19,343,583 members doing good!

The Civil Rights Cause

368,061 people care about Civil Rights




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ Repeal: Who’s Afraid of the Big, Bad Senator?

65 comments ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ Repeal: Who’s Afraid of the Big, Bad Senator?

In his first State of the Union address last week, President Obama promised action on working toward a repeal of the ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ openly gay service military ban. The distinction that was drawn between action toward a repeal and an actual repeal itself seemed prophetic leading into Tuesday’s “historic” Senate Armed Services Committee hearing where some of the military’s top brass said that ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ (DADT) had to go, announcing a year long investigation into how to lift the ban– so no actual repeal in 2010, but the groundwork for it.

Here’s the Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman, Admiral Mike Mullen, announcing his opinion on DADT:

Defense Secretary Robert Gates detailed that the military would initially be taking steps to ease enforcement of the ban, with a 45-day review of military procedures expected to recommend, among other things, that third-party testimony in DADT discharges no longer be used.

In Gates’ view, making the repeal process as easy for the military as possible was paramount, and therefore a year long study would also be undertaken by the Pentagon’s top legal teams to find the best and most efficient way of facilitating the repeal:

“A guiding principle of our efforts will be to minimize disruption and polarization within the ranks, with special attention paid to those serving on the front lines.”

According to some reports however, not all at the Pentagon think that ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ should be repealed, at least not in the near future. They cite military readiness as a top concern.

This decision was never going to be popular with certain members of the Senate, either. Especially “disappointed” was Senator John McCain (R-Arizona) who, only last week, defended the policy as being “successful” despite its large monetary impact and the detrimental effect it has on lesbian and gay service personnel. But John McCain doesn’t care about that. Nor does he have any respect for what Admiral Mike Mullen and his colleagues think.

At least that’s how it appears. The good folks over at AmericaBlog have dug up an interesting interview from 2006 in which McCain said that he would defer to the military leaders and their judgment should they ever say it was a time for a repeal of the ban. You can find out more by going here. It seems, however, that McCain was only willing to be so deferential under the condition that their position agreed with his own. Oh dear.

Here’s what he had to say to the Senate hearing in response to Admiral Mullen and the Defense Secretary’s position (emphasis mine):

I’m deeply disappointed in your statement, Secretary Gates… It would be far more appropriate, I say with great respect, to determine whether repealing this law is appropriate and what effects it would have on the readiness and effectiveness of the military before deciding on whether we should repeal the law or not and fortunately it is an act of Congress and it requires the agreement of Congress in order to repeal it. And so your statement, obvious as one that is clearly biased, without the view of Congress being taken into consideration… Again you are embarking on saying it’s not whether the military prepares to make the change but how we best prepare for it, without ever hearing from members of Congress, without hearing from the members of the Joint Chiefs and, of course, without taking into considerations all the ramifications of this law. Well, I’m happy to say we still have a Congress of the United States that would have to pass a law to repeal Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, despite your efforts to repeal it, in many respects, by fiat.

Notice how Senator McCain seems to feel personally slighted by this, and how quick he is to fall back on the Senate as his stronghold and political stomping ground. He refers to Congress, but, for a long time now there has been solid support for a repeal of ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ in the House. The votes are there for as long as the Democratic majority remains, it would seem.

There are, of course, those who support McCain’s objections, especially in the Senate. At the hearing, Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Alabama) took the time to remind Admiral Mullen that Congress would be the deciding factor in the repeal, while Senator Chambliss (R-Georgia) invoked a version of the slippery-slope argument, arguing that if ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ was done away with, what would be next? Rules about “fraternization” and “body art” may have to be ditched too, he commented.

Funny, isn’t it, how, after a while, all the arguments against gay and lesbian people start to sound the same, no matter the specific subject?

In fact, it appears that this may become a party issue. A Daily Kos/Research 2000 poll reveals that, of 2003 self-identifying Republicans that were surveyed nationwide between January 20 and January 31 this year, 55 percent were against the repeal, with only 26 percent supporting an end of DADT and the rest saying that they were undecided. The poll, which asked questions about a range of gay rights issues, also revealed that 73 percent of the Republicans surveyed felt openly gay men and women should not be allowed to teach in public schools. You can read more here.

As to the Senate hearing itself, I think the team at the Palm Center (a leading think-tank on gay and lesbian inclusion in the military) got it right when they said this was a “game-changer” speech by Admiral Mullen and Defense Secretary Gates. I also share the Palm Center’s frustration, however, over the announcement of yet another study which, again, puts this repeal firmly in the realm of words but, as yet, little action. As they point out:

“It is important to be clear that the government’s data from all sides on gays in the military is overwhelming and already conclusive. There have been twenty studies on gays in the U.S. military and RAND is currently updating its 1993 report. We would have hoped that the volumes of very recent data could be used to address implementation questions, but we understand that the Working Group has been announced.”

