When you hear the words “education reform” what do you think of? Ensuring that there is equity in schooling? That kids are becoming proficient in foundational subjects like reading, math, and science? That they are being prepared for 21st century challenges? That they learn to be critical and creative thinkers ready for a rapidly changing world? That they have excellent, inspiring teachers whom they respect and admire? That they graduate as compassionate, honest, knowledgeable, thoughtful global citizens ready and able to be solutionaries no matter what careers they pursue?
I think most of us would say yes to all of these goals.
Yet education reform in the U.S. has become so polarized, with many camps pitted against one another, as if our purposes were terribly divergent. What feeds this divergence and conflict among so many fair-minded, caring people? I believe it’s a too narrow focus on one or two of the above goals, which prevents crafting better solutions that help to achieve the whole.
Imagine someone coming to an emergency room having been in a car accident. Her bones are broken; she’s bleeding internally; she’s gone into shock; her wounds are in danger of infection. Imagine that instead of being treated comprehensively, the doctor addresses just one of the problems. The trauma specialist stabilizes her with fluids and transfusions and stops there. The orthopedist decides only to set her broken bones. The infectious disease doctor simply prescribes antibiotics. The surgeon tackles solely the internal bleeding. None of these actions on its own would be good enough.
Addressing the myriad problems we face in education without a comprehensive approach isn’t good enough either. A focus on one area may inadvertently delay progress in another. There are numerous impediments to achieving the educational goals mentioned above and they must be addressed simultaneously. Here are a few:
What are the Impediments?
Next page: solutions!
Read more: education reform, humane education, schooling, solutionaries, systemic change, teaching
Image courtesy of lusi/sxc
Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may
not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.
People will get goiters without salt .
I would say the difference in age should be the reason for the law to take its course but the punishment…
Save your breath conservatives will not listen. My own brother said "I WILL NEVER EVER beleive in global…
49 comments
+ add your ownOne side or the other, two conflicting views, good or bad ... all in the eyes of the beholder. Nothing ever changes and so on and one it goes, unresolved on any and all fronts. What's new?
Marianne C, Mary B, Maureen H, Ad D... you all provided excellent comments and I would wholeheartedly support a return to the 'textbooks of the past' that truly challenged young minds to grow and expand. I agree that is an issue with regard to the exercise of the "political will" which has been greatly weakened with our current political model with particular emphasis upon the 'right-winged conservative' world. The attempt to 'dumb-down' and somewhat 'evangelize' has been a huge corruptive experience. Hopefully more folks will wake up...
Mike C...you have grossly misunderstood the reality of teaching. Besides being GREATLY undervalued in this country (we love our wars and sports), teachers don't work a 40-hour week as you implied with your work life. Typical workload for a teacher ranges from 50 to 75 hours per week as many are involved in other school activities (after school programs, arts, tutoring, athletics, etc). Do you work that much and what is your profession that you could make a direct comparison? Being a 'good' teacher is highly skilled process. The issues in education are systemic...
Start with getting rid of NCLB altogether.
Oh yeah, 'taking sides' as in getting into conflict is not the same as haveing a preference for something like an on line course. Of course people have to see what's out there and choose what appeals to them. You don't have to defend your choice.
The only learning that sticks with people is what has meaning to them that they can apply to everyday situations. This is what makes the difference between on-the-ground type intelligence and memorized, academic ideas.Computers can be programed with exquisit mathimatical formulas that come together perfectly, and still be untranslatable 'on the ground' for anything usable.
You can't homeschool unless you can aford to stay home.
Unions can be used for good or ill depending on whether the leaders are in it for self profit or protecting of the teachers.
In my opinion, teachers are some of the best all around people I know. Who else would pick a job of baby sitting and trying to teach other peoples kids, many of whom are spoiled brats, endoctrinated dumbies, fearful, abused, often neglected, and sometimes no-it-all show offs who are bigger and stronger than the teacher. What fun.
Thank you Zoe, for Sharing this!
Too many schools in America just plain waste the money they receive for education........
Home schooling is where its at.
Grammar, oops: Finland's history and culture ARE quite distant from USA's in myriads of ways... Larry: You've said some interesting things but it looks as though you're claiming children will learn all things out of the classroom. Maybe so, but in what place, in what community, with what behavioral code? Could you provide us with info as to the Applied Scholastic ptogram?
Applied Scholastics has been around for over 50 years, it can put a child through school in half the time, guarantee that they can apply the material they have learned and costs very little in comparison to the current system. The system was offered this solution and they refused it.
The current system of teaching will eventually collapse on itself as it cannot keep producing dumbed down kids without wrecking our society. Learning to think on one's own is the result of good education, that does not mean setting up the learning process so that the person learning is forced into becoming same as another. People are not the same, they require individual control over learning and life, and it is all possible with little cost.
Our society is afraid that if we give responsibility and responsible learning to our kids they will turn out bad. In fact it works the other way ...responsible kids turn out responsible, happy and literate. I cannot say that about the last 4 generations of people in America. Most learned more out of school.
login to add your comment
use your care2 login
add your comment