Businesses Fight Obama’s Plan To Increase Disability Hiring

Employers and business groups are fighting an Obama administration proposal that at least 7 percent of employees of federal contractors are individuals with disabilities. Federal contractors and subcontractors, including companies such as Lockheed Martin and Boeing, comprise about a quarter of the workforce in the US and take in some $700 billion in contracts annually. Disability advocates had played a significant role in calling for the changes, noting that the previous provision that contractors make a “good faith” effort was, in the words of Patricia Shiu, who heads the Department of Laborís Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, “not working.”

The new requirement is intended as “part of a broader federal effort” to make finding work easier for individuals with disabilities including injured war veterans, notes the†Wall Street Journal. The unemployment rate for individuals with disabilities was 12.9 percent in January, compared to 8.7 percent for those without disabilities. Moreover, 79.2 percent of working-age people with disabilities are out of the work force as compared to 30.5 percent of people with disabilities, as the Labor Department reported in December. A recent study has indeed found that the majority of individuals with developmental disabilities†simply have nothing to do all day.

The new proposal will not establish quotas but will call for employers to meet the goal of 7 percent of its workforce being individuals with disabilities via increased data collection and required annual self-reviews. Companies that do not meet the target could have their government contracts cancelled or would not be eligible to win new contracts until they meet the target.†Businesses are countering that the new proposal does amount to levying quotas, that they are not sure if they will be able to find sufficient numbers of workers with disabilities with the requisite skills and that they fear having to fire current employees to meet the government’s requirements. They also say that it will be difficult to comply with the law as, under the current law, employers cannot ask about a potential worker’s disabilities during the hiring process.

The Labor Department’s Shiu notes that people will be asked to “voluntarily self-identify” a disability for the purposes of data collection. As Kevan Johnson, an employment consultant with REACH of Dallas, a nonprofit that assists individuals with disabilities lead independent lives, observes to the†Wall Street Journal,

…stronger regulations are needed because severely disabled workers are being overlooked by contractors “who think they can’t do the job.” Mr. Johnson said employers might not be aware of workplace accommodations they could make to enable a disabled person to do their job. “There’s an education process,” he said.

In addition, disability advocates note that new technologies have made it easier for employers to make accommodations for individuals with disabilities in the workplace.

The Obama administration has hailed the changes as one of the most significant civil rights developments since the passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act in 1990. With my teenage autistic son Charlie turning 21 in just a few years — meaning that he will no longer be covered under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act — I can’t say how much such a proposal means to his future. Much of Charlie’s current education is centered around vocational training and, once school ends, we know that he will be eager to have something to do. For him to have a job doing meaningful, productive work in the community is one of our greatest goals.

Related Care2 Coverage

Krewe of Muses Inspires After Autistic Girl Bullied

UK Court: Ban on Sex For Autistic Woman With Intellectual Disabilities

Sick and Disabled Forced Into Unpaid Labor


Photo by Blind Grasshopper

Love This? Never Miss Another Story.


Duane B.
.2 years ago

Thank you for sharing.

Jude Hand
Judith Hand2 years ago

Financial incentives often help employers to choose those with disabilities and to provide reasonable accomodation. There are many agencies that can assist in the employers' education as well as assisting the individual seeking employment. The Department of Labor set these up years ago. The implicit prejudice vs. the disabled makes it difficult, but not impossible. Would that it weren't the case, especially with our present economy and so many in Congress believing that government shouldn't help its people.

Ms. JL M.3 years ago

Bottom line, folks: Employers don't want to hire the disabled, because accommodation costs money. My boyfriend is deaf, but has his bachelors and is working on his audio technology. He is a very smart man. Unfortunately, he has been forced by employer bias to go on SSDI.

At one time, he was a highly paid web programmer.

There are a lot of people with disabilities like him out there: Brilliant, productive, creative people who simply happen to have a physical or mental limitation of some sort.

This country needs to grow up, and fast!

Sal Gomez Jr.
Sal Gomez Jr.3 years ago

Disabled people go to school and learn a trade too why is there a problem hiring is not that they don't qualify is that companies don't want to make the necessary changes for a new or different image with production being competitive in my opinion.

Rosie G.
Rosie G.3 years ago

Shame on you Ernest, what a tired, lame. I support this proposal. Sandy makes no sense. Every other comment is beautiful and has a true valid perspective.

Grace Adams
Grace Adams3 years ago

It will take massive subsidies to bribe even federal contractors to accommodate the disabled. Many employers of low-skill workers would be happy if the subsidy included both reimbursement for the cost of accommodating the disability and reimbursing the employer for the "make-up" difference between the worker's actual measured production and the minimum wage.

Nancy L.
Nancy L.3 years ago

We already have laws for this - Equal Employment Opportunity. If a person meets the minimum requirements for the job they should be considered equally with others, and pick the one who fits best. We don't need more rules. Enforce what's already on the books.

Marianna B M.


june t.
june t.3 years ago

its awful to be caught in a catch 22 situation

Sandy Erickson
Sandy Erickson3 years ago

Another attck on freedom. DO NOT RE-ELECT OBAMA!