START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good

A Sign of the Apocalypse? Newt Gingrich Accepts Gay Marriage

A Sign of the Apocalypse? Newt Gingrich Accepts Gay Marriage

In what may or may not be a sign that the so-called Mayan apocalypse is nigh, Newt Gingrich on Thursday said that Republicans had to accept the “reality” of gay civil marriage.

According to the Huffington Post:

On gay marriage, meanwhile, Gingrich argued that Republicans could no longer close their eyes to the course of public opinion. While he continued to profess a belief that marriage is defined as being between a man and a woman, he suggested that the party (and he himself) could accept a distinction between a “marriage in a church from a legal document issued by the state” — the latter being acceptable.

“I think that this will be much more difficult than immigration for conservatism to come to grips with,” he said, noting that the debate’s dynamics had changed after state referenda began resulting in the legalization of same-sex marriage. “It is in every family. It is in every community. The momentum is clearly now in the direction in finding some way to … accommodate and deal with reality. And the reality is going to be that in a number of American states — and it will be more after 2014 — gay relationships will be legal, period.”


“I didn’t think that was inevitable 10 or 15 years ago, when we passed the Defense of Marriage Act,” he said. “It didn’t seem at the time to be anything like as big a wave of change as we are now seeing.”

This is a marked change from when Gingrich, in a 2011 interview, called marriage equality “a temporary aberration.”

Newt of course has in the past made some absolutely ridiculous statements regarding gay rights and gay marriage.

Horrible Things Newt Has Said About Gay Marriage:

Indeed, ahead of the 2012 presidential race Newt signed on, in part, to the Family Leader’s hateful “Marriage Pledge” in which he said he would “aggressively defend” the Defense of Marriage Act and that he would “support sending a federal constitutional amendment defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman to the states for ratification.”

He didn’t stop there, vowing to repeal or block any reform to welfare or tax policy that attempted to level the inequity between same-sex couples and their heterosexual counterparts.

Gingrich also backed North Carolina’s Amendment 1 which amended the state’s constitution to codify a ban on gay marriage and all marriage-like partnerships, whether gay or straight. In a video recorded for the effort, Gingrich implied gay rights were a radical threat to religious liberty and urged voters to pass the ban at the ballot. Gingrich failed to mention that North Carolina already had a statutory ban on same-sex marriage.

Indeed, Gingrich put his opposition to gay rights at the very heart of his presidential nominee campaign, saying that he was “pro-Classical Christianity” (whatever that means) and would oppose the “homosexual agenda.”

He also said in a radio interview with a known hate group that he believed the Obama administration, after review, declining to defend the constitutionality of Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act was Obama flouting the law, saying “If there is a rule of law, it means that if the congress passes a bill and the president signs it, the president has the obligation to support and sustain the laws of the United States.”

This fails to recognize that there is a strong precedent, used often under the Bush administration in particular, of the federal government declining to defend that which it believes to be constitutionally suspect.

Gingrich has also previously referred to gay marriage as paganism, and said that gay couples could only ever be friends.

So what about this sudden change of heart? Does Newt fear the apocalypse is upon us? Probably not. But it does show how quickly his convictions can be changed by political ambitions. It also raises the question as to whether the wider Republican party will accept this reality.

The Huffington Post interview saw Gingrich go on to say he thought he may have done better than Mitt Romney in fighting Obama, and that he will be taking time out to analyze what went wrong during the last presidential cycle.


Related Reading:

Newt Supports North Carolina Gay Marriage Ban

Newt Gingrich Secretly Funneled $350,000 To Anti-Gay Hate Groups Last Year

Should Obama be Impeached over DOMA?


Read more: , , , , , , ,

Image credit: Gage Skidmore.

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it


+ add your own
8:42AM PST on Jan 26, 2013

Huh? Whaaa? I mean, this man can voice two opposing opinions on the same subject within the space of an hour. Why should we believe anything he says?

3:48PM PST on Jan 5, 2013

I have to share this again.

Sam Harris on "Free Will"

3:32PM PST on Jan 5, 2013

A frickin' Men, Pam. You get all the stars left!

2:10PM PST on Jan 5, 2013

Nobody here "hates" Christianity!

Sorry to burst your "poor me" bubble.....I was raised Christian and have many family members who still believe.

What I object to is having someone pound me over the head with his/her sermons, proselytizing and condemnations/dire predictions.

Nobody cares! If you want to sermonize/proselytize....find a Christian site and do it there, please.

If you read through these posts....YOU are the one who keeps raising the issue. It seems you have a genuine thirst for attention.

2:04PM PST on Jan 5, 2013

A New Year’s Wish from Ugandan Priests: It’s Time to Kill the Gays

Another fine example of Christopher's religion at work.

1:42PM PST on Jan 5, 2013

Is this on the test when I get to Heaven?

1:40PM PST on Jan 5, 2013

How is 'Nature' extraterrestial? You can't grasp the concept of the question, can you?

1:39PM PST on Jan 5, 2013

Don't you know figures of speech? A sacred cow is something you don't mess with, etymology, the cows in India no one kills.

"The Republicans considered keeping tax rates low for the rich to be a sacred cow."

1:38PM PST on Jan 5, 2013

I don't kill cows, just eat them. Yeah, I'd say I am right, that is a sacred cow, it hit a nerve

1:37PM PST on Jan 5, 2013

Christopher, why do you think that cows are sacred? You must have woofed down a few of them in your time?

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

Sounds like a fantasy story to me. I hope this life could be save.

Al As the world population approaches 10 billion, in the next 20 years, water will become scarce to raise…

meet our writers

Steve Williams Steve Williams is a passionate supporter of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Trans (LGBT) rights, human... more
ads keep care2 free

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

site feedback


Problem on this page? Briefly let us know what isn't working for you and we'll try to make it right!