22,395,021 members doing good!
about our ads
share your passions, stories, inspirations, and more
Speciesism and animal testing
Dec 4, 2005

Speciesism and animal testing

By: Rebecca Lazarenko and Matthew Lillie

Issue date: 11/29/05 Section: Opinion
http://www.brockpress.com/media/paper384/news/2005/11/29/Opinion/Speciesism.And.Animal.Testing-1114916.shtml?norewrite&sourcedomain=www.brockpress.com

Several months ago my mum was accepted by a new doctor and required to go in for a routine physical. During the ultrasound, a lump was detected on her ovaries which the doctor was unable to identify. She was informed that she needed major surgery, both to identify and remove the lump. Naturally, anyone in this situation would be very concerned: What if it was something serious?
Until this point I (Rebecca) had not considered the reality of something like cancer affecting my immediate family. For myself, I had always believed that animals were not ours to experiment on for any reason, be it the triviality of cosmetics or the severity of potentially human-life-saving medical research. However, when the question of medical research involving animals affects those I care about, the choice becomes less clear.
I value and respect the lives of all sentient beings, but when it comes down to a choice between the life of my mum and that of a lab rat, ethical decisions become more difficult.
For someone who cares about animals, but who also wants to save the lives of loved ones, the debate on animal research brings up challenging questions.
What is it that makes most humans view their lives as more valuable than an animal's life? Is it morally acceptable to test on animals because they are not as closely genetically related to us as other humans are? If this is true, is it therefore morally acceptable to test on people of another race than yours? Is favouring your own species any different from favouring your own race? One is racism, one is speciesism, though different are they not rooted in a similar injustice?
Obviously, it would be morally reprehensible to conduct tests on humans without their consent. So what is it that gives us the right to test on animals or to take the lives of animals for research? If animals can indeed suffer and feel pain - which they can - then it is our moral responsibility to seriously consider the ethics of testing on them.
Unfortunately, for most people, sacrificing the life of an animal to save the life of a human is not an issue. Obviously most would choose the life of a human over that of an animal, (though vegan, we recognize that most people eat animals for pleasure, so is there really anything wrong with testing on animals or killing animals to save a human's life in their view?) Yet, is it really a question of choosing between human life and animal life? Or is this just what researchers want us to believe?
Thankfully, with modern technological advances, there are more and more feasible alternatives to animal testing becoming available every year, including sophisticated in vitro, genomic, and computer-modeling techniques. These alternatives to animal testing not only save animal lives, but are efficient, cost-effective and reliable as well - perhaps more so than animal based testing as the synthetic methods can work to mirror a human body more accurately than an animal's ever could. Unfortunately, many labs still choose to test on animals. So long as animals are a cheap resource, then humans will continue to exploit them.
So, what can you do?
• If donating to charities (which is often popular this time of year), then really check out where your money is going and choose ones that do not test on animals
• Buy cruelty-free cosmetics and household products: it's easy, they're readily available, and the choice saves millions of animals' lives and reduce their suffering.
• Write a letter: Virtually all federally funded research is paid for with your tax dollars. Two of the main funders of animal-based research in North America, the U.S. National Institutes of Health and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, need to hear that you don't want your tax dollars used to underwrite animal experiments, whatever their purpose.
• Write to the heads of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Food and Drug Administration, National Toxicology Program, and Health Canada and urge them to stop requiring cruel and obsolete animal tests for pharmaceuticals and allow companies to substitute with in vitro tests.
(0) | () | | send green star | flag as inappropriate
Visibility: Everyone
Tags: , ,
Posted: Dec 4, 2005 1:44pm

 
 
 
Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of Care2.com or its affiliates.

Author

pElAgUS hellot
female , single
Tamarindo, Costa Rica
Shares by Type:
All (1001) | Blog (255) | Alert (445) | Poll (4) | Recipe (12) | Photo (11) | Tribute (59) | Message (215)

Showing shares tagged with: testing [show all]
ads keep care2 free
SHARES FROM PELAGUS'S NETWORK
May
18
(0 comments  |  discussions )
The sun in the North is a temporary guestWho brings with him much warmth and light when he comesFor a few precious months every year he keepsUs company through night and day He makes the trees green, he makes flowers bloomHe makes the birds sing, and ...
May
14
(0 comments  |  discussions )
Ashley is our middle cat and only female.At 11:48 a.m. Thursday, 9 May 2013 in a valiant battle against agressive lung cancer, Ashley died at home.
May
9
(0 comments  |  discussions )
The largest genocide in human history happened where? Most people would answer Germany, and the Jewish Holocaust. Actually though, the largest genocide happened in the USA, with the native American Indians, with estimates of 19 million to 100 millio...
May
8
(0 comments  |  discussions )
(0 comments  |  discussions )
Official Nuclear Radiation Study; Tokyo University Hayno, R.S., et al (2013) Internal Radiocesium Contamination of Adults and Children 7 to 20 Months After the Fukushima NPP Accident as Measured by Extensive Whole-Body-Counter Surveys, Proc. Jpn....
May
6
(0 comments  |  discussions )
Toxic radiation accumulates in water supplies after nuclear accidents. Radiation bioconcentrates in fish that live in fresh water and salt water. Runoff of fresh water from land which has been contaminated ends up contaminating oceans, and salt wate...
(0 comments  |  discussions )
66 Atomic Bombs were exploded on the Bikini Island Atolls. Hundreds of islanders were removed from the islands, but not from harms way. One hydrogen bomb exploded near the islands, and the children played with the dust from the bomb, as it fel...
May
5
(0 comments  |  discussions )
"Under our current law, a suspected terrorist on the FBI's No-Fly List can't board an airplane -- but they can still legally purchase guns and explosives. This loophole, known as the “Terror Gap,” is ...
(0 comments  |  discussions )
Germany added more solar panels in one month, than the US did in ONE YEAR. Nearly 1/3 of Germany power output is handled by bottoms up solar energy during the middle of the day. The transition to a 100% renewable energy nation is in process. T...
(0 comments  |  0 discussions )
http://www.upworthy.com/ /the-top-8-ways-to-be-tra ditionally-married-accord ing-to-the-bible?c=upw1 According to the Old Testament, which defines all of the 'rules' of traditional marriage, the above examples are all of the ways that couples can be ...

Copyright © 2013 Care2.com, inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved