Selly Oak, Lab

Daniel Kawczynski Shrewsbury and Atcham, Con

Charles Kennedy Ross Skye and Lochaber, Lib Dem

Robert Key Salisbury, Con

Susan Kramer Richmond Park, Lib Dem

Norman Lamb N. Norfolk, Lib Dem

David Laws Yeovil, Lib Dem

John Leech Manchester Withington, Lib Dem

David Lepper Brighton Pavilion, Lab

Tony Lloyd Manchester Cen., Lab

Elfyn Llwyd Meirionnydd Nant Conwy, Plaid Cymru

Tim Loughton East Worthing and Shoreham, Con

Rob Marris Wolverhampton South West, Lab

Gordon Marsden Blackpool South, Lab

Chris McCafferty Calder Valley, Lab

William McCrea S. Antrim, DUP

Alasdair McDonnell Belfast South, SDLP

John McDonnell Hayes and Harlington, Lab

Alan Meale Mansfield, Lab

Madeleine Moon Bridgend, Lab

Elliot Morley Scunthorpe, Lab

Greg Mulholland Leeds North West, Lib Dem

Doug Naysmith Bristol NW, Lab

Andrew Pelling Croydon Cen, Con

Mike Penning Hemel Hempstead, Con

Willie Rennie, Dunfermline and West Fife, Lib Dem

Paul Rowen Rochdale, Lib Dem

Joan Ruddock Lewisham Deptford, Lab

Bob Russell Colchester, Lib Dem

Martin Salter Reading W, Lab

Adrian Sanders Torbay, Lib Dem

Barry Sheerman Huddersfield, Lab

Alan Simpson Nottingham S, Lab

David Simpson Upper Bann, DUP

Peter Soulsby Leicester S, Lab

Bob Spink Castle Point, Con

Ian Stewart Eccles, Lab

Andrew Stunell Hazel Grove, Lib Dem

David Taylor North West Leicestershire, Lab

Matthew Taylor Truro and St Austell, Lib Dem

John Thurso Caithness Sunderland and Easter Ross, Lib Dem

Rudi Vis Finchley and Golders Green, Lab

Steve Webb Northavon, Lib Dem

Betty Williams Conway, Lab

Hywel Williams Caernarfon, Plaid Cymru

Mark Williams Ceredigion, Lib Dem

Roger Williams Brecon and Radnorshire, Lib Dem

Stephen Williams Bristol West, Lib Dem

Phil Willis Harrogate and Knaresborough, Lib Dem

Jenny Willott Cardiff Cen, Lib Dem

Nicholas Winterton Macclesfield, Con

Mike Wood Batley and Spen, Lab

Derek Wyatt Sittingbourne and Sheppey, Lab

Richard Younger-Ross Teignbridge, Lib Dem

Lobby your MP

* If you are fed up with receiving so much rubbish with your shopping, lobby your MP to sign Early Day Motion 814.

* You can contact your MP by email, post and phone or in person at the Commons, or in your constituency.

* The email address for MPs follows a formula; surname then initial @ parliament.uk, so Hazel Blears' address is <mailto:blearsh@parliament.uk>blearsh@ parliament.uk. The postal address is House of Commons, London, SW1A 0AA. The Commons switchboard number is 020-7219 3000. Ask for your MP and you will be put through to their office.

* You also have a right to lobby your MP in person by turning up at Parliament and asking to see them. Alternatively, make an appointment by checking at your MP's constituency surgery.

As well as being irritating and unnecessary, excess packaging is a waste of resources, increases pollution, contributes to climate change, and squanders precious landfill space.

Commons voices

Alan Simpson, Labour MP for Nottingham South

"If the supermarkets and the Government take no notice of The Independent's campaign, the next step will be for consumers to unpack goods and leave the packaging on the counter."

Mike Penning, Conservative MP for Hemel Hempstead

"This is a complex issue and government has a role - but consumer pressure is the way we will tackle this."

Elliot Morley, Labour MP for Scunthorpe and former environment minister

"If we do not see reductions in waste and packaging, we are going to pay a high price."

Jo Swinson, Lib Dem MP for Dunbartonshire East

"Packaging is far too often not recyclable, and that's very frustrating for consumers."

Peter Ainsworth, shadow Environment Secretary

"Everywhere I go people are doing their best to try to reducewaste ... It is for industry to respond."

Martin Salter, Labour MP for Reading West

"As a former dustman it amazes me how much bigger the bins have grown ... That is partly due to the destructive way in which goods are packaged. I back The Independent's campaign to the hilt."

