my care2
make a difference

community & fun

shares

share your passions, stories, inspirations, and more

Sep 11, 2009
Focus: Animal Welfare
Action Request: Various
Location: United States

Last Chance for Animals (LCA) urges everyone to help rescue and relocate 7 Tigers that have been living in deplorable, substandard conditions, in Cancun, Mexico for FIVE years. They are kept in 12 foot cages, sitting in their own feces, with little or no interaction.  They are not fed or given water regularly (they often drink water covered in algae, bugs, and rotten food). The level of neglect is appalling!  "Pepe," the owner, refuses to allow a veterinarian to examine his tigers; consequently they are in dire need of medical attention!

Click here to see video!
LCA interviews Tippi Hedren at Shambala Preserve in Acton, CA. 
See footage of the Cancun Tigers shot by LCA's undercover operative.

Tiger with broken leg
Bengal Tiger with dislocated leg, sitting in feces and rotten food

"Pepe" used to own and run a restaurant/hotel in Cancun.  Tourists would dine among the caged tigers, and for a fee, get a picture taken with them.  When Hurricane Wilma wiped out Cancun in 2004, the restaurant was never re-opened.  Consequently, the building they are caged in is in dangerous disrepair. They are malnourished, abused, and in dire need of medical attention!

endofmarch
"Pepe" dragging a tiger after his restaurant was flooded in 2004.

And it's getting worse!  Read this testimonial from a passing tourist who saw the tigers recently and wrote this letter of outrage:

I have seen these animals in March 2009 and one of the tigers kept trying to stand up but it's back legs would give way. While we were looking Pepe came out shouting at us to go away which we did not do. When I asked him to come to the side of the iron bars I was on, he refused because I told him I would put him in the same dying condition of these poor endangered big cats.


The Mexican Government wildlife agency, PROFEPA, recently reviewed and revoked the UMA license held by Gil Jose Juarez ("Pepe") after pressure from GEPDA (Gente por la Defensa Animal), an animal rights group in Mexico that has been trying to relocate these tigers to The Wild Animal Sanctuary (TWA in Keenesburg, CO. 

This is where the Cancun tigers should be! 
TWAS tigers showing affection
Affectionate tigers relaxing on TWAS' 320 acres of grassland

The rescue mission was in place 10 days ago--the Mexican government has now reneged on their agreement to release and relocate these tigers to TWAS. They are now talking about sending these already abused animals to a zoo in Mexico City!  PLEASE--help us put the pressure on them to honor the original plan: to release and relocate these tigers to TWAS, where they will get the medical attention they desperately need, as well as a beautiful home where they will be safe and taken care of. TWAS is located on 320 acres of Colorado grasslands, and would be the perfect home for these neglected exotic wild cats.

A CALL TO ACTION!

Help LCA, GEPDA, and TWAS save these exotic cats by putting the pressure on the Mexican Government, as well as the Mexican Embassies and Consulates all across the U.S., by flooding their offices with emails, telephone calls, and letters demanding (politely!) that they release these beautiful animals to The Wild Animal Sanctuary (TWA, in Keenesburg, CO. 

The Cancun Tigers could be frolicking here at TWAS!
TWAS Tigers
Happy tigers relaxing on the wide open grasslands at TWAS

Please contact the Mexican authorities, and give a voice to the voiceless. The terrible existence of these beautiful, exotic animals is reprehensible!  The Cancun authorities don't want negative publicity to affect their holiday trade--this desire to avoid negative public perception can be used to pressure them to do the right thing and relocate these tigers immediately to The Wild Animal Sanctuary (TWA! 

For complete information on who to contact and helpful talking points, please visit:
www.savethecancuntigers.com

Help LCA, GEPDA, and TWAS rescue these exotic cats!

                           TWAS Logo                    GEPDA Logo



For the animals,

Campaigns Dept
Last Chance for Animals
310-271-6096 x 27
campaigns@LCAnimal.org
Visibility: Everyone
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted: Sep 11, 2009 6:52am
Apr 6, 2009
Focus: Animal Welfare
Action Request: Various
Location: United States
The Food Safety Modernization Act, currently being considered by Congress as the answer to the many food safety concerns in the U.S., blatantly gives pet food manufacturers carte blanche opportunity to dump risky garbage into your pet’s food bowl without accountability. If this bill is approved, pet food can easily and legally get far worse than it is today.