And let’s not forget that the military can do all the studies they like, but McCain and his like minded friends will still be waiting in Congress. As McCain’s display on Tuesday shows, no amount of evidence favoring gay and lesbian inclusion in the military will change his mind. It’s up to Congress to act now, to pass legislation for the repeal so as to move as quickly as possible following the Pentagon’s review.

The question is, do Democratic legislators have the will to push the DADT repeal through Congress, or will they cower before McCain as he and his allies pit themselves against the administration’s slow but grinding plan to create change? For the moment, the Democratic legislators have the majority. Let’s hope they use it.

Resources:

Care 2 Action:


UPDATE: General Colin L. Powell, who previously opposed the inclusion of openly gay and lesbian service personnel in the Armed Forces, has released a statement in which he endorses the new strategy for a repeal of ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’. The New York Times reports:

“In the almost 17 years since the ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ legislation was passed, attitudes and circumstances have changed,” General Powell said in a statement issued by his office. He added: “I fully support the new approach presented to the Senate Armed Services Committee this week by Secretary of Defense Gates and Admiral Mullen.”

Read more: , , , , , ,


Photo used under the Creative Commons Attribution License, with thanks to Chesi - Fotos CC.

65 comments

+ add your own
9:13AM PDT on Apr 4, 2010

As others have said, there has always been gays in the military. When I was in the service if someone was known to be gay they just put them with other gays (we had 3 men to a room barracs) and that was it. They all did their job to the best of their ability just like everyone else. Who cares what they do behind close doors as long as they do their job.

4:24PM PDT on Mar 31, 2010

No policy will stop gays and lesbians from joining the military. These males in charge of the military need to stop this ridiculousness once and for all!!!

6:20PM PDT on Mar 21, 2010

"There have and always will be gays in the military. So people should just grow up and get over it."

To Frank and the other liberal anything goes left wing nuts. If you were in the military would you like someone of the same sex leering at you in a shower or a bathroom? I have also read that they have raped some of their same sex comrades is that good? You people are sick!

7:29PM PST on Feb 27, 2010

The repeal in not in effect yet... but hopefully more people will realize how unreasonable "Don't ask, don't tell" is. Talk to your families about this; you may be amazed at how much in the Dark Ages dear ol' grandma still is.

4:45PM PST on Feb 15, 2010

I have worked for the military for over 20 years and I can tell you, there have always been gays and lesbians in the military. I am grateful that now they don't have to fear that they will be discharged for their sexual orientation.

9:01AM PST on Feb 14, 2010

From a practical standpoint the military has to deal with a number of "Jesus" groups ; some as large as whole combat companies organized as a network. I need not say more about what these "bible-thumpers" relate to "gayness." I propose that is the reason causing the deliberation. And by the way who else but "soldiers of the cross" are pulling Hon. McCain's string?

7:36AM PST on Feb 14, 2010

John "I will listen to the Military Commander" Mc Cain, sounds just like GW Bush,except he, fortunately not being President, can not fire or drive out those who make the mistake of telling him what he does not want to hear, the truth! He voted for it based on Powells statements, now that Powell is against it Powell is just wrong. But you have to admire the consistency of the senile old Repugnican whore's hipocrisy, the most relevant being that he is one of the DOMA defenders too, but had no problem committing adultery with the present Mrs. befor he divored the old one in the wheelchair; and just as aside thought why does his extrmarital adultery not deserve the same eternal review as Edwards?

11:35PM PST on Feb 10, 2010

very good article thankyou. sad that a lot of politicians seem to forget what they once said.

11:34AM PST on Feb 10, 2010

What all these people are getting out of their HATE is : more gay-lesbians SUPPORTERS !!!!!! well done.....

9:44AM PST on Feb 10, 2010

McCain is such an example of Hypocrisy. So many things he said when running for President now reversed mow that he is part of the Obstructionist Party.

add your comment

20
20 log in or sign up to start earning Butterfly Credits today!


Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

meet our writers

Steve Williams Steve Williams is a passionate supporter of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Trans (LGBT) rights, human... more
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!

customize your newsletter

This newsletter will be sent daily and will feature updates on all the causes you care about. Which causes would you like to include?

Copyright © 2012 Care2.com, inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved