Notice! Care2 will go offline for site maintenance July 28 at 9pm PST. Thanks
START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
Jul 26, 2009

Fluoridated water must be treated as a medicine, and cannot be used to prepare foods. That is the decision of the European Court of Justice, in a landmark case dealing with the classification and regulation of ‘functional drinks’ in member states of the European Community. (HLH Warenvertriebs and Orthica (Joined Cases C-211/03, C-299/03, C-316/03 and C-318/03) 9 June 2005)

Functional drinks are those products that have two different purposes – for example, nutrition and exerting a positive effect on some medical condition. They include ‘near-water drinks with added minerals’ and, in view of the properties claimed for fluoridated water by fluoride advocates, it must be classified as a ‘funtional food’, and therefore falls within the scope of the relevant legislation.

Medicinal law takes precedent over food law.

The Court ruled that, where two different sets of rules appear to apply to a product, medicinal legislation must take precedent, and the product must be regulated as a medicine. It emphasised that medicines regulators in member states do not have the power to exercise discretion on the classification of such dual-function products. The repeated refusal of the British and Irish Regulators to recognise fluoridated water as a medicinal product is therefore an unlawful misuse of their powers, and one that requires immediate reversal.

ECJ rulings do not establish new laws, but clarify how existing ones should be applied, and are enforceable in the domestic legislation of all member states of the EC. In effect, this decision at last confirms the claim that I have made for many years – that existing medicinal law has always required that fluoridated water be regulated as a medicine. Fluoridated water has no medicinal marketing authorization (&rsquoroduct license&rsquo, and because of this it is – and always has been – illegal to supply it to the public, as the 1968 Medicines Act confirms.

As a ‘medicinal water’, the protection afforded by the water quality regulations that shield consumers from hazardous substances in drinking water does not apply. Its use in the processing of foodstuffs is also prohibited, under the food safety legislation. Aa a direct result of this ruling, all English and Irish legislation providing for water fluoridation are at last exposed as having been in violation of that fundamental prohibition, and must now be repealed.

Prohibition of use of fluoridated water in foods

 

But the Court also ruled that such functional food products must not be used in the preparation of foods. As a ‘medicinal water’ the fluoridated product cannot be regarded as equivalent to the mandatory ‘water for human consumption’ specified for drinking and food preparation. So now every food wholesale and retail outlet in fluoridated areas of the UK and Ireland , from the corner chip-shop to the largest brewery, from the small high-street bakery to the largest supermarket retailers – all will now have to either cease production or install an alternative water supply.

Implications for international trade in food products

But the ruling also has an equally profound implication for export trade in processed foods and drinks. The Court stated that even if a functional food product (or a food containing it) is legally marketed as a food in one member state, it cannot be exported to any other member state unless it has a medicinal licence. So any company making a consumable product using fluoridated water in its preparation or as an ingredient cannot now export that product to any other state in the EC, even if their product is permitted in their home state.

The economic implications are enormous. Not only does the ruling ban the use of fluoridated water for all retail catering and wholesale food processing in the UK and Ireland , it also prohibits such trade from these states to other member states of the EC. But it goes much further than even this, because if British and Irish processed foods from fluoridated areas cannot be exported to the EC, this prohibition must also apply to the importing of such products into EC member states from any other country that practices water fluoridation. The decision effectively bans all processed food products from countries such as the USA , Australia and New Zealand , unless they can be positively proven to have been prepared using only water that was not fluoridated.

What does this mean for water undertakers who fluoridate their product?

Before British water undertakers allow Strategic Health Authorities to order them to start fluoridating their water they need to be fully aware of the implications to them and their shareholders should they agree to do so. Not only are medical damages compensation claims likely to be far higher, with charges of negligently supplying an unlawful product forming the basis of class actions, food processers who lose their markets will certainly hold their water undertaker accountable in law for their losses. This ruling means that Courts in other member states of the EC must support demands from competing food processors that an embargo be placed on British and Irish products unless they can be proven to have been manufactured using only non-fluoridated water.

I have previously warned that this illegal product substitution cannot be permitted to continue, and that members of the public are entirely entitled to demand to be supplied with water that complies with, and is regulated under, the drinking water quality standards that are enforceable under both EC and UK (and Irish) law. Since the ruling must be enforced in all EC member states, water companies will now have to come off the fence and accept that fluoridated water is not an acceptable alternative drinking water.

The only way out – repeal all fluoridation laws and ban the product.

This decision completely supports the challenge that I have issued repeatedly to the UK Regulator, the MHRA – identify the case law that justifies your perverse claim that this product is not a medicine. Ironically, it was the MHRA itself that finally gave the game away, in a formal response to another Regulator, the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA). In what I can only assume was a deliberate attempt to mislead the ASA, the MHRA actually cited this case in support of its continued perverse refusal to implement the medicines legislation that it is obliged to enforce!

The beginning of the end – fluoridation must now be banned, worldwide.

This ECJ ruling effectively puts the final nail in the coffin of water fluoridation, not only within the EC but worldwide. It establishes a very substantial but entirely justified obstacle to trade in food products that are prepared without proper regard to the protection of the public that is enshrined in law. The ruling must be recognised and enforced not only in every memebr state, but also in any external state that wishes to trade with the EC in processed foods. So just what can be done to resolve the present unacceptable situation?

One solution would be to grant a medicinal licence to fluoridated water. But the Court ruled that any evaluation of a functional drink may only be done under the rigorous procedures required to scrutinise any pharmaceutical product. In the present state of scientific concern over the evidence of its lack of efficacy and safety it is impossible to imagine that such a licence could ever be granted. If it were, it would immediately result in a world-wide denunciation from the scientific community that is fully aware of the improper commercial influence that is at the heart of the international promotion of fluoridated products.

The only acceptable response is to call a halt to this controversial practice now. The experience of the past half century has shown that it is completely unjustified – indeed, it is responsible for what may reasonably be described as a pandemic of avoidable chronic fluoride poisoning. In ruling that this type of product must be regulated under medicinal law, the Court has taken the final step towards bringing this disreputable practice to a long-delayed end. Let us hope that national Governments all over the world will heed this decision – the economic consequences will be dire for those who continue to attempt to continue this discredited and illegal practice.

http://www.infowars.com/european-court-ruling-spells-an-end-to-water-fluoridation/

 

 
Visibility: Everyone
Tags: , , , , ,
Posted: Jul 26, 2009 2:24pm
Jul 20, 2009

Vitamin D shines as heart attack fighter
 By Tom Spears, Canwest News Service
http://www.canada.com/health/Vitamin+shines+heart+attack+fighter/1021259/story.html

The Journal of the American College of Cardiology says people with low levels of the vitamin, which comes from sunshine and pills but not much else, are twice as likely to have a heart attack or stroke within five years compared to people with higher vitamin levels.

OTTAWA - Another study has emerged that says vitamin D is good for you - this time, for your heart.

The Journal of the American College of Cardiology says people with low levels of the vitamin, which comes from sunshine and pills but not much else, are twice as likely to have a heart attack or stroke within five years compared to people with higher vitamin levels.

This adds to evidence that people lacking vitamin D have a higher risk of various cancers and diabetes as well. But as well, it shows that the early studies promoting the value of this cheap vitamin are being confirmed by scientific follow-up - unlike the faded early promise of vitamins C and E.

"Vitamin D deficiency is an unrecognized, emerging cardiovascular risk factor, which should be screened for and treated," said the study's main author, cardiologist James O'Keefe of the Mid America Heart Institute in Kansas City, Mo. "Vitamin D is easy to assess, and supplementation (with pills) is simple, safe and inexpensive."

The new evidence comes from the Framingham Heart Study. This is a famous study in a suburb of Boston that has followed thousands of ordinary people, beginning in the 1950s, to find links between their lifestyle and their cardiovascular health.

The story isn't over. "I think one always has to be careful in reporting on the results of clinical trials," said vitamin D researcher John White of McGill University.

He said different trials "may point in opposite directions. "Certainly the two major trials - this one and the one reported a year ago - certainly suggested that vitamin D deficiency is associated with cardiovascular problems later in life."

One potential objection, he noted, is that the heart attacks may not be caused by a lack of vitamin D. The people with the low vitamin levels may also smoke and wolf down too many cheeseburgers.

"They (studies) are a piece of evidence in an accumulating body of evidence, and as a stand-alone result, clinical trials are not in any way definitive." Which is exactly what the American Cancer Society said when a University of Toronto study found that women with breast cancer were more likely to die if they had low vitamin D levels.

The American Cancer Society held a news conference to publicize the findings, but cautioned that more study was needed.

Still, the past year has seen a flurry of studies from cancer institutes, cardiologists and university labs, all generally indicating that the vitamin protects against some cancers and heart disease, and may help fight infection. The Canadian Cancer Society recommends that all Canadian adults take 1,000 international units of the vitamin in fall and winter.

Even with a note of caution, said White, the direction seems clear so far, and important to Canadians: "That vitamin D deficiency - which in temperate (non-tropical) populations is quite widespread - is associated with cardiac problems."

© Copyright (c) Canwest News Service
Thorhallsson: Vitamin D: The Super Nutrient      PDF      Print      E-mail
WEDNESDAY, 04 MARCH 2009 14:43

When you hear about wheelchair-bound patients with kidney disease and associated bone disease getting up and walking again, you pay attention. Discovering that psoriasis can be improved and that malignant cancer cells can be destroyed, you want to know more. What made the difference? New research suggests that adequate amounts of active Vitamin D3 can improve health.

In a 2008 Journal of Alternative Therapies, Dr. Michael Holick, professor of medicine, physiology, and biophysics at Boston University Medical Center, discloses the results of many research studies on Vitamin D. This research suggests that both sun exposure and vitamin D supplementation is important for everyone regardless of their age, gender, race or geographical residence.
Although our general diet is deficient in vitamin D, the body has a tremendous potential to make vitamin D after sun exposure. The problem lies in the pervasive belief that sun exposure is dangerous most of the time. Dr. Holick states that it is well documented that most melanoma is found on the least sun-exposed areas of the body. Research shows that the more sun exposure that an individual has had as a child and adult, the least likely they are to die of cancer if a melanoma develops.

How much supplemental vitamin D should an individual consume daily? Dr. Holick provides guidelines – “It’s estimated that if you take 1000 IU of vitamin D per day, which most experts recommend everybody, both children and adults, be on, you reduce your risk of developing colorectal, breast, prostate, and ovarian cancer by 50%.” Vitamin D supplementation has also been shown to reduce the incidence of both forms of diabetes and heart disease.

Research employing even higher doses has had very positive outcomes. Dr. Holick explains that adequate amounts of vitamin D can enhance immunity. He states, “A study in postmenopausal women who took 2000 IU of vitamin D3 a day had a 90% reduction in upper respiratory tract infections compared to women who took 400 IU of vitamin D3 a day.”

Vitamin D has anti-inflammatory properties as well and this is the mechanism that reduces diseases of the heart and blood vessels. Adequate vitamin D can reduce the incidence of high blood pressure. Dr. Holick warns that vitamin D is not a cure-all for everything, but he maintains that compelling evidence suggests that there are many serious chronic diseases that are strongly associated with a lack of vitamin D.

We have addressed vitamin D in previous columns, but the above information deserves to be presented again. Some of this sounds familiar, but perhaps a reminder about the importance of naturally occurring vitamin D will help us to reconsider spending more time outdoors during the safe hours. There are many reasons to be out in nature, hopefully this information will encourage us all to do this more often.

Maryann Thorhallsson, PhD, ARNP, is a Professional Life Coach, and a Nursing Professor at BCU. Dr. Thorhallsson holds certifications in nutrition, yoga and QiGong and has written wellness columns since 1990.
 

Low vitamin D linked to asthma exacerbations.
By: Zoler, Mitchel L.
Publication: Pediatric News
Date: Tuesday, July 1 2008

PHILADELPHIA -- Children with asthma and on treatment with inhaled
corticosteroids who had insufficient blood levels of vitamin D had an
increased risk of asthma exacerbations during 4 years of follow-up in a
study with 305 children.

The results are only suggestive, because the study wasn't designedto assess
the impact of vitamin D levels on asthma. But the findings warrant further
study into a possible role that vitamin D might play in modifying the effect
of inhaled corticosteroid in children with asthma.

The results suggest that boosting blood vitamin D levels might improve
responsiveness to inhaled corticosteroids in asthmatic children, Dr.
Augusto A. Litonjua said while presenting a poster at the annual meeting of
the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology.

The study included the 305 children with asthma who were enrolled in the
inhaled-budesonide group of the Childhood Asthma Management Program. The
study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of inhaled budesonide
(Pulmicort), compared with treatment with nedocromil (Tilade) or placebo. 
Vitamin D Needed To Cut Cancer Risk, Researchers Say

ScienceDaily (Dec. 28, 2005) —

Taking 1,000 international units (IU) of vitamin D3 daily appears to lower an individual's risk of developing certain cancers – including colon, breast, and ovarian cancer – by up to 50 percent, according to cancer prevention specialists at the Moores Cancer Center at the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) Medical Center. The researchers call for prompt public health action to increase intake of vitamin D3 as an inexpensive tool for prevention of diseases that claim millions of lives each year.

Previous studies by these researchers, including a paper in the December 2005 Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, showed the link between vitamin D deficiency and higher rates of colon cancer. The new paper, to be published on-line December 27, 2005 and printed in the February 2006 issue of The American Journal of Public Health, associates the same risks to breast and ovarian cancers, and underscores the researchers' call to action.
"For example, breast cancer will strike one in eight American women in their lifetime. Early detection using mammography reduces mortality rates by approximately 20 percent. But use of vitamin D might prevent this cancer in the first place," said co-author Cedric F. Garland, a professor with UCSD's Moores Cancer Center and the Department of Family and Preventive Medicine at the UCSD School of Medicine.

In the paper, the authors conclude: "The high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency, combined with the discovery of increased risks of certain types of cancer in those who are deficient, suggest that vitamin D deficiency may account for several thousand premature deaths from colon, breast, ovarian and other cancers annually."

The study also found that residents of the northeastern United States, and individuals with higher skin pigmentation were at an increased risk of vitamin D deficiency. This is because solar UVB is needed for the human body to make vitamin D. The increased skin pigmentation of African-Americans reduces their ability to synthesize vitamin D.ght it might be helpful to pass it on to all of you

"African-American women who develop breast cancer are more likely to die from the disease than White women of the same age," said Garland. "Survival rates are worse among African-Americans for colon, prostate and ovarian cancers as well." Even after adjustments that removed the effect of socioeconomic status and access to care, blacks were shown to have substantially poorer survival rates, a difference that the authors link with the decreased ability of blacks to make Vitamin D.

The findings are based upon an extensive systematic review of scientific papers on the relationship of blood serum levels or oral intake of vitamin D with risk of certain types of cancers published worldwide between January 1966 and December 2004. Sixty-three observational studies of vitamin D status in relation to cancer risk, including 30 of colon cancer, 13 of breast cancer, 26 of prostate cancer and seven of ovarian cancer, were assessed.

This complex analysis of virtually every observational study written on the subject, called a systematic review, paints a clearer picture than any single study and is recognized by scientists as an important tool for establishing a consensus of findings.

"A preponderance of evidence, from the best observational studies the medical world has to offer, gathered over 25 years, has led to the conclusion that public health action is needed," Garland said. "Primary prevention of these cancers has largely been neglected, but we now have proof that the incidence of colon, breast, and ovarian cancer can be reduced dramatically by increasing the public's intake of vitamin D."

Since the safety of daily intake of vitamin D3 in the recommended range has been thoroughly assessed and confirmed by the National Academy of Sciences, and the benefits found so far in observational studies are considerable, expanded use of vitamin D as a public health measure should not be delayed, according to the authors.

They recommend intake of 1,000 IU/day of vitamin D, half the safe upper intake established by the National Academy of Sciences. Garland said that while this study looked at all forms of vitamin D – intake through diet or supplements, and photosynthesis through modest sun exposure – as a practical matter, the majority of people will most easily achieve the target levels by eating foods containing vitamin D and taking supplements, which the authors estimated would cost about five cents per day.

"Many people are deficient in vitamin D. A glass of milk, for example, has only 100 IU. Other foods, such as orange juice, yogurt and cheese, are now beginning to be fortified, but you have to work fairly hard to reach 1,000 IU a day," he explained. "Sun exposure has its own concerns and limitations. We recommend no more than 15 minutes of exposure daily over 40 percent of the body, other than the face, which should be protected from the sun. Dark-skinned people, however, may need more exposure to produce adequate amounts of vitamin D, and some fair-skinned people shouldn't try to get any vitamin D from the sun. The easiest and most reliable way of getting the appropriate amount is from food and a daily supplement."

###
Co-authors on the study are Cedric F. Garland, Edward D. Gorham, Sharif B. Mohr, and Frank C. Garland, affiliated with the Moores Cancer Center and the Department of Family and Preventive Medicine at UCSD School of Medicine ; Martin Lipkin, Strang Cancer Prevention Center, New York; Harold L. Newmark, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey and The Cancer Institute of New Jersey; and Michael F. Holick, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine.

Osteomalacia, Osteoporosis and Vitamin D3
By Bob Livingston • May 8th, 2009 •
Category: Bob Livingston, Conservative Politics, Health, Personal Liberty Articles, Privacy
http://www.personalliberty.com/bob-livingston/osteomalacia-osteoporosis-and-vitamin-d3/
Each month I try to think of what information my subscribers need most, as most of my readers are in the 50 to 90 age group. Of course we all need health and wealth, which is the basic theme of The Bob Livingston Letter.

And one cause of poor health among people in this age group is Vitamin D deficiency.

I have been so mesmerized, excited and overpowered with the benefits of vitamin D3 and sunshine that I have accumulated a small library on the subject.

The vitamin D3 excitement grows exponentially for seniors. I myself am in that age range. I have good seasoning like fine whiskey! I didn’t say that I drink it, just age like it—to perfection!

Increasing numbers of adults are developing a vitamin D deficiency-related bone condition known as osteomalacia (pronounced os-tee-oh-muh-lay-sha), sometimes called "adult rickets." This condition, characterized by vague bone and muscle aches, is frequently misdiagnosed as fibromyalgia or arthritis. This is a typical diagnosis of "conventional" or "orthodox" doctors. I just saw this happen and the patient (or victim) wouldn’t touch vitamin D3 and had to go on disability.

Activated vitamin D or vitamin D3 or sunshine is directly related to bone health and muscle health. It is in fact its main job.

Osteomalacia refers to bone pain with muscle ache. Osteomalacia is a condition in which the bones don’t harden properly during the building or rebuilding phase. Vitamin D3 deficiency is the most common cause of osteomalacia.

Yes, even seniors are always building bone and unhardened bone produces complaints of muscle achiness and weakness. Winter months produce this more when there is little or no sunshine.

Vitamin D3 deficiency affects seniors most simply because few of us get any sunshine or enough sunshine, including me. So my wife and I take large daily doses (10,000 units) of vitamin D3 almost without fail. If we slack anything else, we take vitamin D3 in tablets or liquid.

The rule is to take large doses daily. You should take it on and on. As with any natural nutrient, it will take a while to get D3 solidly in your system, say two months. Then we have to keep it there by continuing to supplement. It may take longer for some. Remember that you acquired this sunshine deficiency over a long period of time.

If vitamin D3 deficiency continues it will weaken your bones and predispose you to fractures, especially of the lower spine, hip and wrist. In fact some researchers suspect that carpal tunnel syndrome is caused by vitamin D3 deficiency. And most importantly, a D3 deficiency causes instability of balance. Seniors fall more than younger people, a whole lot more. Of course when they do, they break their bones, as you well know.

Osteoporosis

All seniors know what osteoporosis is. Osteoporosis is a basic deficiency of vitamin D3 which compromises the bone regrowth and remodeling process—which goes on until death. Vitamin D3 deficiency inhibits efficient absorption of calcium from the diet. Calcium enters the bloodstream and with the help of vitamin D3 is deposited in the bones. If this pattern doesn’t happen because of D3 deficiency, the bones become riddled with holes and become porous, brittle and weak. This is osteoporosis and can be verified with a bone density test.

The result of osteoporosis is death. How many seniors over the centuries have broken a bone, developed pneumonia and died? This was all needless, according to vitamin D research.

Our strongest impression is that you should take your daily units of vitamin D3 above all else.

Normally I wouldn’t include specific product names and links in my editorial articles, but I get so many questions as to which exact products I use that I thought I should do so here. I recommend you take Advanced D3 from Health Resources™.
 
 
 Thorhallsson: Vitamin D: The Super Nutrient      PDF      Print      E-mail
WEDNESDAY, 04 MARCH 2009 14:43

When you hear about wheelchair-bound patients with kidney disease and associated bone disease getting up and walking again, you pay attention. Discovering that psoriasis can be improved and that malignant cancer cells can be destroyed, you want to know more. What made the difference? New research suggests that adequate amounts of active Vitamin D3 can improve health.

In a 2008 Journal of Alternative Therapies, Dr. Michael Holick, professor of medicine, physiology, and biophysics at Boston University Medical Center, discloses the results of many research studies on Vitamin D. This research suggests that both sun exposure and vitamin D supplementation is important for everyone regardless of their age, gender, race or geographical residence.
Although our general diet is deficient in vitamin D, the body has a tremendous potential to make vitamin D after sun exposure. The problem lies in the pervasive belief that sun exposure is dangerous most of the time. Dr. Holick states that it is well documented that most melanoma is found on the least sun-exposed areas of the body. Research shows that the more sun exposure that an individual has had as a child and adult, the least likely they are to die of cancer if a melanoma develops.

How much supplemental vitamin D should an individual consume daily? Dr. Holick provides guidelines – “It’s estimated that if you take 1000 IU of vitamin D per day, which most experts recommend everybody, both children and adults, be on, you reduce your risk of developing colorectal, breast, prostate, and ovarian cancer by 50%.” Vitamin D supplementation has also been shown to reduce the incidence of both forms of diabetes and heart disease.

Research employing even higher doses has had very positive outcomes. Dr. Holick explains that adequate amounts of vitamin D can enhance immunity. He states, “A study in postmenopausal women who took 2000 IU of vitamin D3 a day had a 90% reduction in upper respiratory tract infections compared to women who took 400 IU of vitamin D3 a day.”

Vitamin D has anti-inflammatory properties as well and this is the mechanism that reduces diseases of the heart and blood vessels. Adequate vitamin D can reduce the incidence of high blood pressure. Dr. Holick warns that vitamin D is not a cure-all for everything, but he maintains that compelling evidence suggests that there are many serious chronic diseases that are strongly associated with a lack of vitamin D.

We have addressed vitamin D in previous columns, but the above information deserves to be presented again. Some of this sounds familiar, but perhaps a reminder about the importance of naturally occurring vitamin D will help us to reconsider spending more time outdoors during the safe hours. There are many reasons to be out in nature, hopefully this information will encourage us all to do this more often.

Maryann Thorhallsson, PhD, ARNP, is a Professional Life Coach, and a Nursing Professor at BCU. Dr. Thorhallsson holds certifications in nutrition, yoga and QiGong and has written wellness columns since 1990.
 
Vitamin D Needed To Cut Cancer Risk, Researchers Say

ScienceDaily (Dec. 28, 2005) —

Taking 1,000 international units (IU) of vitamin D3 daily appears to lower an individual's risk of developing certain cancers – including colon, breast, and ovarian cancer – by up to 50 percent, according to cancer prevention specialists at the Moores Cancer Center at the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) Medical Center. The researchers call for prompt public health action to increase intake of vitamin D3 as an inexpensive tool for prevention of diseases that claim millions of lives each year.

Previous studies by these researchers, including a paper in the December 2005 Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, showed the link between vitamin D deficiency and higher rates of colon cancer. The new paper, to be published on-line December 27, 2005 and printed in the February 2006 issue of The American Journal of Public Health, associates the same risks to breast and ovarian cancers, and underscores the researchers' call to action.
"For example, breast cancer will strike one in eight American women in their lifetime. Early detection using mammography reduces mortality rates by approximately 20 percent. But use of vitamin D might prevent this cancer in the first place," said co-author Cedric F. Garland, a professor with UCSD's Moores Cancer Center and the Department of Family and Preventive Medicine at the UCSD School of Medicine.

In the paper, the authors conclude: "The high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency, combined with the discovery of increased risks of certain types of cancer in those who are deficient, suggest that vitamin D deficiency may account for several thousand premature deaths from colon, breast, ovarian and other cancers annually."

The study also found that residents of the northeastern United States, and individuals with higher skin pigmentation were at an increased risk of vitamin D deficiency. This is because solar UVB is needed for the human body to make vitamin D. The increased skin pigmentation of African-Americans reduces their ability to synthesize vitamin D.ght it might be helpful to pass it on to all of you

"African-American women who develop breast cancer are more likely to die from the disease than White women of the same age," said Garland. "Survival rates are worse among African-Americans for colon, prostate and ovarian cancers as well." Even after adjustments that removed the effect of socioeconomic status and access to care, blacks were shown to have substantially poorer survival rates, a difference that the authors link with the decreased ability of blacks to make Vitamin D.

The findings are based upon an extensive systematic review of scientific papers on the relationship of blood serum levels or oral intake of vitamin D with risk of certain types of cancers published worldwide between January 1966 and December 2004. Sixty-three observational studies of vitamin D status in relation to cancer risk, including 30 of colon cancer, 13 of breast cancer, 26 of prostate cancer and seven of ovarian cancer, were assessed.

This complex analysis of virtually every observational study written on the subject, called a systematic review, paints a clearer picture than any single study and is recognized by scientists as an important tool for establishing a consensus of findings.

"A preponderance of evidence, from the best observational studies the medical world has to offer, gathered over 25 years, has led to the conclusion that public health action is needed," Garland said. "Primary prevention of these cancers has largely been neglected, but we now have proof that the incidence of colon, breast, and ovarian cancer can be reduced dramatically by increasing the public's intake of vitamin D."

Since the safety of daily intake of vitamin D3 in the recommended range has been thoroughly assessed and confirmed by the National Academy of Sciences, and the benefits found so far in observational studies are considerable, expanded use of vitamin D as a public health measure should not be delayed, according to the authors.

They recommend intake of 1,000 IU/day of vitamin D, half the safe upper intake established by the National Academy of Sciences. Garland said that while this study looked at all forms of vitamin D – intake through diet or supplements, and photosynthesis through modest sun exposure – as a practical matter, the majority of people will most easily achieve the target levels by eating foods containing vitamin D and taking supplements, which the authors estimated would cost about five cents per day.

"Many people are deficient in vitamin D. A glass of milk, for example, has only 100 IU. Other foods, such as orange juice, yogurt and cheese, are now beginning to be fortified, but you have to work fairly hard to reach 1,000 IU a day," he explained. "Sun exposure has its own concerns and limitations. We recommend no more than 15 minutes of exposure daily over 40 percent of the body, other than the face, which should be protected from the sun. Dark-skinned people, however, may need more exposure to produce adequate amounts of vitamin D, and some fair-skinned people shouldn't try to get any vitamin D from the sun. The easiest and most reliable way of getting the appropriate amount is from food and a daily supplement."

###
Co-authors on the study are Cedric F. Garland, Edward D. Gorham, Sharif B. Mohr, and Frank C. Garland, affiliated with the Moores Cancer Center and the Department of Family and Preventive Medicine at UCSD School of Medicine ; Martin Lipkin, Strang Cancer Prevention Center, New York; Harold L. Newmark, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey and The Cancer Institute of New Jersey; and Michael F. Holick, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine.
More on aortic valve disease and vitamin D
http://heartscanblog.blogspot.com/2007/08/more-on-aortic-valve-disease-and.html
Tuesday, August 21, 2007

I hope I'm not getting my hopes up prematurely, but I believe that I've seen it once again: Dramatic reversal of aortic valve disease.

This 64-year old man came to me because of a heart scan score of 212. Jack proved to have small LDL, lipoprotein(a), and pre-diabetes. But there was a wrench in the works: Because of a new murmur, we obtain an echocardiogram that revealed a mildly stiff ("stenotic") aortic valve, one of the heart valves within the heart that can develop abnormal stiffness with time.

You can think of aortic valve disease as something like arthritis--a phenomenon of "wear and tear" that progresses over time, but doesn't just go away. In fact, the usual history is that, once detected, we expect it to get worse over the next few years. The stiff aortic valve eventually causes symptoms like chest pains, breathlessness, lightheadedness, and in very severe cases, passing out. For this reason, when symptoms appear, most cardiologists recommend surgical aortic valve replacement with a mechanical or a bio-prosthetic ("pig") valve.
Now, Jack's first aortic valve area (the parameter we follow by echocardiogram representing the effective area of the valve opening when viewed end on) was 1.6 cm2. A year later: 1.4 cm2. One year later again: 1.1 cm2.

In other words, progressive deterioration and a shrinking valve area. Most people begin to develop symptoms when they drop below 1.0 cm2.

Resigned to a new valve sometime in the next year or two, Jack underwent yet another echocardiogram: Valve area 1.8 cm2.

Is this for real? I had Jack come into the office. Lo and behold, to my shock and amazement, the prominent heart murmur he had all along was now barely audible.

I'm quite excited. However, it remains too early to get carried away. I've now seen this in a handful of people, all with aortic valve disease.

Aortic valve stenosis is generally regarded as a progressive disease that must eventually be corrected with surgery--period. The only other strategy that has proven to be of any benefit is Crestor 40 mg per day, an intolerable dose in my experience.

If the vitamin D effect on aortic valve disease proves consistent in future, even in a percentage of people, then hallelujah! We will be tracking this experience in future

Vitamin D and Octogenarians
http://www.healthcentral.com/heart-disease/c/1435/17681/vitamin
Related: Heart Disease, More Tags>Heart Healthy Lifestyle, vitamin D, octogenarians, Fewer Tags>More Topics >

Roger practically bounced in his chair, vibrating with energy.

"I haven't felt like this in years! I can work around the yard all day and still have energy left over. It must be the vitamin D!" Roger's wife rolled her eyes, though with a twinkle and a little smile.

At age 84, Roger started out with pretty good health, despite a prosthetic valve and bypass surgery 5 years earlier. He looked 70, perhaps younger.

But just two months earlier, Roger had appeared sapped, spent and without interest in life, having lost even the enjoyment of his seven great grandchildren.

I've seen this effect now in about 20 octogenarians, dramatic restoration of youthfulness and vigor, a virtual reawakening for some.

Most of the octogenarians experiencing this effect are taking between 4000-8000 units per day to achieve a target blood level of 50 ng/ml. In my cardiology practice and in our heart disease reversal program, all patients have vitamin D blood levels checked. Before vitamin D supplementation, most people 80 years and older start with 25-OH-vitamin D3 levels of 10 ng/ml or less-profound deficiency. The average dose of vitamin D to raise levels to the target of 50 ng/ml tends to be higher in this age group, since by age 80, most people have essentially lost the capacity to convert 7-hydrocholesterol to active vitamin D3 in the skin. (One recent patient, a 78-year old, came to my office sporting a deep brown, leather-like tan. When I told him we'd be checking a vitamin D level, he remarked, "Oh, don't bother, doc. Look at me!" referring to his deep tan. His blood level of 25-OH-vitamin D3: 7 ng/ml-profound deficiency.)

 Now having witnessed numerous "re-births" of octogenarians multiple times, I believe the effect is real. It is an enormously gratifying experience to see someone's interest in life re-ignited. Unfortunately, my observations are too informal to qualify as a study. (I'm not even sure how to quantify this effect. I suppose some sort of muscle and coordination testing might yield quantifiable measures.)

The benefits of vitamin D are not, of course, confined to octogenarians. But the 80-year old plus community just seem to demonstrate more dramatic results, since they've fallen farther down an age-related decline of muscle strength, coordination, and vigor. Thus, they serve as a very graphic model for this effect. Younger people can also obtain the same benefits, though they might not be as visible.

 I'm not the only one who has observed the wonderful effects of vitamin D. Studies have shown that vitamin D replacement:

    * Improves mental function and memory
    * Improves coordination
    * Reduces falls and fractures, including feared hip fractures
    * Reverses winter "blues" (a very important effect in my Wisconsin neighborhood!)

Add this list to the other newly-recognized benefits of vitamin D replacement: reduced blood pressure, reduced blood sugar, increased bone density, improvement in arthritis, reduced inflammatory responses, reduced cancer risk (colon, breast, bladder, prostate), enhanced immune responses, and among the most exciting (to me): reduced risk for heart attack and heart disease. (I will be reporting my experiences with vitamin D and heart disease to the medical community in spring, 2008.)

Vitamin D3 already handles Alzheimer's Disease and has been here for us, all along.  Further, it is one of the least expensive vitamin supplements on the planet.  At full retail, a year's supply of vitamin D3 will cost you less than $60 where I buy mine, on line here: https://secure.bio-tech-pharm.com/catalog.aspx?cat_id=2



Visibility: Everyone
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
Posted: Jul 20, 2009 7:41am
Nov 19, 2008

http://www.psychcrime.org/
Provides a data base of psychiatrists and mental health practioners who have commited crimes but are still allowed to practise.

Visibility: Everyone
Tags:
Posted: Nov 19, 2008 4:38pm
Oct 6, 2008
Focus: Politics
Action Request: Petition
Location: United States

Our Government has failed us. Betrayal after trust. They sold us out to special interest. Demand resignations now!

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/tell-all-that-voted-yes-to-resign-now

NOW SPREAD THE WORD

Visibility: Everyone
Tags:
Posted: Oct 6, 2008 12:11pm

 

 
 
Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of Care2.com or its affiliates.

Author

sue M.
, 2
Los Angeles, CA, USA
Shares by Type:
All (4) | Blog (3) | Alert (1)
SHARES FROM SUE'S NETWORK
Feb
12
by Just C.
(0 comments  |  discussions )
 \\r\\n\\r\\n\\r\\nW hy this is important\\r\\nAs a community comprised of members actively using the tools provided by this site to accomplish needed improvements to various aspects of all life (animal, human, environmental), we, the undersigned, are her...
Jan
22
by Just C.
(0 comments  |  discussions )
\\n\\r\\n\\r\\n \\\"The only thing necessary for the triumph\\r\\n\\nof evil is for good men to do nothing.\\\" ~ Edmund Burke ~ \\n\\r\\n\\n
Jan
18
(1 comments  |  discussions )
\\nI found this beautiful inspirational Winter poem and thought it might be a comfort to you.\\r\\n\\r\\nIt was to me and it\\\'s very well written.\\r\\n\\r\\nI felt it really captured my own feelings about Winter.\\r\\n\\r\\n\\r\\n \\r\\n\\\"Winter\\\"\\r\\ n\\r\\nA poem by\\r\\n...
Jan
14
by Just C.
(0 comments  |  discussions )
\\n\\r\\n\\r\\n\\r\\nShar e this image on Facebook!\\r\\nTell Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid\\r\\nto stop S 1881!\\r\\n \\r\\n\\ r\\n\\r\\nJanuary 14, 2014\\r\\n\\r\\nIf there’s ever a bill that should never come up on the floor for a vote, it’s Senate Bil...
by Just C.
(0 comments  |  discussions )
\\n\\nCourt Backs Internet Censorship: Open The Internet Now!\\r\\n\\nA federal appeals court just sided with Verizon and against you, against us, against the Internet. If this ruling stands, the Internet as we know it will die. \\r\\nBackground: Wall Street...
Dec
24
by Good H.
(0 comments  |  discussions )
\\nNorthern California Beach Reading 500 CPM on 12/20/2013 - Fukushima Radiation Is Here. Via @ AGreenRoad. \\r\\nFr om Rense; \\\"The above video was taken today with an Inspector Plus Geiger counter by \\\'Dave\\\', giving readings on a Northern Californ...
Dec
21
(4 comments  |  discussions )
\\nWe face a defining choice between two contrasting models for organizing human affairs. Give them the generic names Empire and Earth Community. Absent an understanding of the history and implications of this choice, we may squander valuable time and ...
Nov
24
(1 comments  |  discussions )
\\nThis article is very interesting!\\r\\nhttp:// www.npr.org/blogs/health/ 2013/11/18/244526773/gut- bacteria-might-guide-the- workings-of-our-minds?utm _medium=Email&utm_cam paign=20131124&utm_so urce=mostemailed\\n
Nov
21
by Good H.
(0 comments  |  discussions )
\\n\\n\\nAntimatter  \\n\\nAccording to wiki; \\\"A classic staple of science fiction and superhero stories, anti-matter  is matter composed of antiparticles, subatomic particles that have mostly exactly the same properties (mass, intrinsic angu...
by Good H.
(0 comments  |  0 discussions )
\\nBeginning in the 1950s, American and Soviet scientists engaged in a dangerous race to see who could build and detonate the world\\\'s largest bomb. In the Soviet Union, Andrei Sakharov was the architect of this bomb. \\n\\nAccordin g to the movie, A...