Betsy DeVos Will Meet With ‘Men’s Rights’ Activists to Consider Ending Obama’s Campus Rape Reforms

Perhaps one of the most underappreciated achievements of President Obama’s administration was the push to hold institutions of higher education accountable for addressing the serious issue of sexual assault on campus.

In addition to launching a public awareness campaign, the Department of Education under Obama opened investigations into the possible mishandling of sexual assault allegations in almost 250 schools, thanks to a restructuring of Title IX.

With Betsy DeVos now helming the Department of Education under President Trump, it appears likely that she will reverse course on these actions soon. In fact, DeVos has scheduled meetings with several groups this week to discuss Title IX.

Some assault survivor advocates worry that these meetings will have little bearing on DeVos’ final policy decisions, however.

The Department of Education’s attitude toward campus sexual assault was made rather plain following a recent remark from Candice Jackson, acting assistant secretary for civil rights.

In an interview for The New York Times, Jackson made the unfounded assertion that “90 percent” of campus rape accusations were merely the result of both parties being drunk and the female accuser deciding the encounter “was not quite right.” After facing a backlash for the comment, Jackson apologized and admitted she had been “flippant.”

Now Sec. DeVos is meeting with groups that share a similar view, one of which is the National Coalition for Men. The NCFM is one of the largest and oldest so-called “men’s rights” activist groups in the United States. Included among its stated goals is a disavowal of the notion that women are oppressed by systemic patriarchy. If anything, the group states, men are victimized by laws that punish them more harshly than women.

The National Coalition for Men has been termed “misogynistic” by critic, having earned such a reputation for threatening suits – or actually filing them — against businesses that hold ladies’ nights, for example. In one case, a California strip club was taken to court by the group for this precise reason. It is hard to take an organization that engages in such trolling as legitimate.

With this in mind, you might be able to guess how the National Coalition for Men views Obama’s Title IX changes — not too favorably.

The NCFM will participate in the second of DeVos’ three planned sessions this week on Title IX. This discussion will focus on those who have been falsely accused of sexual assault; the first will consist of survivor advocates; the third with educational representatives, as well as experts. Each meeting will last a mere 90 minutes.

Survivor advocates find this arrangement highly unsatisfying — and for good reason. Even though there is no real proof that the majority — or even a sizable number — of assault accusations are false, groups on both sides of the issue are being granted equal time with DeVos.

In other words, the survivors, who are affected more often,  and the falsely accused will be treated as equally legitimate.

If DeVos gets her way and Title IX is softened, survivors of sexual assault on America’s campuses will once again have to stay in the dark and face sitting in class next to their assailants or dropping out. In what reality is this outcome acceptable?

Photo Credit: Gage Skidmore / Wikimedia Commons

136 comments

Paulo R
Paulo Reeson2 months ago

stupid woman. ty

SEND
Kathryn I
Kathryn I2 months ago

Betsy DeVoss is just one more blatant incompetent! Thanks!

SEND
Frank Hanline
Frank Hanline4 months ago

@ Susan T: I'd still like to read the study from the person from the U of Arizona

As for "Plateaued" that is not what happened. Even with what you sent there was a spike up in 2012 from 2011 but it went back down in 2013. What happened in 2011?

The Title IX mess was started. Jerry Sandusky and Penn State.

Then there is the issue that Rape and Sexual Assault are combined. What constitutes "sexual assault"? In some cases it is talking to a female, if your a guy, who doesn't want to talk to you because "you're not good enough" for her.

The data after the article, written in 2013, shows the reports of both still going down after 2012. As the article was written in early 2013, 2012 would be the last year they could've looked at. Then there's the fact that from 1995 to 2013 Rapes went down almost 2/3. Hardy a "Rape Epidemic". Currently, the facts have it that 1 in 52 women in college will experience rape, way to high to be sure, but even still half of them will be raped AWAY from campus making colleges the safest place on Earth for women.

SEND
Janis K
Janis K4 months ago

Thanks for sharing.

SEND
Susan T
Susan T4 months ago

Once again Frank, all violent crime is there on by 65% but The rate of rapes has plateaued well other types of violent crime has continued to decline so yes there is a rape epidemic

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/07/sexual-violence-against-women_n_2828653.html

SEND
Frank Hanline
Frank Hanline4 months ago

@ Susan T: could you provide the study from U of Arizona?

Here's the thing, there is no "Rape Epidemic" in the US. There are rape epidemics in several actually Patriarchal countries. The fact that rape has declined (I'd like to read the paper first) almost 2/3 since 1995 shows that.

In any case, the issue with Title IX is that it has done nothing but spawn false allegations that have ruined the lives of many young men, almost all due to spurned, rejected, embarrassed, indoctrinated (had bad sex? that's rape!), women

Read up on Mattress Girl from Columbia and how even after Columbia and the Police found no evidence, the male in questioned was still vilified and Mattress girl and her friends WITH HELP FROM COLUMBIA, continued to accuse the man of "being a rapist" and stated such at campus activities, sponsored by the campus
(which did NOTHING to rebuke the charges) That is what Title IX has done.

I'll let the ladies from Canada explain it far better. They also have links to see:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OKJp2FGjoQc&t=273s

SEND
Susan T
Susan T4 months ago

Hey Frank - I agree with you that even one person being wrongfully convicted, of ANY crime, is a serious tragedy.

The Innocence Project works almost exclusively w/DNA. If you scan their cases, you'll see they have twice as many rape exonerations as murder, & if you look at the murder ones many are rape/murder. DNA is an extremely useful tool in rape cases. Back to stats on the Registry of Exonerations - the overall number of exonerations for DNA is significantly less than for other evidence, as is the number for murder vs rape.

In 2015 a record number of people were exonerated, with 40% being for homicide.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-exonerations-wrongful-convictions-20160202-story.html

Re: the BOJ stats that rape went down 65% in a decade - not significant bec so did the overall violent crime rate. AND:

“The rate of rape has stopped declining, while the rate of other violent crimes has continued to decline,” said Mary P. Koss, a professor of public health at the University of Arizona.

Overall, violent crime has fallen by 65 percent since 1993, from 16.8 million to 5.8 million in 2011. The drop has been attributed by experts to a variety of factors – from better policing to a reduction in the segment of the population that is most crime prone, ages 15 to 24. Koss says some of the same factors explain the stabilizing trend in rapes and sexu

SEND
Frank Hanline
Frank Hanline4 months ago

@ Rachel: Marija is targeting people with name calling. That is why her post was deleted and should be again until she understands that calling people names, especially when you read other things she rights on just how "intimidating is is to be called out" when she or her friends are called out.

As for C2C "censorship, trust me, it is very robust for those who are not "in the coffee club". Rainbow, a real American indigenous person, was banned. Then again, he was stating more conservative viewpoints.

Tell me, if I were to call one person you like a "Marxist butcher", would you like it? The term Patriarchy in the west does not apply, but the connotations associated with it can damage people's reputation and "poison the well". IE, anything I say, as per her calling me such can be ignored as I'm just what she called me, which I'm not, but she doesn't care. She slid the venomous blade in anyways

SEND
Rachel -
Rachel -4 months ago

Marija K., It's unfortunate you had to rewrite your comment. We don't always agree, but deleting posts is straight up wrong. Hey care2 people! You already know your own opinions; if you don't want to hear others, don't have a comment section. I urge everyone to post if their comments get deleted, that way those of us who oppose censorship can gauge when it's time to give up viewing care2.

SEND
Lisa V
Lisa V4 months ago

She hasnever been a victim

SEND