START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
704,961 people care about Education

Why Is the US So Insulted By ‘Welfare Queens’?

Why Is the US So Insulted By ‘Welfare Queens’?

 

Written by Sam Fulwood III

To some people, there’s something very wrong about this picture. Do you see what it is?

This frozen frame captures 8-year-old Michael Smith Jr. sitting on the steps of a public housing complex playing with an iPad. Ayanna Gabriel, 12, looks over his shoulder, as two other men stand nearby, apparently talking amicably with each other. But there’s a lot more going on here than meets the eye.

Let me help by setting the context for the photograph. Rusty Costanza, a staffer at The Times-Picayune, snapped this street scene to accompany a story that appeared Wednesday on the front page of the New Orleans newspaper. The article detailed the health concerns that some residents of a public housing development held toward the impending implosion of a nearby hotel. Seems Louisiana officials made special accommodations to evacuate folks who lived within a 600-foot radius of the demolition but declined to do anything to protect the residents in the 400-apartment Iberville housing complex some 725 feet away. The photo shows some of the people likely in the area when the hotel was blown down early Sunday morning.

So, again, what’s wrong with this picture? It has little to do directly with the substance of the news article, which I find alarming enough. Maybe you don’t see what’s wrong in the photo because the offense is too subtle. To tell the truth, I didn’t figure it out either until some Facebook friends, who are having quite a discussion about this photo, explained it to me.

It’s the iPad!

The photograph seemingly shows a poor black child with an expensive piece of faddish technology. Such incongruity was too much for a great number of people in New Orleans to accept, said Jarvis DeBerry, who noted as much Sunday in his Times-Picayune column.

“Readers called and emailed … to express their anger,” DeBerry wrote, arguing their outrage was misguided. He continued:

The idea that most people in public housing are living the lush life has persisted for at least as long as presidential candidate Ronald Reagan started using the offensive “welfare queen.” But you ought to take a walk through Iberville if you think its residents are living like royalty. Walk through and see if you’d exchange their thrones for yours.

For reasons that I strongly suspect are related to many Americans’ attitudes regarding race, class, and culture, this photo unleashed the often-unstated contempt that some people silently harbor toward the poor. In the relative anonymity of cyberspace, many felt comfortable letting their true feelings be known. “What is a poor kid doing with an iPad?” asked one. “How can he afford such a luxury?” questioned another. “That’s what’s wrong with those people!” complained yet another commenter.

DeBerry heard those comments and worse ones. He told me during a phone conversation that this column prompted more than 344 online comments, more than any other in his seven years as columnist. Most of them expressed varying degrees of outrage that Michael held an iPad in the photo. “People seem to have judgments about the poor and why they are poor,” he told me. “It’s just a visceral response when they see something that somebody has when they don’t think they should have it.”

To be sure, such public attitude isn’t new. Indeed, it’s often spurred on by conservative activists to undermine efforts to garner public support for increased assistance to needy Americans. My Center for American Progress colleagues Melissa Boteach and Donna Cooper made this clear in a recent smackdown of conservative arguments that distort the national tragedy of poverty. “To help justify this assault, the Heritage Foundation released its latest distorted picture of poverty in America,” Boteach and Cooper wrote in 2011. “The purpose: To suggest poor families have it too good for the government to worry about them anymore.”

It’s likely such arguments will resurface soon, as U.S. Census figures are expected to disclose a rise in the nation’s poverty rate to its highest level in nearly 50 years. According to the Associated Press, a broad array of economists, scholars, and observers seem in agreement that the official poverty rate is likely to rise from 15.1 percent in 2010 to as high as 15.7 percent later this year, when the figures are released in the fall. The AP report noted, “Poverty is spreading at record levels across many groups, from underemployed workers and suburban families to the poorest poor.”

In a Washington Post report on the rise in poverty, Robert Rector of the Heritage Foundation dismissed the rising poverty rate as a reason to do more to assist struggling Americans. In fact, the Post noted his fears that progressive activists “may use a rising poverty rate to justify additional spending on the poor, when in fact, he says, many live in decent-size homes, drive cars and own wide-screen TVs.”

Courtney Baker, who studies coded racial messages and images in society as an English professor at Connecticut College in New London, Connecticut, suspects the antagonism toward the newspaper photograph reveals the conservative reluctance to engage public policies to combat poverty. She writes in the academic blog, NewBlackMan(inExile):

At the heart of the photograph of Smith with an (his?) iPad is the loaded question of what the poor deserve …. The rhetoric of deserving employs the toxic language of capitalist individualism that disavows the idea of collective reserves and resources. It is that same language—and that same logic—that spawned the image of the welfare queen and that continues to underwrite the dismissal of a national health care system. It is a language and logic system that treats the poor in general and the black poor especially as effective tenant farmers, as guests in a land who are not pulling their weight and have overstayed their welcome.

For some people, that high-tech gizmo jumped out from the newspaper photograph to assault their sensibilities. An iPad doesn’t fit into their mental matrix of objects that a poor child should own. But that’s such a narrow vision of how the poor should live. If nothing else, in the photo’s context, an iPad symbolizes a future filled with education, opportunity, and hope for a life that extends far out from Iberville’s public housing.

Anyone alarmed by the sight of that photo surely must believe the poor aren’t deserving of anything save the barest of survival necessities—if that much. What else could explain their anger at the sight of an 8-year-old black boy learning about a world beyond his immediate community with an iPad in his hands?

This post was originally published by the Center for American Progress.

 

 

Read more: , , ,

Photo: Michael Evans/Wikimedia Commons

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

131 comments

+ add your own
7:37PM PDT on Sep 25, 2012

Last year Corporate Welfare cost the taxpayers 102 billion dollars.

In that same year social welfare cost 58 billion dollars. They are still getting the raw end of it.

So all of you welfare queen idiots who make them out to be free loaders please shove it. You, as usual are laying blame in the wrong direction.

7:10PM PDT on Sep 25, 2012

@ Faye S, with respect DUE your comments: I believe you've got a problem, and your gripes are all about you. If YOU were poor and hungry; if YOU were on welfare and food stamps; if YOU were the member of a racial group that is despised, well then YOu would be a worthy person who has done everything in her power to HAVE those things. It would be, in your sick narrative, THOSE OTHERS who don't DESERVE to have those things. The truth is, if you haven't lived it, you don't KNOW it. And someone like you will NEVER know much of anything about anyone else because you lack an important component of knowing people: empathy.

12:39PM PDT on Aug 24, 2012

What about the CORPORATE WELFARE KINGS? Parasites, vampires, vultures off the sweat, blood and tears of the honest hardworking American taxpayers?? What about the WELFARE POLITICIANS ??? with their "for life" benefits and Free Universal Healthcare, pension treasures, while they filibusterer the laws to create jobs and provide relief for the working and middle class.

11:28AM PDT on Aug 20, 2012

Quit looking at others and look within. What are you missing inside that makes you condemn others who have something you consider upscale ? It's all about choice. Our society tells us to choose to dress for success, to drive a car that says we are somebody, to do this or that because it is what is happening. Just look at the poison Commercials selling all of these things to the world. Do you believe this commercial nonsense ? Some do and they buy the corporate line.

11:28AM PDT on Aug 20, 2012

Quit looking at others and look within. What are you missing inside that makes you condemn others who have something you consider upscale ? It's all about choice. Our society tells us to choose to dress for success, to drive a car that says we are somebody, to do this or that because it is what is happening. Just look at the poison Commercials selling all of these things to the world. Do you believe this commercial nonsense ? Some do and they buy the corporate line.

7:25AM PDT on Aug 20, 2012

Whoa , hold on there friends, lets take a real close look at a $70,000 tax deduction as a business expense for a "Dancing Horse" hobby and rethink the definition of our "Welfare Queen" because this places the wife of the republican nominee for president at the top of the "Welfare Queen" list for the year 2011 ! I can live with that !

3:17PM PDT on Aug 2, 2012

Let me point out that access to technology has become critical to academic success and, subsequently, financial self-reliance. Because of this, many schools have been successful in providing their students, through grants, with the LOAN of eReaders, electronic tablets (such as the iPad or any of the myriad copycats), netbooks.

Of course, I have no idea if that is the case here, but I do caution that we do not know and cannot know all the facts and should be careful in our denunciations.

5:24PM PDT on Jul 31, 2012

By definition...a "Welfare Queen" is a pejorative phrase used in the United States to describe people who are accused of collecting excessive welfare payments through fraud or manipulation.

If we in the United States are "insulted" by welfare queens it is because it is those of us not collecting public assistance that are paying for these excessive welfare payments being obtained through fraud or manipulation. We have every right to be insulted...and disgusted.

5:24PM PDT on Jul 31, 2012

By definition...a "Welfare Queen" is a pejorative phrase used in the United States to describe people who are accused of collecting excessive welfare payments through fraud or manipulation.

If we in the United States are "insulted" by welfare queens it is because it is those of us not collecting public assistance that are paying for these excessive welfare payments being obtained through fraud or manipulation. We have every right to be insulted...and disgusted.

10:00AM PDT on Jul 31, 2012

The media are no longer relaying unbiased news. They are deliberately manipulating images and facts to better serve some special interests and their agenda..Fox and CNN now sleep in the very same prostitution beds with politicians, large corporations and Oligarchs. Just another form of crafty Marketing just like Religion!! Wake up Human animals from your stupor and coma and see the real Wold..What you see on TV is not always what you get and to top of it, we are all paying for it and getting screwed from the front and the back...

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!

more from causes




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.