Alert: Planned Site Outage Tonight: Tue. July 28th, 9pm-Midnight PST
my care2
make a difference

community

shares

share your passions, stories, inspirations, and more

Jul 3, 2006
I'm leaving Care2 because I don't think they are playing a fair play, I posted an article under "Animals" " Long-Haul Birds 'returning Early'  this morning, 3hours later this one was posted and mine deleted>>>


  Long-Haul Birds 'Returning Early' visit site

Runningfo
Runningfox has received 152 new, 4072 total stars from Care2 membersRunningfox has been awarded 767 butterflies for taking action at Care2Runningfox has 200 Golden Notes.
- 4 hours ago - news.bbc.co.uk
Birds that migrate long distances have adapted to the world's changing climate in unexpected ways, a study shows.


Mine was excacly from the same source so I really don't understand why mine was deleted? is there a sort of discrimination because I'm from europe?? but the article was an european one....

Through the years I maked alot of friends and I'm sorry to leave them but I have my principles and I don't like beiing treath like this, not even from Care2/

Wish all my friends all the best for the future it was a honour to meet you.
May God Bless you all**

elisabeth¨*
Visibility: Everyone
Tags:
Posted: Jul 3, 2006 2:09am
Jun 26, 2006
Russia To Build Floating Nuclear Power Plant

By Ulrich Jaeger

Russia is constructing a floating nuclear power plant for remote regions that could provide energy for coastal cities. Environmentalists warn of a catastrophe at sea. And nuclear proliferation experts point out that the ship would use weapons-grade uranium to generate electricity.


A computer model of the world's first floating nuclear power station in Severodvinsk.
Zoom
A computer model of the world's first floating nuclear power station in Severodvinsk.

The concept is amazing. The new ship could be anchored along any coastline where there is no threat of a tsunami or hurricane. All local engineers have to do is attach a few cables and then the magic arrives: "the reactors are activated -- and there is light." Voilá, the world's mobile, boat-based nuclear reactor for the production of civilian power. That, at least, is how an enthusiastic Evgeny Kuzin, who works for the Russian utility company Malaya Energetika, pitches the ambitious project.

Last week the Russian nuclear energy company Rosenergoatom and the Sevmach military shipyard in Severodvinsk on the Arctic Sea signed a contract to build the world's first floating nuclear power plant. At a cost of €270 million, a 140 meter long by 30 meter wide ship will be fitted with two reactors on its keel. Combined they will produce 70 megawatts of electricity, almost a twentieth of that produced by land-based plants. The Severodvinsk nuclear ship is expected to go online in 2010, but that could be just the beginning. Countries including China, India, Indonesia and states in the Persian Gulf have apparently already expressed interest.

The Russians' plans promise a flexible solution to energy problems: The ship provides space for 55 crew members, a reactor control center and storage for nuclear fuel rods. However, tugboats will be required to bring the floating power plant to its site, as the 20,000 ton boat doesn't have its own engine. Russian experts claim that the ship could supply the energy needs for coastal cities with up to 200,000 residents.

But what may sound like a groundbreaking project triggers nightmares for international nuclear experts. The Norwegian environmental organization Bellona has described the project as an "absolutely sick idea." The Norwegians are backed by the environmental group Green Cross Russia. The organization's spokesman, Vladimir Kuznetsov, former head of the Russian nuclear regulatory agency, believes the floating plants are "a threat to the world's oceans and to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty."

Weapons-grade uranium



The problem is the fact that reactors of the KLT-40C variety are to be used on the ship. Plants of this type are also used to power Russia's nuclear-powered icebreakers. Sure the reactors would be modified for their use as energy suppliers, but that doesn't change their delicate, accident-prone design. The reactors are run using fuel rods, 40 percent of which consist of the easily fissionable Uranium 235. That type of uranium is weapons-grade and could be used to construct dozens of nuclear warheads. Soldiers would be needed to protect the ship from terrorists.

The operational safety is also far from certain. Although reactor accidents on board Russian ships are kept secret, information about several serious incidents on board nuclear-powered icebreakers have reached the West. On at least two occasions, nuclear meltdowns almost occurred on ships after there reactor cooling systems failed.

Because the plant will be cooled using sea water, a reactor incident could lead to the contamination of entire maritime regions. According to the Swedish nuclear expert Oddbjörn Sandervag, the effects of a normal tanker accident would be negligible in contrast.

The concept remains unconvincing economically, too. The price per kilowatt hour would be six cents, according to the project leader. Gas power plants produce energy for 2 cents. And that doesn't take into account the costs for insurance, security or the disposal of the nuclear ship after its estimated 40 years lifespan. Of course, cynics could easily point out that Moscow has a pretty effective system for getting rid of its rotting nuclear fleets: The disposal of the Russian nuclear submarines on the Artic Sea was paid for by neighbor Norway and the United States.



Visibility: Everyone
Tags:
Posted: Jun 26, 2006 8:38am
Jun 21, 2006
A large-scale genocide occurred during World War II. When the Nazis persecuted the Jews, they used the elderly and young Jewish people as human machines in their factories. At the beginning, the western world, including the United States, did not recognize this persecution. People of the west said they were waiting for additional evidence and the persecution was allowed to continue. During the 2 to 3 years that the world was waiting for additional evidence, an additional 2.5 million Jews were killed by the Nazis.

Accumulating evidence today supports the fact that doctors at Sujiatun hospital are currently harvesting healthy organs for transplant from living Falun Gong practitioners without their consent. Information provided from witnesses at the hospital, investigation reports of the World Organization for Investigating the Persecution of Falun Gong (WOIPFG) and investigative reports of the Epoch Times are among the pieces of evidence that large-scale live organ harvesting from healthy Falun Gong practitioners is occurring in China today.

Additional supporting evidence emerging after the two initial reports by the Epoch Times on this atrocity strongly suggests that the Sujiatun hospital is not the only facility in China at at which these illegal transplants occur.

These facilities and the brutal crimes against humanity committed within them are now being compared to the concentration camps of Nazi Germany. WOIPFG reports suggest that similar facilities for the harvesting of healthy organs from living Falun Gong practitioners now exist in the cities of at least 8 provinces in China.


Witness Escapes to the United States

The Epoch Times quickly realized that this crime was more than a just a standard news story. It was a large-scale genocide being committed by the state. It was a crime against humanity. The story exposed by the Epoch Times is beyond the scope of the imagination of any decent human being. It is an evil state of affairs that deserves investigation by the global community. The purpose of this report is to help insure the rescue of those Falun Gong practitioners still being detained as prisoners at these organ harvesting centers and throughout China.

Looking at different reports of supporting evidence in this case is like looking at an apple from different perspectives. People see evidence differently when viewed from different angles. No one yet has the ability to see the entire picture. Witnesses have repeatedly emphasized that the currently revealed facts are just the tip of the iceberg. It is natural that some readers may find it difficult to understand because some of the details have not yet been fully investigated.

One of the witnesses at Sujiatun is the ex-wife of a surgeon at the hospital. She has been evading the authorities for several years. Only after she finally escaped to the United States was she gradually able to step forward and tell her story. For her, the painful process of telling her story is also a process of getting rid of the fear of painful retribution by authorities from which she has suffered for all these years. We believe more facts and information will soon emerge in support of her account of the atrocities at Sujiatun.

Because the evil nature of removing healthy organs from living Falun Gong practitioners was very secretive, some reporting details may be incomplete. Faced with such atrocities, we hope that the public will understand if these first reports are unable to tell the whole story. The world should not allow these crimes to continue and grow worse while waiting for additional evidence to complete the investigation. Even if there is only a 1% possibility of reports being accurate, this crime against humanity deserves immediate global attention and investigation.


We Should Not Allow Crimes to Continue and Grow Worse While Waiting for Additional Evidence

On April 3, senior Canadian diplomat and China expert Brian MacAdam said: "The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) denied the existence of the Sujiatun Concentration Camp as expected." He said "One could find 2.1 million records when searching 'China denies' on Google." MacAdam gave several examples of past false denials by the CCP: "After taking control of China in 1949, the facts denied by the CCP include 1) the great famine during which 20 to 43 million citizens starved to death, 2) the system of re-education through labor, 3) the Tiananmen Square Massacre in 1989, 4) the SARS epidemic, 5) bird flu, and today 5) the harvest of healthy organs from Falun Gong practitioners for transplant to waiting patients." MacAdam pointedly noted that the first ones who denied the holocaust were the Nazis.

On March 27 (last week) Rudolph Vrba died in Vancouver. Vrba and Alfred Wetzler were two of the first Jews who managed to escape from the Auschwitz concentration camp in Poland. In April 1944, they had presented to the allies the first detailed reports of the extent of the holocaust in Europe including details of the atrocities committed at the Auschwitz concentration camp. MacAdam suggested that "Forgetting the past would make history repeat itself."

According to MacAdam, "As first-hand witnesses, Vrba and Alfred Wetzler had written a shocking and detailed report about the crimes against humanity and the human slaughter that had been committed at Auschwitz. However, at that time in history, many people did not believe that the report was accurate. As a result, the information in the report was suppressed. Subsequent to the release of this report, during the time between May 15 and July 7, 1944, an additional 437,000 innocent Jews were sent to the Auschwitz death camp.

MacAdam thinks that the world should not allow these current crimes against humanity in China to continue simply because we are waiting for additional supporting evidence. MacAdam recommended the Canadian government begin investigations immediately.


The Epoch Times replies to typical concerns raised about Sujiatun after interviewing again the witnesses to this atrocity:

1. According to witnesses, in 2001, about 6,000 Falun Gong practitioners were detained in the Sujiatun District, Shenyang City, Liaoning Province.

At the beginning, they were held in one-story houses in the back of the hospital. These houses were very simple—similar to those normally built for construction workers. These houses were later dismantled. The detained Falun Gong practitioners housed there were transferred to a new location.

Hospital staff members have reported that the Sujiatun hospital has a large underground basement area. Very few employees at Sujiatun hospital have permission to enter the underground structure. Hospital staff have suggested that the detained Falun Gong practitioners previously held in the one-story houses were transferred to these basement areas.

The estimate of there being 6,000 Falun Gong practitioners imprisoned at the hospital came from a hospital staff member who was in charge of logistics, supplies and procurement. This staff member had determined that the requisition of basic supply materials had suddenly increased in 2001. The number of patients implied by the requisitioned amounts was far above what would have been required to meet the needs of the officially registered patients at the hospital at that time. The 6,000 Falun Gong practitioners estimated to be imprisoned at Sujiatun at that time is based on these numbers. The actual number present may be higher or lower than this estimate. Some practitioners may have been transferred to other hospitals for harvesting of their organs for transplant at these other locations.

Witnesses from the hospital staff at Sujiatun described the overcrowding of imprisoned Falun Gong practitioners in the underground basement areas: "Everyone is squeezed together. Maybe there is no room after one comes back from the restroom."

Detained Falun Gong practitioners are reportedly numbered, just as the Jews were numbered in the concentration camps of Nazi Germany.

The estimate by the logistics staff member must be considered in the light of the regular situation of detention for Falun Gong practitioners. The consumption of food is one or two meals per day, rather than 3 meals per day. The conditions there are rather harsh.

2. There is an underground defense facility in the Sujiatun Area. (Please refer to The "Underground World" in Shenyang http://www.theepochtimes.com/news/6-4-4/40034.html for more details.) The Chinese official media publicized those facilities. The medical centers near the Sujiatun Hospital have harvested organs from living Falun Gong practitioners. These hospitals include but are not limited to:

The Shenyang No. 6 People's Hospital The Hospital Affiliated with the Liaoning Chinese Medicine Hospital The Shenyang Hospital of Infectious Disease

3. Currently, organ transplants are being performed in Chinese hospitals that do not meet the official standards for such procedures. According to official Chinese standards, only level 3 hospitals are qualified to perform organ transplants. However, the official Guangdong Satellite TV station reported in 2004 a case of a Hong Kong family seeking organ transplant in Guangzhou. The patient was scheduled for a kidney transplant at Yanling, a level 2 hospital. The transplant was performed by a plastic surgeon. The plastic surgeon had no previous training in urology or in performing a kidney transplant.

Quite a few hospitals in Shenyang indicate that they have live kidney sources. A few hospitals have confirmed that they use organs from Falun Gong practitioners. Please refer to details in the reports of WOIPFG. ( Investigative Report of Human Organ Harvesting from Living Abducted Falun Gong Practitioners at the Sujiatun Concentration Camp (Part II), March 30, 2006 )

The China International Transplantation Network Assistance Center at the Hui-Gong Street, Shenhe District, in Shenyang City announces on its English web site: "It may only take one week to find the suitable donor, the maximum time being one month because for a kidney transplant there needs to be an organ with a compatible HLA match".

In contrast, the average wait time for a matched kidney in the U.S. is 2 years.

The Tianjin Oriental Organ Transplantation Center, one of the largest transplantation centers in China shows its achievements (please refer to the graph below). It indicates that the number of organ transplantation cases sharply increased in the time period of 2001 to 2004. Medical professionals reason that their must be a large live organ bank in the Shenyang area considering that some organs have only 24 – 48 hours of survival time and that it takes only a short time to find matching organs.


