Canadians spend around $60 billion annually on restaurant meals, which represents about 30% of their food budget. Since nutritional information on restaurant menus is extremely rare and often tucked away in hard to find places (online or in a book behind the counter somewhere that you need to ask to see), Canadians trying to decide what to eat at a restaurant are ordering blind from a nutritional perspective.
Now, the Centre for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI), along with more than a dozen Canadian health groups and experts, is calling for mandatory nutritional information on restaurant menus. They say that nutrition-related illnesses, like heart disease, stroke, diabetes and cancers cost the Canadian economy between $7 billion and $30 billion and kill 48,000 Canadians every year and that this could be much reduced if Canadians had the information they needed to make better choices.
The CSPI report, Writing on the Wall, compared the two lowest-calorie and highest-calorie items in fourteen different food categories at a variety of chain restaurants in Canada and also looked at sodium levels. Some of the shocking findings include:
CPSI is calling on local, provincial and federal governments to make regulatory changes that would give consumers the information they need to make better nutritional choices. This includes:
They do, however, suggest that there be an exemption for small restaurants (less than $10 million in annual sales or fewer than 10 outlets) and for menu items that are on the menu for short periods of time (such as weekly specials), although they would still be encouraged to voluntarily provide nutritional information.
The proposal certainly is a positive one and would help those Canadians who eat a lot at large chains. But for consumers who prefer to support local small businesses, would this make any difference? There are a number of possible consequences for small restaurants and their patrons if this proposal moves ahead:
What do you think of the proposal? Is it a positive one? Should small businesses be required to participate too? Would having nutritional information influence your decision about where to eat and what to order?
Related Stories
What Are the Unhealthiest Restaurant Meals in America?
Four Unhealthiest Kids Meals in America
Read more: canada, fast food, food, food labels, health, nutrition, restaurants
Photo credit: dmott9 on flickr
Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may
not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.
Look at the polar bear, he's even holding his head in embarassment! ;-))
From the size if the recent Sunday papers I've delivered, you'd think it was all about sales and barbecues. A…
They are just so cute!
115 comments
+ add your ownyes. yes yes yes! we should be able to know
Absolutely nutrition declarations in restaurants should be mandatory internationally and it shouldn't exempt the small restaurants or small chains either. I think one thing they want to avoid is creating high costs to those establishments, but there are services out there who do per recipe professional calculations (e.g. alacalc.com) for the equivalent of about $3 per recipe. That really isn't a huge cost for a restaurant that might sell a salty steak for $15-$20. In fact, having the show of honesty to display the nutrition content information should increase sales.
Great idea.
I think this would be incredible! It should be mandatory in all restaurants. And the article states that people will be drawn away from the small businesses to the large chains because they will know what they are eating there - but I think once the chains actually show what they are serving people will actually eat at the small restaurants MORE because the chains serve such horribly bad-for-you food in the name of taste.
I'll admit to an indulgence every so often, but a few of them I cut out altogether when I found out that these guilty pleasures were 1500+ calories!!! If I had known that sooner they wouldn't have been guilty pleasures to begin with. YUCK
Too many people seem to think that "ignorance is bliss"...
Yes people can pull up the nutritional values on the internet, but not eveyone has access to do that when they happen to be in the restaurant.
i agree with nancy
Credo dovrebbe essere giusto.
Ya, another government program - this one to spend money to force restaurants to provide this info on menus. The budget is already spending more than we take in - there's no money for this ridiculousness. The govt needs to quit spending money to protect us from ourselves.
This article is confusing healthy foods with low calorie and low salt foods. If your meal doesn't contain any vegetables, it's safe to say it's not healthy. Pasta with Alfredo sauce is NEVER a good choice, and feeding this sort of crap to your kids regularly is child abuse. Restaurants serve food that looks and tastes good; If you want healthy meals, you need you cook them at home using fruit, veg, legumes and a variety of grains (quinoa, millet, buckwheat etc.) Anyone who thinks a breakfast sandwich, even without the sausage, is a healthy option, needs to do a crash course in healthy eating immediately.
login to add your comment
use your care2 login
add your comment