It is crystal clear the existing FDA needs an overhaul. Just as clear, the existing FDA has shown no genuine concern for the safety of pet food; the FDA has allowed pet food to be the dumping ground for useless waste of human food processing for many years despite Federal laws that should prohibit it. Over recent years, Congress has made a few half hearted attempts to improve the safety of pet food, especially after the deadly 2007 recall; seemingly just to quiet their pet owning constituents. However, the truth continues to clearly show Congress has no intentions to initiate responsible legislation demanding the safety of pet foods and the FDA has no intention of enforcing existing laws that would improve pet food safety.

To provide you with a little history, in November 2008, pet owners from across the U.S. wrote their Representatives in Congress politely demanding the FDA enforce existing Federal laws. The Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act laws clearly defines food to include pet food and clearly defines adulterated foods (thus prohibited by Federal law) to be foods containing sick, diseased, or euthanized animals; many of the most popular pet foods sold in the U.S. could contain ingredients, determined by the FDA, known to include sick, diseased, and/or euthanized animals. The FDA website itself states that although some pet foods appear to be in violation of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, they will not enforce the laws with pet food.

Every single member of Congress who received a letter from their pet loving constituent, ignored the point. Not one Representative addressed the FDA’s violation of Federal laws. Some spoke of ‘hope’ to improve the FDA with H.R. 875 Food Safety Modernization Act. http://www.truthaboutpetfood.com/pages/We-are-Changing-Pet-Food.html

The ‘hope’ that Congress is trying to pass off as the answer to U.S. Consumers prayers, completely ignores pet food safety.

From www.govtrack.us, the text of H.R. 875 Food Safety Modernization Act of 2009 (http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-875) states the purpose of the Act is to establish a Food Safety Administration which will “regulate food safety and labeling to strengthen the protection of the public health”; and “ ensure that food establishments fulfill their responsibility to process, store, hold, and transport food in a manner that protects the public health of all people in the United States.”

If you notice, there is a complete absence of animal feed safety in the ‘Purpose of the Act’ section. The only mention is &lsquoublic health’.

Under Section 3 Definitions, Animal food gains a small mention. The term ‘food’ is defined as “a product intended to be used for food or drink for a human or an animal and components thereof.” However, in the same section providing a definition of a food contaminant, “The term ‘contaminant’ includes a bacterium, chemical, natural toxin or manufactured toxicant, virus, parasite, prion, physical hazard, or other human pathogen that when found on or in food can cause human illness, injury, or death.” Again, there is NO mention of a pet food or animal food contaminant; only a contaminant that can cause human illness, injury or death.

If no definition of a pet food contaminant is provided in the bill, legally there will be no contaminants of pet food. Thus, there could be NO future legal means for pet owners to hold a pet food manufacturer responsible for a contaminated pet food killing or injuring their pet. Without legal resources to hold a pet food manufacturer responsible for a contaminated pet food, the absolute worst can and probably will happen.

Section 3 Definitions drives the point home one more time with the definition of Hazardous Contamination; “The term ‘hazardous contamination’ refers to the presence of a contaminant in food at levels that pose a risk of human illness, injury, or death or are capable of reaching levels that pose such risk during the shelf life of the product.” No mention of a contaminant in an animal food that poses a risk to animal illness, injury, or death. Again, without a legal definition of a contaminant or hazardous contamination of a pet food, pet owners will be left defenseless.

For those in Congress (or elsewhere) who perhaps might feel dog food or cat food isn’t as important as human food, consider this…
• Sixty three percent of homes in the U.S. own a pet. http://americanpetproducts.org/press_industrytrends.aspSixty three percent of all voters, own a pet.
• The American Pet Product Manufacturers Assn projects U.S. pet owners will spend over $45 billion dollars on their pets in 2009. Based on a conservative 6% sales tax, pet owners will pay over $2.7 billion dollars in sales tax on their 2009 pet purchases. $2.7 billion dollars in revenue in one year provided to state government and our Representatives in Congress don’t bother to demand pet food is safe.

• Simply from a revenue producing perspective, in 2006 the US received over $5 billion dollars in alcohol tax
 
revenue, $36 billion in fuel tax revenue, and almost $15 billion dollars in tobacco tax revenue. In 2009, conservative projections are that pet owners will provide $2.7 billion dollars in tax revenue. We pet owners are in the ballpark with many other high revenue consideration products, yet we get the bottom of the bowl when it comes to protection of our pets.  http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxfacts/listdocs.cfm?topic3id=92&topic2id=90

H.R. 875 Food Safety Modernization Act of 2009 is no safety modernization for pet food. H.R. 875 Food Safety Modernization Act of 2009 is the same old story and worse; forgetting the concerns of our pets yet looking out for the interests of industries that earn billions in profits re-selling waste. If H.R. 875 is passed as it is currently written, it appears caring pet owners will be completely without resources to hold a pet food manufacturer accountable for their actions. This is not something to let others be concerned about and act on; every single caring pet lover needs to take immediate action.

Please write your Representative in Congress and ask them to go back to the drawing board with H.R. 875. Ask them to include direct and specific language that will assure the safety of pet food. Remind them that even if they cannot manage to consider a pet as important as a human when designing legislation, to please consider that $2.7 billion dollars a year in tax revenue deserves their proper attention. Also, remind them pet owners are 63% of the population strong; remind them that although our pets cannot vote, their owners can.

Below is a list of the Sponsor and Co-Sponsors of H.R. 875.
Rep. Rosa DeLauro [D-CT]
Cosponsors [as of 2009-03-07]
Rep. Timothy Ryan [D-OH]
Rep. Gwen Moore [D-WI]
Rep. Fortney Stark [D-CA]
Rep. Bob Filner [D-CA]
Rep. Timothy Bishop [D-NY]
Rep. André Carson [D-IN]
Rep. Joe Courtney [D-CT]
Rep. Jerrold Nadler [D-NY]
Rep. Mark Schauer [D-MI]
Rep. James McGovern [D-MA]
Rep. John Tierney [D-MA]
Rep. Betty McCollum [D-MN]
Rep. Raul Grijalva [D-AZ]
Rep. Barbara Lee [D-CA]
Rep. Chellie Pingree [D-ME]
Rep. John Hall [D-NY]
Rep. Maurice Hinchey [D-NY]
Rep. Louise Slaughter [D-NY]
Rep. Eliot Engel [D-NY]
Rep. Nita Lowey [D-NY]
Rep. Janice Schakowsky [D-IL]
Del. Eleanor Norton [D-DC]
Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz [D-FL]
Rep. Robert Wexler [D-FL]
Rep. Sam Farr [D-CA]
Rep. Marcy Kaptur [D-OH]
Rep. Kathy Castor [D-FL]
Rep. Mazie Hirono [D-HI]
Rep. Betty Sutton [D-OH]
Rep. Anna Eshoo [D-CA]
Rep. Eddie Johnson [D-TX]
Rep. Diana DeGette [D-CO]
Rep. Shelley Berkley [D-NV]
Rep. Linda Sánchez [D-CA]
Rep. James McDermott [D-WA]
Rep. Christopher Murphy [D-CT]
Rep. Sanford Bishop [D-GA]
Rep. Gabrielle Giffords [D-AZ]
Rep. Peter DeFazio [D-OR]

Below is my personal letter sent to Rep. Kathy Castor of Florida. Feel free to use the same letter, edit it to your own liking, and or use your own letter to your Representative.

Representative Kathy Castor,

I am aware that you have co-sponsored H.R. 875 Food Safety Modernization Act of 2009. I have read the bill, and as a caring pet owner, it was apparent to me the bill completely neglects issues regarding safe pet foods.

I wrote you in November 2008 regarding the FDA allowing pet food manufacturers in the U.S. to violate the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act laws. Your response did not address the content of my email. I am hopeful you will not ignore me again.

Although H.R. 875 defines food as “a product intended to be used for food or drink for a human or an animal and components thereof” – there is no mention of or definition of an animal/pet food contaminant. The bill you co-sponsor only mentions a contaminant that can cause human illness, injury or death. Without a clear and concise definition of an animal food/pet food contaminant, that would cause animal/pet illness, injury or death, H.R. 875 would leave pet owners (by the way, we make up 63% of the population) defenseless.

I am requesting a response from your office if you will or will not work to include direct language in H.R. 875 that will assure pet owners pet food will be protected under the law. If you choose to support the bill as it currently reads, which leaves pet owners defenseless, it will be duly noted and shared with every pet owner I know.

By the way, it is estimated that sales of pet products in 2009 will provide the U.S. with sales tax revenue in excess of $2.7 billion dollars this year. If you cannot validate spending some effort to improve pet food safety simply as the right thing to do, consider it as a protection of valuable State assets.

I will be waiting for your response to my question…are you still in support of H.R. 875 as it currently reads? Or will you work to include direct language in H.R. 875 that assures pet food safety?


Please take a few moments and tell your Representative you do not support H.R. 875 as it is currently written.  If this bill passes, all of our pets could be in danger.

Wishing you and your pet(s) the best,

Susan Thixton
Truth about Pet Food
Petsumer Report
www.TruthaboutPetFood.com
Visibility: Everyone
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted: Apr 6, 2009 6:28am
Jan 21, 2009
To supporters of this website:  If you have a blog or website, please post the following press release on your site.  This radio show will be a great means for all pet owners to learn more about pet food and learn more how to keep your pet safe. 

For Immediate Release

TruthaboutPetFood.com joins BlogTalkRadio
Taking your questions directly to Pet Food Decision Makers!

Tampa, FL January 21, 2009 TruthaboutPetFood.com is proud to announce the ‘truth’ will be going to BlogTalkRadio; the very first Internet radio show devoted to pet food. Now, pet owners from all over the world can hear directly from pet food decision makers, ask questions, and learn insider information about pet food and the pet food industry.

TruthaboutPetFood.com publisher, Susan Thixton, is thrilled at her new edition; the TruthaboutPetFood BlogTalkRadio Show. “Pet owners who want to learn more about their pet’s food are now going to have that opportunity; this will be directly from the Top Dogs of pet food”, states Thixton. Beginning January 27, 2009, Thixton plans to interview on live Internet Radio top officials from pet food companies and related industries, plus provide pet owners the opportunity to call in and speak directly to these pet food decision makers.

Thixton’s BlogTalkRadio TruthaboutPetFood Show will be live each Tuesday at 11 AM ET starting 1/27/09. Pet owners can listen live from TruthaboutPetFood.com or BlogTalkRadio and call into the show from their computer or via telephone. Her first show will be discussing one of the hottest topics in pet food, imported ingredients. Two former FDA officials will be the first guests of the TruthaboutPetFood Show; Carl Nielson, a 28 year veteran of the FDA, the last six

years as Director of FDA’s Division of Import Operations; and Stephen Spinak, retired FDA expert of processing and packaging. Thixton says “These two gentleman can share so much with pet owners about the FDA; information that we probably can’t learn anywhere else. I can’t wait to speak with them.”

Future scheduled shows will be interviewing Honest Kitchen Pet Food founder and President Lucy Postins and Nature’s Logic Pet Food Managing Partner Scott Freeman. For more information, to listen to live shows, and listen to archived shows visit
http://www.truthaboutpetfood.com/pages/TruthaboutPetFood-Radio.html

About TruthaboutPetFood.com: TruthaboutPetFood.com provides a world of pet owners an understanding of pet food regulations and ingredients. The website publishes alerts, recalls, and a variety of pet food/treat educational articles, and publishes Petsumer Report; a pet food review publication with close to 1000 different dog foods, cat foods, and pet treats currently reviewed. Forty-plus reviews are added each month providing subscribers with valuable information the pet food label cannot or does not provide.

About BlogTalkRadio: BlogTalkRadio is a free, web-based platform which allows any user with a phone and a computer to host a live, interactive Internet broadcast. Hosts call into the service by phone, managing callers on the web-based host dashboard. Shows stream live directly from the host’s BlogTalkRadio web page with archives available for all past shows. BlogTalkRadio has been featured on ABC News, The Washington Post, Portfolio, Talkers Magazine, and TheStreet.com. The citizen broadcasting network can be found at www.blogtalkradio.com.

Press Contact:
Susan Thixton
Susan@TruthaboutPetFood.com
(813) 871-5237
Visibility: Everyone
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted: Jan 21, 2009 8:58am
Jan 30, 2006

July 21, 2005

Veterinarians most often treat ear infections in dogs and urinary tract infections in cats, according to data from Veterinary Pet Insurance Co./DVM Insurance Agency.

The company reviewed claims its clients filed in 2004 to identify the top 10 reasons dog and cat owners took their pets to the veterinarian (see charts). It found that 9 percent of all claims for dogs were submitted for ear infections, and about 7 percent of all claims filed for cats were for feline lower urinary tract disease.

"The frequency of diseases, such as ear infections and bladder infections, in both dogs and cats is a telltale sign that these pets visit the veterinarian for much more than annual exams and vaccinations" said Carol McConnell, manager of veterinary services and education for VPI.

Top 10 Claims by Incident - Cat


1. Urinary tract infection
2. Stomach upset
3. Respiratory infection
4. Ear infection
5. Skin allergy
6. Eye infection
7. Wound infection
8. Colitis
9. Gum disease
10. Kidney disease
Visibility: Everyone
Tags: , , ,
Posted: Jan 30, 2006 5:45pm
Jan 27, 2006
Wednesday 25 January 2006 headlines >>
Missing Cats Research Launched In order to shed more light on why and how cats go missing, Your Cat magazine and Cats Protection have joined forces this month to launch a survey of people who have had a cat that has gone missing. The survey will try to establish trends and factors relating to pets that go missing. It may also provide a picture of how best to safely and successfully identify a cat, as well as suggest helpful measures that owners can take to increase the chances of being reunited with a lost pet.

Beth Skillings, Head of Veterinary Services at Cats Protection, said:

"It can be a devastating experience for a person to lose a much-loved cat and not know what has happened. We get many calls to our Helpline and Lost and Found registers from distressed people about their missing pets, which result in the charity reuniting over 4,000 felines a year with their owners. But it's not always a happy ending and the more light we can shed on the subject, the better we can support and advise owners."

Sue Parslow, Editor of Your Cat magazine, agrees:

"Our readers are very concerned about this subject and the more useful information we can share, the better. We are very pleased to be working with Cats Protection on this issue and hope that through our combined efforts we will be able to reunite more lost pets with their owners in the future."

Join The Survey

Survey forms, along with tips on keeping cats safe, appear in the February edition of Your Cat magazine and are also available on Cats Protection's website (www.cats.org.uk) or by email request to elizabeth.harbord@cats.org.uk.

Closing date for receipt of survey forms is 3 March, 2006. The results of the survey will be published later this year in Your Cat.

Submitted by: Steve O'Malley
Visibility: Everyone
Tags: , , , ,
Posted: Jan 27, 2006 3:50pm
Jan 27, 2006
   Study Says 80% of New Orleans Blacks May Not Return
    By James Dao
    The New York Times

    Friday 27 January 2006

    Washington - New Orleans could lose as much as 80 percent of its black population if its most damaged neighborhoods are not rebuilt and if there is not significant government assistance to help poor people return, a detailed analysis by Brown University has concluded.

    Combining data from the 2000 census with federal damage assessment maps, the study provides a new level of specificity about Hurricane Katrina's effect on the city's worst-flooded areas, which were heavily populated by low-income black people.

    Of the 354,000 people who lived in New Orleans neighborhoods where the subsequent damage was moderate to severe, 75 percent were black, 29 percent lived below the poverty line, more than 10 percent were unemployed, and more than half were renters, the study found.

    The report's author, John R. Logan, concluded that as much as 80 percent of the city's black population might not return for several reasons: their neighborhoods would not be rebuilt, they would be unable to afford the relocation costs, or they would put down roots in other cities.

    For similar reasons, as much as half of the city's white population might not return, Dr. Logan concluded.

    "The continuing question about the hurricane is this: Whose city will be rebuilt?" Dr. Logan, a professor of sociology, writes in the report.

    If the projections are realized, the New Orleans population will shrink to about 140,000 from its prehurricane level of 484,000, and the city, nearly 70 percent black before the storm, will become majority white.

    The study, financed by a grant from the National Science Foundation, was released Thursday, 10 days after the mayor of New Orleans, C. Ray Nagin, who is black, told an audience that "this city will be a majority African-American city; it's the way God wants it to be."

    Mr. Nagin's remark was widely viewed as an effort to address criticism of a proposal by his own rebuilding panel, the Bring New Orleans Back Commission, that calls for a four-month building moratorium in heavily damaged areas. He said later that he had not meant to suggest that white people would not be encouraged to return.

    "Certainly Mayor Nagin's comments reflected a concern on the ground about the future of the city," Dr. Logan said. "My report shows that there is a basis for that concern."

    The study coincides with growing uncertainty about what government assistance will be available for property owners and renters. Louisiana will receive $6.2 billion in federal block grants under an aid package approved by Congress in December, part of which will be used to help homeowners. But that will not be enough money to help all property owners in storm-damaged areas, Louisiana officials say.

    Those officials have urged Congress to enact legislation proposed by Representative Richard H. Baker, Republican of Louisiana, creating a corporation that would use bond proceeds to reimburse property owners for part of their mortgages, then redevelop the property. But the Bush administration has said it opposes the bill, out of concerns that it would be too expensive and would create a new government bureaucracy.

    Asked Thursday about his opposition to the measure, President Bush told reporters that the $85 billion already allocated for Gulf Coast restoration was "a good start." He added that he was concerned that Louisiana did not have a clear recovery plan in place.

    But Gov. Kathleen Babineaux Blanco of Louisiana, a Democrat who has clashed frequently with the White House, said Mr. Baker's bill provided a clear plan.

    "Administration officials do not understand the suffering of the people of Louisiana," Ms. Blanco said in a statement.

    Demographers are divided over the likelihood of a drastic shift in New Orleans's population. William H. Frey, a demographer at the Brookings Institution who has studied the hurricane's impact on the city, called Dr. Logan's projections "a worst-case scenario that will come about only if these evacuees see that they have no voice in what is going on."

    But Dr. Frey also said low-income evacuees might indeed begin to put down roots in cities like Houston or Dallas if they did not see movement toward reconstruction in the next six months.

    Elliott B. Stonecipher, a political consultant and demographer from Shreveport, La., said that unless New Orleans built housing in flood-protected areas for low-income residents, and also provided support for poor people to relocate, chances were good that many low-income blacks would not return.

    "If they didn't have enough resources to get out before the storm," Mr. Stonecipher said, "how can we expect them to have the wherewithal to return?"

 

Visibility: Everyone
Tags: , , , ,
Posted: Jan 27, 2006 3:24pm

 

 
 
Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of Care2.com or its affiliates.

Author

Laura L.
female, age 108, single
Tampa, FL, USA
Shares by Type:
All (94) | Blog (4) | Alert (23) | Top 10 List (3) | Poll (1) | Message (63)

Showing shares tagged with: cats [show all]
SHARES FROM LAURA'S NETWORK
Dec
21
by Mark D.
(0 comments  |  discussions )
ExistenceI can remember being very young and looking at my hand trying to count the number of years I was alive.  I think I was seven, because I can see my one hand spread wide and my other hand holding open just two fingers.  Or perhaps I ...
by Road L.
(0 comments  |  discussions )
  It is an ungodly mess of errors, loopholes, and massive giveaways. When the American people find out what's actually  ;in this bill, they will revolt. Congress and President Obama have no choice but to do better for health care than...
Dec
20
by Mark D.
(0 comments  |  discussions )
      Jabbering I was talking to a friend this weekend about some issue that he was trying think through.  As we were exchanging ideas and I was saying something, his right eyebrow sudden went up and I laughed and said "what"....
Dec
18
by Mark D.
(0 comments  |  discussions )
      Heart to heart People come and go in our lives.  Some make a big impression and others don’t, some are loved, others not liked at all and many do not evoke any kind of response; they can be a neutral presence i...
by Road L.
(0 comments  |  discussions )
Please note news story at;  http://www.care2.com/news /member/901507364/1333901 THESE ARE FIGHTING WORDS--Keith Olbermann on Perversion of Health Care Bill US Politics & Gov't  (tags:&n bsp;healthcare, obam a, ethic...
(2 comments  |  discussions )
She calls to me from beyondout at the edge of the reefI can not join her thereor at least this is my beliefI would walk out at low tideand stand on the edgeI would talk to her thereas the water lapped at the edgeAs it rose higherI would retreat to the...
Dec
17
by Kat Y.
(7 comments  |  discussions )
PLEASE PASS THIS FORWARD - DECEMBER 16, 2009Once again, we are being threatened with a forced eviction due to the Department of the Interior/Bureau of Indian Affairs ineptness of actions to do anything to assist or protect our Tribe. The governments&...
by Road L.
(0 comments  |  discussions )
Joe Lieberman can only hold reform hostage if we let him video:http://www.youtube. com/watch?v=8vS6kIbJu64&a mp;feature=player_embedde d Tell President Obama and Congress not to let Joe Lieberman gut health care reform. We're counting on them to fig...
by Road L.
(0 comments  |  discussions )
Dear Friends, Copenhagen's last-ditch summit to stop catastrophic global warming isfailing; only massive public pressure can save it. Sign the giant petition below - it may be the largest in history:  With three days to go, t...
Dec
16
by Mark D.
(0 comments  |  0 discussions )
     Humpty DumptyI have some friends who could listen to music all day and with all the ipods and mp3’s around today it is easy enough to do. I often feel a little envy at that, this importance of music and their deep appeti...

Copyright © 2009 Care2.com, inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved