Feb 8, 2008
This is Paul Nison's low down on the raw cacao/chocolate
Cacao: Not As Good As You’ve Been Lead To Believe.
The latest and greatest “so-called” super food being promoted in the raw food world is raw chocolate, also known as cacao. I myself was excited when I first heard about it. But after trying it, I didn’t feel that great. I asked others how they felt after consuming cacao and there were no complaints. That was then. After a few months, I started to get more and more complaints from people who were taking cacao. It didn’t surprise me because chocolate in general is not good for us. Other than the enzyme issue, why would raw cacao be so healthy for us?
That is when I decided to do research and I found some scary facts. What’s even scarier is that people are so addicted to it, that even after learning of the high possibility of harmful effects, they keep consuming it. What concerns me the most is the amount people are eating. If someone took a pinch, let’s say once a week, then maybe they wouldn’t have to worry. When I see people being lead to believe that there are many health benefits to consuming tablespoons every day; that is just crazy!
If you are eating a raw food diet because you want to find a natural toxin that will make you feel high, then you have found a good product. Beware, because there are many downsides to it. If you are eating a raw diet for health benefits, consuming chocolate in any form should be off your list and out of your mind.
In one of the best overall raw guides ever written “Diet by Design: Fruits, Nuts and Natural Foods” (available at www.rawlife.com) it says the following about cacao:
Chocolate and cacao are outright health hazards due to the chemicals, contaminants, and additives they contain. The chemicals within chocolate are called methylxanthines. They can be further classified as theobromine, caffeine, and theophylline, all of which have deleterious effects on the body. Theobromine is known to cause a host of symptoms including abnormal glandular growth, nervousness, depression, anxiety, insomnia, gastrointestinal problems, and itching. Caffeine is highly suspected of being a carcinogen, and is directly linked to heart and circulatory problems, glandular difficulties, nervous disorders, osteoporosis, birthing abnormalities, and so forth. Theophylline causes stomach problems, nausea, vomiting, and nervous disorders.
The processing of cacao beans into powder and chocolate is an unsanitary, risky procedure to say the least. To be blunt-chocolate and cacao are laced with animal feces and hair, insects, and molds. The carcinogenic mold called aflatoxin has been found in large quantities on cacao beans.
Allowable limits have been set by the FDA regarding rodent feces and insect parts in chocolate and cocoa! As quoted from Poison With a Capital C, “…every time you eat a chocolate bar, it may contain a rodent hair and 16 insect parts and still carry the blessing of the FDA.”, and “For chocolate powder or cakes there must not be more than 75 insect fragments in three tablespoons of powder.”, and “Four percent of cacao beans may be infested by insects. Animal excreta (such as visible rat droppings) must not exceed 10 milligrams per pound”.
Now, after learning this information, people will still continue to indulge, making excuses to keep eating it. Please note I have no reason to write this information, other than to make you aware of the truth. In fact, I would make a lot of money if I sold raw chocolate and products that contain it. But I just can’t do that, knowing the truth.
I give lectures all over the world, mostly in the United Stated. I have already giving over 100 lectures this year alone. Just about every lecture I give, I have someone come up to me telling me that they experienced one or more of the symptoms above after consuming cacao. Now if you are eating cacao and have not had symptoms, that doesn’t mean it’s okay for you. It’s just a matter of time, so why not stop now.
It is my passion and my goal to get information about health to as many people as possible. What you do with that information is your own personal choice.
Apr 13, 2007
Eight good reasons to block the G8
(By: Affinity Group Wilnis)
An impressive number of groups in Germany and outside is currently
preparing to effectively blockade the G8 summit this June. At least they
will try to, they are, of course countered by a large police force that
will try and stop them.
At carious info-nights about these mobilisation efforts held in the
Netherlands, you often hear people voicing doubts about the use of
blockades. It is sometimes claimed that they “useless”, “a ritual” and
that “summits are only symbols”. Below you will find eight good reasons
for taking part in the blockades and help making them successful.
1) In order to win. Imagine that this time round it will really work! The
big names will, of course, be flown in with a helicopter, but that’s only
a few of them. The lower ranks, especially the personnel, will have to be
brought in by car. Furthermore, you can block a helicopter, too (with hang
gliders, sky rockets&hellip, and on the day of the summit, people have already
announced they will try and block the only big airport in the region. But
again, imagine that it will be a successful blockade; that we are enough
people with enough fantasy, initiative and courage to block the entry
points. Then the G8 summit, where those who are instrumental in
perpetuating global poverty, environmental destruction and neo-liberal
business want to get together and play, will simply fail. Just that day,
2) In order to create networks. Summit protests are spaces where countless
groups and individuals join forces who rarely see each other in their
daily lives, let alone organise protests together. We have been divided
into countless one-issue movements which in turn are divided over
strategic and political questions. But during protests against a summit
such as this one, everything comes together and crosses each other. This
cross-fertilisation yields unexpected results.
3) As a school for protest. The protests, the preparations and the action
camps, are spaces in which everyone learns new things. It is a living
school for self-organisation, theory, discussion, action forms, etc.
Helping organising an action camp, witnessing how people who barely know
each other can stop something of that scale in such a short period of time
and under difficult circumstances, is in itself something that everyone
should have experienced at least once in their lifetime. These camps are
also places where people who have just recently decided to become active
against the current world order can come into contact with people who have
been active already for a long time. The blockades and actions can be
astonishing experiences, they can change lives and let people see that we
can change things and that resistance is possible. These experiences are
then used in different places and on different subjects and thereby
disseminated beyond only the summit.
4) For the spin-off effect: the effects of these sort of mass actions are
much bigger than the place and time of the summit. It influences a large
part of the surrounding society, the media, the discussions at the baker’s
and in the bus. Suddenly everyone is talking about the issue, and that
would never happen if the protests would not take place. Of course, not
everyone agrees with the activists, but at least they are discussing the
issues. Compare that with summits that meet with no resistance, which was
common place only a few years ago. Then the media picture presented is
largely that which those in power created, and you would see men in grey
suites shaking hands. But now, WE are in the picture. But the spin-off
goes much further than that: the networks created during the protests,
activists return to their local settings and are inspired to carry on with
their work. Because no one considers these summit protests as the end
point in their lives as political activists; it is but one moment in our
daily campaigns and struggles to change the world. But it is an important
one that can be used well.
5) Ritual and spectacle? The common reasoning that summits are just a
ritualised display of power and serve as a trap which activists step into
by protesting against them is simply not true. The powerful would much
rather meet and discuss in peace. Now they are forced to protect
themselves with an army surrounding them in order to keep off the angry
masses. They have a very hard time, under these circumstances, to
legitimise themselves and their actions and are thereby forced to make all
sorts of pseudo-promises. So this is what we have achieved already. Of
course they also learn from these experiences and activists have to be
inventive to keep up the pressure. It is also important to realise that
summit protests cost activists a lot of time, money and labour, which
could also be invested elsewhere. Hyping militant behaviour can also be
irritating and counter-productive. Much more dangerous, however, is the
ritualisation of powerless political agreement which mainstream NGOs make
with governments, such as symbolic mass demonstrations (round the church
and back). They also cost much time, money and energy, and are, moreover,
But to be active only at the local level and &lsquoositively’ is also not an
option, the ruling elite will laugh at you and couldn’t care less. Every
now and then, you have to try and come together and score ‘globally’, and
then part again to carry on working at the local level. Also: not all
actions that have taken place many times are also out of date. For
centuries now, workers have gone on strike against their bosses and
strikes are still necessary tools that book results.
6) In order to break out of the often illusionary ‘civil society input’
culture. In order to experience a different reality for a moment (other
than the endless ‘consultation’ model with its ‘civil feedback groups’,
‘stakeholder meetings’, reports, studies and policy recommendations), it
helps to, once in a while, attempt an actual act of resistance without
compromise. Yabasta! It’s enough, in June in Heiligendamm, we had enough
and will try and stop the limousines and dance on their roofs. All this in
the hope that the practice of direct action will effect the negotiations,
because not so long ago this was the case and had actual effect (e.g. in
the squatting, women’s and initially the workers movements&hellip. Fewer things
on earth are more fulfilling than to smash the party of fat cats and stop
them, even if only for a moment, from destroying this planet.
7) For strategic reasons. Although the G8 is an informal meeting at which,
officially, no decisions are taken, the G8 is becoming an increasingly
important forum and, for this reason, is being increasingly
institutionalised. Thousands of politicians and civil servants take part
in it and it is prepared during the whole year by large teams. It is
evident that these sort of meetings form the structure for negotiations
between the most powerful capitalist nations in the world in order for
them to coordinate their policies. Important decisions of other
institutions, such as the WTO, IMF and World Bank, are prepared during
this summit. The ‘system’ will not collapse if they cannot hold one of
their summits, but it makes it all a little more difficult to keep the
machine running smoothlessly. Imagine that each of their gatherings is met
with such resistance. Also ideologically, they are forced into the defence
by this form of mass protest.
8) For international solidarity. We fight against the G8 leaders because
we are suffering from their policies. But we also know that often people
that are hit the worst by them live in the global South, far away from the
cities where the power lies, where the conferences are held and the
offices of the multi-nationals are located. In southern countries it is
often common to resist economic oppression with hand and feet, for which
people pay a high price. Those people also appreciate that also in the
capitalist centres, people actively resist and demand an end to the
desperation and status quo. This is why ‘global’ actions often go hand in
hand with very specific demands around specific issues that all have to do
with the G8 – supporting the Ogoni fighting against Shell in Nigeria,
freeing political prisoners, solidarity with Oaxaca/Chiapas, oppose GMOs,
But first and foremost 1) in order to win! Those who join can later tell
their grandchildren (or those of the neighbours) that they were there; the
historic beginning of the end of the capitalist nightmare. Heiligendamm,
June 2007, that’s where you have to be, en masse and active!
For more information on the coming protests see, amongst others,
Oct 23, 2006
This article is actually the great proof that violence damages the cause rather then helping in any way:
Why Killing Lab Rats Is Good
Sometimes lab rats die rightly. See this Seattle P-I story of today, on UW research to fight new flu strains sharing similarities with that "Spanish" variety of 1918-19 which took 1,600 lives in Seattle, half a million in the U.S., and 50 million worldwide. Yet animal wrongs activists stress "speciesism" and other idiocies. A poster boy is Seattle activist and new prisoner Josh Harper of Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (SHAC) , a former UW Frat Row non-student resident when last arrested, whom I've previously SPblogged about here.
Harper is the quintessential Seattle radical - intimidation, bluster and temper trump dialog. More here.
Joshua Harper, a West Coast coordinator for Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty, was sentenced to three years in prison and was ordered to help pay a total of $1 million in restitution to the company and people he helped terrorize. Yesterday, three other members of the group were sentenced to prison for terms ranging from four to six years...
...the...activists were convicted in March of using a Web site to incite threats, harassment and vandalism against Huntingdon Life Sciences, a Britain-based company that tests drugs and household products on
animals.....The government charged that the group waged a five-year campaign against the company, posting the names, addresses and phone numbers of Huntingdon employees and those who do business with the company, and personal information such as where they go to church and where their children attend school. Many of those people saw their homes vandalized and received threatening e-mails, faxes and phone calls. The group, based in Philadelphia, maintained its actions were protected under the First Amendment.
There may be some legitimate issues around animal testing for household products, and cosmetics; even if far less so in relation to life and death medical research. But inciting threats to researchers and pinpointing their homes and families is beyond the pale. There is no better way to harm one's cause than with such tactics. Feel free to message the animal wrongs convict Josh Harper here. But as he's been banned from the Internet for a while - quite understandably, as it turns out - they'll have to forward your bon mots to him. Advice: surprise Josh by being radically.......civil. Posted by Matt Rosenberg at September 28, 2006 08:35 PM |
Oct 23, 2006
Good food, wicked food: Take the quiz and find out your nutrition IQ
The Sacramento Bee
About 30 percent to 40 percent of all cancers are related to our lifestyle choices, including the foods we eat, how much exercise we get and how well we watch our weight. Are you making the right choices? Here's a quiz based on a report on cancer prevention from the American Institute for Cancer Research.
1. Exercise helps prevent colon cancer. True or false?
2. A plant-based diet of vegetables, fruits, whole grains and beans seems to decrease colorectal cancer risk. True or false?
3. A diet high in red meat, processed meat and fat in- creases colorectal cancer risk. True or false?
4. Fiber may reduce the colon's exposure to cancer-causing substances by moving wastes out quickly. True or false?
5. Vitamin supplements help prevent cancer. True or false?
6. A diet high in salt has no effect on cancer risk. True or false?
7. Overweight and obesity has no effect on cancer risk. True or false?
8. Grilled foods cause cancer. True or false?
9. Green tea may have anti-cancer benefits. True or false?
10. All berries, particularly strawberries and raspberries, are especially rich in a substance called ellagic acid, which has shown the ability to prevent cancers of the skin, bladder, lung, esophagus and breast in laboratory studies. True or false?
Answers: 1) T. Exercise speeds the movement of food through the intestine and decreases bile and acid secretion. 2) T; 3) T; 4) T; 5) F; 6) F. Diets containing a large amount of salted fish (such as those in Asian countries) increase the risk of stomach cancer. 7) F. Research shows that obesity is not only a risk for diabetes and heart disease but also for several types of cancers. 8) T. Research shows that exposing meats to direct flame, smoke and intense heat can cause the formation of carcinogens. 9) T. In laboratory studies, green tea has been shown to slow or completely prevent cancer development in colon, liver, breast and prostate cells. 10) T. This phytochemical acts as an antioxidant; it helps the body deactivate specific carcinogens, and it helps slow the reproduction of cancer cells.
Source: American Institute for Cancer Research, www.aicr.org
Oct 23, 2006 8:42am
Jan 9, 2006
Press Relations: How green printing can make a good impression http://www.coanews.org/tiki-read_article.php?articleId=559
Article By Joel Makower - Jan 05 2006
Look around your workplace, and you'll likely find plenty of printed material, from business cards to brochures to books. Printing words and images on paper may seem like one of the more environmentally benign things your company does, but that isn't necessarily the case.
If you examine the life cycle of printed matter — from turning trees into paper through the witch's brew of chemicals involved — professional printing takes on a decidedly non-green hue.
The explosion of web and digital technology doesn't seem to have changed things — as one pundit put it, the paperless office has turned out to be about as practical as the paperless bathroom. But if you still have to print, go green.
Green printing is on a roll, moving beyond small, do-good companies and activist groups to larger corporations and government agencies that have mandates to purchase greener goods and services. As demand for green printing has grown, so too has the number of printers offering such services — or, at least, claiming to.
It's about time. The mechanics of most types of printing haven't changed much over the past half-century. Lithography and gravure — the methods typically used to print books, magazines, and catalogs — employ plates, which are used to apply ink to paper. Typically, the process involves a variety of inks, solvents, acids, resins, lacquers, dyes, driers, extenders, modifiers, varnishes, shellacs, and other solutions. Only a few of these ingredients end up directly on the printed page. The balance are used to produce films, printing plates, gravure cylinders, or proofs, or to clean printing plates or presses.
Many of the ingredients are toxic: silver, lead, chromium, cadmium, toluene, chloroform, methylene chloride, barium-based pigments, and acrylic copolymers. And that's not all. Chlorine bleaching of paper is linked to cancer-causing water pollutants. Waste inks and solvents are usually considered hazardous. Bindings, adhesives, foils, and plastic bags used in printing or packaging printed material can render paper unrecyclable.
And you thought it was just ink on paper.
I Ink, Therefore I Am
Not everyone defines "green printing" the same way, and there is no standard or certification for what makes a printer — or a given project — green. For example, some printers use conventional techniques for most customers, breaking out the recycled paper and soy-based inks only when a customer asks. But others go all-out as a matter of course.
Among those in the latter category is GreenerPrinter, based in Berkeley, Calif., whose customers include Clif Bar & Co., Hewlett Packard, and the San Francisco Giants. The company uses high post-consumer recycled content, non-chlorine-bleached papers from New Leaf, one of the leading environmental paper companies. GreenerPrinter customers can receive an "environmental benefits statement" detailing the water, energy, and emissions saved for a given print job. And the climate impact of shipping finished jobs is offset through investments in renewable energy. (Full disclosure: GreenBiz.com, the nonprofit website I founded, has an affiliate relationship with GreenerPrinter.)
Then there's Quad/Graphics, one of the nation's largest printers, with more than 12,000 employees. For more than 30 years, Quad, based in Sussex, Wis., has been a pioneer in green-printing practices, from reducing ink and paper waste to making sure print-shop air quality far surpasses legal guidelines. The company recycles more than 98 percent of its waste and has won numerous awards for environmental leadership, though it doesn't market itself as a "green" printer.
It's not hard to suss out who's green and who's not, says Priscilla Martin, print buyer for Clif Bar. "When speaking with a new potential vendor, their views or positions on environmental considerations are generally apparent within the first few minutes," she says. "If I'm not hearing a green message, rather than asking about it, I tell them what is important to us and see how they respond."
And what about price? Green printing can cost a little more — but it doesn't have to. "The major trade-off we thought we'd experience was a price increase," says Andrea Stupka, marketing and promotions manager at Homegrown Naturals, Inc., purveyor of Annie's Homegrown products. "But after doing a cost comparison between four printers, one of them green, we were pleasantly surprised. The slight cost increase to go green was so insignificant it was worth it."
In fact, a green printer worth its salt will help you find ways to make projects more economical. "We spend a lot of time educating customers to show them that green printing isn't just more environmentally responsible, it's often better quality and more affordable," says Josh Maddox, sales manager at GreenerPrinter. "By taking the time to show them the least wasteful way to design and produce (projects), we often save clients money over conventional printing costs. We win a lot of business that way."
So how do you make your printing greener? Since there's no official standard, you're on your own to determine who's really committed. In general, an environmentally minded printer should: use the most eco-friendly papers available; reduce or eliminate toxic chemicals, waste ink, and solvents; be willing to use soy or other vegetable inks without any price premium; educate customers about how to reduce a project's environmental impact; and provide safe working conditions for employees, including using the most advanced air-filtration systems.
Here are three questions to ask when scoping out your particular job:
1. Can the job be printed on paper containing a high percentage of post-consumer recycled fiber?
The answer will help determine whether the printer has practical knowledge about the characteristics and advantages of different types of recycled paper. Don't just accept "sure, we can use recycled" as an answer. Specify paper with at least 50 percent post-consumer content.
2. Can it be printed with low-polluting inks?
In most jobs, soy- or vegetable-based inks work just fine (90 percent of daily newspapers use them routinely for color printing). Avoid inks containing heavy metals like lead, cadmium, and mercury, which are commonly used to produce some bright colors. Printers should be willing to swear off heavy-metal inks and suggest alternatives.
3. What is being done to improve the recyclability of the print job?
Coatings, laminates, inks, foils, adhesives, labels, and paper selection can all affect the recyclability of a printed document. A printer should be able to find alternative ways to get the desired effect — through innovative paper sizes and newer glues that won't inhibit recycling, for example.
As with so many things green, the more you know, the better decisions you can make. In the end, the best option may be not to print at all. "It is always good to question, 'How important is this item to print?'" says Bryan Mazzarello, art director at Organic Bouquet. "Many times companies can offer the same information online and update it cheaper and faster. Maybe a postcard invitation to the website would be more effective than a brochure that will end up in the trash."
As Mazzarello makes clear, green printing isn't your only option. The greenest document of all is the one you never commit to paper.
Good resources for green printing include: GreenBiz Green Printing Resource Center, the Bay Area Green Business Program's Top 10 Green Printing Practices, Dynamic Graphics' Printing Green: 12 Things You Need to Know, and Environmental Considerations for the Print Buyer from the Minnesota Environmental Initiative.
Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of Care2.com or its affiliates.
, harmful more
|SHARES FROM PELAGUS'S NETWORK
New Petition! Speak out
Merger with Comcast! Let
your opinion be know
before your bill goes up
and your programming
DOJ and FCC to Not Allow
Merger of Time-Warner and
\\nI have recently posted
some BlogSpot radio
interviews and YouTube
videos, publicizing my
two new books,\\r\\n1)
Deepening Your Personal
Emotional Intimacy and
Through Creative S...
\\nCoretta Scott King:
“We have done what
we can to reveal the
truth, and we now urge
you as members of the
media, and we call upon
elected officials, and
other persons of
influence to do what they
can to share the
revelation of this case
to the ...
\\nWe declare that no
man nor nation nor race
have a greater right than
others to enjoy the
fruits of their work, as
the ecological sphere is
our common condition of
epidemic of sky-rocketing
medical costs has
afflicted our country and
grown to obscene
bills are bloated with
profiteering, fraud and
Much is wrong with t...
n\\r\\nMy two current
books have been published
and are available for
sale through Amazon,
Barnes and Noble, and the
Hammer. Reading these
books can be very helpful
\\nA stainless steel tank
the size of a basketball
court lies buried in the
sandy soil of
state, an aging remnant
of U.S. efforts to win
World War II. The tank
holds enough radioactive
waste to fill an
Peninsula is home to
d forests and many of our
iconic creatures. To keep
healthy, WEC and our
st and Olympic Forest