My five-year old students are learning to read. Yesterday one of them pointed at a picture in a zoo book and said,'Look at this! It's a frickin' elephant!'
I took a deep breath, then asked...'What did you call it?
'It's a frickin' elephant!It says so on the picture!'
Some of the greatest Animal Rights activists used to be hunters. Some of the most powerful members of our movement used to work in the meat industry. Most of us used to eat meat. We changed our ways because somebody showed us a different way of looking at things, not because they insulted us. That must be top of mind as we write letters. If we insult and alienate somebody who may have eventually, even years down the line, become a supporter, we vent our anger at the expense of the animals.
If you are writing a complaint to a show or publication whose stories you have enjoyed in the past, do not lose the opportunity to pay a compliment. Then, gently point out the current problem, making sure you tackle the issue, not the person or organization. Try to do it in a friendly manner. It is human nature to care more about pleasing a friend who has been wronged than an adversary. The reader of your letter is only human.
The reader of your letter is also busy. Keep notes short. Do not get sidetracked from your main point; save other points for future notes.
Use your spell-checker. Rightly or wrongly, people who can spell are assumed to be more intelligent, more educated, and are taken more seriously.
This page is headed "Email Etiquette" because email is preferable to standard mail when communicating with major media. The media function in real time. By the time the US post delivers your letter to the editor or station, the topic about which you are writing will be yesterday's news.
When writing a letter to the editor, always include your full name, address, and daytime telephone number. Most papers will call you, before printing, to confirm that it was you who sent the letter.
Never borrow phrases from DawnWatch alerts for use in your letters. And do not include sample letters if you forward DawnWatch alerts. While legislators, wishing to appease strong lobby groups, count the number of responses they receive in favor of pieces of legislation, the media wish to please their viewers and readers, not lobbyists. Some leading editors have stated that they avoid publishing letters that are clearly part of campaign. If you are tempted to include in your letter a phrase from an alert, you can be sure somebody else was attracted by the same phrase. The letters editor, having seen a phrase more than once, will spot a campaign and might decide to avoid the whole issue. Therefore please send short heartfelt notes written entirely in your own words.
DawnWatch keeps an eye mostly on major media in huge markets. You will have the most impact with your local media. Please respond to DawnWatch alerts, but consider this a training ground -- a place where you get in the habit of contacting the media. Then practice that habit in your local media world; your ability to influence it will surprise you.
Of foremost importance: be nice. Though the reputation of the Animal Rights community is improving, there is still some perception of Animal Right's activists as odd and angry. We need to change that perception for the sake of the animals. We must make sure that our letters are always rational, to the point, and preferably concerned rather than outraged. Anger tends to put people on the defensive whereas a friendly argument can get a decent hearing. We will be heard most clearly not when we are shouting loudest, but when we are communicating in such a way that people are willing to listen.
The public deserves to be told the full truth of who animals are and what is being done to them behind closed doors, as well as the catastrophic impact that the continuing consumption of meat, eggs, and dairy products will have on human health, wildlife and the environment. We will do all we can to uphold this public trust.
As animal advocates committed to compassion and justice, we will refuse to take part in the exploitation of others or to collaborate with those caught up in such injustice. We will do our best to present a clear and uncompromised message to the public, a sincere and respectful message that is free of cynicism and manipulation.
Recognizing that progress toward social justice is gradual and depends on more and more people becoming aware of the truth, we will do all we can to insure that each of the steps our culture takes is toward an accurate understanding of the ways animals are being harmed, and away from the false and misleading idea that the production of meat, eggs, and dairy products can be carried out without cruelty, violence, or injustice.
Recognizing that fostering cultural transformation requires a variety of creative approaches, we will support a broad range of nonviolent programs and initiatives that eliminate or reduce the use and killing of animals, as well as measures that reduce the level of abuse and agony experienced by animals being exploited for human purposes, provided such measures involve NONE of the following:
1. Offering a misleading or incomplete portrait of the confinement, social deprivation, mutilation, reproductive manipulation, indignity and premature death endured by animals being exploited for profit.
2. Minimizing or failing to reveal the full impact on human health, wildlife and our environment from the continuing production and consumption of animal-based foods.
3. Developing, endorsing, certifying and/or promoting any animal products, including those that are labeled as being "humane," "cruelty-free," "cage-free," "free range," "organic," "compassionate," etc.
4. Developing, endorsing, praising, applauding or promoting "new and improved" methods for using and killing animals.
5. Providing individuals or corporations with promotional or public relations benefits that have the effect of making the use and killing animals or the sale of any animal product more profitable or more socially acceptable.
Rachel Carson 1907 - 1964 Rachel Carson grew up on a small Pennsylvania farm, where she spent hours exploring the outdoors. She always loved books, and when she was young thought she would be a writer. Her first publication was at age 10, in a children's magazine.
She went to the Pennsylvania College for Women. A required course in biology made her change assumptions about her career: She majored in zoology, and then went to Johns Hopkins for a masters degree in genetics. After completing her degrees in 1932, she wrote science articles for newspapers and worked at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute. After her father's sudden death in 1935, she needed to find more regular work to help support her family. She was hired by the Bureau of Fisheries (later the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) in Washington, D.C. Her sister died in 1936, and Carson and her mother raised her two orphaned children. While working as a scientist-bureaucrat for the government, Carson continued writing. In 1941, she published Under the Sea-Wind, her first book. She was a quiet, private person, fascinated with the workings of nature from a scientific and aesthetic point of view.
Carson went on to write The Sea Around Us and The Edge of the Sea, and finally Silent Spring in 1962. Her science and nature writing was serialized in magazines, and she had a devoted following. The Sea Around Us won the National Book Award in 1951, and that year she received a Guggenheim Foundation Fellowship. She was able to retire in 1952, living off her writing. Her books brought her considerable fame, which she disliked but about which she maintained some humor. The fame was both positive and negative. In the wake of Silent Spring, which described the dangers of pesticides such as DDT and other chlorinated hydorcarbons, she was attacked personally and as a scientist by many -- such as chemical company representatives -- who had reason to fear her critiques. She mostly did not reply, but let the book speak for itself. In one interview, however, she was asked by someone making the link between pesticides and agricultural output, "Miss Carson, what do you eat?" And she replied, "Chlorinated hydrocarbons like everyone else." Despite innumerable personal tragedies while she was working on Silent Spring -- she was seriously ill, a niece died and left a young son whom she adopted, her mother died, and she learned she had cancer -- Carson produced a book that would take on a life of its own. It was a best-seller for a year and was translated into many languages. As Esquire magazine wrote, "The book that her efforts resulted in was about the spraying and what it did to the birds and other creatures. But that does not begin to describe its scope or account for its impact. One might just as well say that Darwin wrote about turtles and the Pacific islands where they were found." Carson died two years after Silent Spring was published, at age 56. "Those who dwell, as scientists or laymen, among the beauties of the earth are never alone or weary in life. . . . Those who contemplate the beauty of the earth find reserves of strength that will endure as long as life lasts." (from Sense of Wonder)"
Silent Spring"is published 1962"
Over increasingly large areas of the United States spring now comes unheralded by the return of birds, and the early mornings are strangely silent where once they were filled with the beauty of bird song." (from Silent Spring) Rachel Carson received a letter from a friend in Massachusetts in the summer of 1957. Her friend wrote that an airplane hired by the state had flown back and forth over her two acres of woods, spraying DDT to control mosquitos. The next day, there were dead songbirds in her yard. She contacted Carson, a biologist and author working for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, to find out what could be done to stop another spraying. Carson looked into the problem and was shocked by how extensive the pesticide situation was. She decided to write about it and let people know. DDT came into common use around 1939 (though invented in 1874), especially for insect control for the army during World War II. Two of Carson's colleagues had written of the dangers of DDT in the mid-1940s, but in scientific papers. Carson herself queried Reader's Digest at the time to see if they would run a story on the issue. They declined and Carson put the idea on the back burner. Until her friend's letter arrived. Carson spent much of 1958 to 1962 researching and writing the book that would be Silent Spring. She brought a rare trio of assets to this work: scientific training, dedication to research, and literary flair. The book starts with a fable of a lovely rural town that suddenly suffers blight, sickness, and death. Its people finally realize they had unwittingly poisoned themselves. Carson then presented scientific evidence that this was happening all over the country. She explained in plain terms how the strongest bugs survive, making stronger pesticides necessary, and that DDT, though scarce in the water, becomes concentrated as it works its way up the food chain -- from plankton to fish to birds and so on. Her message that humans cannot totally control nature, or eradicate species we don't like -- at least not without harmful side effectsÑcame through clearly. She advocated integrated management: using a minimum of chemicals combined with biological and cultural controls.
One chemical company tried to stop publication of the book before it went to press, threatening a law suit over facts. The publisher went ahead. The company did not sue, and in fact was found later to be one of the worst offenders in using and producing toxic chemicals. As Esquire magazine wrote, Silent Spring "made people think about the environment in a way they never had before. . . . Rachel Carson introduced to the general imagination the idea of ecology." Her book is often cited as the kick-off of the modern environmental movement. The year after its publication, President Kennedy set up an advisory committee on environmental matters. In 1969, Congress passed the National Environmental Policy Act and the National Cancer Institute announced its findings that DDT could produce cancer. By then, individual states had started to ban DDT use. In 1972, a federal ban was placed on the pesticide.
AAHF/HFF rarely asks you to take action on a bill BEFORE it is even introduced, but occasionally we come across a piece of legislation that we consider so horrendous that we must act before it is even introduced.Unfortunately, Senators Kennedy D/MA, Burr R/NC, and Roberts R/KS, among others are considering legislation that would severely restrict and possibly deny your access to critical medications.Act today to protect patient access to compounded medicines. Send your letters today to your Senators with a copy going to Senators Kennedy, Burr, and Roberts. About the Bill Just as everybody has a unique fingerprint, so is our response to various pharmaceuticals and other healing modalities.No reasonable person can expect a mass produced pharmaceutical to address all the subtle nuances of varying human physiology – but that is not stopping Big Pharma, the FDA, and Congress from trying to take away your right to individualized medicine.
If this legislation passes, federal regulators, not your doctor, will decide what medicines you can take.Do you really want to leave your customized medicine needs in the hands of bureaucrats in the government? We cannot stand idly by while our pharmacists and doctors are forced to become mere dispensers of a few heavily-advertised, one-size-fits-all pharmaceutical products.
Among other things, the so-called Safe Drug Compounding Act of 2007 would give the Food and Drug Administration the power to:
Broadly eliminate the availability of many critical, commonly compounded medications that many patients rely on, such as bioidentical hormones for women, hospice care treatments for the terminally ill and customized medicines for children.
Determine when compounded medicines are needed - a decision that has always been and should always be made by doctors.
Restrict the compounded medications your doctor can prescribe even if he or she determines you need them.
According to the Washington, D.C. political magazine Congressional Quarterly, pharmaceutical manufacturers are in “high lobby mode” in support of this legislation.From what we understand, hospitals are staying silent, anticipating that they will be exempt from this bill.We are working with doctor groups, compounding pharmacist organizations, consumer groups, and women associations among others, but it’s not enough.We are up against a highly organized, well-funded front and we need you to stop them.
A Sample of Those AffectedMenopausal women and andropausal men, the Autistic community, individuals living with HIV/AIDS, hospice patients, infants and young children with conditions like gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and people who are extremely allergic or sensitive to fillers, dyes, and additives in medicines will be left with no choice.
What can you do? If you or someone you know depends on compounded medications, act now to stop this dangerous legislation!
1. Write your elected representatives in Congress.Use AAFH’s easy-to-use tool to write your members of Congress.REMEMBER:It’s critical that you personalize your letter.Tell your own story.Tell them how you rely on compounded medicines and what your life would be like without them. 2. Tell a friend. Even if your friends and relatives don’t rely on compounded medicines themselves, they still have a loved one - you - who does.That’s their story to tell.Please encourage them to tell their representatives in Congress. 3. Tell more friends.The best weapon we have in this fight is you.You are involved in the patient/doctor relationship.Yours is the story that Congress cannot ignore.The more people we can get to unite in support of compounded medicines, the better our chances of winning will be. 4. Show your support with a financial contribution and/or join AAHF today.In order to do all the things that we will need to do over the next few months (and particularly the next few weeks), we need funds.This is an unexpected fight and we need to act fast and we have to think outside of the box!
5. Keep updated! Listen to our lobbyist, Dr. William Duncan on the Deborah Ray show on April 4th in the afternoon - find out more information or listen online at www.healthytalkradio.com.
Brenna Hill Executive Director Health Freedom Foundation and American Association for Health Freedom 4620 Lee Highway, Suite 210 Arlington, VA 22207 1.800.230.2762 Fax: 703.294.6380
Walk With Me If you have learned to walk A little more sure-footedly than I, Be patient with my stumbling then And know that only as I do my best and try May I attain the goal For which we both are striving. If through experience, your soul Has gained heights which I As yet in dim-lit vision see, Hold out your hand and point the way, Lest from its straightness I should stray, And walk a mile with me. From the book, Taking Time For Friends. The author is unknown
There was never a good war or a bad peace. Ben Franklin (1706-1790)
Peace cannot be achieved through violence, it can only be attained through understanding. Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803-1882) Peace is the marriage of the people and the planet, with all attendant vows. Anonymous
Cautions from
the Better Business
Bureau
Be Cautious About
Giving Info to Census
Workers!!!!
With the U.S. Census
process beginning, the
Better Business
Bureau
(BBB) advises p...
Waste Deep in Coal
Ash"Wondering
what is coal
ash? Interested in what
is being done about the
threat coal ash poses to
our drinking water
supplies?RSVP to our
online chat today!
Coal ash is the leftover
waste from coal-fired
power plants. ...
RawYou just keep going,
moving forward slowly,
hopefully, perhaps,
getting wiser and a
little bit better
everyday. Even if
it seems that all that is
being done is the
spinning of wheels.
Coffee, pastry, or cereal
in the ...
Mounting Debilities and
Deaths from H1N1 Vaccine
"Seriou
s side effects are now
being reported around the
world, from anaphylactic
shock, to sudden blood
pressure plunge, to death
-- causing a sense of
panic in those who got
the sh...