The watermark says "our achievements."
4. The ex-wife says that her ex-husband sometimes performed 3 live organ removal operations per day when he was involved. Organ removal or live organ removal had been done by neighborhood hospitals as well. She estimates that 4,000 were killed in 3 years. Because of the CCP's policy of "not being accountable for killing Falun Gong practitioners," surgeons involved may be those without adequate experience or surgeons affiliated with other hospitals. The witness says that she often saw unknown doctors in the hospital who were affiliated with other hospitals.

5. Those who receive these organs are usually from Southeast Asian countries such as Japan. Some are from Australia and the U.S. Some patients have operations in Shenyang. Removed organs include not only kidneys and livers, but also skin, bone marrow, and corneas. Skin and corneas can be stored perpetually.

Recently, the Department of Health in Japan and Malaysia issued statements and asked China to investigate the death of their citizens after receiving organ transplantation in China. This may have happened because Chinese organ transplantation hasn't strictly followed medical standards. Some organs may be out-of-date.


Falun Gong Practitioners in the Rural Areas Are the Main Target

6. The Falun Gong practitioners detained in the Sujiatun Hospital were transferred from Dabei prison and other prisons. Many of such Falun Gong practitioners were peasants. They don't have any power in the society. They are easy to deceive. They come from all over China. The witness says that no Falun Gong practitioners who were sent to the hospital for organ removal came out of the hospital alive. About 4,000 people had been killed by the time she left the hospital in 2004. It was estimated that the number of detained Falun Gong practitioners had reduced to 2,000 at that time.

According to further information, Sujiatun is not the only facility performing live organ removals of Falun Gong practitioners. Other hospitals in Shenyang City perform similar illegal operations. Victims of live organ removals may come from the Liaoning Thrombus Treatment Center of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine. Eight provinces and cities have similar facilities (WOIFPG report). A Shenyang military zone doctor says that in the Jiutai Area in Jilin Province alone, more than 14,000 Falun Gong practitioners were detained.


About 700,000 Falun Gong Practitioners Appealed in Beijing around July, 2001

7. According to Minghui web site, from July 20, 1999 to July 2001, about 7 million Falun Gong practitioners went to Beijing to appeal. In the months around July 2001, many Falun Gong practitioners gathered in Beijing urban areas. 300,000 is estimated to be the peak number of practitioners staying in Beijing; if those staying in Beijing's suburbs is considered, the number rises to around 700,000. A 1998 Shanghai TV program reported before the persecution that 100 million Chinese were practicing Falun Gong.

In order to avoid their family/friends being persecuted because of them, the detained Falun Gong practitioners refused to submit their names and regions. The witnesses say that people detained there are called by numbers, not names.

8. Through investigation, the first witness to come forward, the TV journalist know as "Mr. R.," realized that all the victims are Falun Gong practitioners. The ex-wife of a surgeon said that every surgeon involved in the live organ removal scheme knew that the victims were Falun Gong practitioners. When the doctor asked if it would be murder since these people were alive, leaders in the Department of Health said no one would be accountable for the death of Falun Gong practitioners. This is helping to "cleanse" the nation. Detained Falun Gong practitioners are unidentified.


Why did crimes beginning in 2001 not be revealed until 2006?

9. This is a crime sponsored by the State. Witnesses indicate that participants in this scheme are health care professionals, correction officers, armed police, labor camp personnel and organ brokers, and the number is large. Even the doctors were carefully chosen. Usually they were orphans of communist army soldiers or people who have close ties with those in the scheme. Even the doctors who once participated in this scheme now face the danger of being killed for the sake of destroying evidence.

The surgeon who is the ex-husband of the staff member who came forward as a witness didn't want to continue his involvement. When he made this decision, he began to receive life-threatening phone calls. Once, he survived an assassination attempt. A few doctors disappeared without a trace. All participants are afraid of being killed. A few surgeons left China after having plastic surgery done.

In China, it is impossible to report such news. Even when an insider has decided to quit news outlets outside China may be reluctant to publish. Mr. R has met with several big mainstream media outlets in Japan. The reporters understood and believed his story was true, but they said that this article would not be published because of the relationship between Japan and China.


Everyone Should Help Stop These State-sponsored Crimes

Sixty years ago, fewer Jewish people would have been killed if more people had stepped forward in the name of justice and courage. At least, the extent of persecution would have not been that extensive. Our efforts today become so significant to those whose lives are in danger. But if we choose to keep silent about what the Chinese Communist Party has done and continues to do, or wait for more "hard evidence," the same tragedy from 60 years ago could become true today.

It is our obligation to stop these state-sponsored crimes.
http://www.theepochtimes.com/news/6-4-7/40196.html

Visibility: Everyone
Tags:
Posted: Jun 21, 2006 11:20pm
Jun 21, 2006
Meeting attendants in China now missing; American facilitator who set up meeting interrogated and deported
2006-5-29
A vice-president of the European Parliament returned last week from a three day investigation into human rights abuses in mainland China.  He is the first high-level western official to personally meet with persecuted Falun Gong practitioners inside China. The facilitator of the gathering, a Boston businessman and Falun Gong practitioner himself, was arrested and deported for "hosting an illegal meeting."
A Falun Gong practitioner holds up a banner protesting the persecution of the spiritual group in mainland China. Last week, vice-president of the European Parliament returned from a three day investigation into human rights abuses in mainland China.
Over the course of several days, Vice-President Edward McMillan-Scott met various Chinese diplomats, experts, and intellectuals. In the mid-1990s, as a member of the EU Committee on Foreign Affairs, McMillan-Scott investigated the Chinese Communist Party's political practices.

"Ten years later it saddens me to report that China remains a brutal, arbitrary, paranoid system in which free speech does not exist, in which freedom of thought is constrained, in which freedom of religion is severely curtailed, and where the process of reform, in political and social terms is, quite frankly, glacial," said McMillan-Scott at a Hong Kong press conference on Wednesday.

On May 21, McMillan-Scott held a secret meeting in a hotel with two Falun Gong practitioners from Beijing. They provided evidence of the persecution, including maps of detention centers and labor camps they had been sent to, receipts from the police showing how much money they were forced to pay for their release, and various documents their employers and relatives were forced to sign.

One Falun Gong practitioner said that while in a labor camp he had been forced to manufacture jade jewelry for export to Europe.

Both of them said they knew about the Chinese regime's practice of organ harvesting from live prisoners of conscience. One of them claimed to personally know a Falun Gong practitioner who had been killed this way.

"The experiences they relayed to me... leave me very, very saddened not just for them, but for anybody else in China who tries to adhere to a religion which is repressed by the regime," said McMillan-Scott.

Steve Gigliotti, who facilitated the meeting said, "In the middle of the meeting, the VP asked them, 'Are you risking your lives by being here today to talk to me?' And both practitioners without hesitation said yes."

Following the meeting, neither has been heard from.

One of them was even willing to have his face photographed to help expose how real the persecution is. Gigliotti said McMillan-Scott told him that the fact that the practitioner wanted to show his face showed him that he had nothing left to lose.

Shortly after leaving the meeting, Gigliotti was followed by plainclothes police, who pulled him into an unmarked car, pulled a hood over his head, and took him to a detention center and later a hotel room. He was interrogated for 26 hours, threatened, and deprived of sleep before being deported back to the U.S.

They searched him and his luggage, copied the hard drive from his laptop computer, and transcribed his cell phone address book. Gigliotti said he believes he was treated especially harshly by the police because he practices Falun Gong.

Gigliotti is not the first Western Falun Gong practitioner to be arrested in China. In November 2001, 35 Caucasian practitioners from around the world went to Tiananmen Square and held up a yellow banner that read "Truth-Compassion-Tolerance," Falun Gong's core principles. Within one minute they were surrounded by police vans. After being thrown inside the vans they were taken to a detention center and had their belongings confiscated. Many were beaten and several were injured. They were deported the next day.

In early 2002, a second group of approximately 120 practitioners from around the world gathered in Beijing to make a peaceful appeal. Nearly 100 of them were rounded up throughout the city, detained, and deported. One woman was held for a week in a Chinese jail.

China is the last large nation to be ruled by a one-party dictatorship. India, with 1.1 billion people, almost as many as China's 1.3 billion, has had a democracy since the time of Gandhi over half a century ago.

McMillan-Scott sees the current wave of resignations from the Communist Party as an important factor for the future development of China.

"[It's hard] really to know whether it is true that ten million people have torn up their Communist Party cards, but if they have, it's just not enough," he said at the press conference last week. "I would hope that a hundred percent of the current membership of the Communist Party of China would tear up their cards if they knew the truth."

McMillan hopes that human rights organizations around the world can unite to focus on China in advance of the 2008 Beijing Olympics.

He said, "It is after all the biggest and most repressive regime left on earth."

Source:www.theepochtimes.com/news/6-5-28/42032.html

Visibility: Everyone
Tags:
Posted: Jun 21, 2006 11:09pm
Jun 21, 2006
The horrors of the Sujiatun death camp were prefigured and made possible by the system of harvesting organs that has been present in China for two decades.

That system treats prisoners as raw material to be exploited for profit. It hopelessly confounds the roles of courts and doctors. Courts are given incentives by the transplant industry to schedule executions. Doctors become de facto members of the criminal justice system. Instead of having as their only priority healing the sick, doctors become assistants in executions.


The Beginning

According to traditional Chinese beliefs, only a whole body can go on to the next life. For this cultural reason, or because the Chinese Communist regime has never really tried to develop a system of voluntary organ donation, there are almost no voluntary donors of organs in China.

According to Professor Tsuyoshi Awaya of Tokuyama University in testimony given before the U.S. Congress in 1998, from the beginning organ transplants in China have depended on organs from executed prisoners.

In 1983 the immuno-suppressive drug cyclosporine was approved for use, greatly increasing the chances of successful transplant operations. Also in 1983, a series of "crackdown on crime" campaigns began, which resulted in a large increase in the number of executions of prisoners and thus a big supply of available organs.

These two developments provided the occasion for the birth of China's regime of organ harvesting.

In 1984 six agencies, including the Ministry of Health and the Ministry of Public Security, issued a secret directive that was published for the first time by Human Rights Watch: Asia in its report on "Organ Procurement and Judicial Execution in China." "Temporary Rules Concerning the Utilization of Corpses or Organs from the Corpses of Executed Criminals" continues to this day to govern the procedures for harvesting organs in China.


Secrecy

Organ harvesting involves collusion between security agencies and medical officials that the rest of the world considers grossly unethical, and the treatment of prisoners that is considered not only unethical but inhumane. Organ harvesting is therefore carried out in secrecy.

This directive stipulates that "The use of the corpses or organs of executed criminals must be kept strictly secret…"

In order to assure secrecy, "a surgical vehicle from the health department may be permitted to drive onto the execution grounds to remove the organs, but it is not permitted to use a vehicle bearing health department insignia or to wear white clothing. Guards must remain posted around the execution grounds while the operation for organ removal is going on."


"Consent Is Not an Issue."

A prisoner in Sheynyang, China who is about to be executed stands with police. On the top row of the placard around is neck is his crime. Below that is his name, which has been crossed out, indicating he has been sentenced to death. (AFP/Getty Images
This directive appears to protect the rights of the prisoners by assuring that organs may only be taken from them with consent. In fact, prisoners retain no rights to their own bodies.

According to the directive, organs may be used if any one of these conditions is met: "1. No one claims the body or the family refuses to claim the body; 2. The executed criminal has volunteered to have his corpse provided to a medical treatment or health unit for use; 3. The family consents to the use of the corpse."

These conditions are hardly strict. Even so, it is always the case in China that the rules as written down, even in secret documents, are not necessarily what counts.

A report in the South China Morning Post in January 2000 on liver transplants at Sun Yatsen Hospital in Guangzhou Province quoted one of the transplant doctors as saying "Consent is not an issue."

Indeed, when a death sentence is handed down, the convicted prisoner is also stripped of all political rights, which immediately nullifies the guarantees provided in the 1984 directive.

Harry Wu of the Laogai Foundation explained in testimony before the U.S. Congress in 1998, the time and location of executions are kept secret, which means the family has no opportunity to make a claim for the body. They are simply given the ashes after it has been cremated. Or, families may be offered "pennies" for consent, and, as a cadre told Wu, "see if they dare say 'no.'"

The prisoner may give consent, but under the extraordinarily coercive conditions on death row in a Chinese jail, the giving of free and informed consent is not possible. The prisoner may be offered a slightly less painful regime of confinement if he consents, and at the same time knows more brutal mistreatment may follow upon refusal.


The Execution

Dr. Wang Guoqi, in testimony before the U.S. Congress in 2001, described one execution gone wrong in which he skinned a prisoner who was still alive.

There are numerous accounts of organs being harvested from prisoners who are still living. In some cases, organs have been taken before the execution. In other cases, the execution by gunshot has been deliberately bungled to assure that organs are not damaged.

The use of lethal injection, which has been introduced in China over the last five years, may seem to be more humane than execution by gunshot. But it is also more sure—no organs are damaged by lethal injection. This method is preferred by China's transplant doctors.

The number of executions in China is considered a state secret. Amnesty International can verify 2,468 executions in China in 2001. It estimates the actual number of executions to be far higher, perhaps as many as 10,000 each year. Liu Renwen, a scholar at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, recently stated that he believed the number of executions each year to be around 8,000.

70 offenses in China may now incur the death penalty, including theft and embezzlement. Four men in China were recently executed for falsifying VAT tax reports. Among those executed each year are prisoners of conscience. Because of the widespread use of torture to coerce confessions, and the general failures of the criminal justice system, a large percentage of convictions are believed to be false.


Money

Organ transplants in China are big business. Visit http://www.bek-transplant.com/en/index.htm and one will find an English-language website set up to assist those seeking transplants in China.

Prices vary, but transplants do not come cheap. According to an article in the Daily Telegraph , a transplant middleman offered a kidney transplant for $40,000. In an article in the Globe and Mail , a middleman quotes a price of $125,000 for a new kidney.

In any case, the money by the transplant patients is spread widely. Once in China, the patients are expected to offer "red envelopes" of cash to all their doctors and nurses. Doctors involved in the transplant pay judges and bailiffs. Everyone profits, and everyone has a stake in keeping the system going.

Harry Wu in the introduction to "Communist Charity," the Laogai Foundation's report on organ harvesting, reflects on how this system could come into existence. "The materialistic philosophy of the Communist Party sees human life as coming from matter. They think life has no value. In their re-education camps some people became so hopeless they took their own lives. Then the official would say 'death only makes a piece of dirt smell.' During my 19 years in re-education camp, I heard this line innumerable times.

"If even life and freedom do not have any value, let alone the dead, and the organs of the dead, then this is the basic perspective of Chinese Communist regime's use of the organs of death row inmates."

By Stephen Gregory

Visibility: Everyone
Tags:
Posted: Jun 21, 2006 11:04pm
Jun 21, 2006
Thu 22 Jun 2006


THE world's leading scientists have issued a damning statement against the teaching of creationism in schools, arguing that denying the facts of evolution damages the development of children.

The national science academies of 67 countries, including the Royal Society, issued a joint statement warning that scientific evidence about the origins of life was being "concealed, denied, or confused" in many schools.


It added that teaching children about Darwinian evolution and the natural world was integral to protecting the planet.

The statement aims to present a united front against the teaching of creationism and intelligent design in schools in the United States, the UK and elsewhere.

Creationism argues that the origin of life on earth is recent and divine and that all forms of life have always existed in their present form.

Intelligent design, which has been called "thinly veiled" creationism, argues that some species are too complex to have evolved through natural selection and must therefore be the product of a "designer".

The statement says: " Knowledge of the natural world in which they live empowers people to meet human needs and protect the planet. [Life has] evolved in ways which paleontology and the modern biological sciences are describing and confirming with increasing precision."

It continues: "Within science courses taught in certain public systems of education, scientific evidence ... [is] being concealed, denied or confused with theories not testable by science."

The statement follows a long-running row over claims that one of Prime Minister Tony Blair's flagship city academies in the north-east of England, backed by Christian millionaire Sir Peter Vardy, is promoting creationism alongside conventional evolutionary scientific theory.

It also comes as a Times Higher Education Supplement investigation reveals that there are at least 14 academics in science departments at UK universities who consider themselves to be creationists. Creationism and intelligent design have been added to the curriculum at Leicester and Leeds Universities, although the universities say they will be presented as fallacies irreconcilable with scientific evidence.

Scientists in the US have also voiced concern over intelligent design being taught in American schools despite a recent federal court decision prohibiting its teaching in science classes.

A spokesman for the Royal Society said the diversity of signatories to the statement should dismiss claims that evolution is just a "theory" still debated among scientists.

He said: "With crucial international issues, it is important for scientists to express a collective voice in the political process.

"It may be a surprise to people that there is a such a strong consensus on evolution across these cultures and countries."

He added: "We hope this statement will help those who are attempting to uphold the rights of young people to have access to accurate scientific knowledge about the origins and evolution of life on Earth."

Al Nasr, a Berkshire-based Islamic education group which has published leaflets dismissing Charles Darwin's theories as false, said that the Koran provided an equally compelling argument for the origins of life.

A spokesman said: "Evolution is a theory. There are many scientific claims in the Koran - about geography and embryology for example - that are clearly correct and science cannot disprove them.

"So one has to believe [the Koran] has more weight when it comes to the origins of life than evolutionary theory."

Stephen Green, of Christian Voice, a British Christian lobby group, said: "I am encouraged that these guys feel rattled enough to issue this statement.

"It shows how worried they are that children are open to the idea that the complexity of the world around us cannot be explained by the evolutionary process and that the complexity of the world demands the considering of intelligent design.

"And to say that protecting the planet requires an understanding of Darwin is so far off.

"Christians are concerned for the environment and the planet. We are concerned because the planet and environment were created by God."

Facts of life

THE following is the joint statement concerning evolution from the Inter-Academy Panel on International Issues (IAP):

"We agree [on] the following evidence-based facts about the origins and evolution of the Earth and of life on this planet:

• In a universe that has evolved towards its present configuration for some 11 to 15 billion years, our Earth formed approximately 4.5 billion years ago.

• Since its formation, the Earth - its geology and its environments - has changed under the effect of numerous physical and chemical forces and continues to do so.

• Life appeared on Earth at least 2.5 billion years ago. The evolution, soon after, of photosynthetic organisms enabled, from at least 2 billion years ago, the slow transformation of the atmosphere to one containing substantial quantities of oxygen. In addition to the release of the oxygen that we breathe, the process of photosynthesis is the ultimate source of fixed energy and food upon which human life on the planet depends.

• Since its first appearance on Earth, life has taken many forms, all of which continue to evolve. Commonalities in the structure of the genetic code of all organisms living today, including humans, clearly indicate their common primordial origin."

EBEN HARRELL

Visibility: Everyone
Tags:
Posted: Jun 21, 2006 7:25pm
Jun 16, 2006

By Cahal Milmo

Published: 17 June 2006

As a show of British military finery, the Trooping of the Colour has had no equal for 258 years. Today, the Guards regiments will parade for the monarch and tourists in their spotless regalia, topped with their lustrous bearskins.

But as the Queen takes the salute to mark her 80th birthday celebrations this morning, some 4,000 miles away a group of hunters will be preparing to go into the dense woodlands of Canada and kill an Ursus americanus or Canadian black bear.

If the animal is fortunate, it will die quickly from a shot to the head before having its head and paws severed as trophies and the skin sold to a fur auctioneer. In the past five years alone, 494 of those pelts have been sold at a cost of £321,000 to a long-standing customer of the Canadian fur industry - the British Ministry of Defence.

Yesterday, the MoD - and by default the guardsmen who will stand to attention on Horse Guards Parade today - were accused by animal welfare campaigners of perpetuating the annual slaughter of 10,000 Canadian black bears, many of whom die in pain from botched kills by fee-paying trophy " sportsmen".

The Army confirmed yesterday it would continue to buy between 50 and 100 bearskins a year after it declared a trial to replace the distinctive headwear with hats fashioned from synthetic fur had failed because they got " waterlogged" on rainy days.

Senior officers complained that the man-made hats lacked the "life" and "bounce" of real bearskin - the focus of millions of tourist photographs every year and, as one MoD official put it, "as much an icon of Britishness as a red telephone box".

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (Peta), which has waged a three-year campaign to persuade the Army to switch to man-made bearskins and co-operated in the trial, said the MoD was engaging in a cynical "PR exercise" by insisting the synthetic hats were not fit for purpose.

The row has provoked an Early Day Motion signed by 175 MPs calling on the Army to switch to man-made bearskins.

Anita Singh, campaign co-ordinator for Peta, said: "The taxpayer should know that hundreds of thousands of pounds of public money is being spent to perpetuate this shameless slaughter.

"The MoD declared 20 years ago it was willing to switch to a synthetic fur. But, despite being an organisation with the resources to wage modern warfare, it seems incapable of sourcing a suitable man-made material. The result is the Labour Government, which banned fox hunting and fur farming in the UK, is indulging in a trade that inflicts terrible cruelty on wild animals solely for their skins. The MoD has blood on its hands."

The 16-inch high bearskins, worn by the soldiers of the five Guards regiments, have been part of British military uniform since the early 18th century. They are bought on behalf of the Army from unnamed licensed fur traders in Canada. The hats, fashioned from almost an entire bear pelt around a bamboo frame, are made in England by two military outfitters.

The MoD, which pays an average of £650 for a bearskin, said its requirement for fresh hats represented only a tiny proportion - between 0.5 per cent and 1 per cent - of the total number of Canadian black bears killed each year. It is refurbishing a large number of the existing 2,500 hats to reduce demand.

A spokesman said: "None of these bears are killed specifically to make the caps. They are the result of a controlled kill overseen by the Canadian authorities.

"We have made it clear for some time that if we could find an effective alternative to the bearskins we would use it. We are very aware of the sensitivities about the use of fur. But so far there has not been a synthetic fur which performs the task."

With an estimated population of one million, the Canadian black bear is not an endangered species and the annual kill of 10,000 is controlled by a licensing scheme under which hunters pay to kill one or two animals at a time.

The species is listed under Cites, the international register of protected species, to ensure it is not passed off as its endangered relative, the Asian brown bear.

But Peta, which says it has sourced a synthetic fur that does not retain water but the MoD refuses to submit it to an independent laboratory test, insisted the British Army was legitimising an unnecessary and often cruel sport.

Ms Singh said: "There is no official cull in Canada. This is a commercial enterprise in which the female bear, when it has cubs, is the most prized because her fur is thicker and glossier. The fur of the mother bear is used in the bearskins of Guards officers.

"When the mother bear is killed, all too often her young cubs are left to starve. So, for every bear killed, another two or three will also die. Bears are also badly injured and manage to escape only to die in agony."

The armed forces minister, Adam Ingram, this week insisted that the "manner" in which the bears were killed was a matter for the Canadian authorities.

As a show of British military finery, the Trooping of the Colour has had no equal for 258 years. Today, the Guards regiments will parade for the monarch and tourists in their spotless regalia, topped with their lustrous bearskins.

But as the Queen takes the salute to mark her 80th birthday celebrations this morning, some 4,000 miles away a group of hunters will be preparing to go into the dense woodlands of Canada and kill an Ursus americanus or Canadian black bear.

If the animal is fortunate, it will die quickly from a shot to the head before having its head and paws severed as trophies and the skin sold to a fur auctioneer. In the past five years alone, 494 of those pelts have been sold at a cost of £321,000 to a long-standing customer of the Canadian fur industry - the British Ministry of Defence.

Yesterday, the MoD - and by default the guardsmen who will stand to attention on Horse Guards Parade today - were accused by animal welfare campaigners of perpetuating the annual slaughter of 10,000 Canadian black bears, many of whom die in pain from botched kills by fee-paying trophy " sportsmen".

The Army confirmed yesterday it would continue to buy between 50 and 100 bearskins a year after it declared a trial to replace the distinctive headwear with hats fashioned from synthetic fur had failed because they got " waterlogged" on rainy days.

Senior officers complained that the man-made hats lacked the "life" and "bounce" of real bearskin - the focus of millions of tourist photographs every year and, as one MoD official put it, "as much an icon of Britishness as a red telephone box".

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (Peta), which has waged a three-year campaign to persuade the Army to switch to man-made bearskins and co-operated in the trial, said the MoD was engaging in a cynical "PR exercise" by insisting the synthetic hats were not fit for purpose.

The row has provoked an Early Day Motion signed by 175 MPs calling on the Army to switch to man-made bearskins.

Anita Singh, campaign co-ordinator for Peta, said: "The taxpayer should know that hundreds of thousands of pounds of public money is being spent to perpetuate this shameless slaughter.

"The MoD declared 20 years ago it was willing to switch to a synthetic fur. But, despite being an organisation with the resources to wage modern warfare, it seems incapable of sourcing a suitable man-made material. The result is the Labour Government, which banned fox hunting and fur farming in the UK, is indulging in a trade that inflicts terrible cruelty on wild animals solely for their skins. The MoD has blood on its hands."

The 16-inch high bearskins, worn by the soldiers of the five Guards regiments, have been part of British military uniform since the early 18th century. They are bought on behalf of the Army from unnamed licensed fur traders in Canada. The hats, fashioned from almost an entire bear pelt around a bamboo frame, are made in England by two military outfitters.

The MoD, which pays an average of £650 for a bearskin, said its requirement for fresh hats represented only a tiny proportion - between 0.5 per cent and 1 per cent - of the total number of Canadian black bears killed each year. It is refurbishing a large number of the existing 2,500 hats to reduce demand.

A spokesman said: "None of these bears are killed specifically to make the caps. They are the result of a controlled kill overseen by the Canadian authorities.

"We have made it clear for some time that if we could find an effective alternative to the bearskins we would use it. We are very aware of the sensitivities about the use of fur. But so far there has not been a synthetic fur which performs the task."

With an estimated population of one million, the Canadian black bear is not an endangered species and the annual kill of 10,000 is controlled by a licensing scheme under which hunters pay to kill one or two animals at a time.

The species is listed under Cites, the international register of protected species, to ensure it is not passed off as its endangered relative, the Asian brown bear.

But Peta, which says it has sourced a synthetic fur that does not retain water but the MoD refuses to submit it to an independent laboratory test, insisted the British Army was legitimising an unnecessary and often cruel sport.

Ms Singh said: "There is no official cull in Canada. This is a commercial enterprise in which the female bear, when it has cubs, is the most prized because her fur is thicker and glossier. The fur of the mother bear is used in the bearskins of Guards officers.

"When the mother bear is killed, all too often her young cubs are left to starve. So, for every bear killed, another two or three will also die. Bears are also badly injured and manage to escape only to die in agony."

The armed forces minister, Adam Ingram, this week insisted that the "manner" in which the bears were killed was a matter for the Canadian authorities.

Visibility: Everyone
Tags:
Posted: Jun 16, 2006 7:53pm
Jun 11, 2006
    
                       Congratulations  "Mexico"   YOU WON**
                       MEXICO - IRAN    3-1  Worldcup soccer In Germany
                       
                                         
Visibility: Everyone
Tags:
Posted: Jun 11, 2006 10:59am
Jun 11, 2006

The Faroese Whale Hunt

Faroese killing whales
Faroese islanders having fun
Whales are sensitive, social animals with highly developed nervous systems. They have a profound capacity to suffer distress, terror and pain.

Whales are sensitive, social animals with highly developed nervous systems. They have a profound capacity to suffer distress, terror and pain.
        Each year, the Faroese kill over 1500 pilot whales. The scenes of medieval cruelty are too shocking to be shown here.

        Whole families of whales - including pregnant mothers, lactating females, youngsters and foetuses - are butchered by the islanders. The whales die slow deaths, screaming in agony. Their killers are often drunk.

        Islanders in motorboats first drive the whales into a bay. The chase may be lengthy. The exhausted, terrified and confused whales are eventually driven into the shallows. Here the bloodbath begins. The islanders repeatedly hammer 2.2 kg metal gaffs into the living flesh of each whale until the hooks hold. A 15 cm knife is then used to slash through the blubber and flesh to the spinal column. Next the main blood vessels are severed. The blood-stained bay is soon filled with horribly mutilated and dying whales.

        The Faroese celebrate the butchery of their victims in an carnival atmosphere of entertainment. Indoctinated from an early age, children are often given a day off school to watch the fun. They run down to the bay and clamber over the carcasses of slaughtered whales.

Is the suffering inflicted by Faroese whaling ethically justified? Or is whale-killing an atrocity that has no place in any civilised society?

the society are trying to stop the traditional pilot whale hunting in the waters around the Faroe Islands, which is part of the state community with Denmark and Greenland.


http://www.campaign-whale.org/campaigns

http://www.campaign-whale.org/campaigns?PHPSESSID=6c20c74f5718fe471a0424f7241b8ab9



Visibility: Everyone
Tags:
Posted: Jun 11, 2006 7:45am
Jun 11, 2006
Sunday June 11, 2006

In the next 10 days, Japan's long campaign to end the hunting moratorium could pay off. As offers of aid sway poorer nations to side with pro-whalers, conservationists fear the tide is turning. Justin McCurry reports from Tokyo


It is early morning in Tokyo, and the narrow streets of Tsukiji fish market are already packed with shoppers inspecting the overnight catch. At this time of day they are spoilt for choice: salmon, crab, shrimps, enormous sides of tuna and enough dried fish to last a lifetime. Tucked away among row upon row of exquisitely fresh seafood are the telltale red and white slivers of flesh, presented, rather unattractively, in tightly sealed polythene bags: whale meat.
Within the next 10 days the pro-whaling nations of Japan, Norway and Iceland are expected to win control of the International Whaling Commission meeting on the Caribbean island of St Kitts and begin wholesale changes to the regulatory body that could, in the near future, see Tsukiji's ageing stalls once again creak under an abundance of whale meat.

The three whaling nations, which continue to hunt limited numbers of whales in the name of 'scientific research', believe they are closer than ever to securing 51 per cent of the votes among the IWC's 69 members.

To scrap the IWC's 1986 ban on commercial whaling they would need a three-quarters majority - both sides agree that that is unlikely to happen in St Kitts - but even a slim majority would mark the death knell of a ban that environmentalists hail as one of their greatest achievements.

Though they sense victory on St Kitts, pro-whalers in Japan attempted to play down the vote's significance. 'I don't think we can expect any major changes if Japan wins,' said Konomu Kubo of the Japan Whaling Association. 'Both camps have a similar number of countries on their side, so it really is too close to call at the moment. But I'm confident that the momentum is with the countries that want to get rid of the ban.'

In a last-ditch attempt to prevent that, anti-whaling nations have spent recent days lobbying smaller IWC nations to attend the 16-20 June meeting and make their voices heard. Leading the campaign is Australia, which has tried to stop Japanese whaling fleets from operating in the South Pacific and the Southern Ocean.

The environment minister, Ian Campbell, recently led delegations to Kiribati, the Marshall Islands and Vanuatu to urge them to fend off any overtures from Japan. 'This year's IWC vote is crunch time for the survival of whales and every vote will be critical,' he said.

'Should the vote go the way of the whalers... this will raise interest to levels I haven't seen since the 1970s. The outrage that will surge up around the world will force a lot of public attention on those key votes.' Days later, the Marshall Islands joined the IWC and indicated they would vote with Japan.

The future of the 20-year-old ban appears shakier than ever, despite its success in forcing pro-whaling nations to largely leave whales alone to recover after hundreds of years of hunting that took them to the brink of extinction. Between 1904 and 1986 about 2 million whales were killed in the southern hemisphere alone. By the early 1980s, unregulated whaling had reduced the number of humpback and grey whales by an estimated 98 per cent.

Whaling countries began scientific hunts the year after the ban went into effect, but catches continued to drop every year for a decade, reaching a low of 731 in 1994. The number of minke whales is estimated at several hundred thousand.

Now the tide is turning again. A loophole in IWC regulations allows pro-whaling countries to hunt about 2,000 whales a year in the name of scientific research. When the 'research' is done, the meat is packed and sold in Japanese restaurants and supermarkets.

Last year about 1,300 whales were killed during scientific hunts, and early this year whaling fleets returned with more than 2,100. Norway's cull of 1,052 minke whales in the North Atlantic this year was its highest since the ban went into effect. Japan, meanwhile, returned from the Southern Ocean whale sanctuary with 850 minke whales - twice the previous season's take - as well as 10 fin whales, a species listed as endangered. Only last week a Japanese fleet left for the northwest Pacific, where it hopes to catch 260 minke whales.

But if Japan and its allies win a majority in St Kitts they will have the mandate they need to use the way the IWC operates to their advantage. Campaigners fear their first step would be to end the observer status of Greenpeace and other environmental groups. The pro-whalers would also be able to abolish the commission's conservation committee and introduce secret ballots, allowing smaller countries to vote with Japan without fear of upsetting aid donors such as the US.

Last year Japan came tantalisingly close to achieving a majority, only to be let down by poorer member countries that either failed to turn up at the meeting in South Korea or were barred from voting because they had not paid their fees.

Tokyo has gone to extraordinary lengths to prevent a repeat of the debacle. Last month the foreign ministry convened a secret meeting of pro-whaling countries to discuss tactics ahead of the IWC meeting. An official in the ministry's whaling division denied that aid packages had been discussed, but conceded that the parties had agreed on 'logistics' to ensure that poorer Pacific and African nations made the journey to St Kitts.

Since 1998, Japan has persuaded 19 new countries to join the IWC, but it rebuts claims that it has done so by dangling generous aid packages in front of desperately poor countries in Africa, the Caribbean and the Pacific.

Japan has increased aid to Belize, Mali and other countries that have recently joined the IWC but have yet to vote. Earlier this year it pledged more than $1m to the Pacific island of Tuvalu, a pro-whaling IWC member, and has reached similar deals with Nauru and Kiribati and other impoverished Pacific islands.

But even if commercial whaling resumes, Japan's whale hunters cannot be sure there will be demand for their catch back home: their compatriots appear to have lost their appetite for the oily, chewy flesh.

'Consumption is decreasing and stock is increasing,' said Junichi Sato, campaign director of Greenpeace Japan. 'Coastal regions once had a tradition of limited local whaling, but we never used to send fleets of ships out to the Southern Ocean. It is pretty obvious that whaling is no longer a part of our culture.'

A 2002 survey conducted by the Asahi Shimbun newspaper found that only 4 per cent of respondents ate whale meat 'sometimes' and 9 per cent 'infrequently'. By contrast, 86 per cent said they had never eaten the meat or had stopped doing so in childhood.

'The only time one hears news of whale meat selling out is when it is given away for free in whale soup at some event,' Junko Sakuma, a former Greenpeace official turned freelance writer, said. 'Despite this, there are plans to substantially increase production. Really? Will the meat actually sell?'

Officials in Tokyo have started playing up whale meat's part in the traditional Japanese diet, hailing it as a healthy, low-fat alternative to meat. Last month the government set up a company that will market the meat to schools, hospitals and family restaurants in a bid to boost consumption and reduce stockpiles.

Conservationists attribute whale meat's near disappearance from Japanese dinner tables to a combination of changing diet and sensitivity about eating an animal that leaves much of the rest of the world in awe. Such is the sensitivity surrounding whale cuisine that the Women's Forum for Fish, a Tokyo-based circle that promotes whale cuisine, refused to discuss its activities when approached by The Observer.

Faced with the embarrassing prospect of primary schoolchildren turning up their collective nose at what was once an important part of the traditional diet, Japanese whaling officials have turned to children for help. Last year, schoolchildren in Wakayama prefecture, the home of the Japanese whaling industry, were give deep-fried whale meat in their school lunches, and there are plans to extend the school meals programme to other areas.

'It will be difficult to increase consumption because young people aren't interested in eating whale meat,' said Nanami Kurasawa, director-general of the Dolphin and Whale Action network.

'Most Japanese don't like to talk about whaling, but they also believe the government line that whales are responsible for decimating fish stocks. But it is people, not whales, who are responsible for eating too much fish.'

The whaling lobby counters that whale meat consumption has slumped as a direct result of the IWC ban. 'It means that the amount of meat on the market dropped, and the price went up,' said Kubo. 'People can no longer cook whale meat at home - that's why consumption is down. If it cost the same as other types of fish and meat, I am sure consumption would rise again.

'Because the meat available now comes from scientific hunts, it isn't freely available. Its sale is limited by all sorts of red tape, so the price just keeps going up.'

This week's meeting is certain to be one of the most acrimonious since the IWC was formed in 1946. Whaling officials in Tokyo have repeated their threat to leave the body and set up a rival, pro-whaling organisation should it fail to win a majority. 'If things go on like this,' said Hideki Moronuki, head of the whaling section at the Fisheries Agency, 'there's definitely the danger that voices asking whether the IWC is needed will increase.'

Wonder beneath the waves

· Sperm whales dive as deep as two miles below the sea surface and stay down for up to an hour and a half. Their brains can weigh up to 20lbs, the largest of any creature, and they sleep upside down, with their heads pointing towards the bottom of the ocean.

· Blue whales grow to more than 100ft long, six times bigger than a brontosaurus. A blue whale has a heart the size of a Volkswagen Beetle. A newborn is around 20ft long and drinks 50-150 gallons of milk a day, adding about 8lbs to its body weight an hour.

· Humpback whales sing 'love songs'. In the mating season, the males sing to the females. Those who sing longest are most successful.

· It's difficult to tell the sex of a whale on sight. Its penis is called a dork, which has become a term of abuse in some parts of the world.

· Killer whales have such a good sense of touch that if you dropped a pill into a bucket of fish and fed it to one, it could eat the fish and spit out the pill.

· The 'strapped toothed' whale is named for the two teeth in its bottom jaw which 'strap' the upper jaw, preventing it from opening very much. How these animals eat is not known, but one theory is that they stun their prey with high intensity sound.

· Whales use layers of water in the sea to communicate with each other over long distances. Fin whales talk to each other while 2,000 miles apart.

· Most whales have five fingers in their flippers.

· Whale products included animal feed, industrial oils, fertiliser, perfume, soap, shampoo and margarine. George Washington's false teeth were made of whalebone.

· Whaling fleets are equipped with sonar, helicopters and long-range explosive harpoons. The whale is killed by a 6ft long iron harpoon shot from a cannon. The harpoon head contains a time-fuse grenade which blows the whale's insides apart seconds after impact, though this does not usually kill it immediately.

· In the 1930-31 hunting season 30,000 blue whales were killed. By the Fifties the species had practically disappeared.




Visibility: Everyone
Tags:
Posted: Jun 11, 2006 7:37am

 

 Next >
 
Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of Care2.com or its affiliates.

Author

,

Shares by Type:
All (387) | Blog (387)
SHARES FROM 'S NETWORK
No shares

Copyright © 2009 Care2.com, inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved