Animal Cruelty: Who is to Blame?


For many of us who are aware of the multitude of ways that animals suffer at the hands of humans around the world, this ubiquitous cruelty is the most pressing social justice issue of them all. From declawing to debeaking, ear clipping to tail docking, the suffering that human beings inflict on animals being used for food, clothing, research, ‘pets’ and entertainment appears to know no bounds, and the many brutal ways in which we force animals to succumb to our desires appear to be limited only by the scope of our imaginations.

But why does all this cruelty take place? And what can we do about this horrifying brutality as individuals? It’s easy to point the finger at the direct perpetrators of animal cruelty as being villains who need to be brought to justice. It’s much harder – and yet much more significant – to turn that critical eye inward and ask oneself, ‘What am I doing to contribute to this?’ But it is only by asking that question that the path toward emancipation from barbaric injustice becomes clear.

The vast majority of the time, money and effort of animal welfare organizations goes toward trying to develop new laws and regulations to address the many separate issues relating to animal cruelty, while at the same time trying to force the industry to adhere to those currently in place.  As explained in Are Anti-Cruelty Campaigns Really Effective?, these efforts consistently fail to create any significant improvement for animals.

Behind these campaigns lies a hidden assumption that the animal industry is responsible for animal cruelty. But is this assumption warranted? Isn’t industry simply a middle agent put in place to do the dirty deeds requested by consumers of animal products? Although it’s true that the animal industry is an eager and aggressive middle agent, its role is only that of middle agent. As such, while institutionalized exploiters certainly have a lot to answer for, it is consumers who are primarily responsible for animal cruelty through their purchases of animal products.


Image: Daniel St.Pierre /

Many people will likely respond that their concern is not with the rights of animals not to be enslaved and killed, but with the excessive brutality in the animal industry; gratuitous violence for instance, and the cruelty that is inflicted on animals along the way to being slaughtered and butchered – debeaking,  dehorning, detoeing, mulesing, castration, tail docking, etc. But as long as our society continues to treat animals as property and economic commodities, our legal system will continue to accept such mutilations as a necessary evil on the way to providing goods and services to a human population largely indifferent to what is hidden behind remote sheds and slaughterhouses.

In any case, even if we did find some way to eliminate every single practice involving physical mutilation, it’s impossible to make slavery and murder anything other than slavery and murder. We can slap fancy labels on the products of animal misery and market them as ‘humanely-raised’, ‘animal compassionate’, ‘ethically-produced’ or ‘guilt-free’, but needless killing is needless killing, and no amount of regulation can change that.

It is understandable that individual stories of horrific suffering make people want to seek out the perpetrators, bring them to justice, and protect potential victims from experiencing the same treatment. But pointing the finger at institutional exploiters ignores the most significant issue – that no matter what the suppliers do along the way, consumption of animal products ultimately requires taking animals’ lives.

Image: Flickr (Glen Bledsoe)

How can we expect morally decent behavior from the people we ask to carry out the task of breeding, confining and ultimately killing and butchering the animals we choose to enslave and eat? These are innocent beings who most people would rather caress and embrace than hurt and kill.

There is something very unjust about the fact that we delegate the most obscene work of our society to a select few who are emotionally hardened enough to carry it out, only to later denigrate them for their disconnection from their natural sense of empathy. When thinking about it honestly, most of us would be hard-pressed to find it in ourselves to slaughter an animal – or to rip off her skin, or slice open her body to remove the entrails, or butcher her flesh into supermarket-sized pieces… And yet, we continue to ask others to do it for us, while most people refuse to even watch these things on video or hear others describe them.

But our distaste toward being involved in such violent acts isn’t something that should be squelched and suppressed, as Michael Pollan or Julie Powell would have us believe. No – we should be grateful for the revulsion we feel when we imagine what happens to animals in between being born and being on our plates. Our horror is a sane reaction to practices that are nothing short of horrifying.

We cannot separate ourselves from depravity simply because we have found a way to tuck the dirty deeds out of sight – behind the walls of slaughterhouses and other obscure buildings. And all the disconnection and indifference in the world cannot change the fact that it is impossible to distinguish the immorality of a Pollan-style DIY approach from the immorality of any other act of unnecessary violence.

In any court of law, those who are complicit in a crime are considered to be responsible along with those who carry it out.

As expressed so eloquently by Ralph Waldo Emerson,

“You have just dined, and however scrupulously the slaughterhouse is concealed in the graceful distance of miles, there is complicity.”


Angel Flinn is Director of Outreach for Gentle World — a vegan intentional community and non-profit organization whose core purpose is to help build a more peaceful society, by educating the public about the reasons for being vegan, the benefits of vegan living, and how to go about making such a transition.

Dan Cudahy is author of Unpopular Vegan Essays: Unpopular Essays Concerning Popular Violence Inflicted On The Innocent.


Related Stories:

Are Anti-Cruelty Campaigns Really Effective?

Making a Killing with Animal Welfare Reform

Legal Slavery in the 21st Century

The Importance of Being Vegan


Jeanne Rogers
Jeanne R5 months ago

Thank you for sharing.

Jeanne Rogers
Jeanne R5 months ago

Thank you for sharing.

Nickihermes Celine
Past Member 3 years ago

do you need to ask?*some called humans*of course.thank you for sharing 8/7

Patricia Ann A.
Patricia A4 years ago

The cruelty falls squarely on our shoulders. Least cruelty possible, not perfect. Justifications="Why keep looking for the right way to do the wrong thing?"

Fi T.
Past Member 4 years ago

No one but ourselves to be blamed

Duane B.
.4 years ago

Thank you for sharing.

4 years ago

We, and all living beings, eat for nourishment, to stay healthy and alive.

Eating to feed a political ideal or philosophy does not nourish the body.

People are all different and have different nutritional requirements and people must eat what their own bodies require.

Ricardo Petinga
Ricardo Petinga4 years ago

It's sad to see so many people getting so defensive whenever the topic is Veganism. And it's sadder still to see so many people still ignore what veganism is and base their opinion about it on ignorance and prejudice. Veganism is the politics of non-oppression. That is the definition as said by the founder of the Vegan Society, Donald Watson. Veganism means recognizing that animals' lives are their own, not ours for whatever purposes, and that therefore they are not and must not be considered property or commodities. What society does to animals is slavery, it is oppression, there's no way around it.

Yes, it's true that even vegans are guilty of using some things that contain ingredients that come from animals, like tires, computers, etc., but so far there isn't much of a choice if we want to move from place to place and communicate with more people. Eventually, there will be, because the rise of veganism will demand it.

When people come here and say that "God gave us animals to eat", all I can say is: you don't know that. You can believe that, but you have no way of being sure. And if your faith is responsible for justifying your lack of empathy, your selfishness and cumplicity in causing suffering, then what kind of perverse faith is that? What kind of sick deity would create animals and give them the capacity to feel and to be conscious just so human animals could enslave and murder them without any need to do so? There is NO difference between cruelty and needless

4 years ago

Yes, Laureen....that's why there is no such thing as a vegan. At best, there are people who are vegan-by-diet.

What we have to do is stop the cruelty of factory farming, by eating less meat, and finding sources for humanely raised meat that isn't contaminated by antibiotics, hormones and synthetic supplements that are at the root of the health problems of those people who don't understand the concept of 'eating in moderation'.
There are EXCESSES that are responsible for most of the diseases....and eating a nutritionally balanced diet is healthiest....especially if what you're eating isn't already contaminated.
So organic is important!

Laureen Godin
Laurie Godin4 years ago

It is pretty tough to avoid animal byproducts. It is in everything from toothpaste to auto tires. I could not believe that there are animal byproducts in tires of all things! Animals have been used for testing in hair colourants, shampoos, etc. Everywhere you turn, there it is! It is gross.