Wayne Adkins knows who he is, even if the federal government doesn't.
The soft-spoken assistant chief of Virginia's Chickahominy Indian Tribe can recount the history of his people — how the past 400 years have been filled with displacement and discrimination, how some say the state once tried to eradicate records of their existence and how all of this happened despite their efforts to help America's first settlers survive.
In May of 1607, Capt. John Smith landed at Jamestown. Six months later, he came to the Chickahominy hoping to trade corn.
"It was probably fortunate for him, because we were known for being great growers of corn anyway," Mr. Adkins said.
That history is a driving force behind the decade-long efforts of the Chickahominy and five other tribes to gain federal recognition through congressional legislation. The status would grant them access to millions of dollars in funding and grants that could increase educational opportunities and provide greater health benefits for tribal members.
But in a time of billion-dollar federal bailouts, many Virginia Indians say money isn't what their quest is about.
"It means that the struggles that we've gone through and the difficulties we've had over 400 years, it means something," said Chief Ken Adams of the Upper Mattaponi Tribe, based in King William County. "We have never shied away from our responsibility to this country, and this country needs to live up to its responsibility to us — and put it on paper."
'A matter of pride'
The effort of the Chickahominy, Chickahominy Eastern Division, Nansemond, Rappahannock and Upper Mattaponi tribes, along with the Monacan Indian Nation, has been led by Rep. James P. Moran and championed by other state leaders, including Sen. Jim Webb and Gov. Tim Kaine.
Mr. Moran, a Democrat, initially introduced legislation granting the tribes federal recognition in 1999 but was unsuccessful then and in subsequent sessions of Congress.
Last year, a version of the legislation passed the House — the first time it had cleared a congressional chamber — but died after a September hearing before the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs, though chairman Sen. Byron Dorgan said then that he hoped the committee would "take action" early in 2009.
Progress on the bill this year has been steady so far, if not swift. Mr. Moran again introduced the legislation March 9, and the bill was heard by the House Committee on Natural Resources nine days later.
The committee unanimously voted to pass the bill April 22, clearing the way for it to be sent to the House floor.
"Frankly, it's a matter of pride. And pride is the greatest motivator really," Mr. Moran told The Washington Times. "You want to be recognized. It's a legacy they want to leave for their children and grandchildren."
Mr. Webb introduced the Senate's version of Mr. Moran's bill in 2008. A spokeswoman for Virginia's senior senator said members of Mr. Webb's office in February accompanied Mr. Dorgan's committee staff on visits to the tribal grounds of those seeking recognition.
"Our office continues to work with the committee to lay the groundwork in preparation for introduction of the federal recognition legislation in the Senate," Webb spokeswoman Jessica Smith said.
The recent legislative progress has bred optimism among members of the affected tribes, although they remain cautious — perhaps because of the pace of a government battling other priorities, or perhaps because their history has taught them the pitfalls of trusting too much.
Mr. Adkins said his tribe — allies of the paramount chief Powhatan, whose daughter, Pocahontas, married Virginia tobacco pioneer John Rolfe — signed its last treaty with the local colonists in 1677.
Through the years, colonial expansion and trading led to lost homeland, until the Chickahominy began to migrate back to their current location, based in Providence Forge halfway between Richmond and Williamsburg.
More recently, in the halls of Congress, the possibility that the tribes were seeking federal recognition to make a foray into the gambling industry led to concerns from lawmakers like Rep. Frank Wolf and former Sen. John Warner, Virginia Republicans.
The bill now prohibits the tribes from entering the gaming industry, Mr. Moran said. Mr. Wolf said he cautiously supports the measure but is worried about what may happen regarding gambling if the bill reaches a conference committee.
"I will vote for it, although I am worried that there'll be a bait and switch," Mr. Wolf told The Times. Mr. Adkins said that worry always has been irrelevant for groups that consider themselves deeply religious. Across from the Chickahominy Tribal Center in Providence Forge is a red-brick Baptist church that at one time housed an Indian school and now has more than 200 members.
"I know we're in a better position than we've ever been in, but there's always something out there that could trip us up," Mr. Adkins said of the pending legislation.
The preferred method
There isn't a single route to earning federal recognition: Of the 562 federally recognized tribes in the United States, a vast majority have gained the status through past treaties with the American government, the passage of a statute or the issuance of an executive order.
