START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
2,135,067 people care about Health Policy

3-Parent Babies Coming Soon To The UK?

3-Parent Babies Coming Soon To The UK?

The UK could become the first country to legalize the creation of genetically engineered babies with three genetic parents.

The technique would involve defective DNA in the mother’s egg being replaced with material from a healthy donor, in order to eliminate the risk of her passing a host of hereditary diseases on to her child. A child would effectively have two mothers and a father.

Depending on your perspective, this is either an amazing benefit to society or a scary specter of an Orwellian world ruled by government scientists.

However, according to The Telegraph, the therapy has the broad support of the British public.

The procedure, known as mitochondrial replacement technique, is currently illegal, but that could change.

The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA), a government watchdog, has set out safeguards for the controversial procedure that could affect future generations. It is now up to government ministers to decide whether they should ask the UK Parliament to consent to the therapy.

You can get a sense of how it works by watching this video.

From The Telegraph:

By removing faulty DNA from the mitochondria, which is always inherited from the mother, experts believe the child and future generations could be spared from a collection of devastating conditions affecting the heart, muscles and brain.


The Department of Health, which ordered the consultation last year, must now decide whether to make Britain the first country in the world to permit the treatment, paving the way for its use in clinics.

Mitochondria are rod-shaped power plants in cells that supply energy. They contain their own DNA which is only passed onto offspring by mothers.

Defects in mitochondrial DNA (mDNA) give rise to a range of potentially life-threatening diseases, including a form of muscular dystrophy and conditions leading to the loss of hearing and vision, heart problems and bowel disorders.

How many people does this affect? Around one in every 200 people in Britain is affected by faulty mitochondria; out of these, one in 6,500 people suffer from incurable diseases such as muscular dystrophy or ataxia.

The HFEA has advised certain restrictions: if the government does legalize the therapy, donors and patients should remain anonymous. The group also points out that further tests are needed to ensure the therapy is safe and effective, but believes that it could be ready within a year.

So is this therapy the first step on a slippery slope to designer babies and eugenics, as some critics have argued?

Or is it an exciting new development that will lead to the eradication of a host of serious inherited diseases?

For many people, I suspect the answer will depend on their personal experience. Several years ago, I was assigned to work with a 14-year-old boy suffering from muscular dystrophy. He was a bright, creative child, but confined to a wheelchair and slowly losing all muscle control. He died two years later. His brother, five years younger, knew that he was destined to follow the same path. Their mother lived in a constant state of despair and guilt.

So yes, if this technique brings hope to people who are carriers of conditions like muscular dystrophy, then let’s make it as widely available as possible.

Others will disagree with me, concerned that we are tinkering with nature too much, without knowing exactly what the consequences might be, or they will question whether we really want to create genetically modified humans.

The reality is that we humans will always want to push boundaries, to explore, and to improve on what we have.  That’s a good thing, but the moral and ethical questions need to be resolved too.

What do you think?


Related Care2 Coverage

Babies Afloat: Coping With Unplanned Pregnancies In The Navy

Is Sleeping Outside In The Cold Better For Babies’ Health?

U.S. Maternity Coverage Hurts Moms And Babies


Read more: , , , , , , ,

Photo Credit: thinkstock

quick poll

vote now!

Loading poll...

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it


+ add your own
10:32AM PST on Feb 10, 2014

Heyhey! It's the first step in the direction of Gattaca! (A film about a world that consists of genetically perfect people, created with the help of labratories, and "lovechildren", created the oldfashioned way. Includes Jude Law for those interested.)

11:31AM PDT on Oct 25, 2013

This is morally wrong, it will cause more problems genetically, not less. It is time the scientists and politicians stopped trying to play God, with our food, with our health, and now with our future generations. For the Telegraph to say this has the broad support of the people of the UK is I believe an outright lie, there is a letter writing campaign to our MP's objecting to this. This genetic interference is against the law in every other country in the world, and should stay that way.

8:06AM PDT on Apr 17, 2013

@Berny I agree also I was asked many times why I don't have any children yet, when I say because i cannot afford it they always say the same thing....." that i should have some, anyway I will get benefit and if i play my cards well I will get a council flat too" I come from a country where we don't have any benefit at all no JBA no housing benefit and if you have kids you pay for it, so people are much more responsible, and love their children, they make them when they can afford it and because they want them not because they get free house and money.

7:19AM PDT on Apr 17, 2013

Very interesting article ! and if it really works I will be very good especially for children with congenital illnesses.
also it would be good so some children in this country will know who their father actually

5:36AM PDT on Apr 3, 2013

Most parent want kids for them self...not for the kid sake...if they did...they would not have so many and would stay home looking after them and enjoying them...



7:15AM PDT on Apr 2, 2013

No, thank you. They should stick to two parents. It's better that way.

3:32AM PDT on Apr 2, 2013

That's a large family!

1:57PM PDT on Mar 30, 2013


4:07AM PDT on Mar 30, 2013

Don't know what to think about this !

12:28PM PDT on Mar 29, 2013

I don't like this :/ I don't think there should be genetically modified's against nature

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

Much more stricter laws !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I demand justice and Palmer needs to get the maximum punishment

I hope that he gets just what is coming to him. The fact that he seeks out to kill to prove his manhood…

meet our writers

Steve Williams Steve Williams is a passionate supporter of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Trans (LGBT) rights, human... more
ads keep care2 free

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.