START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
746,742 people care about Real Food

Call For Mandatory Nutrition Information on Restaurant Menus

Call For Mandatory Nutrition Information on Restaurant Menus

Canadians spend around $60 billion annually on restaurant meals, which represents about 30% of their food budget. Since nutritional information on restaurant menus is extremely rare and often tucked away in hard to find places (online or in a book behind the counter somewhere that you need to ask to see), Canadians trying to decide what to eat at a restaurant are ordering blind from a nutritional perspective.

Now, the Centre for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI), along with more than a dozen Canadian health groups and experts, is calling for mandatory nutritional information on restaurant menus. They say that nutrition-related illnesses, like heart disease, stroke, diabetes and cancers cost the Canadian economy between $7 billion and $30 billion and kill 48,000 Canadians every year and that this could be much reduced if Canadians had the information they needed to make better choices.

The CSPI report, Writing on the Wall, compared the two lowest-calorie and highest-calorie items in fourteen different food categories at a variety of chain restaurants in Canada and also looked at sodium levels. Some of the shocking findings include:

  • Steak please! Across most of the restaurant menus, the steak (e.g. Sirloin, New York, Tenderloin, etc.) has less than 1/5 of the calories and less than 1/10 of the sodium that is found in a rack of ribs.
  • Wrap it: The Pickle Barrel’s Tuna Sandwich (960 calories) has almost five times as many calories as its Tuna Wrap (200 calories).
  • Alfredo sauce miles better than cheese pizza? Alfredo sauce is often considered the thing to avoid in restaurants if you want a health choice. at Montana’s, however, the kids pasta with alfredo sauce has only 1/4 of the sodium found in the cheese pizza and 1/5 of the sodium in the junior beef burger and a lot less calories too.
  • Cut the sausage: Tim Horton’s Sausage, Egg and Cheese Breakfast Sandwich (530 calories) has nearly twice as many calories as the English Muffing with Egg and Cheese (280 calories).
  • Salty burger: McDonald’s Angus Bacon and Cheese Sandwich has nearly three times the sodium in the Big Xtra Sandwich.
  • Hell for your heart: East Side Mario’s Hell’s Kitchen Chicken has two days worth of sodium! (3,220 mg).

CPSI is calling on local, provincial and federal governments to make regulatory changes that would give consumers the information they need to make better nutritional choices. This includes:

  • Indicating the number of calories
  • Using symbols to flag foods with high levels of sodium
  • Providing free brochures with all nutritional information, especially saturated fat and trans fat
  • Providing nutritional information to a publicly accessible government database that would assist with monitoring of sodium levels in foods

They do, however, suggest that there be an exemption for small restaurants (less than $10 million in annual sales or fewer than 10 outlets) and for menu items that are on the menu for short periods of time  (such as weekly specials), although they would still be encouraged to voluntarily provide nutritional information.

The proposal certainly is a positive one and would help those Canadians who eat a lot at large chains.  But for consumers who prefer to support local small businesses, would this make any difference? There are a number of possible consequences for small restaurants and their patrons if this proposal moves ahead:

  • Consumers could be driven away from smaller restaurants in favor of the chains that provide full information;
  • Small restaurants could be forced to provide the nutritional information in order to remain competitive with larger chains that have this information; or,
  • Consumers frequenting small businesses could continue to have to make potentially unwise food choices because of a lack of information.

What do you think of the proposal? Is it a positive one? Should small businesses be required to participate too? Would having nutritional information influence your decision about where to eat and what to order?

Related Stories

What Are the Unhealthiest Restaurant Meals in America?

Four Unhealthiest Kids Meals in America

Takeout Without: Leave Disposable Packaging Behind

Is Cheap Chocolate Frosting Healthier than Nutella?

Read more: , , , , , ,

Photo credit: dmott9 on flickr

quick poll

vote now!

Loading poll...

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it


+ add your own
12:24AM PDT on Jun 1, 2013

It’s amazing in support of me to truly have a blog site, which will be valuable meant for my knowledge. Thanks admin.
outback steakhouse coupons

7:19PM PDT on Jun 14, 2012

yes. yes yes yes! we should be able to know

12:51AM PDT on Apr 30, 2012

Absolutely nutrition declarations in restaurants should be mandatory internationally and it shouldn't exempt the small restaurants or small chains either. I think one thing they want to avoid is creating high costs to those establishments, but there are services out there who do per recipe professional calculations (e.g. for the equivalent of about $3 per recipe. That really isn't a huge cost for a restaurant that might sell a salty steak for $15-$20. In fact, having the show of honesty to display the nutrition content information should increase sales.

1:36AM PST on Mar 10, 2012

Great idea.

10:12AM PST on Mar 9, 2012

I think this would be incredible! It should be mandatory in all restaurants. And the article states that people will be drawn away from the small businesses to the large chains because they will know what they are eating there - but I think once the chains actually show what they are serving people will actually eat at the small restaurants MORE because the chains serve such horribly bad-for-you food in the name of taste.

5:07PM PST on Mar 7, 2012

I'll admit to an indulgence every so often, but a few of them I cut out altogether when I found out that these guilty pleasures were 1500+ calories!!! If I had known that sooner they wouldn't have been guilty pleasures to begin with. YUCK

12:31PM PST on Mar 7, 2012

Too many people seem to think that "ignorance is bliss"...

Yes people can pull up the nutritional values on the internet, but not eveyone has access to do that when they happen to be in the restaurant.

6:44AM PST on Mar 7, 2012

i agree with nancy

9:32AM PST on Mar 6, 2012

Credo dovrebbe essere giusto.

7:24AM PST on Mar 6, 2012

Ya, another government program - this one to spend money to force restaurants to provide this info on menus. The budget is already spending more than we take in - there's no money for this ridiculousness. The govt needs to quit spending money to protect us from ourselves.

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

Brian F., We are barely 2/3 of the way through the year. Unless you have vast predictive powers, how…

@ Danielle K ."If a Muslim truck driver does not want to transport alcohol, the company should be able…

Wow! That is so great. What a fabulous guy!

ads keep care2 free

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

site feedback


Problem on this page? Briefly let us know what isn't working for you and we'll try to make it right!