In case you missed it, there is an election coming up. And, if you happen to be Catholic, your choices just got a lot easier.
Just eliminate voting for any candidates who is pro-choice or believes that gays should have equal rights. At least, that’s what the Cardinals say.
Via Politics Daily:
Just ahead of Election Day, one of the most influential American churchmen in the Vatican, Cardinal-designate Raymond L. Burke, has warned Catholic voters in the United States that they may never vote for politicians who support abortion rights or same-sex marriage, position usually associated with Democratic candidates.
Burke, an outspoken conservative and the former archbishop of St. Louis who will be made a cardinal by Pope Benedict XVI next month, made his remarks in a videotaped interview in Rome with Thomas J. McKenna, head of Catholic Action for Faith and Family, a conservative lobbying group based in San Diego.
In the interview, which Catholic Action taped on Oct. 20 and started promoting Thursday on YouTube, McKenna asks Burke, “Is it ever licit for a Catholic to vote for a pro-abortion candidate, a candidate who either in a platform or who has voted, has shown himself to support that. Is it ever valid?”
“No,” Burke answers. “You can never vote for someone who favors absolutely the right to choice of a woman to destroy a human life in her womb or the right to a procured abortion.”
His rules on same sex marriage are just as rigid, claiming the cloak of “good discrimination.”
“Where there is unjust discrimination — for instance, where you say that a fellow human being, because of the color of his skin, is not a part of the same race as someone, say, who is a Caucasian — that is a kind of discrimination which is unjust and immoral,” Burke said.
“But there is a discrimination which is perfectly just and good, and that is the discrimination between what is right and what is wrong — between what is according to our human nature and what is contrary to our human nature. So the Catholic Church, in teaching that sexual acts between persons of the same sex are intrinsically evil, are against nature itself, is simply announcing the truth, helping people to discriminate right from wrong in terms of their own activities.”
But in case you are one of those people who do not believe that one religion is a homogenous vote, here’s 5 Myths of the Catholic Vote, from Catholics for Choice:
MYTH ONE: Catholics are more conservative than the rest of the electorate
REALITY: Catholics’ opinions largely mirror those of the rest of the electorate
On these and other issues, we see that Catholics make up their minds independent of the bishops or the loud noises from the blogosphere.
MYTH TWO: All Catholics oppose abortion
REALITY: Catholics are prochoice
The reality is that like people of other faiths and no faith, a large majority of Catholics can see circumstances in which abortion is an acceptable or even necessary moral choice.
MYTH THREE: Catholic teachings on reproductive health issues are rigid and unchanging
REALITY: Catholic teachings on abortion and family planning are more nuanced than the bishops claim
The reality is that Catholics can, in good conscience, support access to abortion and other reproductive health services and affirm that they can be a moral choice.
MYTH FOUR: Catholics do what their bishops tell them to
REALITY: Catholics do not want to hear from their bishops about politics
These numbers are crystal clear. Catholics are perfectly capable of making up their own minds about whom to vote for and can and do, in good conscience, cast votes that their bishops might oppose.
MYTH FIVE: Catholics are obsessed about abortion
REALITY: Abortion is not the only issue that concerns Catholics
Read more: 2010 election, civil rights, politics, reproductive rights, womens rights
Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may
not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.
Another trick question. Anyone who could possibly wonder whether Romney supports equality for women…
The only way to encourage restaurants to do it is to show them it will be profitable.
"Only eat cage free and not Foster Farms, they are awful caretakers of dairy cows".......Carlene, Foster…
179 comments
+ add your ownA thing most people don't know, is Rick Santorum's close connections with the extreme and cult-like Catholic group, Opus Dei. {Yes, like in the Da Vinci Code - which was based on true factual research into controversial Opus Dei.}
The organization Opus Dei paid for a trip to Rome while Santorum was a Senator {as part of his "official duties"}; Senator Santorum was accompanied on this trip by an Opus Dei priest; and the occasion for the trip was the canonization {raising to Sainthood} of the founder of Opus Dei. Santorum even gave a speech at that event -- the transcript of Santorum's speech is public and available -- in which Santorum declared that his entire life and Political Agenda were inspired by Opus Dei's founder. Opus Dei, by the way, has had close ties with many Fascist dictators -- this can be researched -- and is one of the reasons it is so controversial.
Another thing to say here, is, that money people give to the Church DOES NOT GO TO CHARITY; but to the Church's Political Agenda, at this time an ENORMOUS amount going into fighting Marriage Equality for Gays. And, of course, money given to pay off victims of abuse for their silence; and much, much money for the best sneaky slandering lawyers that money can seduce. Money for Catholic Charities actually comes from money the U.S. Government GIVES to the Catholic Church for its "social programs". OUR taxpayers' money! Please, Catholics, stop giving ANY of your money to the Catholic Church. They are LYING.
T all right-wingers, again there is no such thing as good discrimination. All humans are of the same species, therefore equal. No matter what a person's race, color, creed, sexual orientation or gender, makes no difference. Any one who discriminates against any group of humans simply shows how moronic they are.
You know your "Catholic bashing" is just as bad as "gay bashing."
In this case, a ban for religion is in fact good discrimination.
Why hasn't the catholic church disappeared from the face of the earth? With all those pedophiles in their midst, the elaborate money laundering and their own secret police hunting down people they don't like. I say: close them down and distribute their enormous wealth to the needy they stole it from! And as always: Religion IS an opium for the people!
There is no such thing as good discrimination against our fellow man. Jesus healed the lepers. Forgave the thieves. Christians are supposed to follow in these footsteps.
Sarah D,
I think I understand that a symbolic marriage ceremony is not a substitution for legal marriage. I would hope though, that each state gives the full set of rights to those LGBT couples joined in a civil union as are given to married couples, and if they wanted a religious ceremony IN ADDITION, they could do that at any number of churches and synagogues. Really, this is all subject to ones comfort levels. We all draw a line somewhere, and thats where mine is. Why the hostility?
Yes, I have been to a gay pride parade, and I was uncomfortable with some of the behavior and dress. Do I derive that EVERY parade is like the one I saw? Not necessarily, but again thats what I felt.
Know what I just learned? The Vatican is a country:
http://geography.about.com/od/politicalgeography/a/vaticancountry.htm
That's right, a FOREIGN country. Plus, it's not even a democracy. In fact, their system of government looks an awful lot like Communism:
http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0108136.html
As a United States citizen, are you going to give up your right to vote on the orders of the almost-leader of a foreign COMMUNIST country?
I mean geez, they even refuse to join the UN. Even Iraq was part of the UN when Saddam Hussein was in power. How backward can you get?
http://www.un.org/en/members/
When claiming rights gay people should not have used the word marriage. This word has so many implications and traditions. Nobody makes a fuzz about a social contract. It would have been the opportunity to come to a new neutral standard of a union. That the church sets its guideline doesn't say people listen to it. It's an old traditional institute that may look important; but I wonder if you do research if its policies are being implemented by a large group. The distance is too great. Diving into biology there's only a very diverse picture when it comes to reproduction and sexual behavior. Only the large public doesn't know. So some indifference to such a public figure is in my opinion legitimate as long as it is goes along with the settlement of gay rights. The focus should be on the matter/law and benefits instead of trying to change the opinion of an institute. You can isolate someone by just doing the opposite on a large scale. Practise makes perfect.
Idiots like that cardinal are the reason why religion should stay in the closet.
login to add your comment
use your care2 login
add your comment
20