The Protect Our Water Alliance (POWA) petition, "Re-Examining Fluoridation", in its present form, is about 2 years old. It now has over 11,000 signatures and many enthusiastic comments. We want to thank you again for your valuable signatures!
Many of you may have signed this petition assuming that, like most other online petitions, it would be delivered to its destination in a very short time. POWA updates that have gone out to signatories asking for their further help in gathering signatures have stated that, when we have sufficient signatures, and "when the time is right", we will submit them. We feel that because so much time has lapsed since we first started gathering signatures, we owe you a clear explanation of what our intentions have been and are now.
POWA's purpose has always been to bring people together in a loose alliance on issues pertaining to the protection of drinking water, including, but not necessarily only, water fluoridation.
The small group of us activists who created our "Re-Examining Fluoridation" petition always imagined that it would be a part of a much larger national movement, one that would have caught the attention of the general public, health and scientific personnel, and government officials. We anticipated that several big events were imminent, and we were trying to get poised to ride the wave with all the other efforts nationwide that we assumed would occur as a result of these events.
We could not read the future, so we had no way of knowing: a) that some very big events would, indeed, occur**; b) that these events would go largely unnoticed by the media and public; c) that other activist efforts would also be stymied by a disinterested media. Further, as stated on our website, POWA is very small group of activist volunteers with other commitments and never intended to mobilize and organize a huge national outcry on our own, just be a part of it. After immediate success with the petition, with the aid of Fluoride Action Network and other organizations that helped the numbers grow quickly, the numbers have been increasing steadily, but much more slowly than at first. We are thrilled that we have reached over 11,000 signatures, but many more would be needed to have a meaningful, stand-alone petition.
Meanwhile, Fluoride Action Network (FAN) recently decided to do a petition drive of their own, with their petition reflecting the latest events, and calling for an end to fluoridation as well as for a Congressional investigation. In contrast, POWA's petition was designed to ask Congress to "re-examine fluoridation", and to support the EPA Union's repeated call for a Congressional investigation into the public policy of fluoridation and a moratorium nationwide on fluoridation programs.
In view of the fact that recent significant events** have changed the landscape and should be addressed, and in view of FAN's imminent petition drive, WE HAVE DECIDED TO RETIRE THE "RE-EXAMINING FLUORIDATION" PETITION AND TO FORWARD THE SIGNATURES TO THE EPA UNION, for them to use to support their own efforts, possibly in a coordinated way with FAN's petition, if this is what they choose to do.
Although we are retiring this petition, POWA will remain poised to contact those on our mailing list about any significant changes regarding fluoridation policy, or any action alerts we might suggest you follow on this issue or any other drinking water-related issue. While we will shortly be changing our website to reflect these developments, POWA itself will not be fully retired. Meanwhile, you may be interested in signing FAN's new online petition at www.fluoridealert.org .
We thank you again for your valuable signatures, for your comments on the petition, and for your help toward bringing on what we hope will be a major Congressional investigation into the public policy of water fluoridation, ultimately leading to the demise of this outdated practice.
The POWA Team
** The important events that have occurred since our petition was launched are: a) in March, 2006, the National Research Council of the National Academies of Science released a report of their 3-year research project concerning the toxicity of fluoride in drinking water. This report was very damning of fluoride and recommended that the EPA lower their safety level of fluoride in the water. This has not yet been done. b) In April, 2006, the publication of Dr. Elise Bassin's research showing a 5-7-fold rise in cases of osteosarcoma (a deadly bone cancer) in young boys in fluoridated areas. c) As a result of these 2 important events, a third event arose. In November, 2006, the ADA quietly issued an e-Gram with a warning about mixing baby formula with fluoridated water and recommended that unfluoridated bottled water be used. In spite of this warning, they are still claiming that fluoride is safe and recommending it for children.
It's Happened in South Dakota - Protect Choice in Your State Now!
The worst has happened: South Dakota has banned abortion.
What does the law do? South Dakota’s criminal ban outlaws abortion in almost all cases and does not protect a woman in cases of rape or incest or even when her health is in danger. Doctors who violate the ban could face up to five years in prison.
The sun in the North is a
temporary guestWho brings
with him much warmth and
light when he comesFor a
few precious months every
year he keepsUs company
through night and day He
makes the trees green, he
makes flowers bloomHe
makes the birds sing, and
...
The largest genocide in
human history happened
where? Most people would
answer Germany, and the
Jewish Holocaust.
Actually though, the
largest genocide happened
in the USA, with the
native American Indians,
with estimates of 19
million to 100 millio...
Official Nuclear
Radiation Study; Tokyo
University
Hayno, R.S., et al
(2013) Internal
Radiocesium Contamination
of Adults and Children 7
to 20 Months After the
Fukushima NPP Accident as
Measured by Extensive
Whole-Body-Counter
Surveys, Proc. Jpn....
Toxic radiation
accumulates in water
supplies after nuclear
accidents. Radiation
bioconcentrates in fish
that live in fresh water
and salt water. Runoff of
fresh water from land
which has been
contaminated ends up
contaminating oceans, and
salt wate...
66 Atomic Bombs were
exploded on the Bikini
Island Atolls. Hundreds
of islanders were removed
from the islands, but not
from harms way. One
hydrogen bomb exploded
near the islands, and the
children played with the
dust from the bomb, as it
fel...
"Under our current law,
a suspected terrorist on
the FBI's No-Fly List
can't board an airplane
-- but they can still
legally purchase guns and
explosives.
This loophole, known
as the
âTerror
Gap,â
is ...
Germany added more
solar panels in one
month, than the US did in
ONE YEAR. Nearly 1/3 of
Germany power output is
handled by bottoms up
solar energy during the
middle of the day. The
transition to a 100%
renewable energy nation
is in process. T...
http://www.upworthy.com/
/the-top-8-ways-to-be-tra
ditionally-married-accord
ing-to-the-bible?c=upw1
According to the Old
Testament, which defines
all of the 'rules' of
traditional marriage, the
above examples are all of
the ways that couples can
be ...