START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
3,169,061 people care about Animal Welfare

Animal Rights vs. Animal Welfare: Which Side Are You On?

Animal Rights vs. Animal Welfare: Which Side Are You On?

The animal protection movement is divided: animal rights vs animal welfare.

Although often falling on the same side of an argument, there is a fundamental difference between these two ideologies. But what exactly is it?

This statement, from American philosopher Tom Regan, sums it up perfectly:

“Animal rights advocates are campaigning for no cages, while animal welfarists are campaigning for bigger cages.”

Animal Welfare

Animal welfarists focus on the treatment of nonhuman animals by promoting and supporting welfare reforms in efforts to make animal treatment more humane, single issue campaigns such as foie gras and fur, and compassionate consumption through the endorsement of grass fed beef and cage free eggs. Some animal welfarists believe that these measures will eventually lead to the abolition of animal use, whilst others do not see animal use as inherently wrong as long as suffering of the animals is eliminated or greatly reduced. Animal welfarists’ end goal is to ensure humane treatment.

Animal Rights

Animal rights activists on the other hand reject all forms of animal use and fight in the corner of the abolitionist approach regarding veganism as the moral baseline. They believe that it is morally wrong to use and exploit animals for any means, regardless of how that animal was treated. The animal rights approach is centered around the philosophy that nonhuman animals are conscious beings that have interests of their own and those interests are deserving of our respect. Therefore they should not be treated as machines, objects or economic units, and all institutions that commodify animals for human benefit should be abolished.

Photo Credit: Compassion in World Farming via Compfight cc

Incremental Progress

From a welfarists’ point of view, working towards welfare reforms such as cage free conditions for hens or group housing for sows is making incremental progress for animals. Decreasing suffering for those animals involved is what welfarists strive for. If you put yourself in the animals’ place — for example, suffering from lifelong immobility caused by living in tiny gestation crates and ammonia burns from rubbing against the bars and lying in excrement — you would appreciate better conditions too. Albeit, improved conditions may not be the ideal or optimum answer, but they do decrease suffering and they do make a difference to the animals experiencing this abuse now. Many welfarists welcome each reform as a step towards liberation. With each reform, society will begin to recognize that animals have interests that matter, and in turn may rethink killing, eating and using them.

All Or Nothing

The all or nothing animal rights approach is often categorized as ‘fanatical.’ Those who oppose this standpoint argue that veganism is too extreme and that we can in fact be morally conscious carnivores and still care about animals. For an abolitionist, this is contradictory and the promotion of ‘happy’ animal products and animal welfare measures does little, if anything, to protect animal interests. By pushing for animal welfare measures, continued animal use is encouraged, as the public are made to feel better about their exploitative decisions and discharge their moral obligations with no intent to end animal use in their own lives. Animal rights supporters also reject the notion of single issue campaigns in favor of vegan and abolitionist education. With every passing second and cent spent on advocating the idea that there is a right way to exploit animals or on campaigns that only address single issues, they contest that we are not vying for meaningful change.

Photo Credit: andjohan via Compfight cc

So the question is: which approach is the most effective? Is it possible that one could support both animal rights and animal welfare? That one can strive for abolition whilst still supporting single issue campaigns and welfare reforms?

Should we go for broke with all or nothing campaigns, or should we endorse incremental measures?

Which side are you on..?

Read more: , , , , , ,

Photo Credit: revnev

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

1420 comments

+ add your own
6:45PM PST on Dec 20, 2014

All creatures small or large should be treated humanely, they all need our love and care.

7:04PM PST on Dec 18, 2014

Im personally striving towards Animal Rights myself.

5:34AM PST on Dec 18, 2014

PETROPOLIS : now you can help the sanctuary that is home to farm animals, victims of exploitation, of abuse, and all kinds of cruelty. Some comes from Pétropolis some from other places around this city. Today there are 150 lucky animals, please give, for keeping them and to rescue other ones : ♥ Fairy sanctuary - or - ♥ Doe

Thank you for sharing

5:33AM PST on Dec 18, 2014

ANOTHER THREAT on Petropolis animals, they need again your help
to stop a project of a vivarium for laboratory. You know what's
happened to the horses in the streets outside, imagine for pets in cages. Please sign the new petition here :
STOP Petropolis vivarium project

5:32AM PST on Dec 18, 2014

For the horses and goats from PETROPOLIS thanks you to sign the petitions :
Care 2 - and - ♞ PeticaoPublica.com
To see more : misfed. - Rip - Rip - misfed - Rip

Angev

4:57AM PST on Dec 18, 2014

We need to treat All creatures humanely.

12:31AM PST on Dec 18, 2014

Until everyone goes vegan, which may never happen, we need animal welfare advocates.

11:28PM PST on Dec 17, 2014

Since human slavery still exists and women lack rights in many countries; it is unrealistic to expect animal rights to take first place. Poor and ignorant people are more concerned about self survival and having many offspring than the pain of other species and destruction of the world.. It is an extremely sad story around the world. That will end in extinction.

9:57PM PST on Dec 17, 2014

Whatever you call yourself, the goals should be to end cruelty to animals. Period.

9:57PM PST on Dec 17, 2014

Whatever you call yourself, the goals should be to end cruelty to animals. Period.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free
CONTACT THE EDITORS

Recent Comments from Causes

Wow....what a happy husky! Being involved in Siberian Husky rescue with a group that helped fund a prosthesis…

A lot less expensive and fun to watch! Same with cats.

ads keep care2 free

more from causes




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.