Chris Huhne, Lib Dem environment spokesman

"We should be looking at the possibility of legislation so that shops are required to take back packaging from consumers."
(0) | () | | send green star | flag as inappropriate
Visibility: Everyone
Tags: , , , , , , , ,
Posted: Jul 10, 2007 1:32am
Petition against homophobic violence in Russia
Jun 2, 2007
Focus: GLBT
Action Request: Petition
Location: Russian Federation
Please take a moment to read about this important issue, and join me in signing the petition. It takes just 30 seconds, but can truly make a difference. We are trying to reach 1,000 signatures - please sign here: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/553056460

Once you have signed, you can help even more by asking your friends and family to sign as well.

Thank you!
(2) | () | | send green star | flag as inappropriate
Visibility: Everyone
Tags: , , , , ,
Posted: Jun 2, 2007 7:13am
Internationals against G8
Apr 17, 2007

After the first meeting during the Global Meeting in Venice (that took place at the end of March 2007), people from various Social Centers (Italy) and people from the Antiauthoritarian Movement (Greece) called the International Meeting during the 3rd G8-Action-Conference in Rostock, Germany.

STATEMENT
We met today on the 14th of Αpril, we are people of different territories and countries of Europe. We participate in the third Action Conference against the G8 Summit in Rostock. Several of us took part in the Global Meeting organized on the 31th of Μarch in Venice, where we began to coordinate on an European level. Facing our committements to participate in the protest and actions against the G8 summit, we want to share some agreements about borders control and freedom of movement.

We state that:

1) All human beings must have a freedom of movement in a Europe and in a world without borders.

2) We refuse any control, repression and ban used by European polices to stop peoples moving toward the protest against the G8, and we reject any classification and discrimination between protesters.

3) We will express solidarity to people facing problems at the borders and we will coordinate efforts to guarantee the right of movement through the first week of June.

4) A political Europe already exists and it's based on border control and capitalistic economy, instead we are building another Europe of equality, justice and equal rights for all.

5) We call for actions of solidarity on embassies, consulates, Goethe-Institutes, German enterprises all over Europe and the world. In this context we will respect every form of action and protest.

This text has been discussed and supported by participants from Greece, Italy, Poland, Russia, Latvia, Estonia, France, U.K., Sweden, Belgium, Denmark, Czech Republic, Netherlands, U.S.A. and Canada.


We will be everywhere!

Rostock, April 14th 2007

International Meeting against G8-Summit

Links:
www.globalproject.info/art-11817.html
www.resistance2003.gr
www.2007-g8.tk
www.heiligendamm2007.de/index_en.html

About and against the G8-Summit 2007
www.2007-g8.tk
gr2007g8@yahoo.de

Imported from external blog

(0) | () | | send green star | flag as inappropriate
Visibility: Everyone
Tags: , ,
Posted: Apr 17, 2007 6:38am
Call for Weekend of Resistance Against the "Green Scare" June 9 - 11, 2006
May 26, 2006
Focus: Civil Rights
Action Request: Protest
Location: United States
http://www.freefreenow.org/june2006.htm

Call for Weekend of Resistance Against the "Green
Scare" June 9 - 11, 2006

by Jeff Free Luers

This June marks my 6th year in prison. From behind
these walls I have strived to remain an active part of
this struggle; from contributing to the dialogue and
discussion of tactics, to furthering the debate on
climate change in the public. Perhaps most importantly
I am proof that prison cannot crush the spirit of
resistance.

This year has seen an increase in state repression
against activists and radicals alike. It is truly a
scary time. We all know about the "Red Scare" - the
government's attempt to justify repression by labeling
dissidents "communists" back in the 1950's. Today we
see their "Green Scare" attempt to crush resistance by
labeling them "eco-terrorists."

For the last three years, June 11th has been
celebrated as an international day of solidarity with
me, Jeffrey Luers. I have been overjoyed with a sense
of love & pride at the support I have received from
around the world. My deepest and sincerest thanks go
out to all of you.

Right now there are more than a dozen people sitting
in American jails (or on strict bail release) accused
of Earth/Animal Liberation Front actions. Six people
were originally arrested. These arrests were based
almost entirely on the testimony of one police
informant, Jacob Ferguson. Bill Rodgers - accused of
multiple arsons - took his own life in a jail cell.
Unfortunately, several of those arrested are now
cooperating with the state.

These defendants are facing ridiculous charges and a
draconian amount of time.

This June, I ask you to show them the solidarity that
you have shown me. I ask that foremost in your mind be
the thought that the state is trying to break this
struggle with repressive and intimidating arrests and
sentences. I hope you understand that it's not just
those of us in prison being punished with these
sentences; they are designed to be examples to you, to
frighten you into compliance. This June I'm asking you
to demonstrate that you can't be intimidated.
Celebrate your dissent, give it voice. Be loud. Be
visible. If you have the ability, organize a reclaim
the streets party or a critical mass.

If you are going to host a fundraiser or venue event,
I ask that you donate all proceeds to the legal
defense of those recently arrested who maintain
integrity in the face of repression, whether they are
innocent or guilty.

This June, show the world that the voice of truth will
not be silenced by fear.

Contact Friends of Jeff Luers, PO Box 3, Eugene, OR
97440 USA or email freefreenow@mutualaid.org for
organizing resources.

June 9 - 11, 2006, is a Weekend of Resistance Against
the Green Scare. There is no central organizing body
or group to check in with but the Jeff Luers Support
Network can help by providing you with flyers,
graphics, and merchandise such as videos, zines and
stickers about Jeff and allies in the struggle. Begin
planning your event now. Read more about the Green
Scare defendants here. Plan an action that makes sense
for your area: a demonstration, treesit, music
festival, teach-in, stenciling campaign, rally,
protests at an American consulate/embassy overseas or
public forum. Circulate petitions. Contribute to the
legal defense for the defendants. Do what you think is
appropriate. But please remember when planning an
action or event think about how it could affect the
upcoming court cases. Ask yourself: does this help or
hurt the defendants? Does this strengthen the movement
or weaken it in the long-term?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
East Coast contact:
Friends of Jeff 'Free' Luers-freefreenow@mutualaid.org

West Coast contacts:
Free's Defense Network -PO Box 3, Eugene, OR 97440,
breakthechains02@yahoo.com or
freefreenow@mutualaid.org
San Francisco Jeffrey Luers Support Network-
freejeffreyluers@resist.ca

European contact:
Brighton Anarchist Black Cross- PO Box 74, Brighton,
East Sussex, BN1 4ZQ, UK, mail@brightonabc.org.uk
(2) | () | | send green star | flag as inappropriate
Visibility: Everyone
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted: May 26, 2006 8:53am
The Interview: Nathan Winograd from No Kill Solutions goes up against PETA's pro-killing stance of Pound Animals
Apr 13, 2006
Focus: Death Penalty
Action Request: Read
Location: United States
The Interview: Nathan Winograd from No Kill Solutions goes up against PETA's pro-killing stance of Pound Animals

He's vegan. His attitude is enlightened and revolutionary towards pound animals. His successes to date have been remarkable. Nathan Winograd is the guru of no-kill sheltering in the world today. He once said, "Once a fringe movement dismissed by the status quo, the no-kill movement is now only the legitimate standard for animal sheltering". No Kill is also the only legitimate standard for the animal rights movement to embrace as well. If the AR Movement refuses to embrace
No-Kill options for all animals then not only will it have a credibility problem on its hands but also, if neglected, this one thing alone will plant the seed for the destruction of the continuance of the animal rights movement. Here he speaks with the Abolitionist.

READ IT AT: www.abolitionist-online.com

Here's a taste of what's in store:

"I am an ethical vegan and I don't think that's necessary to be a shelter director but you really want people who love animals and who hurt by the killing and if you hurt by the killing you will stop at nothing to save lives."

"I don't think most people know about PETA's position. I have a copy of a postcard Ingrid sent me back in 1992/3 where she says she does not believe in 'a right for life' for feral cats and she does have a policy against No-Kill shelters and there's the whole thing about the pitbulls."
"Her position is these animals should be dead even in the face of life saving alternatives. Because of that, PETA have stopped making sense to us as vegans, as animal rights people, as animal lovers and we have chosen to focus on other groups that have a more enlightened stance when it comes to cats and dogs."

"{PETA} have a policy against No-Kill shelters and, my best guess is, that their founder Ingrid Newkirk rose from the ranks of animal control at the Washington Humane Society and actually spent a good part of her career killing animals instead of protecting them."

"As early as the mid- 1970's the Humane Society of the United States (HSU and all those large groups were opposing the very types of efforts that made San Francisco so incredibly successful. In fact right after San Francisco did achieve success the HSUS started vilification campaigns against no-kill. I believe there's a body count attached to their anti no-kill rhetoric and positions."

Also the Corrine Daws Interview: Making Sydney No-Kill

"In the last 10 years since my pound has been no-kill I have not once looked at a dog and thought, "You are a horrible dog. You don't deserve a home. You deserve to die"".

www.abolitionist-online.com
(2) | () | | send green star | flag as inappropriate
Visibility: Everyone
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted: Apr 13, 2006 3:26am
wiNteR aCtivisM
Mar 5, 2006
Check out pages 7 & 8... The protest against the agriculture fair saturday afternoon
Great time & we did not get kicked out
(0) | () | | send green star | flag as inappropriate
Visibility: Everyone
Tags: , , , ,
Posted: Mar 5, 2006 4:31am
Bulgaria Restricts Violence against Both Humans and Nonhumans on TV
Dec 10, 2005
Name: Bulgaria
Type: Tribute (for the living)
To Honor: Other
Location: , Bulgaria

Television channels must not show any psychological or physical violence against humans or nonhuman animals in Bulgaria.

Bulgarian Council for Electronic Media (CEM) (which is in charge of controlling the contents displayed in the media) has banned violence from television from 6 a.m. to 11 p.m. CEM has commented that the rule is an attempt to stop the negative influence that television can have on children.

This will include giving information in detail regarding crimes, as well as broadcasting images that might promote the consumption of drugs, among other images.

Those channels that break this new rule would have to pay a fine which could be of up to 7 600 euros. The Association of Bulgarian Broadcasters (ABBRO) has accused this decision to be an interference of the CEM in their work which means actual censorship and goes against the right of the public to be informed and the media to do their job freely.

This measure does not forbid harming animals, but simply doing it in such a way that can be violent (at least for children). In any case, it is interesting to note the fact that the CEM has implicitly assumed that it is not only humans that can be the victims of violence, since other animals can be so as well, which implies that they are sentient beings as humans are.

From:  www.speciesism.org
(2) | () | | send green star | flag as inappropriate
Visibility: Everyone
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
Posted: Dec 10, 2005 10:19am

 
 
 
Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of Care2.com or its affiliates.

Author

pElAgUS hellot
female , single
Tamarindo, Costa Rica
Shares by Type:
All (1001) | Blog (255) | Alert (445) | Poll (4) | Recipe (12) | Photo (11) | Tribute (59) | Message (215)

Showing shares tagged with: against [show all]
ads keep care2 free
SHARES FROM PELAGUS'S NETWORK
May
25
(0 comments  |  discussions )
I have always been a strong proponent of a future united, federal Europe - a single European country, as a more progressive, liberal counterpoint towards the current U.S. hegemony and towards the upcoming powers of China, India and Russia. And I feel...
May
18
(0 comments  |  discussions )
The sun in the North is a temporary guestWho brings with him much warmth and light when he comesFor a few precious months every year he keepsUs company through night and day He makes the trees green, he makes flowers bloomHe makes the birds sing, and ...
May
14
(0 comments  |  discussions )
Ashley is our middle cat and only female.At 11:48 a.m. Thursday, 9 May 2013 in a valiant battle against agressive lung cancer, Ashley died at home.
May
9
(0 comments  |  discussions )
The largest genocide in human history happened where? Most people would answer Germany, and the Jewish Holocaust. Actually though, the largest genocide happened in the USA, with the native American Indians, with estimates of 19 million to 100 millio...
May
8
(0 comments  |  discussions )
(0 comments  |  discussions )
Official Nuclear Radiation Study; Tokyo University Hayno, R.S., et al (2013) Internal Radiocesium Contamination of Adults and Children 7 to 20 Months After the Fukushima NPP Accident as Measured by Extensive Whole-Body-Counter Surveys, Proc. Jpn....
May
6
(0 comments  |  discussions )
Toxic radiation accumulates in water supplies after nuclear accidents. Radiation bioconcentrates in fish that live in fresh water and salt water. Runoff of fresh water from land which has been contaminated ends up contaminating oceans, and salt wate...
(0 comments  |  discussions )
66 Atomic Bombs were exploded on the Bikini Island Atolls. Hundreds of islanders were removed from the islands, but not from harms way. One hydrogen bomb exploded near the islands, and the children played with the dust from the bomb, as it fel...
May
5
(0 comments  |  discussions )
"Under our current law, a suspected terrorist on the FBI's No-Fly List can't board an airplane -- but they can still legally purchase guns and explosives. This loophole, known as the “Terror Gap,” is ...
(0 comments  |  0 discussions )
Germany added more solar panels in one month, than the US did in ONE YEAR. Nearly 1/3 of Germany power output is handled by bottoms up solar energy during the middle of the day. The transition to a 100% renewable energy nation is in process. T...

Copyright © 2013 Care2.com, inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved