START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
Oct 30, 2008

Don’t miss the first-ever live political fundraising webathon to give voice to millions of women across the country who know Sarah Palin is the wrong choice for America and our wildlife.

 

It all started when two women (Lara Kilston and Quinn Latimore) sent a letter to their friends to express their outrage at McCain’s choice of Palin for his Vice President.

 

This intimate letter got picked up by more than 100,000 women from across the political and age spectrums and became a springboard for them to express their own frustrations and fears. It’s main message struck a chord:

 

“Ms. Palin does not respresent us. She does not demonstrate or uphold our interests.”

 

Today until 9:00 p.m. (ET), performers from all walks of life will give voice to millions of women across the country who know that Sarah Palin is the wrong choice for America by reading their letters live to a global audience. Watch it now: http://womenrespondtopalin.com/2008/10/29/watch/

 

Web video producers Kathryn Jones and Charlie Oliver will help take this movement to the next level by hosting the first-ever live political fundraising webathon which will help raise fundrs for Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund and other groups that represent causes that would suffer greatly under a Palin-influenced administration.

 

The idea is for people who agree that Palin is the wrong choice for America to give small amounts which, when combined, will add up to a hefty sum that will help Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund continue to advocate for our wolves, polar bears and other wildlife.

 

Watch the live webcast right now – and chip in if you can. Every little bit helps!

 

http://womenrespondtopalin.com/2008/10/29/watch/

 

 

-- Chris and the Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund Team

 

P.S. If you can watch the webathon, but would like to help protect America’s great wildlife and wild places, please visit the website below:

 

http://actionfund.defenders.org/womenrespond

Visibility: Everyone
Tags: , , , , , ,
Posted: Oct 30, 2008 1:18pm
Oct 23, 2008

Less than two weeks out from the presidential election, some people still don't know the truth about Sarah Palin’s reckless and cruel record when it comes to wildlife and the environment.

That's why Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund teamed up with activist-actress Ashley Judd to produce a new TV ad to set the record straight.

This powerful new ad about Palin's callous disregard for polar bears starts airing this week, but you can see it online now at:

http://actionfund.defenders.org/palinpolarbears

The next presidential administration may well determine whether or not these beloved bears disappear forever. Do we trust Governor Palin with that responsibility?

Even though our nation's leading scientists agree that polar bears could be extinct in America in less than 50 years if we don't take extreme measures to save them, as Governor of Alaska, Sarah Palin covered up evidence from her own state scientists that showed the need for greater protections and sued the federal government when it moved to add polar bears to the Endangered Species list in an effort to protect the oil and gas industry.

It's a move that could lead to more polar bears dying of starvation, drowning and being killed by wealthy trophy hunters.

American voters deserve to know the truth. That's why I need you to not only watch our new ad, but also to help us spread the word about Palin's record.

1. Share this link -- http://actionfund.defenders.org/palinpolarbears -- and let your friends know about Palin's heartless disregard for our polar bears.

2. Donate to help air this TV ad in hotly-contested battleground states like Virginia, Colorado and Ohio. You can make a contribution of as little as $5 online at:

http://actionfund.defenders.org/palinpolarbears

Thanks for caring about our polar bears and other wildlife and helping to spread the word!

-- Leslie, Chris and the rest of the Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund team

Visibility: Everyone
Tags: , , , , , , ,
Posted: Oct 23, 2008 7:17am
Oct 20, 2008

We couldn't have time it better... during Wolf Awareness Week, a U.S. District Court in Missoula officially granted the US Fish and Wildlife Service’s request to withdraw its 2008 Delisting Rule for Northern Rockies wolves.

On March 28, 2008, the US Fish and Wildlife Service removed federal protection for wolves in our region.  Under their Delisting plan, wolves in 88% of Wyoming lost all legal protection and, in less than 24 hours, there were confirmed reports of wolves being killed on sight.  One man claimed that he chased a wolf over 70 miles on snowmobile before shooting the exhausted animal.  That same day, the Idaho state legislature passed a new wolf management provision allowing Idaho wolves to be killed simply for being on the same trail shared with livestock.  During the next month, Idaho Fish and Game commissioners succumbed to pressure from the Idaho anti-wolf coalition and agreed to allow more than half of our wolf population to be killed before the end of this year.  As wolf conservationists had warned, these state plans were entirely insufficient to protect the regional wolf population.  We immediately filed an emergency request for an injunction to stop delisting and restore federal protection for wolves.  On July 18, 2008, the U.S. District Court in Missoula granted our preliminary injunction to wolf conservation temporarily placing Northern Rockies wolves back under federal protection and preventing the hunts from going forward but not before we lost all the known wolves in southwestern Wyoming.  These animals and their pups had already been killed.    

Today, we have renewed hope for wolves in our region.  On October 14, 2008, the U.S. District Court in Missoula, Montana granted the US Fish and Wildlife Service’s request to officially withdraw its 2008 Delisting Rule for Northern Rockies wolves.  Wolves are now back on the federal Endangered Species List throughout Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Oregon, Washington and Utah.  While this legal victory stops the wolf hunts and indiscriminate killing of wolves in our region for now, it means that the Delisting process will now start over again.  This time, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s needs to adhere to its original 1994 minimum recovery plan for gray wolves in the region that requires that wolves in each of the three recovery areas (central Idaho, NW Montana and Yellowstone) be connected as one “metapopulation.”  That means the various packs of wolves need to be able to reach each other in order to breed and raise pups without inbreeding.  The Service’s own research proved that at 2004’s population levels, which were nearly three times higher than the recovery number of 30 breeding pairs, these wolf subgroups were still not connected.  A larger wolf population is clearly needed to ensure the future of wolves in the region.   

Wyoming must change its law that allows unregulated wolf killing in nearly 90 percent of the state.  The Service firmly rejected Wyoming’s hostile wolf management plan in 2003 then ‘flip-flopped without explanation’ by approving the plan with “the same deficiencies” in 2007. But all of the state wolf management plans will need to be improved in order to allow for a sustainable regional wolf population throughout the region including our neighboring states.  This summer, biologists documented a pack of wolves with pups in Washington State and that same day, Oregon wolf biologists discovered the state’s first documented wolf pack and pups since the species was eradicated in the 1930s.  Biologists are celebrating this news because the return of wolves means that these ecosystems can sustain greater biodiversity of other native species. If we manage wolves responsibly in Idaho, Montana and Wyoming, we will see more successes like this played out in neighboring states.   

What about managing wolves in the meantime?  Reinstating federal protection for wolves in the region still allows the states to manage wolves. State agencies can still help livestock owners with conflict prevention measures to avoid losses and wolves that switch to preying on livestock can still be killed.  Defenders of Wildlife and other groups will continue to actively work with livestock owners and agencies to help provide the tools and methods that reduce losses to wolves and other native carnivores. 

Ultimately, we do want to see wolves relieved of their federal protections and managed by the states in a responsible and sustainable manner.  But this time, we need a process that brings together a balance of stakeholders to craft wolf and livestock management plans based on solid science.  As westerners who share a deep respect for our natural resources, we can make this a reality.  We have another chance to get it right this time.   

Imported from external blog

Visibility: Everyone
Tags:
Posted: Oct 20, 2008 10:23am
Oct 20, 2008

Many of you were curious about the current climate for wolves in the Southwest. Our Southwest Program Director, Eva Sargent, answers your questions:

Question 6: How are the reintroduced Mexican wolves in Arizona and New Mexico doing? 

Eva_bio "The lobos are in serious trouble. There were only 52 alive in the wild at the last official count, and that’s the only wild population of this rare wolf anywhere in the world! Despite ten years of work, and about 100 captive-born wolves released, there were only three breeding pairs at last count. Mexican wolves are once again teetering on the brink of extinction. Management needs to change – fast"

Question 7: What are the challenges facing Mex. wolf recovery efforts in the Southwest?

Eva_bio"The challenges are social and political – not biological. The released wolves know how to form packs, hunt prey, pair up and raise young. They restore balance to ecosystems in ways scientists are just beginning to understand. Unfortunately, a small number of very vocal and active wolf opponents have managed to slow progress toward wolf recovery. Many Mexican wolves have been illegally killed or poached. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has abdicated its responsibility for recovery – taking the easy fix of removing wolves when they prey on cattle instead of preventing conflicts in the first place. Too many wolves have been killed or removed this way. Keeping a healthy population of wolves in the wild should be the service’s top priority to ensure that Mexican wolf recovery is successful."

Imported from external blog

Visibility: Everyone
Tags:
Posted: Oct 20, 2008 6:50am
Oct 17, 2008

Question 4: Michele K asks: "Why are wolves in Alaska being shot from airplanes if the are still protected under the Endangered Species Act?  Why isn't that being shut down?"

Caroline_bio Our Senior Director of Field Conservation and Alaska wolf expert, Caroline Kennedy, answers: "Because wolf populations in Alaska have never declined to the extent they have in other states, they were never listed under Endangered Species Act. Alaska classifies wolves as both big game animals and furbearers, which means they can be hunted and trapped. The state has implemented predator control programs in certain parts of the state in order to artificially boost game populations. Their preferred method of killing wolves in these areas is aerial and land and shoot hunting. Each winter, the state issues permits to Alaska residents allowing them to shoot wolves using airplanes.

More than 30 years ago, Congress passed the Airborne Hunting Act to stop the aerial hunting of wolves and other wildlife. But Alaska is exploiting a loophole in this federal law that needs to be closed in order to end the state’s aerial hunting program. Congressman George Miller has introduced legislation that would fix the loophole and prevent other states from adopting similar programs when wolves are removed from the Endangered Species Act."

For more about aerial hunting, read our fact sheet.

Question 5: Randy B asks: "As a supporter of wolves I am often faced with accusations of wolf attacks on people. I have heard that no human has ever been killed in the US by a wolf. Is this true? What is the record of wolf caused injuries ? How do wolf attacks compare to cougar, bear, coyote and bobcats attacks?"

Gina_bio_3 Our Conservation Associate, Gina Schrader answers: "In general, wolves fear humans and do not approach them. As of October 2008, there is no documented case of a healthy, wild wolf killing a human in the United States. In fact, very few incidents involving wolves attacking humans have occurred in North America. Those rare occurrences were reportedly caused because wolves associated humans as a food source, or because a wolf was likely reacting to the presence of dogs. 

Arguments regarding the danger of wolves to humans should be tempered by an understanding of their relative occurrence compared to attacks on or deaths of humans caused by other animals. For instance, each year 90 to 100 deaths from bee or wasp sting reactions occur in the United States. Furthermore, 4.7 million Americans are bitten by dogs each year, and approximately 16 fatalities result from such bites.

To prevent conflicts with wildlife, people must act responsibly by never feeding or approaching wild animals or take other actions that cause wild animals to lose fear of humans."

Imported from external blog

Visibility: Everyone
Tags:
Posted: Oct 17, 2008 10:50am
Oct 17, 2008

That next week is Wolf Awareness Week??

Join us in celebrating Wolf Awareness Week by submitting your burning questions to our panel of wolf experts! As you may know, this year has been extremely eventful for our legal, field and science teams. We have succeeded in making sure wolves remain protected under the Endangered Species Act and we have just wrapped up a very successful collaborative effort working with livestock owners and state officials to engage in non-lethal techniques.

Our experts are available to answer any question you have ever wanted to ask about wolves, or our work with wolves. You must submit your question by 11am on Tuesday the 13th of October.

Don't forget to check back with our blog to see if your question was answered by one of our experts! 

Imported from external blog

Visibility: Everyone
Tags:
Posted: Oct 17, 2008 5:35am
Oct 17, 2008

Happy Wolf Awareness Week!!

Thank you for sending us your questions on wolves. Due to an overwhelming response, we are not able to have our experts answer every question that was submitted. We have chosen the most popular questions for our experts to answer, the first batch is below:

Question 1: Katherine C asks: "Are the Red wolves of the Pocosin National Wildlife Refuge in North Carolina fully protected?"

Our Conservation Associate and red wolf expert Gina Schrader answers:

Gina_bio_3"Today, more than 100 wild red wolves roam more than 1.7 million acres throughout northeastern North Carolina, including Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife Refuge and Alligator River National Wildlife Refuge. Within their current range, red wolves are protected under the Endangered Species Act as a non-essential experimental population. This designation offers special management regulations. Learn more about endangered red wolves."

Question 2: Denise K asks: "Why isn't more being done to let farmers and ranchers know about the guy who came up with the idea of recording his packs howling and giving that recording to the farmers/ranchers to play on their property to keep the wild wolves away from their flocks and herds? It has been proven that it works as wolves are territorial and will not go where another pack lives, and the howling of another pack lets them know to not trespass."

Our Northern Rockies associate and proactive expert, Jesse Timberlake, answers:

Jesse_bio_2"Work has been done on these 'howl boxes' for a number of years now. One has to be careful though and make sure that these recorded wolf howls do not attract nearby wolves. Wolves by their nature are very curious creatures, as are all canines, and if they hear a howl that they do not recognize, they may decide to come closer and check it out. Obviously this is the opposite effect that these boxes are intended for. State agencies have used Radio Activated Guard (RAG) boxes for a number of years. These boxes are tuned into the frequency of local collared wolves, and when they get too close the box emits a strobe light effect and recorded noises of gunshots and horses stampeding. These have proven to be a very effective tool to keep wolves out of cattle during calving season.

In fact this summer Defenders has helped fund a project that used similar 'howl boxes' to monitor the number of wolves in remote areas. These boxes emit howls on a timed schedule, and when nearby wolves howl back it records these noises and biologists can tell how many wolves are in a certain area. Defenders employs a wide array of nonlethal techniques which you can view on our Web site."

Question 3: Karen G asks: "Is it true that wolves have only one partner that they mate with for life?"

Our Northern Rockies representative and gray wolf expert, Suzanne Asha Stone, answers:

Suzanne_bio_2 "Wolves have very strong family bonds much like humans.  Alpha wolves are often the parents of the other pack members and typically are the only pack members to mate and produce pups, but not always. The alpha pair sometimes mate for life but wolves rarely live beyond 8 years old in the wild.  Sometimes an alpha wolf is killed and its mate may select a new alpha. Other times, when an alpha wolf dies, the pack itself disbands.  Sometimes, wolves change roles within a pack and a younger wolf may become an alpha leader.  However, wolves almost never interbreed with other family members but will seek out a mate that is unrelated to the pack.  That helps ensure better genetic stability within the species."

Imported from external blog

Visibility: Everyone
Tags:
Posted: Oct 17, 2008 5:35am
Oct 9, 2008
Lane Adamson, a member of Defenders' Livestock Producers Advisory Council, shows his animal magnetism (Photo: Jesse Timberlake)

Lane Adamson, a member of Defenders' Livestock Producers Advisory Council, shows his animal magnetism

Photo: Jesse Timberlake

Last week I drove up to Madison Valley, Montana to visit a range rider project we are involved with. This is the first year we have partnered with the Madison Valley Ranchlands Group and other conservation organizations to help fund the project, and so I was eager to see how it was going and to meet the riders themselves. I met up with Lane Adamson who is on our Livestock Producers Advisory Council and the project director for the Madison Valley Ranchlands Group, a non-profit, grassroots ranching organization that encourages collaborative stewardship of the Madison Valley. We drove the twenty miles of so from Ennis, almost down to the Idaho border, then heading west along a dirt road we entered the Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest. The range riders, a local couple who have been riding horses and roping cattle for much of their lives, had set up their base-camp at a creek at the valley bottom with their five dogs, four horses and one RV. We chatted about the project with the riders and the local wolf specialist from the state wildlife agency, and discussed ways in which riders can help both the livestock producers and the wolves. Riders are out with the cattle much of the time so are able to spot any sick or injured cattle, the ones most venerable to depredation by predators, and remove them from the pasture. They can look for wolf tracks and other signs to see if there is a lot of wolf activity in the area and take the appropriate action with the cattle. They can also help to put to bed the many myths that surround wolves as they have the rare experience of seeing wolves and cattle co-exist on our public lands.

The range rider next to 'Horsethief Cabin' that was built with help from Defenders (Photo: Mel Mckitrick)

The range rider next to 'Horsethief Cabin' that was built with help from Defenders.

Photo: Mel Mckitrick

Last year we teamed up with a grazing association in the Madison Valley to help build a cabin for their range riders. The grazing allotments in the National Forest that these producers use are a long way from any roads; it is a three hour ride in, and a three hour ride out. Doing this on a daily basis meant that there was not much time in the day to actually spend with the cattle and to look for signs of wolves in the area. They had decided to build a rider cabin that would allow the riders to stay overnight, giving them more time to do their job. 'Horsethief' cabin, as it has been named, has helped the rider project this year, and hopefully for many years to come.

Working with producers in these areas surrounding Yellowstone National Park is vital in protecting corridors on the landscape that provide wolves and other animals the connectivity between the Park, northwest Montana and Central Idaho. These corridors allow the genetic exchange that is vital to keeping populations of predators healthy and viable on an ever changing landscape. By encouraging producers to use non-lethal deterrents on wolves, we can give these animals the ability to disperse throughout the region using both public and private lands.

Imported from external blog

Visibility: Everyone
Tags:
Posted: Oct 9, 2008 4:18am
Sep 26, 2008

Check out this awesome video made by one of our supporters about Palin's brutal anti-wolf policies -- and pass it on to your friends! 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHCcunc7SHo

Join Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund's new anti-Palin Facebook group today at: http://www.new.facebook.com/group.php?gid=35682719679

Visibility: Everyone
Tags:
Posted: Sep 26, 2008 12:52pm
Sep 23, 2008

....It was the guard dogs barking that woke me up, and only then did I hear the two wolves howling on the ridge line above me. It was four o’clock on a chilly Monday morning, and I was huddled in my sleeping bag lying on top of a rocky outcrop. The sky was exceptionally clear and the Milky Way shone brightly above me, the moon having dipped below the horizon hours before. The wolf howls seemed to be coming just a hundred or so yards away, although it was hard to tell as it was so quiet out here in the foothills of the Boulder Mountains.

Jessetelemetry
This is me, Jesse Timberlake, trying to track collared wolves using telemetry equipment.

I grabbed my telemetry equipment to see if it was the Alpha male or female that was making the entire ruckus, or maybe both. I turned on the receiver and scanned all the channels, but did not pick up a single signal, so either these were the uncollared sub-adults of the Phantom Hill pack, or a different pack altogether that was new to the area. On any other night I would have been happy to just sit under the stars and listen to the wolves howl away, but this night my job was to guard the nearby sheep band, the sheep band that was in the same direction that the howls were coming from. Throwing on my boots and grabbing my spotlight and air-horn, I started running up the hill sounding the horn and shining the light were I thought they might be. After a minute or so I stopped making noise and listened, I could not hear the wolves any more, and I was not able to catch them in my spotlight, which was fine by me. I sat down near the band and waited to see if the wolves would come back, but the sheep settled down again and the guard dogs stopped barking so I was content that the wolves were on their way.

Luckily there were three big Pyrenees guard dogs with this band that were able to make some noise and wake me up. These dogs are great as predator alarms, but they are no match for a wolf and there should be a human nearby to scare the wolves off as there was in this case. In the Phantom Hill wolf pack there are two animals that are collared, and so we often can tell when they are in the vicinity, but as last year's pups get older they start to go off on their own, and as they are uncollared telemetry will not pick them up. This evening we had decided not to put fladry up as the terrain was very rocky and also very steep. But after the close encounter with the wolves you can bet we started using fladry on all the following nights, as well as setting up RAG alarm boxes. Even with all the best tools and technology at ones disposal, producers are finding that one of the best methods is increased human presence as wolves are still wary of people.

The day after all this excitement, I met up with three different documentary producers who were all interested in the proactive work we were doing out in central Idaho, and how producers were working together to try and reduce conflicts between predators and livestock. The Forest Service, USDA Wildlife Services, Defenders and the producers all went on a field trip to show the filmmakers where we worked and what it entailed on a day-to-day basis. They got some great footage and we will keep you posted on when these films come out so you can see what these projects involve, and how they work.

Imported from external blog

Visibility: Everyone
Tags:
Posted: Sep 23, 2008 6:46am

 

 Next >
 
Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of Care2.com or its affiliates.

Author

Defenders Action Fund
, 1
Washington, DC, USA
Shares by Type:
All (13) | Blog (13)
SHARES FROM DEFENDERS'S NETWORK
No shares