START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
1,515,361 people care about Health Policy

4 Reasons Sperm Shortages Are Bad News for Our Health

4 Reasons Sperm Shortages Are Bad News for Our Health

Recent reports say that the UK is facing a severe shortage of quality sperm donations, meaning that it will be forced to import sperm stocks from Denmark and the U.S. There are a number of reasons why sperm shortages are bad news for our reproductive health, and especially for the women who are trying to get pregnant. Here’s a look at what sperm donation shortages might mean if this problem isn’t solved.

1) More Invasive Procedures for Women

Most of us are aware of the IVF procedure. While it may be uncomfortable for the woman who must go through the procedure, it is considered only mildly invasive as it usually involves introducing the sperm sample.

Procedures like Intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), which are often used when the sperm sample is of poorer quality or the donating party has a low sperm count, are more invasive. They involve first harvesting eggs from the prospective mother so that a single healthy sperm can be injected into one egg. For the hopeful woman, this means another set of procedures that can be stressful and are not guaranteed to work.

Obviously, with sperm banks running low on donations there is the potential that they will need to switch to these more invasive procedures in order to maximize their stocks, something that could make the process even more daunting for the women undergoing fertility procedures.

2) Sperm Banks Could Begin Accepting Lower Quality Sperm

The alternative to importing high-quality sperm, which is more costly and if needed over the longterm may serve to drive up the cost of already very expensive fertility treatment, is that sperm banks could start accepting lower quality sperm.

Right now the threshold is set very high to offer the best chance of a healthy and successful pregnancy. Some doctors have argued that this threshold is set too high and that in the general population we would in fact see many men who would have their donations rejected by sperm banks fathering perfectly healthy children.

Yet other medical experts believe that any relaxation of the rules will likely put women through more invasive procedures (like those mentioned above) because the lower quality sperm would need all the assistance it could get, and puts the children at risk of developmental abnormalities that would have been guarded against if the sperm samples had been as rigorously checked as they are now.

It’s important to stress though that these are just speculative fears, like those expressed by one doctor to the BBC, and not a reality at the moment.

3) It Encourages So-Called Sperm/Fertility Tourism

In 2005 the UK changed its laws on sperm donation to mean that, should a child who was conceived via a sperm donor want to one day track their biological father down, they have the legal right to do so (though the biological father has no financial burden as a result of this change). At the time critics said that this would mean men would think twice about donating. Sperm donation actually seemed to increase for a time, but then donation numbers dropped off. Some doctors earmark the lack of guaranteed anonymity as one possible contributing factor for Britain’s current problems.

Various restrictions on sperm donation and laws chipping away at donor anonymity have appeared around the globe and, whether rightly or wrongly (and the data isn’t convincing either way yet), is in part blamed for donor shortages. Getting around laws like that, then, is what some people have attempted to do, and that’s where fertility tourism comes in. This is where couples and individuals hoping to get pregnant via fertility treatment or sperm donation travel to countries where restrictions are not as tight or cumbersome.

While some countries (say Denmark) provide good fertility options (though getting treatment as a non-national is more difficult), there are a number of countries where this kind of practice carries severe risks. Lax vetting procedures may mean an abundance of sperm samples, but it can also mean the risks of complications or unhealthy sperm. It may also mean using unqualified doctors who potentially might botch procedures, as a relatively recent study has documented.

4) It Encourages Underground and DIY Sperm Donation

The Internet is an amazing tool, but its ability to allow us to connect and communicate can also carry its own set of drawbacks. One such problem is the rise of so-called DIY sperm donation. For years now, stories have emerged of women seeking men online to donate sperm without going through a sperm bank. A number of sites have popped up offering this kind of service, and there are even stories of women meeting with men and trading cash for a prepared sample.

The risks are obvious. While the man may say that he’s got a clean bill of health, there’s no guarantee that is true. Even if it is, there will be no objective quality control on that sperm sample, and the DIY procedures that a woman may use to get pregnant at home carry significant health risks of their own.

As to the problems in the UK, some health clinics have said that fears of a shortage are overblown, but there seems to be a general consensus that there is a shortfall in men donating and that if it continues, it could impact the UK and other nations’ fertility treatment capacities with a good deal of the burden falling on the shoulders of women.

Read more: , , , , , , ,

Photo credit: Thinkstock.

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

60 comments

+ add your own
2:44PM PDT on Jul 11, 2014

Thanks for sharing

11:54AM PDT on Jul 11, 2014

Thanks for Sharing

3:17AM PDT on Jul 11, 2014

Thanke you.

4:07PM PDT on Jul 10, 2014

Golly I thought over population was a bigger problem.

5:04AM PDT on Jul 10, 2014

Just to clarify you are apparently, not aware of the multiple children one woman alone can reproduce!

5:02AM PDT on Jul 10, 2014

Karin B. "Perhaps if we didn't tamper with nature and only couples who get pregnant
naturally have children, we wouldn't be soooooo over-populated."
You can't be serious!

4:54AM PDT on Jul 10, 2014

How about adopting instead? People go beyond the 'my' child...

4:40AM PDT on Jul 10, 2014

Too many people already! What we need is a worldwide sperm shortage!!! Like 7.2 billion people and increases of nearly quarter million people/day isn't enough?????????

12:15AM PDT on Jul 10, 2014

This article is about a Sperm Shortage IN THE UK.
And importing Sperm TO the UK from Denmark and the U.S.

Actually I don't think the number of Women in the UK who want to be Artificially Inseminated, will make a big difference in Population numbers. Some of these will be Lesbians, by the way, in Same-sex marriages or relationships.
In other words, altho over-population IS a huge problem, I don't think Artificial Insemination adds significantly to it. Just mainly couples reproducing themselves, when the "non-maternal parent" is either a man who's sterile and unable to reproduce, or a Woman...

Having said that, I make a smart-aleck remark about "Another Viking Invasion of England" har har. Suddenly, blond kiddies everywhere?
[England was under the "Danelaw", that is, under Danish Rule back 1200 years or so ago...]

1:12PM PDT on Jul 9, 2014

Thanks

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

meet our writers

Steve Williams Steve Williams is a passionate supporter of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Trans (LGBT) rights, human... more
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK

Children

Civil Rights

Education

Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights

Politics

Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.