Lt. Dan Choi, an Iraq war veteran and Arabic translator whose discharge under the military’s ban on openly gay service personnel, “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” (DADT), is still pending, announced on Thursday that he and fellow DADT repeal advocates including former Army Captain James Pietrangelo will be launching a hunger strike until President Obama meets their demands.
From the press release:
Immediately following congressional mark-ups on the National Defense Authorization Act 2011, Captain James Pietrangelo and I will commence a fast in pursuit of Equality and Dignity. We have three demands of President Barack Obama:
Demand #1: End the Comprehensive Working Group “Study,” which insults the dignity of all Americans.
Demand #2: End “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” discharges forever.
Demand #3: Replace all discriminatory regulations in the military with a comprehensive non-discrimination policy.”
A legislative “compromise” was announced earlier this week that, on Thursday, allowed lawmakers in the U.S. House to move forward on attaching legislation to the Defense Authorization Act that would allow for the repeal of the “Policy Concerning Homosexuality in the Armed Forces” or 10 U.S.C. 654, therein removing the legislative roadblock to ending the ban on openly gay service personnel.
It is important to note that, as per the compromise, the amendment does not end the ban immediately as the effect will be delayed until the Department of Defense has completed its implementation study (due December 1) and the military has brought its own policies in line with the change. In fact, the repeal will only be enacted when the Joint Chiefs of Staff along with the President sign-off on the change, and there is no firm deadline compelling action in the immediate future.
The amendment’s lack of a specific time frame for enacting the repeal has been marked as a central concern for repeal advocates. Also, the fact that the legislation contains no anti-discrimination policy and instead puts the handling of gay and lesbian soldiers at the discretion of military leaders, has been a red flag to many as the potential for abuse of that discretion remains an issue.
Choi, who has been a vocal critic of the amendment, detailed his feelings earlier this week in the following video:
You can read more about the amendment here. It should be noted that while the effects of the amendment will be delayed should it pass, changes that were made a few months ago to the implementation of the DADT policy remain active. To find out more about those changes, please click here.
Earlier in the year, Choi made national news when he and James Pietrangelo, along with other repeal advocates, chained themselves to the White House fence to protest DADT and call the President to action.
Choi also announced on Thursday that people can expect more non-violent protests, saying via updates on his Twitter page:
“In response to the United States Senate and the House of Representatives voting on the repeal of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, forces are mobilizing for non-violent direct action and civil disobedience. Veterans are ready to spend Memorial Weekend in prison. Fasting will also commence. The simple demands are (1) End DADT firings. (2) Enact non-discrimination. (3) End the insulting, wasteful study.”
Details of Thursday’s Votes
After fierce debate, the House voted in favor of the amendment by 234 to 194. 229 Democrats and 5 Republicans voted in favor with 168 Republicans and 26 Democrats opposed. Find out how your lawmakers voted here.
The Senate Armed Services Committee also voted Thursday to advance counterpart legislation
In a closed session, lawmakers voted 16 to 12 in favor, with one Republican, Senator Susan Collins of Maine, voting for the amendment, and one Democrat, Senator Jim Webb of Virginia, voting to oppose. Chariman of the committee Senator Carl Levin (D-Michigan) said he believed that the votes were present in the Senate to pass the amendment. Alongside several other Senate Republicans, Senator John McCain (R-Arizona) is believed to be planning a filibuster of the bill.
President Obama Praises Congress on Legislative Action
Following the votes in the House and the Senate Armed Services Committee, the President released the following statement:
I have long advocated that we repeal ‘Don’t Ask Don’t Tell’, and I am pleased that both the House of Representatives and the Senate Armed Services Committee took important bipartisan steps toward repeal tonight. Key to successful repeal will be the ongoing Defense Department review, and as such I am grateful that the amendments offered by Representative Patrick Murphy and Senators Joseph Lieberman and Carl Levin that passed today will ensure that the Department of Defense can complete that comprehensive review that will allow our military and their families the opportunity to inform and shape the implementation process. Our military is made up of the best and bravest men and women in our nation, and my greatest honor is leading them as Commander-in-Chief. This legislation will help make our Armed Forces even stronger and more inclusive by allowing gay and lesbian soldiers to serve honestly and with integrity.
The President has faced criticism for not acting quickly enough on his promise to repeal “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” and for not showing enough leadership on pushing the repeal effort forward. That this amendment appears to hand the reigns of the repeal over to military leaders has not done much to alleviate such criticism, although most repeal advocates seem to agree that Thursday’s vote was a step in the right direction, albeit a small one.
Meanwhile, response to Choi’s hunger strike has been mixed. While many commend Choi’s bravery and his unyielding push for equality, it seems there is also some doubt as to how effective such an action can be. What are your thoughts? Can a hunger strike be effective? Or will such a protest fall on deaf ears? Have your say in our poll below.
If you would like to follow the hunger strike protest, dubbed “Dignity Fast”, you can do so on Facebook or Twitter.
Related Resources:
Read more: civil rights, dadt, dan choi, dont ask dont tell, gay rights, getequal, john mccain, lgbt rights, military defense, military readiness enhancement act, militarytmc, pentagon, president obama, service members united, veterans
Photo used under the Creative Commons Attribution License, with thanks to Pam Spaulding.
Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may
not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.
This sheriff is a hater. He is obviously prejudice. Why don't Americans ever put themselves in the…
Good for Adam. Thanks Miranda.
Don't like this. Poor Norman looks very uncomfortable. This is such an unnatural thing for a dog to do.…
55 comments
+ add your ownSodomy (sexual act of the male HOMOSEXUAL) used to be illegal in the military for many years. What happened??? Today's society's lack of moral standards and ungodlyness is what happened.
I don't believe hunger strikes can be effective unless they are made known among the masses {example Gandi} The sad part is this this soldier has to go to these lengths to be heard.
DADT is absurd, those are brave people serving America, how dare we discharge them because of whom they sleep with?
The last time i checked, America was a free country.
To be a practicing homosexual in the service is different than someone who is a chaste homosexual.
Isn't President Obama the "Commander in Chief"? Could he not just make an executive order to repeal DADT?
Hope this works for him. But I hold out little hope for that..
Maybe hunger strikes wouldn't have to go on if people weren't so ignorant.
this is wrong
My personal beliefs are as long as your beliefs do not infringe on mine and other are not harmed then go for it and damn anyone or government that stands in your way. And please if someones beliefs upset you and somehow you consider this as harming then seek help for your mental condition.
I am very troubled with Dan Choi statement. He had the perfect opportunity / forum to state his displeasure with the lack of Gay rights combined with how unjust the wars are. He chose to only include his primary objective. Many will say he spoke on the topic at hand and this is what I say to them. This is a civil issue that I support. He stated his case while in uniform and neglected to add what the majority of Americans already believe about the wars. Anyone using public forums knows attaching your issue to and equal or greater issue only enhances the effects. He chose selfishly in my opinion. The fact is in war the majority of people killed are civilians. With that said what in the hell are we doing, it certainly is not fighting for ours or theirs freedom.
thanks
login to add your comment
use your care2 login
add your comment
20