Chicken nuggets, chicken burgers, buffalo wings, fried chicken, Double Down chicken burger—chicken in all its edible forms floats through our imaginations and into our hungry stomachs. The two-legged, heavy-breasted, factory-farmed birds now provide the most popular meat in America. In its new report, “Big Chicken,” the Pew Environment Group puts the numbers to the environmental cost of that growing appetite.
The statistics are staggering. Consider these from the report:
That’s a lot of chicken manure in a concentrated area. While a good source of nutrients for crops, especially nitrogen and phosphorous, the staggering heaps of manure are far too much of a good thing. The excess nutrients create major environmental headaches.
“Big Chicken” points to the Chesapeake Bay as an example of the scope of the problem. While agriculture is only one contributor, “In May 2010, the EPA reported that an estimated 19 percent of excess nitrogen and 26 percent of excess phosphorous were directly linked to animal manure in the watershed.”
Poorly managed manure and inadequate regulations have led to significant losses of resources such as rockfish, blue crabs and oysters. Data shows “that more than half of the streams in the watershed are rated as ‘poor’ or ‘very poor,’ bereft of snails, insects and other low-level organisms critical to a healthy aquatic environment.”
The Chesapeake Bay is only one watershed. Everywhere Big Chicken and its Big Ag relatives operate, the same story is repeated. The Pew report concludes industrial agriculture must reform its practices, and regulators must put teeth into their oversight.
The “Big Chicken” report calls on public officials to put a stop to the industry’s often-repeated threat to move operations to states with minimum pollution safeguards. These threats serve only to undermine efforts to protect water supplies and rural communities, and to force elected officials and policymakers to establish ‘race to the bottom’ standards that benefit no one.”
Related Care2 Stories
Gulf of Mexico “Dead Zone” Larger Than Ever and Growing
Data Shows 20 Percent Growth in Factory Farming in Past 5 Years
Read more: anoxia, chesapeake bay, dead zone, environment & wildlife, pesticides, toxic waste
Photo from USDA
Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may
not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.
DISGRACEFUL.. NEVER NEVER MUST THESE RESTAURANTS THERE OR ANYWHERE ELSE BE ALLOWED TO SERVE THIS.. IT…
"For you created me in my inmost being; you knit me together in my mothers womb. I praise you because…
I don't think those EU leaders ever envisaged this when chuntering away about banks! Angela and co.…
97 comments
+ add your ownThanks.
THANKS.
NO to factory farms!
Thanks for the article.
Stop factory farming: problem solved.
finger lickin' chicken sh't
fck-kfc
Stop Factory farming!
eg: 'To produce one pound of beef, it takes 2,500 gallons of water, 12 pounds of grain, 35 pounds of topsoil and the energy equivalent of one gallon of gasoline. If all these costs were reflected in the price of the product, WITHOUT SUBSIDIES, the least expensive hamburger in the US would cost US$35.' ~John Robbins.
Heartbreaking story for those poor chickens and the environment---Please, Please,Please become vegetarian if you are not already one. That would be the biggest impact you could make to heal the planet.
login to add your comment
use your care2 login
add your comment
20