START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
2,560,532 people care about Environment & Wildlife

345 Species Are at Risk in Canada

345 Species Are at Risk in Canada

This post was written by Dr. David Suzuki and originally appeared on EcoWatch

Of 345 species at risk in Canada, more than 160 have waited far too long for recovery strategies. Thanks to a recent federal court decision, four luckier ones are finally getting overdue plans detailing steps needed to save and protect them, including identifying habitat they need to survive. But to make it happen, environmental groups including the David Suzuki Foundation, with the help of Ecojustice lawyers, had to take the federal government to court. It wasn’t the first time we’ve gone to court to protect wildlife.

In what the judge called “the tip of the iceberg,” the court found an enormous systemic problem in the two ministries responsible for protecting endangered and threatened wildlife. Both the environment and fisheries ministers broke the law for the species in question by allowing multi-year delays in meeting deadlines required under the Species at Risk Act.

This legal win is good news for Pacific humpback whales, marbled murrelets, Nechako white sturgeon and southern mountain caribou. But their fate and that of many other federally recognized endangered and threatened species remains in jeopardy. Court victories are just a start. It will take political will to ensure species and their habitats get the protection they need.

The yellow-breasted chat, northern goshawk and spotted turtle are just some of the endangered species that continue to wait—some for as long as seven years now. The eastern whip-poor-will—known for its distinct nocturnal cries—struggles to survive pollution, pesticides and climate change, while the grey fox and prairie loggerhead shrike confront agricultural and pesticide threats as they contend with recovery strategy delays.

When plans come this late, impacts of large development projects such as the Northern Gateway pipeline aren’t adequately considered before projects are approved. We’ll never know if the Joint Review Panel’s recommendation to support the Enbridge project would have been different had it considered recovery impacts on threatened species such as the humpback whale.

Recovery strategies are not the only slow-moving part of the species-at-risk process. Just getting status assessments for species may take up to five years. Five more years could be required for government to decide whether to accept these scientific assessments and give species protection. Then, legal timelines kick in, followed by recovery strategies—many delayed—and still more years for action plans, which have no timelines, to take effect. For killer whales, whose overdue action plan was just released, the process has taken about 13 years and a court challenge from the David Suzuki Foundation and others, which concluded government was failing to protect the whale’s critical habitat. Many species have been waiting even longer.

The Species at Risk Act was adopted in 2002 to protect Canada’s plants and animals. Although the act itself is sound, implementation leaves much to be desired. Some species that need help, such as the porbeagle shark, are excluded from the list, along with other fish that have high economic value. Despite a 90 percent decline in population, the shark was denied protection because of possible impacts on the fishing industry.

The act only automatically applies to a small fraction of species at risk, since most are not guaranteed protection on provincial lands, and allows the federal government to step in if a province is failing to protect a species. But this has only happened once, for the greater sage grouse. Despite a recent federal emergency order to improve protection for the bird and its prairie habitat, concerns remain around continued delays on recovery actions.

The main threat to more than 85 percent of species at risk is habitat loss and degradation. Recovery plans identify habitat, which can then be protected and restored to help wildlife survive. Strategies are now required for 192 species. Successful court challenges—such as our 2009 Nooksack dace case involving a small minnow on the brink of extinction—helped enforce the act’s requirement that the federal government identify critical habitat. Government can speed the process by following a precautionary approach in the absence of scientific certainty.

Wouldn’t it be nice if we didn’t have to resort to court challenges to protect threatened wildlife? Endangered species caught in long delays are like emergency patients denied life support. If we really care about them, we need to do a better job of supporting them.

Read more: , , ,

Photo Credit: FWS

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

295 comments

+ add your own
3:39PM PDT on Apr 27, 2014

Mark D- that is a great idea!

3:39PM PDT on Apr 27, 2014

Hopefully the UN will do something useful.. realize that the Canadian government is one of the most terrorist in the world, and pass a resolution to bomb Ottawa. The seals will be grateful

3:33PM PDT on Apr 27, 2014

Take Harper out to a patch of thin ice where leopard seals swim, and club him over the head. I would love to see that psychotic scumbag crying for help.

12:44PM PDT on Mar 31, 2014

thanks for sharing

6:17AM PDT on Mar 31, 2014

Noted

6:16AM PDT on Mar 31, 2014

Helping the weak is just

11:30PM PDT on Mar 30, 2014

nice post

2:15PM PDT on Mar 30, 2014

IF WE KEEP UP THE FIGHT, AND KEEP PUSHING THIS ISSUE WE WILL WIN. TOGETHER WE CAN MAKE IT HAPPEN.

1:38PM PDT on Mar 30, 2014

Since OUR Government is financing every country on Earth...CANADA GET A REAL JOB INSTEAD OF KILLING EVBERYTHING YOU SEE!!

12:20AM PDT on Mar 30, 2014

It's too bad... Unfortunately it's a worldwide tendancy ; more and more animals are threatened to extinction because of humans ! SHAME ON US !

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free

more from causes




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.