A Green Road Blog 

Newsweek recently reported that the nation's biggest phone companies, "working closely with the White House, have mounted a secretive lobbying campaign to get Congress to quickly approve a measure wiping out all private lawsuits against them" for helping the Bush administration illegally wiretap innocent Americans.¹

Yesterday, President Bush weighed in publicly, promising to veto an upcoming bill dealing with our nation's wiretapping policy if it doesn't give corporations retroactive immunity for their lawbreaking.²

Pending lawsuits could be the only way Americans ever find out how far Bush went in breaking the law—Bush's threat yesterday is an attempted cover-up.³

Some Democrats like Sen. Russ Feingold immediately said no to Bush.⁴ But House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer said retroactive immunity "is not off the table."⁵

Can you call your Congressman  today? Tell him to oppose retroactive immunity for phone companies' lawbreaking.

Yesterday, the American Civil Liberties Union summed up the situation well:

Why is the president of the United States trying to get the telecommunications companies off the hook for their illegal activity? He is supposed to be upholding laws, not encouraging companies to break them. Businesses that break the law should be held accountable. We expect these companies to keep our personal information private, and if they break the law, there should be consequences—not a re-write of the rule book.⁶

After September 11, the Bush Administration began working with phone companies to monitor the private phone calls and emails of millions of ordinary Americans without legally-required warrants. A former AT&T employee says the company even let the government set up shop right in their office—a charge AT&T has refused to confirm or deny.⁷

Since then, lawsuits have been filed against these companies for breaking the law—and these suits could allow facts to surface that the Bush administration has so far refused to give Congress. Retroactive immunity for phone company lawbreaking could prevent the truth from ever coming out.

That's why we need lots of members of Congress to oppose the idea of letting these phone companies off the hook for past lawbreaking. Can you call or email your Rep?

Thanks for all you do.

–Nita, Adam G., Justin, Natalie and the MoveOn.org Political Action Team
  Thursday, October 11th, 2007

Sources:

1. "Case Dismissed? The secret lobbying campaign your phone company doesn't want you to know about," Newsweek, September 20, 2007
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20884696/site/newsweek/page/0/

2. "Wiretap laws face new static," ZDNet News, October 10, 2007
http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9588_22-6212777.html

3. "Congress Stand Firm: America Deserves A Legal Decision on Warrantless Wiretapping," Electronic Frontier Foundation, October 10, 2007
http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/archives/005480.php#005480

4. "Statement of U.S. Senator Russ Feingold In Response to the President's Remarks on FISA," October 10, 2007
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=3046&id=11365-8424909-Fj_QDQ&t=4

5. "Wiretap laws face new static," ZDNet News, October 10, 2007
http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9588_22-6212777.html

6. "ACLU Response to President Bush's Request for Telecom Amnesty, Civil Liberties Group Lauds House Committee Vote to Reject Telecom Immunity," ACLU Press Release, October 10, 2007
http://www.aclu.org/safefree/general/32138prs20071010.html

7. "Wiretap laws face new static," ZDNet News, October 10, 2007
http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9588_22-6212777.html

Time:  Doors open at 4:30 pm for English tea
Program begins at 5:00 pm
Place:  Elim Lutheran Church
Baker & Stanley, Petaluma
504 Baker Street, Petaluma, CA 94952

Directions: From 101, go west on Washington St., left onto Howard, right onto Stanley to Baker.