However, in 1978, the Department of the Interior set up what some see as the preferred process for tribes to gain recognized status, in order "to acknowledge that a government-to-government relationship exists between the United States and tribes which have existed since first contact with non-Indians," according to a 1997 document of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, which is in charge of the process.
"There had to be some kind of accountability if there was a system set up where members of an Indian tribe were to benefit," said Lee Fleming, head of the Office of Federal Acknowledgment within the bureau and a member of the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma. "It's a process that requires documentation so that an informed decision can be made regarding these groups."
The bureau's process requires tribes to meet a list of seven stringent criteria that mandates they validate their existence throughout American history with extensive documentation like birth records, marriage licenses, membership lists and censuses. Other areas of proof can include records tied to individual tribal members, like a family Bible.
The tribes submit such evidence to the acknowledgment office, which works to validate the claims and make a final determination through a process that involves technical review and is subject to appeal.
On average, it takes roughly eight years for tribes to fully develop their petition for federal acknowledgment and nearly five years for the office to make a decision, according to data analysis by the Government Accountability Office.
The data-gathering process can cost $830,000 annually, according to 2006 data published in the Federal Register.Since its inception, the Department of the Interior has granted acknowledgment to 16 tribes and denied it to 28 others.
Some of the tribes included in the Moran bill have at least started the executive branch process. But members say they have been discouraged by the time frame for completion and the costs involved in producing the required research.
"That is a time-consuming process. And some people will say that's none of their business," Chief Adams said. "If every person in the U.S. were forced to submit their genealogies to the federal government, there would be an uprising. But it's OK to force the Indians to do it."
The Virginia tribes also refer to what Mr. Moran and others refer to as a "paper genocide." In 1924, the state passed the Racial Integrity Act, which officials have said forced Indians to identify themselves as "colored" and led to the destruction and alteration of genealogical records.
The effort was led by Walter Plecker, the first registrar of Virginia's Bureau of Vital Statistics, and has been cited by the tribes' advocates as a main obstacle to their pursuit of recognition through the executive process.
"That's why they have a particularly difficult task of meeting the BIA requirements," Mr. Moran said.
But Mr. Fleming points to more than 20 tribal records sent to his office — including birth certificates signed by Plecker himself — that show "Indian" designated on the document.
"These records were not destroyed, and this is just a scratch of the surface," Mr. Fleming said. "It just is an example of how the objective factual information has greater weight than subjective statements that aren't backed by documents."
Mr. Adkins said the records were only a small sampling of the roughly 4,000 members in the six tribes. Still, Mr. Fleming stressed the importance of a process that provides evidence for claims that could be a gateway to millions of dollars in funding.
For example, Malcolm Webber, a man known also as Grand Chief Thunderbird IV, was sentenced last year after enlisting illegal immigrants to join his tribe and defrauding them of hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Webber had previously tried to gain federal recognition for a tribe through the bureau's process, but was denied.
Mr. Fleming also pointed to a forged 1845 census of New York Indians, and the creation of a fictitious diary and altered death certificate. With federal recognition providing some groups with a gateway into the gambling industry, Mr. Fleming said the need for vigilance is paramount.
"This is an important cause," he said. "But it is something that needs to be based on the documentation and not on emotion, not on guilt."
A means to an end
The effect of achieving federal recognition likely would not be seen right away among the Virginia tribes, and it could create the added burden of finding qualified people to help write grants and facilitate the funding application process.
But it would provide a foundation for what tribal members see as longer-term success.
At a March conference of the Virginia Council on Indians held at the Chickahominy Tribal Center in Providence Forge, Sharon Bryant — a member of the Monacan Indian Nation's tribal council — discussed how she helped form an economic development committee to invest in tribal businesses.
One of the ventures simply involves stocking a convenience store, but portions of the proceeds go back to the tribe in small increments. Access to additional grants could create other opportunities for tribes to benefit themselves, Ms. Bryant said.
"I'm hoping that there would be access to grants and programs … to encourage people to live their dreams," she said.
Tribal members also could become eligible for homeowner's assistance, said Dana Martin Johnson, a law professor at the University of Richmond, former Virginia assistant attorney general and a member of the Sappony Tribe of North Carolina.
"It gives them so many more opportunities — even things like the trickle-down effect," she said.
Other options the tribes could explore with the aid of federal recognition include health clinics, community centers and the relative luxury of having paid employees work for their respective governments.
They are things that can be taken for granted by the average American citizen, even though many tribal members live precisely the same way.
"It's hard to explain to people sometimes who say, 'How are you different? You drive a car, live in a house, go to work,'" Mr. Adkins said. "It's more an internal thing I guess, and the sense of community we have with each other, our common heritage. That's something people can't necessarily see."
The recognition effort comes back to that sense of pride — a reverence for ties rooted in a unique heritage that gradually have become part of an even larger history.
In the small brick schoolhouse in King William that now serves as the tribal center for the Upper Mattaponi, Chief Adams points to a board listing the many tribal members who have served in the U.S. military.
More than 20 members of the Eastern Chickahominy alone have served in the military since World War I, Chief Gene Adkins said.
It is for those past and future members that federal recognition has become an intrinsic end for the tribes: To be recognized is a goal in and of itself.
"It's something that I really would like to see happen as a sign of respect," said Lee Lovelace, a member of the Upper Mattaponi and a Virginia Tech student. "From that there will be opportunities … but I think that the No. 1 thing is to recognize that we're here and a living, breathing race."
To most American Indians it is absolutely abhorrent for a professional football team to use the color of their skin as their team mascot. As a matter of fact, we oftentimes refer to the mascot of the Washington professional football team as the R word because to us it is as hideous as the N word is to African Americans. The use of an Indian name in and of itself for mascots is not offensive, but it is what the fans (short for fanatic) do with it that is reprehensible. When they paint their faces, stick turkey feathers in their hair, and do those awful Hollywood chants, it then starts to become insulting and racist to Native Americans. Imagine if you will a team with a mascot called the Zulus. Would African Americans be offended if the white fans painted their faces black, put Afro wigs on their heads, and waved spears in the air while chanting their perception of African war songs? Why name teams for the color of a people's skin - "Redskins?" Why not a mascot for the Blackskins, Brownskins or Yellow Skins? At one Washington Redskin football game the fans painted a pig red, put feathers on its head, and ran it around the football field. What if they had painted it black, put an Afro wig on its head, and then chased it around the football field. Would the African American fans consider this an honor? If the sports fans want to honor Native Americans, honor our treaties. You do not honor us by making us mascots for America's fun and games. In fact, just the opposite is true. If the fans of these teams choose to honor these symbols for their sports teams, so be it. But when they take real life American Indians and turn them into cartoon caricatures and then mimic them by painting their faces, donning feathers, and doing the tomahawk chop, they cross that thin line called racism.
Please sign and share this petition with everyone you know we need to build HUGE signature base so we can take this petition to washington DC!!!!!!!!! This matter is so important to all Indian People PLEASE support or efforts.
Human Rights NETWORK! American Indians need your help!
To most American Indians it is absolutely abhorrent for a professional football team to use the color of their skin as their team mascot. As a matter of fact, we oftentimes refer to the mascot of the Washington professional football team as the R word because to us it is as hideous as the N word is to African Americans. The use of an Indian name in and of itself for mascots is not offensive, but it is what the fans (short for fanatic) do with it that is reprehensible. When they paint their faces, stick turkey feathers in their hair, and do those awful Hollywood chants, it then starts to become insulting and racist to Native Americans. Imagine if you will a team with a mascot called the Zulus. Would African Americans be offended if the white fans painted their faces black, put Afro wigs on their heads, and waved spears in the air while chanting their perception of African war songs? Why name teams for the color of a people's skin - "Redskins?" Why not a mascot for the Blackskins, Brownskins or Yellow Skins? At one Washington Redskin football game the fans painted a pig red, put feathers on its head, and ran it around the football field. What if they had painted it black, put an Afro wig on its head, and then chased it around the football field. Would the African American fans consider this an honor? If the sports fans want to honor Native Americans, honor our treaties. You do not honor us by making us mascots for America's fun and games. In fact, just the opposite is true. If the fans of these teams choose to honor these symbols for their sports teams, so be it. But when they take real life American Indians and turn them into cartoon caricatures and then mimic them by painting their faces, donning feathers, and doing the tomahawk chop, they cross that thin line called racism.
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/3/american-indians-are-not-mascots To most American Indians it is absolutely abhorrent for a professional football team to use the color of their skin as their team mascot. As a matter of fact, we oftentimes refer to the mascot of the Washington professional football team as the R word because to us it is as hideous as the N word is to African Americans. The use of an Indian name in and of itself for mascots is not offensive, but it is what the fans (short for fanatic) do with it that is reprehensible. When they paint their faces, stick turkey feathers in their hair, and do those awful Hollywood chants, it then starts to become insulting and racist to Native Americans. Imagine if you will a team with a mascot called the Zulus. Would African Americans be offended if the white fans painted their faces black, put Afro wigs on their heads, and waved spears in the air while chanting their perception of African war songs? Why name teams for the color of a people's skin - "Redskins?" Why not a mascot for the Blackskins, Brownskins or Yellow Skins? At one Washington Redskin football game the fans painted a pig red, put feathers on its head, and ran it around the football field. What if they had painted it black, put an Afro wig on its head, and then chased it around the football field. Would the African American fans consider this an honor? If the sports fans want to honor Native Americans, honor our treaties. You do not honor us by making us mascots for America's fun and games. In fact, just the opposite is true. If the fans of these teams choose to honor these symbols for their sports teams, so be it. But when they take real life American Indians and turn them into cartoon caricatures and then mimic them by painting their faces, donning feathers, and doing the tomahawk chop, they cross that thin line called racism.
PLEASE support our petition we NEED YOUR HELP http://www.thepetitionsite.com/3/american-indians-are-not-mascots
To most American Indians it is absolutely abhorrent for a professional football team to use the color of their skin as their team mascot. As a matter of fact, we oftentimes refer to the mascot of the Washington professional football team as the R word because to us it is as hideous as the N word is to African Americans. The use of an Indian name in and of itself for mascots is not offensive, but it is what the fans (short for fanatic) do with it that is reprehensible. When they paint their faces, stick turkey feathers in their hair, and do those awful Hollywood chants, it then starts to become insulting and racist to Native Americans. Imagine if you will a team with a mascot called the Zulus. Would African Americans be offended if the white fans painted their faces black, put Afro wigs on their heads, and waved spears in the air while chanting their perception of African war songs? Why name teams for the color of a people's skin - "Redskins?" Why not a mascot for the Blackskins, Brownskins or Yellow Skins? At one Washington Redskin football game the fans painted a pig red, put feathers on its head, and ran it around the football field. What if they had painted it black, put an Afro wig on its head, and then chased it around the football field. Would the African American fans consider this an honor? If the sports fans want to honor Native Americans, honor our treaties. You do not honor us by making us mascots for America's fun and games. In fact, just the opposite is true. If the fans of these teams choose to honor these symbols for their sports teams, so be it. But when they take real life American Indians and turn them into cartoon caricatures and then mimic them by painting their faces, donning feathers, and doing the tomahawk chop, they cross that thin line called racism.
PLEASE support our petition we NEED YOUR HELP http://www.thepetitionsite.com/3/american-indians-are-not-mascots
Please help support this very important petition http://www.thepetitionsite.com/3/american-indians-are-not-mascots To most American Indians it is absolutely abhorrent for a professional football team to use the color of their skin as their team mascot. As a matter of fact, we oftentimes refer to the mascot of the Washington professional football team as the R word because to us it is as hideous as the N word is to African Americans. The use of an Indian name in and of itself for mascots is not offensive, but it is what the fans (short for fanatic) do with it that is reprehensible. When they paint their faces, stick turkey feathers in their hair, and do those awful Hollywood chants, it then starts to become insulting and racist to Native Americans. Imagine if you will a team with a mascot called the Zulus. Would African Americans be offended if the white fans painted their faces black, put Afro wigs on their heads, and waved spears in the air while chanting their perception of African war songs? Why name teams for the color of a people's skin - "Redskins?" Why not a mascot for the Blackskins, Brownskins or Yellow Skins? At one Washington Redskin football game the fans painted a pig red, put feathers on its head, and ran it around the football field. What if they had painted it black, put an Afro wig on its head, and then chased it around the football field. Would the African American fans consider this an honor? If the sports fans want to honor Native Americans, honor our treaties. You do not honor us by making us mascots for America's fun and games. In fact, just the opposite is true. If the fans of these teams choose to honor these symbols for their sports teams, so be it. But when they take real life American Indians and turn them into cartoon caricatures and then mimic them by painting their faces, donning feathers, and doing the tomahawk chop, they cross that thin line called racism.
Let Us Honor Indigenous Day October 12th, 1492
Make Our Day just as important as Columbus Day, Presidents Day or any other Day we honor.
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/let-us-honor-indigenous-day-october-12th-1942
Sponsored by: Gilda Davis aka Lestat runningwolf
We, the Chickamauga Cherokee Indian Creek Tribe, turn to the public and ask your help to reach our huge goal of 5,000 signatures!!!!!
In the aftermath of the French and Indian War the British government prohibited settlement west of the Appalachian Mountains, laying the foundation of one of the major irritants leading to the Revolution. "We had hoped the white men would not be willing to travel beyond the mountains. Now that hope is gone. They have passed the mountains, and have settled upon Cherokee land. They wish to have that usurpation sanctioned by treaty. When that is gained, the same encroaching spirit will lead them upon other land of the Cherokees. New cessions will be asked. Finally the whole country, which the Cherokees and their fathers have so long occupied, will be demanded, and the remnant of the Ani-Yunwiya, 'The Real People', once so great and formidable, will be compelled to seek refuge in some distant wilderness. Should we not therefore run all risks, and incur all consequences, rather than submit to further laceration of our country?"
Dragging Canoe Sycamore Shoals March 1775.
Please help us reclaim our ancestral rights! We are the Chickamauga Warriors and descendants of Dragging Canoe and Nancy Ward
We need your support for our petition. Please Sign today!
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/federal-recognition-for-chickamauga-cherokee-indian-creek-band
Chickamauga Cherokee Indian Creek Tribe
We need your help! Please help us reach our huge goal of 5,000 signatures!
Our history is well known as the descendants of Dragging Canoe's warriors. Dragging Canoe (c. 1738- March 1, 1792) was an American Indian war leader who led a band of young Cherokees against the United States in the American Revolutionary War. The Chickamauga fought alongside the British in the American Revolution along with Indians from a number of other tribes. We suffered and left hearts on the ground during the founding of America. We have a proud history connected to this country yet we are not federally recognized. By signing our petition you will encourage Congressman Mica to support our bid for federal recognition and you will also be offering support in our effort to fulfill our destiny as the keepers of the history for all the Chickamauga Cherokee
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/federal-recognition-for-chickamauga-cherokee-indian-creek-band
Keep up the good work!
Washington can be a very
lonely place when you are
fighting for progressive
ideas like Medicare for
All and an end to the
occupations of Iraq and
Afghanistan. It is
for that reason I wanted
to thank all my friends
at...
Over the past week,
we've asked you to make
calls to your
representative and
Speaker Nancy Pelosi to
demand a vote on the only
real health care reform
that can cover all
Americans: single-payer.
You are being heard!
Contact your rep. today!
It's ...
Take action by sending a
message to President
Obama now to let him know
you expect him to keep
Tibet on the agenda at
the US-China summit in
November and in all his
future meetings with
China. Nearly 6 million
Tibetans are counting on
you to tell the ...
by Amanda Kloer
Published December 30,
2008 @ 10:26AM PT
Human trafficking may
seem like an
insurmountable chall
enge because it is a
multi-billion dollar
global industry, but
individuals can have a
huge impact on the fight
against trafficking....
Join the US Campaign to
End the Israeli
Occupation, and member
groups CodePink and
Grassroots International,
for two exciting weeks of
action this
November! The first
week of action, Nov. 2-8,
will be to end Israel's
siege of the Gaza Strip
and...
Vers La Verité
Speech in Paris
By Cynthia
McKinneyPresident Obama's
Nobel Peace Prize was not
the only news yesterday.
And in my opinion, it's
not even the biggest
news. It's not even the
saddest news. But it does
provide us with some
cr...
Occupying Afghanistan
Does Nothing But Make
America LESS Safe!Didn't
we already have a
so-called troop "surge"
in Afghanistan? Well it
obviously didn't work.
Because now General
Stanley McChrystal, whose
last appointment was head
of Dick Cheney's secr...
The Single Payer
Alternative
Interview: Dr. Andy
CoatesSeptember 28, 2009
The politicians declared
one plan for health care
reform “off the
table” from the
beginning: a single-payer
system that would cover
all Americans and cut ...
Afghanistan FUNDING!
Congress is close to
final passage of the
$625.8 billion 2010
Defense Budget, which
contains approximately
$128.2 billion to conduct
the wars in Afghanistan
and Iraq through
September 2010.
So far the White House...
A Death Every 12 Minutes:
The Price of Not Having
Medicare For AllPosted by
John Geyman MD on
Monday, Sep 21, 2009
We have seen this coming
for many weeks, but the
release of the Baucus
plan in recent days by
the Senate Finance
Committee, with...